- 21 6月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.10-rc1 commit 7981593b category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5C32F CVE: CVE-2022-20166 -------------------------------------------------- Convert the unbound sprintf in hugetlb_report_node_meminfo to use sysfs_emit_at so that no possible overrun of a PAGE_SIZE buf can occur. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Acked-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/894b351b82da6013cde7f36ff4b5493cd0ec30d0.1600285923.git.joe@perches.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Conflicts: drivers/base/node.c include/linux/hugetlb.h Signed-off-by: NGuo Mengqi <guomengqi3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NXiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>
-
- 24 3月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kefeng Wang 提交于
hulk inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4YTLN CVE: NA -------------------------------- The user wants to reserve a certain amount of memory for normal non-huge page, that is, the hugetlb can't allowed to use all the memory. Add a new kernel parameters "hugepage_prohibit_sz=" to set size for normal non-huge page reserved, and when alloc huge page, let's fail if the new allocating exceeds the limit. Signed-off-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NPeng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NChen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>
-
- 08 3月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Yuntao 提交于
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.17-rc6 commit e79ce983 category: bugfix bugzilla: 186043 CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- When we specify a large number for node in hugepages parameter, it may be parsed to another number due to truncation in this statement: node = tmp; For example, add following parameter in command line: hugepagesz=1G hugepages=4294967297:5 and kernel will allocate 5 hugepages for node 1 instead of ignoring it. I move the validation check earlier to fix this issue, and slightly simplifies the condition here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220209134018.8242-1-liuyuntao10@huawei.com Fixes: b5389086 ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation") Signed-off-by: NLiu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLiu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Zhenguo Yao 提交于
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.16-rc5 commit 4178158e category: bugfix bugzilla: 186043 CVE: NA -------------------------------- Preallocation of gigantic pages can't work bacause of commit b5389086 ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation"). When nid is NUMA_NO_NODE(-1), alloc_bootmem_huge_page will always return without doing allocation. Fix this by adding more check. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211129133803.15653-1-yaozhenguo1@gmail.com Fixes: b5389086 ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation") Signed-off-by: NZhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Tested-by: NMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: NBaolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLiu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Zhenguo Yao 提交于
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.16-rc1 commit b5389086 category: feature bugzilla: 186043 CVE: NA -------------------------------- We can specify the number of hugepages to allocate at boot. But the hugepages is balanced in all nodes at present. In some scenarios, we only need hugepages in one node. For example: DPDK needs hugepages which are in the same node as NIC. If DPDK needs four hugepages of 1G size in node1 and system has 16 numa nodes we must reserve 64 hugepages on the kernel cmdline. But only four hugepages are used. The others should be free after boot. If the system memory is low(for example: 64G), it will be an impossible task. So extend the hugepages parameter to support specifying hugepages on a specific node. For example add following parameter: hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:1,1:3 It will allocate 1 hugepage in node0 and 3 hugepages in node1. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211005054729.86457-1-yaozhenguo1@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NZhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt Documentation/admin-guide/mm/hugetlbpage.rst arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c include/linux/hugetlb.h mm/hugetlb.c Signed-off-by: NLiu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nadav Amit 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-v4.19.219 commit b0313bc7f5fbb6beee327af39d818ffdc921821a category: bugfix bugzilla: 185854 CVE: CVE-2021-4002 ----------------------------------------------- commit a4a118f2 upstream. When __unmap_hugepage_range() calls to huge_pmd_unshare() succeed, a TLB flush is missing. This TLB flush must be performed before releasing the i_mmap_rwsem, in order to prevent an unshared PMDs page from being released and reused before the TLB flush took place. Arguably, a comprehensive solution would use mmu_gather interface to batch the TLB flushes and the PMDs page release, however it is not an easy solution: (1) try_to_unmap_one() and try_to_migrate_one() also call huge_pmd_unshare() and they cannot use the mmu_gather interface; and (2) deferring the release of the page reference for the PMDs page until after i_mmap_rwsem is dropeed can confuse huge_pmd_unshare() into thinking PMDs are shared when they are not. Fix __unmap_hugepage_range() by adding the missing TLB flush, and forcing a flush when unshare is successful. Fixes: 24669e58 ("hugetlb: use mmu_gather instead of a temporary linked list for accumulating pages)" # 3.6 Signed-off-by: NNadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Conflicts: include/asm-generic/tlb.h mm/mmu_gather.c Signed-off-by: NLiu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ntong tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Kravetz 提交于
mainline inclusion from mainline-5.15-rc1 commit e32d20c0 category: bugfix bugzilla: 180680 CVE: NA --------------------------- When removing a hugetlb page from the pool the ref count is set to one (as the free page has no ref count) and compound page destructor is set to NULL_COMPOUND_DTOR. Since a subsequent call to free the hugetlb page will call __free_pages for non-gigantic pages and free_gigantic_page for gigantic pages the destructor is not used. However, consider the following race with code taking a speculative reference on the page: Thread 0 Thread 1 -------- -------- remove_hugetlb_page set_page_refcounted(page); set_compound_page_dtor(page, NULL_COMPOUND_DTOR); get_page_unless_zero(page) __update_and_free_page __free_pages(page, huge_page_order(h)); /* Note that __free_pages() will simply drop the reference to the page. */ put_page(page) __put_compound_page() destroy_compound_page NULL_COMPOUND_DTOR BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 To address this race, set the dtor to the normal compound page dtor for non-gigantic pages. The dtor for gigantic pages does not matter as gigantic pages are changed from a compound page to 'just a group of pages' before freeing. Hence, the destructor is not used. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210809184832.18342-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: mm/hugetlb.c Signed-off-by: NChen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 30 10月, 2021 4 次提交
-
-
由 guomengqi 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4EUVI CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- Modified hugetlb_insert_hugepage_pte_by_pa to assure k2u hugepages can be set as READONLY. Signed-off-by: Nguomengqi <guomengqi3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NZhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Weilong Chen 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4EUVI CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- Add a flag VM_SHAREPOOL to avoid vfree() a shared kva. Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Weilong Chen 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4EUVI CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- Sharepool applies for a dedicated interface for large pages, which optimizes the efficiency of memory application Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Ding Tianhong 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4EUVI CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- The do_mmap/mmap_region/__mm_populate could only be used to handle the current process, now the share pool need to handle the other process and create memory mmaping, so need to export new function to distinguish different process and handle it, it would not break the current logic and only valid for share pool. The share pool need to remap the vmalloc pages to user space, so introduce the hugetlb_insert_hugepage to support hugepage remapming. Signed-off-by: NTang Yizhou <tangyizhou@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NLi Ming <limingming.li@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NZefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NZhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 22 10月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Zhou Guanghui 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4D63I CVE: NA ---------------------------------------------------- The current function hugetlb_alloc_hugepage implements the allocation from static hugepages first. When the static hugepage is used up, it attempts to apply for hugepages from buddy system. Two additional modes are supported: static hugepages only and buddy hugepages only. Signed-off-by: NZhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NGuo Mengqi <guomengqi3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Zhou Guanghui 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4D63I CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------------------- The following functions are used only in the ascend scenario: hugetlb_get_hstate, hugetlb_alloc_hugepage, hugetlb_insert_hugepage_pte, hugetlb_insert_hugepage_pte_by_pa Remove unused interface hugetlb_insert_hugepage Signed-off-by: NZhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NGuo Mengqi <guomengqi3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Zhou Guanghui 提交于
ascend inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4D63I CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------------- commit(bd177f8f0548f): Only __GFP_THISNODE marked allocations will come from the CDM node. Therefore, when we alloc normal hugepages, if __GFP_THISNODE is marked, hugepages can be applied for from the specified nid. Signed-off-by: NZhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.197 commit 2445837e9cd084ba849a7c1c70086a6cdc608f48 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit fe19bd3d ] If more than one futex is placed on a shmem huge page, it can happen that waking the second wakes the first instead, and leaves the second waiting: the key's shared.pgoff is wrong. When 3.11 commit 13d60f4b ("futex: Take hugepages into account when generating futex_key"), the only shared huge pages came from hugetlbfs, and the code added to deal with its exceptional page->index was put into hugetlb source. Then that was missed when 4.8 added shmem huge pages. page_to_pgoff() is what others use for this nowadays: except that, as currently written, it gives the right answer on hugetlbfs head, but nonsense on hugetlbfs tails. Fix that by calling hugetlbfs-specific hugetlb_basepage_index() on PageHuge tails as well as on head. Yes, it's unconventional to declare hugetlb_basepage_index() there in pagemap.h, rather than in hugetlb.h; but I do not expect anything but page_to_pgoff() ever to need it. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: give hugetlb_basepage_index() prototype the correct scope] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b17d946b-d09-326e-b42a-52884c36df32@google.com Fixes: 800d8c63 ("shmem: add huge pages support") Reported-by: NNeel Natu <neelnatu@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Zhang Yi <wetpzy@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Note on stable backport: leave redundant #include <linux/hugetlb.h> in kernel/futex.c, to avoid conflict over the header files included. Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 29 7月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Xiang 提交于
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.11-rc1 commit 0a4f3d1b category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: NA ----------------------------------------------- On 64-bit machine, delta variable in hugetlb_acct_memory() may be larger than 0xffffffff, but gather_surplus_pages() can only use the low 32-bit value now. So we need to fix type of delta parameter and related local variables in gather_surplus_pages(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1605793733-3573-1-git-send-email-liu.xiang@zlingsmart.comReported-by: NMa Chenggong <ma.chenggong@zlingsmart.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Xiang <liu.xiang@zlingsmart.com> Signed-off-by: NPan Jiagen <pan.jiagen@zlingsmart.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Liu Xiang <liuxiang_1999@126.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> conflict: mm/hugetlb.c Signed-off-by: NTong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NChen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 19 7月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mina Almasry 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.194 commit 7de60c2d5a2a66ef2c5d76952a5a3a9a4ea4d436 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit d84cf06e ] The userfaultfd hugetlb tests cause a resv_huge_pages underflow. This happens when hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() is called with !is_continue on an index for which we already have a page in the cache. When this happens, we allocate a second page, double consuming the reservation, and then fail to insert the page into the cache and return -EEXIST. To fix this, we first check if there is a page in the cache which already consumed the reservation, and return -EEXIST immediately if so. There is still a rare condition where we fail to copy the page contents AND race with a call for hugetlb_no_page() for this index and again we will underflow resv_huge_pages. That is fixed in a more complicated patch not targeted for -stable. Test: Hacked the code locally such that resv_huge_pages underflows produce a warning, then: ./tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd hugetlb_shared 10 2 /tmp/kokonut_test/huge/userfaultfd_test && echo test success ./tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd hugetlb 10 2 /tmp/kokonut_test/huge/userfaultfd_test && echo test success Both tests succeed and produce no warnings. After the test runs number of free/resv hugepages is correct. [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: changelog fixes] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210528004649.85298-1-almasrymina@google.com Fixes: 8fb5debc ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: add hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte for userfaultfd support") Signed-off-by: NMina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 30 6月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Kravetz 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.193 commit a92212ef6326c8dc09003c7af4e1ba7da0b77e44 -------------------------------- commit 55254636 upstream. A new clang diagnostic (-Wsizeof-array-div) warns about the calculation to determine the number of u32's in an array of unsigned longs. Suppress warning by adding parentheses. While looking at the above issue, noticed that the 'address' parameter to hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash is no longer used. So, remove it from the definition and all callers. No functional change. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190919011847.18400-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reported-by: NNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@gmail.com> Cc: David Bolvansky <david.bolvansky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Miaohe Lin 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.191 commit 2e8b30d7f8b5f55539659039a5e1ae2803002a22 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit da56388c ] A rare out of memory error would prevent removal of the reserve map region for a page. hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() handles this rare case to avoid dangling with incorrect counts. Unfortunately, hugepage_subpool_get_pages and hugetlb_acct_memory could possibly fail too. We should correctly handle these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: b5cec28d ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages") Signed-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2021 4 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Xu 提交于
mainline inclusion from mainline-5.6 commit 4426e945 category: bugfix bugzilla: 47439 CVE: NA --------------------------- This is the gup counterpart of the change that allows the VM_FAULT_RETRY to happen for more than once. One thing to mention is that we must check the fatal signal here before retry because the GUP can be interrupted by that, otherwise we can loop forever. Signed-off-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: NBrian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220195357.16371-1-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NXiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NJing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
由 Li Xinhai 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.179 commit 66a013879cdb304c214e94a49d2129363f29e174 -------------------------------- commit a1ba9da8 upstream. The current code would unnecessarily expand the address range. Consider one example, (start, end) = (1G-2M, 3G+2M), and (vm_start, vm_end) = (1G-4M, 3G+4M), the expected adjustment should be keep (1G-2M, 3G+2M) without expand. But the current result will be (1G-4M, 3G+4M). Actually, the range (1G-4M, 1G) and (3G, 3G+4M) would never been involved in pmd sharing. After this patch, we will check that the vma span at least one PUD aligned size and the start,end range overlap the aligned range of vma. With above example, the aligned vma range is (1G, 3G), so if (start, end) range is within (1G-4M, 1G), or within (3G, 3G+4M), then no adjustment to both start and end. Otherwise, we will have chance to adjust start downwards or end upwards without exceeding (vm_start, vm_end). Mike: : The 'adjusted range' is used for calls to mmu notifiers and cache(tlb) : flushing. Since the current code unnecessarily expands the range in some : cases, more entries than necessary would be flushed. This would/could : result in performance degradation. However, this is highly dependent on : the user runtime. Is there a combination of vma layout and calls to : actually hit this issue? If the issue is hit, will those entries : unnecessarily flushed be used again and need to be unnecessarily reloaded? Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210104081631.2921415-1-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com Fixes: 75802ca6 ("mm/hugetlb: fix calculation of adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible") Signed-off-by: NLi Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com> Suggested-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
由 Mike Kravetz 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.179 commit 08831f662b88f7117be51c5e55bd1f120087f90c -------------------------------- commit dbfee5ae upstream. page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The routine update_and_free_page can encounter a gigantic page, yet it assumes page structs are contiguous when setting page flags in subpages. If update_and_free_page encounters non-contiguous page structs, we can see “BUG: Bad page state in process …” errors. Non-contiguous page structs are generally not an issue. However, they can exist with a specific kernel configuration and hotplug operations. For example: Configure the kernel with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM and !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. Then, hotplug add memory for the area where the gigantic page will be allocated. Zi Yan outlined steps to reproduce here [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/16F7C58B-4D79-41C5-9B64-A1A1628F4AF2@nvidia.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217184926.33567-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: 944d9fec ("hugetlb: add support for gigantic page allocation at runtime") Signed-off-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
由 Miaohe Lin 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.178 commit 2d0324108fa80446d6b41228bac40c03cd3b5d35 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit cc2205a6 ] In hugetlb_sysfs_add_hstate(), we would do kobject_put() on hstate_kobjs when failed to create sysfs group but forget to set hstate_kobjs to NULL. Then in hugetlb_register_node() error path, we may free it again via hugetlb_unregister_node(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107123249.36964-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: a3437870 ("hugetlb: new sysfs interface") Signed-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
- 11 3月, 2021 4 次提交
-
-
由 Muchun Song 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.175 commit 6bf5461ae968b870f81c813a880e0e3a2684dfc1 -------------------------------- commit ecbf4724 upstream. The page_huge_active() can be called from scan_movable_pages() which do not hold a reference count to the HugeTLB page. So when we call page_huge_active() from scan_movable_pages(), the HugeTLB page can be freed parallel. Then we will trigger a BUG_ON which is in the page_huge_active() when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is enabled. Just remove the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-6-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: 7e1f049e ("mm: hugetlb: cleanup using paeg_huge_active()") Signed-off-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
由 Muchun Song 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.175 commit 532574ae2586940729419253fd2defd9c9880490 -------------------------------- commit 0eb2df2b upstream. There is a race between isolate_huge_page() and __free_huge_page(). CPU0: CPU1: if (PageHuge(page)) put_page(page) __free_huge_page(page) spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) update_and_free_page(page) set_compound_page_dtor(page, NULL_COMPOUND_DTOR) spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) isolate_huge_page(page) // trigger BUG_ON VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page) spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) page_huge_active(page) // trigger BUG_ON VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHuge(page), page) spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) When we isolate a HugeTLB page on CPU0. Meanwhile, we free it to the buddy allocator on CPU1. Then, we can trigger a BUG_ON on CPU0, because it is already freed to the buddy allocator. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-5-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: c8721bbb ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage") Signed-off-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
由 Muchun Song 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.175 commit db510d8f98c38a953ae5d3b51b01f435740729b4 -------------------------------- commit 7ffddd49 upstream. There is a race condition between __free_huge_page() and dissolve_free_huge_page(). CPU0: CPU1: // page_count(page) == 1 put_page(page) __free_huge_page(page) dissolve_free_huge_page(page) spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) // PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page) update_and_free_page(page) // page is freed to the buddy spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) clear_page_huge_active(page) enqueue_huge_page(page) // It is wrong, the page is already freed spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) The race window is between put_page() and dissolve_free_huge_page(). We should make sure that the page is already on the free list when it is dissolved. As a result __free_huge_page would corrupt page(s) already in the buddy allocator. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: c8721bbb ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage") Signed-off-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
由 Muchun Song 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.175 commit b6e04c19c5b2060c91b07acec5d650a1beb6855f -------------------------------- commit 585fc0d2 upstream. If a new hugetlb page is allocated during fallocate it will not be marked as active (set_page_huge_active) which will result in a later isolate_huge_page failure when the page migration code would like to move that page. Such a failure would be unexpected and wrong. Only export set_page_huge_active, just leave clear_page_huge_active as static. Because there are no external users. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: 70c3547e (hugetlbfs: add hugetlbfs_fallocate()) Signed-off-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
- 22 2月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Miaohe Lin 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.169 commit bba1a0da5bbdd938907cf7f5c3573b3d8e199074 -------------------------------- commit 0eb98f15 upstream. The huge page size is encoded for VM_FAULT_HWPOISON errors only. So if we return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON, huge page size would just be ignored. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107123449.38481-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: aa50d3a7 ("Encode huge page size for VM_FAULT_HWPOISON errors") Signed-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
由 Fang Lijun 提交于
ascend inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- The vm_flags will overflow on arm32 as left shift CHECKNODE_BITS(48). This checknode function only used in cdm feature. Fixes: cdccf4d4b7b5 ("arm64/ascend: mm: Add MAP_CHECKNODE flag to check node hugetlb") Signed-off-by: NFang Lijun <fanglijun3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com> -
由 Fang Lijun 提交于
ascend inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- Dvpp use flags MAP_CHECKNODE to enable check node hugetlb. The global variable numanode will cause the mmap not be reenterable, so use the flags BITS[26:31] directly. Fixes: cbdbfc7514ab ("mm: Check numa node hugepages enough when mmap hugetlb") Signed-off-by: NFang Lijun <fanglijun3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NCheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
-
- 15 10月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Xu 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.142 commit 734654ae7962be55c44ff3fb0bb0652b5149cc17 -------------------------------- commit 75802ca6 upstream. This is found by code observation only. Firstly, the worst case scenario should assume the whole range was covered by pmd sharing. The old algorithm might not work as expected for ranges like (1g-2m, 1g+2m), where the adjusted range should be (0, 1g+2m) but the expected range should be (0, 2g). Since at it, remove the loop since it should not be required. With that, the new code should be faster too when the invalidating range is huge. Mike said: : With range (1g-2m, 1g+2m) within a vma (0, 2g) the existing code will only : adjust to (0, 1g+2m) which is incorrect. : : We should cc stable. The original reason for adjusting the range was to : prevent data corruption (getting wrong page). Since the range is not : always adjusted correctly, the potential for corruption still exists. : : However, I am fairly confident that adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible : is only gong to be called in two cases: : : 1) for a single page : 2) for range == entire vma : : In those cases, the current code should produce the correct results. : : To be safe, let's just cc stable. Fixes: 017b1660 ("mm: migration: fix migration of huge PMD shared pages") Signed-off-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200730201636.74778-1-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2020 4 次提交
-
-
由 Muchun Song 提交于
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.9-rc4 commit 17743798 category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: CVE-2020-25285 -------------------------------- There is a race between the assignment of `table->data` and write value to the pointer of `table->data` in the __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() on the other thread. CPU0: CPU1: proc_sys_write hugetlb_sysctl_handler proc_sys_call_handler hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common hugetlb_sysctl_handler table->data = &tmp; hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common table->data = &tmp; proc_doulongvec_minmax do_proc_doulongvec_minmax sysctl_head_finish __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax unuse_table i = table->data; *i = val; // corrupt CPU1's stack Fix this by duplicating the `table`, and only update the duplicate of it. And introduce a helper of proc_hugetlb_doulongvec_minmax() to simplify the code. The following oops was seen: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page Code: Bad RIP value. ... Call Trace: ? set_max_huge_pages+0x3da/0x4f0 ? alloc_pool_huge_page+0x150/0x150 ? proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x46/0x60 ? hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common+0x1c7/0x200 ? nr_hugepages_store+0x20/0x20 ? copy_fd_bitmaps+0x170/0x170 ? hugetlb_sysctl_handler+0x1e/0x20 ? proc_sys_call_handler+0x2f1/0x300 ? unregister_sysctl_table+0xb0/0xb0 ? __fd_install+0x78/0x100 ? proc_sys_write+0x14/0x20 ? __vfs_write+0x4d/0x90 ? vfs_write+0xef/0x240 ? ksys_write+0xc0/0x160 ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 ? __close_fd+0x129/0x150 ? __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x200 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: e5ff2159 ("hugetlb: multiple hstates for multiple page sizes") Signed-off-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200828031146.43035-1-songmuchun@bytedance.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NJason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Weilong Chen 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: NA CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- Add a variable to change alloc hugepage gfp flags, and export it out. Hugepage need to be accounted by cgroup. We use this to set ACCOUNT flag to memory subsystem. Signed-off-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Weilong Chen 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: NA CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- Add helper function for change system hugepage nr, and export it out. Signed-off-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Longpeng 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.119 commit dcca7d2f751014d8caa3711e93b2119305e837df -------------------------------- commit 3c1d7e6c upstream. Our machine encountered a panic(addressing exception) after run for a long time and the calltrace is: RIP: hugetlb_fault+0x307/0xbe0 RSP: 0018:ffff9567fc27f808 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: e800c03ff1258d48 RBX: ffffd3bb003b69c0 RCX: e800c03ff1258d48 RDX: 17ff3fc00eda72b7 RSI: 00003ffffffff000 RDI: e800c03ff1258d48 RBP: ffff9567fc27f8c8 R08: e800c03ff1258d48 R09: 0000000000000080 R10: ffffaba0704c22a8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff95c87b4b60d8 R13: 00005fff00000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9567face8074 FS: 00007fe2d9ffb700(0000) GS:ffff956900e40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffd3bb003b69c0 CR3: 000000be67374000 CR4: 00000000003627e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: follow_hugetlb_page+0x175/0x540 __get_user_pages+0x2a0/0x7e0 __get_user_pages_unlocked+0x15d/0x210 __gfn_to_pfn_memslot+0x3c5/0x460 [kvm] try_async_pf+0x6e/0x2a0 [kvm] tdp_page_fault+0x151/0x2d0 [kvm] ... kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x330/0x490 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x309/0x6d0 [kvm] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3f0/0x540 SyS_ioctl+0xa1/0xc0 system_call_fastpath+0x22/0x27 For 1G hugepages, huge_pte_offset() wants to return NULL or pudp, but it may return a wrong 'pmdp' if there is a race. Please look at the following code snippet: ... pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr); if (sz != PUD_SIZE && pud_none(*pud)) return NULL; /* hugepage or swap? */ if (pud_huge(*pud) || !pud_present(*pud)) return (pte_t *)pud; pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); if (sz != PMD_SIZE && pmd_none(*pmd)) return NULL; /* hugepage or swap? */ if (pmd_huge(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd)) return (pte_t *)pmd; ... The following sequence would trigger this bug: - CPU0: sz = PUD_SIZE and *pud = 0 , continue - CPU0: "pud_huge(*pud)" is false - CPU1: calling hugetlb_no_page and set *pud to xxxx8e7(PRESENT) - CPU0: "!pud_present(*pud)" is false, continue - CPU0: pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr) and maybe return a wrong pmdp However, we want CPU0 to return NULL or pudp in this case. We must make sure there is exactly one dereference of pud and pmd. Signed-off-by: NLongpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200413010342.771-1-longpeng2@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2020 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ding Tianhong 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: NA CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- There are too many ascend features enable flag, all of them is used for all ascend soc till now, so use a new enable flag to enable all of them for ascend platform by default, it would clean and simplify the bootargs. Also clean some code warning. v2: modify the wrong config name. v3: modify the wrong include head file. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NZefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Zhou Guanghui 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature Bugzilla: N/A CVE: N/A ------------------------------------------------------------- When the driver gets huge pages by alloc_huge_page_node, it attempts to apply for migrate hugepages after the reserved memory hugepages are used up. We expect that the migrated hugepages that are applied for can be charged in memcg to limit the memory usage. __GFP_ACOUNT flag is added to gfp mask before we allocate migrage hugepages. Then, if memcg is set by memalloc_use_memcg(), the allocated migrate hugepages will be charged to this memcg. Signed-off-by: NZhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Fang Lijun 提交于
ascend inclusion category: Bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: NA -------------- System cann't use the cdm nodes memory, but it can mmap all nodes huge pages, so it will cause Bus error when mmap succeed but the huge pages were not enough. When set the cdmmask, users will transfer the numa id by mmap flag to map the specific numa node hugepages, if there was not enough hugepages on this node, return -ENOMEM. v2: Fix compile error when disable CONFIG_COHERENT_DEVICE Signed-off-by: NFang Lijun <fanglijun3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
- 27 12月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lijun Fang 提交于
ascend inclusion category: feature bugzilla: NA CVE: NA -------- Delete CONFIG_ARCH_ASCEND for versatility code Signed-off-by: NLijun Fang <fanglijun3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWenan Mao <maowenan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-
由 Zhou Guanghui 提交于
ascend inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: NA ------------ Check nid when alloc hugepage. Signed-off-by: NZhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NLijun Fang <fanglijun3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
-