- 30 12月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
The virtio PCI devices don't depend on the guest page size. This matters now PowerPC virtio is gaining ground (they like 64k pages). Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
由 Kay Sievers 提交于
This patch is part of a larger patch series which will remove the "char bus_id[20]" name string from struct device. The device name is managed in the kobject anyway, and without any size limitation, and just needlessly copied into "struct device". To set and read the device name dev_name(dev) and dev_set_name(dev) must be used. If your code uses static kobjects, which it shouldn't do, "const char *init_name" can be used to statically provide the name the registered device should have. At registration time, the init_name field is cleared, to enforce the use of dev_name(dev) to access the device name at a later time. We need to get rid of all occurrences of bus_id in the entire tree to be able to enable the new interface. Please apply this patch, and possibly convert any remaining remaining occurrences of bus_id. We want to submit a patch to -next, which will remove bus_id from "struct device", to find the remaining pieces to convert, and finally switch over to the new api, which will remove the 20 bytes array and does no longer have a size limitation. Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NKay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
由 Hollis Blanchard 提交于
kzalloc() does not guarantee page alignment, and in fact this broke when I enabled CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON. (Thanks to Anthony Liguori for spotting the missing kfree sub) Signed-off-by: NHollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (fixed kfree) Tested-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
To prepare for virtio_ring transport feature bits, hook in a call in all the users to manipulate them. This currently just clears all the bits, since it doesn't understand any features. Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
Rather than explicitly handing the features to the lower-level, we just hand the virtio_device and have it set the features. This make it clear that it has the chance to manipulate the features of the device at this point (and that all feature negotiation is already done). Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
- 30 5月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
Anthony Liguori points out that three different transports use the virtio code, but each one keeps its own counter to set the virtio_device's index field. In theory (though not in current practice) this means that names could be duplicated, and that risk grows as more transports are created. So we move the selection of the unique virtio_device.index into the common code in virtio.c, which has the side-benefit of removing duplicate code. The only complexity is that lguest and S/390 use the index to uniquely identify the device in case of catastrophic failure before register_virtio_device() is called: now we use the offset within the descriptor page as a unique identifier for the printks. Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com> Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
The common virtio code sets the bus_id, overriding anything virtio_pci sets anyway. Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com> Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
-
- 02 5月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
A recent proposed feature addition to the virtio block driver revealed some flaws in the API: in particular, we assume that feature negotiation is complete once a driver's probe function returns. There is nothing in the API to require this, however, and even I didn't notice when it was violated. So instead, we require the driver to specify what features it supports in a table, we can then move the feature negotiation into the virtio core. The intersection of device and driver features are presented in a new 'features' bitmap in the struct virtio_device. Note that this highlights the difference between Linux unsigned-long bitmaps where each unsigned long is in native endian, and a straight-forward little-endian array of bytes. Drivers can still remove feature bits in their probe routine if they really have to. API changes: - dev->config->feature() no longer gets and acks a feature. - drivers should advertise their features in the 'feature_table' field - use virtio_has_feature() for extra sanity when checking feature bits Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c:148:2: warning: returning void-valued expression drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c:155:2: warning: returning void-valued expression Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
- 31 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 28 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anthony Liguori 提交于
Make sure to call unregister_virtio_device() when a virtio device is removed. Otherwise, virtio_pci.ko cannot be rmmod'd. This was spotted by Marcelo Tosatti. Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
- 17 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anthony Liguori 提交于
virtio-pci acquires its spin lock in an interrupt context so it's necessary to use spin_lock_irqsave/restore variants. This patch fixes guest SMP when using virtio devices in KVM. Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
- 04 2月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Anthony Liguori 提交于
As Avi pointed out, as we continue to massage the virtio PCI ABI, we can make things a little more friendly to users by utilizing the PCI revision field to indicate which version of the ABI we're using. This is a hard ABI version and incrementing it will cause the guest driver to break. This is the necessary changes to virtio_pci to support this. Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
由 Anthony Liguori 提交于
This is a PCI device that implements a transport for virtio. It allows virtio devices to be used by QEMU based VMMs like KVM or Xen. Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-