Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 19 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 17 10月, 2007 3 次提交
  7. 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 10 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  11. 23 1月, 2007 1 次提交
    • V
      [PATCH] resierfs: avoid tail packing if an inode was ever mmapped · de14569f
      由 Vladimir Saveliev 提交于 
      This patch fixes a confusion reiserfs has for a long time.

On release file operation reiserfs used to try to pack file data stored in
last incomplete page of some files into metadata blocks.  After packing the
page got cleared with clear_page_dirty.  It did not take into account that
the page may be mmaped into other process's address space.  Recent
replacement for clear_page_dirty cancel_dirty_page found the confusion with
sanity check that page has to be not mapped.

The patch fixes the confusion by making reiserfs avoid tail packing if an
inode was ever mmapped.  reiserfs_mmap and reiserfs_file_release are
serialized with mutex in reiserfs specific inode.  reiserfs_mmap locks the
mutex and sets a bit in reiserfs specific inode flags.
reiserfs_file_release checks the bit having the mutex locked.  If bit is
set - tail packing is avoided.  This eliminates a possibility that mmapped
page gets cancel_page_dirty-ed.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      de14569f
  13. 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 08 12月, 2006 2 次提交
    • Y
      [PATCH] reiser: replace kmalloc+memset with kzalloc · 01afb213
      由 Yan Burman 提交于 
      Replace kmalloc+memset with kzalloc
Signed-off-by: NYan Burman <burman.yan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      01afb213
    • S
      [PATCH] fix reiserfs bad path release panic · 87b4126f
      由 Suzuki K P 提交于 
      One of our test team hit a reiserfs_panic while running fsstress tests on
2.6.19-rc1.  The message looks like :

  REISERFS: panic(device Null superblock):
  reiserfs[5676]: assertion !(p->path_length != 1 ) failed at
  fs/reiserfs/stree.c:397:reiserfs_check_path: path not properly relsed.

The backtrace looked :

  kernel BUG in reiserfs_panic at fs/reiserfs/prints.c:361!
	.reiserfs_check_path+0x58/0x74
	.reiserfs_get_block+0x1444/0x1508
	.__block_prepare_write+0x1c8/0x558
	.block_prepare_write+0x34/0x64
	.reiserfs_prepare_write+0x118/0x1d0
	.generic_file_buffered_write+0x314/0x82c
	.__generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x350/0x3e0
	.__generic_file_write_nolock+0x78/0xb0
	.generic_file_write+0x60/0xf0
	.reiserfs_file_write+0x198/0x2038
	.vfs_write+0xd0/0x1b4
	.sys_write+0x4c/0x8c
	syscall_exit+0x0/0x4

Upon debugging I found that the restart_transaction was not releasing
the path if the th->refcount was > 1.

/*static*/
int restart_transaction(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
                           			struct inode *inode, struct path *path)
{
	[...]

         /* we cannot restart while nested */
         if (th->t_refcount > 1) { <<- Path is not released in this case!
                 return 0;
         }

         pathrelse(path); <<- Path released here.
	[...]

This could happen in such a situation :

In reiserfs/inode.c: reiserfs_get_block() ::

      if (repeat == NO_DISK_SPACE || repeat == QUOTA_EXCEEDED) {
          /* restart the transaction to give the journal a chance to free
           ** some blocks.  releases the path, so we have to go back to
           ** research if we succeed on the second try
           */
          SB_JOURNAL(inode->i_sb)->j_next_async_flush = 1;

        -->>  retval = restart_transaction(th, inode, &path); <<--

  We are supposed to release the path, no matter we succeed or fail. But
if the th->refcount is > 1, the path is still valid. And,

          if (retval)
                   goto failure;
          repeat =
              _allocate_block(th, block, inode,
                             &allocated_block_nr, NULL, create);

If the above allocate_block fails with NO_DISK_SPACE or QUOTA_EXCEEDED,
we would have path which is not released.

         if (repeat != NO_DISK_SPACE && repeat != QUOTA_EXCEEDED) {
                   goto research;
         }
         if (repeat == QUOTA_EXCEEDED)
                   retval = -EDQUOT;
         else
                   retval = -ENOSPC;
         goto failure;
	[...]

       failure:
	[...]
         reiserfs_check_path(&path); << Panics here !

Attached here is a patch which could fix the issue.

fix reiserfs/inode.c : restart_transaction() to release the path in all
cases.

The restart_transaction() doesn't release the path when the the journal
handle has a refcount > 1.  This would trigger a reiserfs_panic() if we
encounter an -ENOSPC / -EDQUOT in reiserfs_get_block().
Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K P <suzuki@in.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <vs@namesys.com>
Cc: <reiserfs-dev@namesys.com>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      87b4126f
  17. 04 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  19. 30 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  21. 27 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  23. 06 8月, 2006 2 次提交
  25. 02 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  27. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  29. 29 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  31. 27 3月, 2006 2 次提交
  33. 03 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  35. 02 2月, 2006 2 次提交
    • C
      [PATCH] reiserfs: reiserfs hang and performance fix for data=journal mode · e0e851cf
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      In data=journal mode, reiserfs writepage needs to make sure not to trigger
transactions while being run under PF_MEMALLOC.  This patch makes sure to
redirty the page instead of forcing a transaction start in this case.

Also, calling filemap_fdata* in order to trigger io on the block device can
cause lock inversions on the page lock.  Instead, do simple batching from
flush_commit_list.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      e0e851cf
    • C
      [PATCH] resierfs: fix reiserfs_invalidatepage race against data=ordered · d62b1b87
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      After a transaction has closed but before it has finished commit, there is
a window where data=ordered mode requires invalidatepage to pin pages
instead of freeing them.  This patch fixes a race between the
invalidatepage checks and data=ordered writeback, and it also adds a check
to the reiserfs write_ordered_buffers routines to write any anonymous
buffers that were dirtied after its first writeback loop.

That bug works like this:

proc1: transaction closes and a new one starts
proc1: write_ordered_buffers starts processing data=ordered list
proc1: buffer A is cleaned and written
proc2: buffer A is dirtied by another process
proc2: File is truncated to zero, page A goes through invalidatepage
proc2: reiserfs_invalidatepage sees dirty buffer A with reiserfs
       journal head, pins it
proc1: write_ordered_buffers frees the journal head on buffer A

At this point, buffer A stays dirty forever
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      d62b1b87
  37. 10 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  39. 15 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  41. 29 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  43. 28 10月, 2005 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] gfp_t: fs/* · 27496a8c
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
       - ->releasepage() annotated (s/int/gfp_t), instances updated
 - missing gfp_t in fs/* added
 - fixed misannotation from the original sweep caught by bitwise checks:
   XFS used __nocast both for gfp_t and for flags used by XFS allocator.
   The latter left with unsigned int __nocast; we might want to add a
   different type for those but for now let's leave them alone.  That,
   BTW, is a case when __nocast use had been actively confusing - it had
   been used in the same code for two different and similar types, with
   no way to catch misuses.  Switch of gfp_t to bitwise had caught that
   immediately...

One tricky bit is left alone to be dealt with later - mapping->flags is
a mix of gfp_t and error indications.  Left alone for now.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      27496a8c
  45. 13 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  47. 10 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  49. 19 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  51. 28 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  53. 13 7月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code · bd4c625c
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This was a pure indentation change, using:

	scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h

to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style.  As Jeff
Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes:

 The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes
 different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable
 for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it
 is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined
 in Documentation/CodingStyle.

 This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against
 fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the
 code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate
 so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge
 patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*.

 A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent
 with the Linux coding style.

 Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he
 wouldn't really oppose them either.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      bd4c625c
  55. 26 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  57. 24 6月, 2005 2 次提交
  59. 01 5月, 2005 2 次提交
  61. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
      1da177e4