Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 2月, 2022 1 次提交
  3. 13 1月, 2022 1 次提交
  5. 14 10月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 09 9月, 2021 1 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915/hdcp: reuse rx_info for mst stream type1 capability check · 3e31d057
      由 Juston Li 提交于 
      On some MST docking stations, rx_info can only be read after
RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List and the RxStatus READY bit is set
otherwise the read will return -EIO.

This behavior causes the mst stream type1 capability test to fail to
read rx_info and determine if the topology supports type1 and fallback
to type0.

To fix this, check for type1 capability when we receive rx_info within
the AKE flow when we read RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List instead
of an explicit read just for type1 capability checking.

This does require moving where we set stream_types to after
hdcp2_authenticate_sink() when we get rx_info but this occurs before we
do hdcp2_propagate_stream_management_info.

Also, legacy HDCP 2.0/2.1 are not type 1 capable either so check for
that as well.

Changes since v5:
 - rename intel_set_stream_types() to intel_hdcp_prepare_streams()
   (Anshuman)

Changes since v4:
 - move topology_type1_capable to intel_digital_port and rename it as
   hdcp_mst_type1_capable (Anshuman)
 - make a helper function intel_set_stream_types() to set stream types
   in hdcp2_authenticate_and_encrypt() (Anshuman)
 - break on failure to set stream types and retry instead of returning
 - remove no longer used declaration for streams_type1_capable()

Changes since v2:
 - Remove no longer used variables in _intel_hdcp2_enable()
Signed-off-by: NJuston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRamalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Tested-by: NSuraj K <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210819184835.1181323-4-juston.li@intel.com
      3e31d057
  9. 06 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 14 4月, 2021 2 次提交
    • L
      drm/i915/display: rename display version macros · 93e7e61e
      由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于 
      While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:

	1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
	macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
	like is done for >, >=, <=?

	2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
	brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
	could actually repurpose it for a range check

With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.

So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:

	@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
	- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
	+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1

	@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
	- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
	+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1

	@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
	- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
	+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
      93e7e61e
    • M
      drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_GEN9_{BC,LP} · 2446e1d6
      由 Matt Roper 提交于 
      Now that we've eliminated INTEL_GEN(), IS_GEN_RANGE(), etc. from the
display code, we should also kill off our use of the IS_GEN9_* macros
too.  We'll do the conversion manually this time instead of using
Coccinelle since the most logical substitution can depend heavily on the
code context, and sometimes we can keep the code simpler if we make
additional adjustments such as swapping the order of if/else arms.

v2:
 - Restore a lost negation in intel_pll_is_valid().

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRadhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210407203945.1432531-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 70bfb307)
[Jani: cherry picked to topic branch to reduce conflicts]
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      2446e1d6
  13. 08 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  15. 24 3月, 2021 2 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/display: Simplify GLK display version tests · 2b5a4562
      由 Matt Roper 提交于 
      GLK has always been a bit of a special case since it reports INTEL_GEN()
as 9, but has version 10 display IP.  Now we can properly represent the
display version as 10 and simplify the display generation tests
throughout the display code.

Aside from manually adding the version to the glk_info structure, the
rest of this patch is generated with a Coccinelle semantic patch.  Note
that we also need to switch any code that matches gen10 today but *not*
GLK to be CNL-specific:

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 9
        + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10

        @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
        (
        - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 && E
        + (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) && E
        |
        - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10
        + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)
        |
        - IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 10, E)
        + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 11, E) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)
        )

        @@ expression dev_priv, E, E2; @@
        (
        - (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)
        |
        - E || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)
        + E || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)
        |
        - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)
        |
        - IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || E || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)
        + E || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)
        |
        - E || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || E2 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)
        + E || E2 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)
        |
        - (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)
        |
        - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10))
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)
        )

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        - (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9) && !IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9)

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        (
        - !(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10))
        + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 10
        |
        - (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10))
        + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10
        )

        @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
        - E || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)
        + E || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10

        @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
        - (IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 11, E) || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10))
        + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 10, E)

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        (
        - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)
        + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)
        |
        - IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)
        + IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10
        )

        @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
        - !(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= E)
        + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < E

v2:
 - Convert gen10 conditions that don't include GLK into CNL conditions.
   (Ville)

v3:
 - Rework coccinelle rules so that "ver>=10" turns into "ver>=11||is_cnl." (Ville)

v3.1:
 - Manually re-add the ".display.version = 10" to glk_info after
   regenerating patch via Coccinelle.

v4:
 - Also apply cocci rules to intel_pm.c and i915_irq.c!  (CI)

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210322233840.4056851-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
      2b5a4562
    • M
      drm/i915/display: Eliminate most usage of INTEL_GEN() · 005e9537
      由 Matt Roper 提交于 
      Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead.  The
following semantic patch was used:

        @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
        - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
        + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)

        @@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
        - IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
        + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)

        @@
        expression dev_priv;
        expression from, until;
        @@
        - IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
        + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)

There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c.  Those will be updated separately.

v2:
 - Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers.  (Jani)
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
      005e9537
  17. 22 3月, 2021 4 次提交
  19. 22 1月, 2021 2 次提交
  21. 18 1月, 2021 2 次提交
  23. 13 1月, 2021 12 次提交
  25. 24 9月, 2020 2 次提交
  27. 02 9月, 2020 2 次提交
  29. 01 9月, 2020 6 次提交