1. 12 7月, 2008 5 次提交
  2. 05 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 27 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • E
      ext4: enable barriers by default · 571640ca
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      I can't think of any valid reason for ext4 to not use barriers when
      they are available;  I believe this is necessary for filesystem
      integrity in the face of a volatile write cache on storage.
      
      An administrator who trusts that the cache is sufficiently battery-
      backed (and power supplies are sufficiently redundant, etc...)
      can always turn it back off again.
      
      SuSE has carried such a patch for ext3 for quite some time now.
      
      Also document the mount option while we're at it.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      571640ca
  4. 26 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 07 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 14 5月, 2008 4 次提交
  7. 30 4月, 2008 3 次提交
  8. 28 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 17 4月, 2008 3 次提交
  10. 30 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  11. 15 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  12. 10 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Add new "development flag" to the ext4 filesystem · 469108ff
      Theodore Tso 提交于
      This flag is simply a generic "this is a crash/burn test filesystem"
      marker.  If it is set, then filesystem code which is "in development"
      will be allowed to mount the filesystem.  Filesystem code which is not
      considered ready for prime-time will check for this flag, and if it is
      not set, it will refuse to touch the filesystem.
      
      As we start rolling ext4 out to distro's like Fedora, et. al, this makes
      it less likely that a user might accidentally start using ext4 on a
      production filesystem; a bad thing, since that will essentially make it
      be unfsckable until e2fsprogs catches up.
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
      Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
      469108ff
  13. 08 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  14. 07 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 29 1月, 2008 13 次提交