1. 09 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  2. 22 12月, 2018 13 次提交
  3. 21 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  4. 27 11月, 2018 1 次提交
    • O
      selinux: always allow mounting submounts · 2cbdcb88
      Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于
      If a superblock has the MS_SUBMOUNT flag set, we should always allow
      mounting it. These mounts are done automatically by the kernel either as
      part of mounting some parent mount (e.g. debugfs always mounts tracefs
      under "tracing" for compatibility) or they are mounted automatically as
      needed on subdirectory accesses (e.g. NFS crossmnt mounts). Since such
      automounts are either an implicit consequence of the parent mount (which
      is already checked) or they can happen during regular accesses (where it
      doesn't make sense to check against the current task's context), the
      mount permission check should be skipped for them.
      
      Without this patch, attempts to access contents of an automounted
      directory can cause unexpected SELinux denials.
      
      In the current kernel tree, the MS_SUBMOUNT flag is set only via
      vfs_submount(), which is called only from the following places:
       - AFS, when automounting special "symlinks" referencing other cells
       - CIFS, when automounting "referrals"
       - NFS, when automounting subtrees
       - debugfs, when automounting tracefs
      
      In all cases the submounts are meant to be transparent to the user and
      it makes sense that if mounting the master is allowed, then so should be
      the automounts. Note that CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability checking is already
      skipped for (SB_KERNMOUNT|SB_SUBMOUNT) in:
       - sget_userns() in fs/super.c:
      	if (!(flags & (SB_KERNMOUNT|SB_SUBMOUNT)) &&
      	    !(type->fs_flags & FS_USERNS_MOUNT) &&
      	    !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
      		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
       - sget() in fs/super.c:
              /* Ensure the requestor has permissions over the target filesystem */
              if (!(flags & (SB_KERNMOUNT|SB_SUBMOUNT)) && !ns_capable(user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
                      return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
      
      Verified internally on patched RHEL 7.6 with a reproducer using
      NFS+httpd and selinux-tesuite.
      
      Fixes: 93faccbb ("fs: Better permission checking for submounts")
      Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
      2cbdcb88
  5. 14 11月, 2018 1 次提交
  6. 11 10月, 2018 2 次提交
  7. 03 10月, 2018 1 次提交
    • E
      signal: Distinguish between kernel_siginfo and siginfo · ae7795bc
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      Linus recently observed that if we did not worry about the padding
      member in struct siginfo it is only about 48 bytes, and 48 bytes is
      much nicer than 128 bytes for allocating on the stack and copying
      around in the kernel.
      
      The obvious thing of only adding the padding when userspace is
      including siginfo.h won't work as there are sigframe definitions in
      the kernel that embed struct siginfo.
      
      So split siginfo in two; kernel_siginfo and siginfo.  Keeping the
      traditional name for the userspace definition.  While the version that
      is used internally to the kernel and ultimately will not be padded to
      128 bytes is called kernel_siginfo.
      
      The definition of struct kernel_siginfo I have put in include/signal_types.h
      
      A set of buildtime checks has been added to verify the two structures have
      the same field offsets.
      
      To make it easy to verify the change kernel_siginfo retains the same
      size as siginfo.  The reduction in size comes in a following change.
      Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      ae7795bc
  8. 05 9月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 17 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  10. 12 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 20 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  12. 16 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 15 5月, 2018 4 次提交
  14. 14 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  15. 05 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  16. 04 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  17. 12 4月, 2018 3 次提交
    • D
      ipc/msg: introduce msgctl(MSG_STAT_ANY) · 23c8cec8
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      There is a permission discrepancy when consulting msq ipc object
      metadata between /proc/sysvipc/msg (0444) and the MSG_STAT shmctl
      command.  The later does permission checks for the object vs S_IRUGO.
      As such there can be cases where EACCESS is returned via syscall but the
      info is displayed anyways in the procfs files.
      
      While this might have security implications via info leaking (albeit no
      writing to the msq metadata), this behavior goes way back and showing
      all the objects regardless of the permissions was most likely an
      overlook - so we are stuck with it.  Furthermore, modifying either the
      syscall or the procfs file can cause userspace programs to break (ie
      ipcs).  Some applications require getting the procfs info (without root
      privileges) and can be rather slow in comparison with a syscall -- up to
      500x in some reported cases for shm.
      
      This patch introduces a new MSG_STAT_ANY command such that the msq ipc
      object permissions are ignored, and only audited instead.  In addition,
      I've left the lsm security hook checks in place, as if some policy can
      block the call, then the user has no other choice than just parsing the
      procfs file.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215162458.10059-4-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
      Reported-by: NRobert Kettler <robert.kettler@outlook.com>
      Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      23c8cec8
    • D
      ipc/sem: introduce semctl(SEM_STAT_ANY) · a280d6dc
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      There is a permission discrepancy when consulting shm ipc object
      metadata between /proc/sysvipc/sem (0444) and the SEM_STAT semctl
      command.  The later does permission checks for the object vs S_IRUGO.
      As such there can be cases where EACCESS is returned via syscall but the
      info is displayed anyways in the procfs files.
      
      While this might have security implications via info leaking (albeit no
      writing to the sma metadata), this behavior goes way back and showing
      all the objects regardless of the permissions was most likely an
      overlook - so we are stuck with it.  Furthermore, modifying either the
      syscall or the procfs file can cause userspace programs to break (ie
      ipcs).  Some applications require getting the procfs info (without root
      privileges) and can be rather slow in comparison with a syscall -- up to
      500x in some reported cases for shm.
      
      This patch introduces a new SEM_STAT_ANY command such that the sem ipc
      object permissions are ignored, and only audited instead.  In addition,
      I've left the lsm security hook checks in place, as if some policy can
      block the call, then the user has no other choice than just parsing the
      procfs file.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215162458.10059-3-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
      Reported-by: NRobert Kettler <robert.kettler@outlook.com>
      Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a280d6dc
    • D
      ipc/shm: introduce shmctl(SHM_STAT_ANY) · c21a6970
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      Patch series "sysvipc: introduce STAT_ANY commands", v2.
      
      The following patches adds the discussed (see [1]) new command for shm
      as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same
      discrepancies for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and
      via procfs.  These new commands are justified in that (1) we are stuck
      with this semantics as changing syscall and procfs can break userland;
      and (2) some users can benefit from performance (for large amounts of
      shm segments, for example) from not having to parse the procfs
      interface.
      
      Once merged, I will submit the necesary manpage updates.  But I'm thinking
      something like:
      
      : diff --git a/man2/shmctl.2 b/man2/shmctl.2
      : index 7bb503999941..bb00bbe21a57 100644
      : --- a/man2/shmctl.2
      : +++ b/man2/shmctl.2
      : @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
      :  .\" 2005-04-25, mtk -- noted aberrant Linux behavior w.r.t. new
      :  .\"	attaches to a segment that has already been marked for deletion.
      :  .\" 2005-08-02, mtk: Added IPC_INFO, SHM_INFO, SHM_STAT descriptions.
      : +.\" 2018-02-13, dbueso: Added SHM_STAT_ANY description.
      :  .\"
      :  .TH SHMCTL 2 2017-09-15 "Linux" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
      :  .SH NAME
      : @@ -242,6 +243,18 @@ However, the
      :  argument is not a segment identifier, but instead an index into
      :  the kernel's internal array that maintains information about
      :  all shared memory segments on the system.
      : +.TP
      : +.BR SHM_STAT_ANY " (Linux-specific)"
      : +Return a
      : +.I shmid_ds
      : +structure as for
      : +.BR SHM_STAT .
      : +However, the
      : +.I shm_perm.mode
      : +is not checked for read access for
      : +.IR shmid ,
      : +resembing the behaviour of
      : +/proc/sysvipc/shm.
      :  .PP
      :  The caller can prevent or allow swapping of a shared
      :  memory segment with the following \fIcmd\fP values:
      : @@ -287,7 +300,7 @@ operation returns the index of the highest used entry in the
      :  kernel's internal array recording information about all
      :  shared memory segments.
      :  (This information can be used with repeated
      : -.B SHM_STAT
      : +.B SHM_STAT/SHM_STAT_ANY
      :  operations to obtain information about all shared memory segments
      :  on the system.)
      :  A successful
      : @@ -328,7 +341,7 @@ isn't accessible.
      :  \fIshmid\fP is not a valid identifier, or \fIcmd\fP
      :  is not a valid command.
      :  Or: for a
      : -.B SHM_STAT
      : +.B SHM_STAT/SHM_STAT_ANY
      :  operation, the index value specified in
      :  .I shmid
      :  referred to an array slot that is currently unused.
      
      This patch (of 3):
      
      There is a permission discrepancy when consulting shm ipc object metadata
      between /proc/sysvipc/shm (0444) and the SHM_STAT shmctl command.  The
      later does permission checks for the object vs S_IRUGO.  As such there can
      be cases where EACCESS is returned via syscall but the info is displayed
      anyways in the procfs files.
      
      While this might have security implications via info leaking (albeit no
      writing to the shm metadata), this behavior goes way back and showing all
      the objects regardless of the permissions was most likely an overlook - so
      we are stuck with it.  Furthermore, modifying either the syscall or the
      procfs file can cause userspace programs to break (ie ipcs).  Some
      applications require getting the procfs info (without root privileges) and
      can be rather slow in comparison with a syscall -- up to 500x in some
      reported cases.
      
      This patch introduces a new SHM_STAT_ANY command such that the shm ipc
      object permissions are ignored, and only audited instead.  In addition,
      I've left the lsm security hook checks in place, as if some policy can
      block the call, then the user has no other choice than just parsing the
      procfs file.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/19/220
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215162458.10059-2-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: Robert Kettler <robert.kettler@outlook.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c21a6970
  18. 28 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  19. 23 3月, 2018 2 次提交