Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
11 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 16 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 06 5月, 2016 3 次提交
  5. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于 
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  7. 12 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace · 73beece9
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,

[ 1226.649039] =========================================================
[ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
[ 1226.649039] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock:
[ 1226.652955]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 1226.652955]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

[ 1226.652955]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1226.652955] Chain exists of:
  &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock

[ 1226.652955]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

[ 1226.652955]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1226.652955]        ----                    ----
[ 1226.652955]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
[ 1226.652955]                                local_irq_disable();
[ 1226.652955]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
[ 1226.652955]   <Interrupt>
[ 1226.652955]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]
 *** DEADLOCK ***

Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried
to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still
run to this.

The above lock chain comes from
btrfs_commit_transaction
  ->btrfs_run_delayed_items
    ...
    ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode
      ...
      ->__btrfs_cow_block
         ...
         ->find_free_extent
            ->cache_block_group
              ->load_free_space_cache
                ->btrfs_readpages
                  ->submit_one_bio
                    ...
                    ->__btrfs_map_block
                      ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock

However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can
be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied
by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes
to

[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30
[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700

delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads
to a ABBA deadlock.

To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but
things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock.

With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      73beece9
  11. 11 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: scrub: use GFP_KERNEL on the submission path · 58c4e173
      由 David Sterba 提交于 
      Scrub is not on the critical writeback path we don't need to use
GFP_NOFS for all allocations. The failures are handled and stats passed
back to userspace.

Let's use GFP_KERNEL on the paths where everything is ok, ie. setup the
global structures and the IO submission paths.

Functions that do the repair and fixups still use GFP_NOFS as we might
want to skip any other filesystem activity if we encounter an error.
This could turn out to be unnecessary, but requires more review compared
to the easy cases in this patch.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      58c4e173
  13. 23 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      wrappers for ->i_mutex access · 5955102c
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested},
inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex).

Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle
->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held
only shared.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      5955102c
  15. 20 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 16 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 07 1月, 2016 3 次提交
  21. 03 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  23. 25 11月, 2015 3 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block groups from being deleted · 758f2dfc
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Currently scrub can race with the cleaner kthread when the later attempts
to delete an unused block group, and the result is preventing the cleaner
kthread from ever deleting later the block group - unless the block group
becomes used and unused again. The following diagram illustrates that
race:

              CPU 1                                 CPU 2

 cleaner kthread
   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

     gets block group X from
     fs_info->unused_bgs and
     removes it from that list

                                             scrub_enumerate_chunks()

                                               searches device tree using
                                               its commit root

                                               finds device extent for
                                               block group X

                                               gets block group X from the tree
                                               fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
                                               (via btrfs_lookup_block_group())

                                               sets bg X to RO

     sees the block group is
     already RO and therefore
     doesn't delete it nor adds
     it back to unused list

So fix this by making scrub add the block group again to the list of
unused block groups if the block group is still unused when it finished
scrubbing it and it hasn't been removed already.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      758f2dfc
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between scrub and block group deletion · 020d5b73
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Scrub can race with the cleaner kthread deleting block groups that are
unused (and with relocation too) leading to a failure with error -EINVAL
that gets returned to user space.

The following diagram illustrates how it happens:

              CPU 1                                 CPU 2

 cleaner kthread
   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

     gets block group X from
     fs_info->unused_bgs

     sets block group to RO

       btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)

         deletes device extents

                                         scrub_enumerate_chunks()

                                           searches device tree using
                                           its commit root

                                           finds device extent for
                                           block group X

                                           gets block group X from the tree
                                           fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
                                           (via btrfs_lookup_block_group())

                                           sets bg X to RO (again)

          btrfs_remove_block_group(bg X)

            deletes block group from
            fs_info->block_group_cache_tree

            removes extent map from
            fs_info->mapping_tree

                                               scrub_chunk(offset X)

                                                 searches fs_info->mapping_tree
                                                 for extent map starting at
                                                 offset X

                                                    --> doesn't find any such
                                                        extent map
                                                    --> returns -EINVAL and scrub
                                                        errors out to userspace
                                                        with -EINVAL

Fix this by dealing with an extent map lookup failure as an indicator of
block group deletion.
Issue reproduced with fstest btrfs/071.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      020d5b73
    • Z
      btrfs: Continue replace when set_block_ro failed · 76a8efa1
      由 Zhaolei 提交于 
      xfstests/011 failed in node with small_size filesystem.
Can be reproduced by following script:
  DEV_LIST="/dev/vdd /dev/vde"
  DEV_REPLACE="/dev/vdf"

  do_test()
  {
      local mkfs_opt="$1"
      local size="$2"

      dmesg -c >/dev/null
      umount $SCRATCH_MNT &>/dev/null

      echo  mkfs.btrfs -f $mkfs_opt "${DEV_LIST[*]}"
      mkfs.btrfs -f $mkfs_opt "${DEV_LIST[@]}" || return 1
      mount "${DEV_LIST[0]}" $SCRATCH_MNT

      echo -n "Writing big files"
      dd if=/dev/urandom of=$SCRATCH_MNT/t0 bs=1M count=1 >/dev/null 2>&1
      for ((i = 1; i <= size; i++)); do
          echo -n .
          /bin/cp $SCRATCH_MNT/t0 $SCRATCH_MNT/t$i || return 1
      done
      echo

      echo Start replace
      btrfs replace start -Bf "${DEV_LIST[0]}" "$DEV_REPLACE" $SCRATCH_MNT || {
          dmesg
          return 1
      }
      return 0
  }

  # Set size to value near fs size
  # for example, 1897 can trigger this bug in 2.6G device.
  #
  ./do_test "-d raid1 -m raid1" 1897

System will report replace fail with following warning in dmesg:
 [  134.710853] BTRFS: dev_replace from /dev/vdd (devid 1) to /dev/vdf started
 [  135.542390] BTRFS: btrfs_scrub_dev(/dev/vdd, 1, /dev/vdf) failed -28
 [  135.543505] ------------[ cut here ]------------
 [  135.544127] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4080 at fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c:428 btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x398/0x440()
 [  135.545276] Modules linked in:
 [  135.545681] CPU: 0 PID: 4080 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.3.0 #256
 [  135.546439] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.2-0-g33fbe13 by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
 [  135.547798]  ffffffff81c5bfcf ffff88003cbb3d28 ffffffff817fe7b5 0000000000000000
 [  135.548774]  ffff88003cbb3d60 ffffffff810a88f1 ffff88002b030000 00000000ffffffe4
 [  135.549774]  ffff88003c080000 ffff88003c082588 ffff88003c28ab60 ffff88003cbb3d70
 [  135.550758] Call Trace:
 [  135.551086]  [<ffffffff817fe7b5>] dump_stack+0x44/0x55
 [  135.551737]  [<ffffffff810a88f1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
 [  135.552487]  [<ffffffff810a89e5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
 [  135.553211]  [<ffffffff81448c88>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x398/0x440
 [  135.554051]  [<ffffffff81412c3e>] btrfs_ioctl+0x1d2e/0x25c0
 [  135.554722]  [<ffffffff8114c7ba>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xaa/0xf0
 [  135.555506]  [<ffffffff8111ab36>] ? current_kernel_time64+0x56/0xa0
 [  135.556304]  [<ffffffff81201e3d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x30d/0x580
 [  135.557009]  [<ffffffff8114c7ba>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xaa/0xf0
 [  135.557855]  [<ffffffff810011d1>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x61/0x70
 [  135.558669]  [<ffffffff8120d1c1>] ? __fget_light+0x61/0x90
 [  135.559374]  [<ffffffff81202124>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80
 [  135.559987]  [<ffffffff81809857>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
 [  135.560842] ---[ end trace 2a5c1fc3205abbdd ]---

Reason:
 When big data writen to fs, the whole free space will be allocated
 for data chunk.
 And operation as scrub need to set_block_ro(), and when there is
 only one metadata chunk in system(or other metadata chunks
 are all full), the function will try to allocate a new chunk,
 and failed because no space in device.

Fix:
 When set_block_ro failed for metadata chunk, it is not a problem
 because scrub_lock paused commit_trancaction in same time, and
 metadata are always cowed, so the on-the-fly writepages will not
 write data into same place with scrub/replace.
 Let replace continue in this case is no problem.

Tested by above script, and xfstests/011, plus 100 times xfstests/070.

Changelog v1->v2:
1: Add detail comments in source and commit-message.
2: Add dmesg detail into commit-message.
3: Limit return value of -ENOSPC to be passed.
All suggested by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      76a8efa1
  25. 11 11月, 2015 6 次提交
  27. 08 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  29. 01 9月, 2015 2 次提交
  31. 14 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  33. 09 8月, 2015 10 次提交
    • O
      Btrfs: fix parity scrub of RAID 5/6 with missing device · 4a770891
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      When testing the previous patch, Zhao Lei reported a similar bug when
attempting to scrub a degraded RAID 5/6 filesystem with a missing
device, leading to NULL pointer dereferences from the RAID 5/6 parity
scrubbing code.

The first cause was the same as in the previous patch: attempting to
call bio_add_page() on a missing block device. To fix this,
scrub_extent_for_parity() can just mark the sectors on the missing
device as errors instead of attempting to read from it.

Additionally, the code uses scrub_remap_extent() to map the extent of
the corresponding data stripe, but the extent wasn't already mapped. If
scrub_remap_extent() finds a missing block device, it doesn't initialize
extent_dev, so we're left with a NULL struct btrfs_device. The solution
is to use btrfs_map_block() directly.
Reported-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      4a770891
    • O
      Btrfs: fix device replace of a missing RAID 5/6 device · 73ff61db
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      The original implementation of device replace on RAID 5/6 seems to have
missed support for replacing a missing device. When this is attempted,
we end up calling bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL ->bi_bdev, which
crashes when we try to dereference it. This happens because
btrfs_map_block() has no choice but to return us the missing device
because RAID 5/6 don't have any alternate mirrors to read from, and a
missing device has a NULL bdev.

The idea implemented here is to handle the missing device case
separately, which better only happen when we're replacing a missing RAID
5/6 device. We use the new BTRFS_RBIO_REBUILD_MISSING operation to
reconstruct the data from parity, check it with
scrub_recheck_block_checksum(), and write it out with
scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace().
Reported-by: NPhilip <bugzilla@philip-seeger.de>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96141Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      73ff61db
    • O
      Btrfs: add RAID 5/6 BTRFS_RBIO_REBUILD_MISSING operation · b4ee1782
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      The current RAID 5/6 recovery code isn't quite prepared to handle
missing devices. In particular, it expects a bio that we previously
attempted to use in the read path, meaning that it has valid pages
allocated. However, missing devices have a NULL blkdev, and we can't
call bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL blkdev. We could do manual
manipulation of bio->bi_io_vec, but that's pretty gross. So instead, add
a separate path that allows us to manually add pages to the rbio.
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b4ee1782
    • O
      Btrfs: remove misleading handling of missing device scrub · 03679ade
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      scrub_submit() claims that it can handle a bio with a NULL block device,
but this is misleading, as calling bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL
->bi_bdev would've already crashed. Delete this, as we're about to
properly handle a missing block device.
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      03679ade
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix data checksum error cause by replace with io-load. · 55e3a601
      由 Zhaolei 提交于 
      xfstests btrfs/070 sometimes failed.
In my test machine, its fail rate is about 30%.
In another vm(vmware), its fail rate is about 50%.

Reason:
  btrfs/070 do replace and defrag with fsstress simultaneously,
  after above operation, checksum error is found by scrub.

  Actually, it have no relationship with defrag operation, only
  replace with fsstress can trigger this bug.

  New data writen to target device have possibility rewrited by
  old data from source device by replace code in debug, to avoid
  above problem, we can set target block group to readonly in
  replace period, so new data requested by other operation will
  not write to same place with replace code.

  Before patch(4.1-rc3):
    30% failed in 100 xfstests.
  After patch:
    0% failed in 300 xfstests.

It also happened in btrfs/071 as it's another scrub with IO load tests.
Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      55e3a601
    • Z
      btrfs: use scrub_pause_on/off() to reduce code in scrub_enumerate_chunks() · b708ce96
      由 Zhaolei 提交于 
      Use new intruduced scrub_pause_on/off() can make this code block
clean and more readable.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b708ce96
    • Z
      btrfs: Separate scrub_blocked_if_needed() to scrub_pause_on/off() · 0e22be89
      由 Zhaolei 提交于 
      It can reduce current duplicated code which is similar to
scrub_blocked_if_needed() but can not call it because little
different.
It also used by my next patch which is in same case.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      0e22be89
    • Z
      btrfs: Bypass unrelated items before accessing its contents in scrub · d7cad238
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      When we access extent_root in scrub_stripe() and
scrub_raid56_parity(), we need bypass unrelated tree item firstly
before using its contents to do other condition.

It is not a bug fix, only making code sequence in logic.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      d7cad238
    • Z
      btrfs: Load only necessary csums into list in scrub · fe8cf654
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      We need not load csum of whole strip in scrub because strip is trimed
before use, it is to say, what we really need to calculate csum is
data between [extent_logical, extent_len).

This patch changed to use above segment for btrfs_lookup_csums_range()
in scrub_stripe()
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      fe8cf654
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix calculate typo caused by ambiguous meaning of logic_end · a0dd59de
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      For example, in scrub_raid56_parity(), following lines are used
to judge is all data processed:
 place1: if (key.objectid > logic_end) ...
 place2: if (logic_start >= logic_end) ...
 ...
 (place2 is typo, is should be ">", it is copied from other
  place, where logic_end's meaning is different, long story...)

We can fix above typo directly, but the root reason is ambiguous
meaning of logic_end in scrub raid56 parity.

In other place, XXX_end is pointed to data which is not included,
and we need to process segment of [XXX_start, XXX_end).

But for scrub raid56 parity, logic_end is pointed to lattest data
need to process, and introduced many "+ 1" and "- 1" in code as
below:
 length = sparity->logic_end - sparity->logic_start + 1
 logic_end - logic_start + 1
 stripe_logical + increment - 1

This patch changed logic_end's meaning to make it in normal understanding
in raid56 parity functions and data struct alone with above bugfix.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a0dd59de