1. 19 10月, 2013 5 次提交
  2. 15 10月, 2013 8 次提交
  3. 11 10月, 2013 11 次提交
  4. 04 10月, 2013 2 次提交
    • X
      wireless: rt2x00: rt2800usb: add new devices · 274dede8
      Xose Vazquez Perez 提交于
      0411,0241  RT5572  BUFFALO WI-U2-300D Wireless LAN Adapter
      0789,0170  RT3572  Logitec LAN-W300AN/U2
      0846,9013  RT3573  NETGEAR Adaptador USB Inalambrico Movistar
      0df6,006e  RT3573  Sitecom WiFi USB adapter N900
      2001,3c1f  RT3573  D-Link DWA-162 Wireless N900 Dual Band Adapter
      2001,3c20  RT5372  D-Link DWA-140 Wireless N USB Adapter(rev.D)
      2001,3c21  RT5572  D-Link DWA-160 Xtreme N Dual Band USB Adapter(rev.C)
      2001,3c22  RT5372  D-Link DWA-132 Wireless N USB Adapter(rev.B)
      2001,3c23  RT5372  D-Link GO-USB-N300 Wireless N Easy USB Adapter
      2019,ab29  ?       Planex GW-USMirco300
      20f4,724a  RT5572  TRENDnet N600 Wireless Dual Band USB Adapter
      
      Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
      Cc: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
      Cc: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
      Cc: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      Cc: users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
      Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NXose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      274dede8
    • S
      rt2800: add support for radio chip RF3070 · 3b9b74ba
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      Add support for new RF chip ID: 3070. It seems to be the same as 5370,
      maybe vendor just put wrong value on the eeprom, but add this id anyway
      since devices with it showed on the marked.
      Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      3b9b74ba
  5. 27 9月, 2013 3 次提交
  6. 10 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 04 9月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      drivers/net: Convert uses of compare_ether_addr to ether_addr_equal · 7367d0b5
      Joe Perches 提交于
      Use the new bool function ether_addr_equal to add
      some clarity and reduce the likelihood for misuse
      of compare_ether_addr for sorting.
      
      Done via cocci script: (and a little typing)
      
      $ cat compare_ether_addr.cocci
      @@
      expression a,b;
      @@
      -	!compare_ether_addr(a, b)
      +	ether_addr_equal(a, b)
      
      @@
      expression a,b;
      @@
      -	compare_ether_addr(a, b)
      +	!ether_addr_equal(a, b)
      
      @@
      expression a,b;
      @@
      -	!ether_addr_equal(a, b) == 0
      +	ether_addr_equal(a, b)
      
      @@
      expression a,b;
      @@
      -	!ether_addr_equal(a, b) != 0
      +	!ether_addr_equal(a, b)
      
      @@
      expression a,b;
      @@
      -	ether_addr_equal(a, b) == 0
      +	!ether_addr_equal(a, b)
      
      @@
      expression a,b;
      @@
      -	ether_addr_equal(a, b) != 0
      +	ether_addr_equal(a, b)
      
      @@
      expression a,b;
      @@
      -	!!ether_addr_equal(a, b)
      +	ether_addr_equal(a, b)
      Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7367d0b5
  8. 29 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 27 8月, 2013 3 次提交
  10. 23 8月, 2013 5 次提交