Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 01 3月, 2022 3 次提交
  3. 09 2月, 2022 8 次提交
    • D
      mm/page_alloc: fix counting of free pages after take off from buddy · 3c002599
      由 Ding Hui 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from linux-v5.13-rc5
commit bac9c6fa
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4LE22
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

Recently we found that there is a lot MemFree left in /proc/meminfo
after do a lot of pages soft offline, it's not quite correct.

Before Oscar's rework of soft offline for free pages [1], if we soft
offline free pages, these pages are left in buddy with HWPoison flag,
and NR_FREE_PAGES is not updated immediately.  So the difference between
NR_FREE_PAGES and real number of available free pages is also even big
at the beginning.

However, with the workload running, when we catch HWPoison page in any
alloc functions subsequently, we will remove it from buddy, meanwhile
update the NR_FREE_PAGES and try again, so the NR_FREE_PAGES will get
more and more closer to the real number of available free pages.
(regardless of unpoison_memory())

Now, for offline free pages, after a successful call
take_page_off_buddy(), the page is no longer belong to buddy allocator,
and will not be used any more, but we missed accounting NR_FREE_PAGES in
this situation, and there is no chance to be updated later.

Do update in take_page_off_buddy() like rmqueue() does, but avoid double
counting if some one already set_migratetype_isolate() on the page.

[1]: commit 06be6ff3 ("mm,hwpoison: rework soft offline for free pages")

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210526075247.11130-1-dinghui@sangfor.com.cn
Fixes: 06be6ff3 ("mm,hwpoison: rework soft offline for free pages")
Signed-off-by: NDing Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>
Suggested-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NMa Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      3c002599
    • O
      mm,hwpoison: rework soft offline for in-use pages · 40b69d16
      由 Oscar Salvador 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from linux-v5.10-rc1
commit 79f5f8fa
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4LE22
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

keep set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page exported to avoid kapi change.

This patch changes the way we set and handle in-use poisoned pages.  Until
now, poisoned pages were released to the buddy allocator, trusting that
the checks that take place at allocation time would act as a safe net
and would skip that page.

This has proved to be wrong, as we got some pfn walkers out there, like
compaction, that all they care is the page to be in a buddy freelist.

Although this might not be the only user, having poisoned pages in the
buddy allocator seems a bad idea as we should only have free pages that
are ready and meant to be used as such.

Before explaining the taken approach, let us break down the kind of pages
we can soft offline.

- Anonymous THP (after the split, they end up being 4K pages)
- Hugetlb
- Order-0 pages (that can be either migrated or invalited)

* Normal pages (order-0 and anon-THP)

  - If they are clean and unmapped page cache pages, we invalidate
    then by means of invalidate_inode_page().
  - If they are mapped/dirty, we do the isolate-and-migrate dance.

Either way, do not call put_page directly from those paths.
Instead, we keep the page and send it to page_handle_poison to perform the
right handling.

page_handle_poison sets the HWPoison flag and does the last put_page.

Down the chain, we placed a check for HWPoison page in
free_pages_prepare, that just skips any poisoned page, so those pages
do not end up in any pcplist/freelist.

After that, we set the refcount on the page to 1 and we increment
the poisoned pages counter.

If we see that the check in free_pages_prepare creates trouble, we can
always do what we do for free pages:

  - wait until the page hits buddy's freelists
  - take it off, and flag it

The downside of the above approach is that we could race with an
allocation, so by the time we  want to take the page off the buddy, the
page has been already allocated so we cannot soft offline it.
But the user could always retry it.

* Hugetlb pages

  - We isolate-and-migrate them

After the migration has been successful, we call dissolve_free_huge_page,
and we set HWPoison on the page if we succeed.
Hugetlb has a slightly different handling though.

While for non-hugetlb pages we cared about closing the race with an
allocation, doing so for hugetlb pages requires quite some additional
and intrusive code (we would need to hook in free_huge_page and some other
places).
So I decided to not make the code overly complicated and just fail
normally if the page we allocated in the meantime.

We can always build on top of this.

As a bonus, because of the way we handle now in-use pages, we no longer
need the put-as-isolation-migratetype dance, that was guarding for poisoned
pages to end up in pcplists.
Signed-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>

Conflicts:
	mm/page_alloc.c
Signed-off-by: NMa Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      40b69d16
    • O
      mm,hwpoison: rework soft offline for free pages · 0d0fa7b8
      由 Oscar Salvador 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from linux-v5.10-rc1
commit 06be6ff3
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4LE22
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

When trying to soft-offline a free page, we need to first take it off the
buddy allocator.
Once we know is out of reach, we can safely flag it as poisoned.

take_page_off_buddy will be used to take a page meant to be poisoned off
the buddy allocator. take_page_off_buddy calls break_down_buddy_pages,
which splits a higher-order page in case our page belongs to one.

Once the page is under our control, we call page_handle_poison to set it
as poisoned and grab a refcount on it.
Signed-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Conflicts:
	mm/page_alloc.c
Signed-off-by: NMa Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      0d0fa7b8
    • C
      mm/vmscan: fix unexpected shrinking page cache with vm_cache_reclaim_enable disable · 76569c77
      由 Chen Wandun 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4SK3S
CVE: NA

-------------------------------------------------------

In function cache_limit_ratio_sysctl_handler and
cache_limit_mbytes_sysctl_handler, it will shrink
page cache even if vm_cache_reclaim_enable is false,
it is unexpected.
Signed-off-by: NChen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      76569c77
    • M
      mm: Introduce fallback mechanism for memory reliable · 3023a4b3
      由 Ma Wupeng 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4SK3S
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

Introduce fallback mechanism for memory reliable. The following process
will fallback to non-mirrored region if their allocation from mirrored
region failed

- User tasks with reliable flag
- thp collapse pages
- init tasks
- pagecache
- tmpfs

In order to achieve this goals. Buddy system will fallback to non-mirrored
in the following situations.

- if __GFP_THISNODE is set in gfp_mask and dest nodes do not have any zones
  available

- high_zoneidx will be set to ZONE_MOVABLE to alloc memory before oom

This mechanism is enabled by defalut and can be disabled by adding
"reliable_debug=F" to the kernel parameters. This mechanism rely on
CONFIG_MEMORY_RELIABLE and need "kernelcore=reliable" in the kernel
parameters.
Signed-off-by: NMa Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      3023a4b3
    • P
      mm: Add reliable memory use limit for user tasks · 1845e7ad
      由 Peng Wu 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4SK3S
CVE: NA

----------------------------------------------

there is a upper limit for special user tasks's memory allocation.
special user task means user task with reliable flag.

Init tasks will alloc memory from non-mirrored region if their allocation
trigger limit.

The limit can be set or access via /proc/sys/vm/task_reliable_limit

This limit's default value is ULONG_MAX.
Signed-off-by: NPeng Wu <wupeng58@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NMa Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      1845e7ad
    • P
      mm: Introduce reliable flag for user task · c7731567
      由 Peng Wu 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4SK3S
CVE: NA

------------------------------------------

Adding reliable flag for user task. User task with reliable flag can
only alloc memory from mirrored region. PF_RELIABLE is added to represent
the task's reliable flag.

- For init task, which is regarded as as special task which alloc memory
  from mirrored region.

- For normal user tasks, The reliable flag can be set via procfs interface
  shown as below and can be inherited via fork().

User can change a user task's reliable flag by

	$ echo [0/1] > /proc/<pid>/reliable

and check a user task's reliable flag by

	$ cat /proc/<pid>/reliable

Note, global init task's reliable file can not be accessed.
Signed-off-by: NPeng Wu <wupeng58@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NMa Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      c7731567
    • M
      mm: Introduce memory reliable · 33d1f46a
      由 Ma Wupeng 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4SK3S
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

Introduction
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

============

Memory reliable feature is a memory tiering mechanism. It is based on
kernel mirror feature, which splits memory into two sperate regions,
mirrored(reliable) region and non-mirrored (non-reliable) region.

for kernel mirror feature:

- allocate kernel memory from mirrored region by default
- allocate user memory from non-mirrored region by default

non-mirrored region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE.

for kernel reliable feature, it has additional features below:

- normal user tasks never alloc memory from mirrored region with userspace
  apis(malloc, mmap, etc.)
- special user tasks will allocate memory from mirrored region by default
- tmpfs/pagecache allocate memory from mirrored region by default
- upper limit of mirrored region allcated for user tasks, tmpfs and
  pagecache

Support Reliable fallback mechanism which allows special user tasks, tmpfs
and pagecache can fallback to alloc non-mirrored region, it's the default
setting.

In order to fulfil the goal

- ___GFP_RELIABILITY flag added for alloc memory from mirrored region.

- the high_zoneidx for special user tasks/tmpfs/pagecache is set to
  ZONE_NORMAL.

- normal user tasks could only alloc from ZONE_MOVABLE.

This patch is just the main framework, memory reliable support for special
user tasks, pagecache and tmpfs has own patches.

To enable this function, mirrored(reliable) memory is needed and
"kernelcore=reliable" should be added to kernel parameters.
Signed-off-by: NMa Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      33d1f46a
  5. 30 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 20 10月, 2021 6 次提交
    • D
      mm/page_alloc: place pages to tail in __free_pages_core() · 01702464
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.10-rc1
commit 7fef431b
category: feature
bugzilla: 182882
CVE: NA

__free_pages_core() is used when exposing fresh memory to the buddy during
system boot and when onlining memory in generic_online_page().

generic_online_page() is used in two cases:

1. Direct memory onlining in online_pages().
2. Deferred memory onlining in memory-ballooning-like mechanisms (HyperV
   balloon and virtio-mem), when parts of a section are kept
   fake-offline to be fake-onlined later on.

In 1, we already place pages to the tail of the freelist.  Pages will be
freed to MIGRATE_ISOLATE lists first and moved to the tail of the
freelists via undo_isolate_page_range().

In 2, we currently don't implement a proper rule.  In case of virtio-mem,
where we currently always online MAX_ORDER - 1 pages, the pages will be
placed to the HEAD of the freelist - undesireable.  While the hyper-v
balloon calls generic_online_page() with single pages, usually it will
call it on successive single pages in a larger block.

The pages are fresh, so place them to the tail of the freelist and avoid
the PCP.  In __free_pages_core(), remove the now superflouos call to
set_page_refcounted() and add a comment regarding page initialization and
the refcount.

Note: In 2.  we currently don't shuffle.  If ever relevant (page shuffling
is usually of limited use in virtualized environments), we might want to
shuffle after a sequence of generic_online_page() calls in the relevant
callers.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005121534.15649-5-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Conflicts:
	mm/page_alloc.c
[Peng Liu: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: NPeng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      01702464
    • D
      mm/page_alloc: move pages to tail in move_to_free_list() · 5be3d693
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.10-rc1
commit 293ffa5e
category: feature
bugzilla: 182882
CVE: NA

-----------------------------------------------

Whenever we move pages between freelists via move_to_free_list()/
move_freepages_block(), we don't actually touch the pages:
1. Page isolation doesn't actually touch the pages, it simply isolates
   pageblocks and moves all free pages to the MIGRATE_ISOLATE freelist.
   When undoing isolation, we move the pages back to the target list.
2. Page stealing (steal_suitable_fallback()) moves free pages directly
   between lists without touching them.
3. reserve_highatomic_pageblock()/unreserve_highatomic_pageblock() moves
   free pages directly between freelists without touching them.

We already place pages to the tail of the freelists when undoing isolation
via __putback_isolated_page(), let's do it in any case (e.g., if order <=
pageblock_order) and document the behavior. To simplify, let's move the
pages to the tail for all move_to_free_list()/move_freepages_block() users.

In 2., the target list is empty, so there should be no change.  In 3., we
might observe a change, however, highatomic is more concerned about
allocations succeeding than cache hotness - if we ever realize this change
degrades a workload, we can special-case this instance and add a proper
comment.

This change results in all pages getting onlined via online_pages() to be
placed to the tail of the freelist.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005121534.15649-4-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Conflicts:
	mm/page_alloc.c
[Peng Liu: cherry-pick from 293ffa5e]
Signed-off-by: NPeng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      5be3d693
    • D
      mm/page_alloc: place pages to tail in __putback_isolated_page() · 69e15bb4
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.10-rc1
commit 47b6a24a
category: feature
bugzilla: 182882
CVE: NA

-----------------------------------------------

__putback_isolated_page() already documents that pages will be placed to
the tail of the freelist - this is, however, not the case for "order >=
MAX_ORDER - 2" (see buddy_merge_likely()) - which should be the case for
all existing users.

This change affects two users:
- free page reporting
- page isolation, when undoing the isolation (including memory onlining).

This behavior is desirable for pages that haven't really been touched
lately, so exactly the two users that don't actually read/write page
content, but rather move untouched pages.

The new behavior is especially desirable for memory onlining, where we
allow allocation of newly onlined pages via undo_isolate_page_range() in
online_pages().  Right now, we always place them to the head of the
freelist, resulting in undesireable behavior: Assume we add individual
memory chunks via add_memory() and online them right away to the NORMAL
zone.  We create a dependency chain of unmovable allocations e.g., via the
memmap.  The memmap of the next chunk will be placed onto previous chunks
- if the last block cannot get offlined+removed, all dependent ones cannot
get offlined+removed.  While this can already be observed with individual
DIMMs, it's more of an issue for virtio-mem (and I suspect also ppc
DLPAR).

Document that this should only be used for optimizations, and no code
should rely on this behavior for correction (if the order of the freelists
ever changes).

We won't care about page shuffling: memory onlining already properly
shuffles after onlining.  free page reporting doesn't care about
physically contiguous ranges, and there are already cases where page
isolation will simply move (physically close) free pages to (currently)
the head of the freelists via move_freepages_block() instead of shuffling.
If this becomes ever relevant, we should shuffle the whole zone when
undoing isolation of larger ranges, and after free_contig_range().
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005121534.15649-3-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Conflicts:
	mm/page_alloc.c
[Peng Liu: cherry-pick from 47b6a24a]
Signed-off-by: NPeng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      69e15bb4
    • D
      mm/page_alloc: convert "report" flag of __free_one_page() to a proper flag · 22d4ccfa
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.10-rc1
commit f04a5d5d
category: feature
bugzilla: 182882
CVE: NA

-----------------------------------------------

Patch series "mm: place pages to the freelist tail when onlining and undoing isolation", v2.

When adding separate memory blocks via add_memory*() and onlining them
immediately, the metadata (especially the memmap) of the next block will
be placed onto one of the just added+onlined block.  This creates a chain
of unmovable allocations: If the last memory block cannot get
offlined+removed() so will all dependent ones.  We directly have unmovable
allocations all over the place.

This can be observed quite easily using virtio-mem, however, it can also
be observed when using DIMMs.  The freshly onlined pages will usually be
placed to the head of the freelists, meaning they will be allocated next,
turning the just-added memory usually immediately un-removable.  The fresh
pages are cold, prefering to allocate others (that might be hot) also
feels to be the natural thing to do.

It also applies to the hyper-v balloon xen-balloon, and ppc64 dlpar: when
adding separate, successive memory blocks, each memory block will have
unmovable allocations on them - for example gigantic pages will fail to
allocate.

While the ZONE_NORMAL doesn't provide any guarantees that memory can get
offlined+removed again (any kind of fragmentation with unmovable
allocations is possible), there are many scenarios (hotplugging a lot of
memory, running workload, hotunplug some memory/as much as possible) where
we can offline+remove quite a lot with this patchset.

a) To visualize the problem, a very simple example:

Start a VM with 4GB and 8GB of virtio-mem memory:

 [root@localhost ~]# lsmem
 RANGE                                 SIZE  STATE REMOVABLE  BLOCK
 0x0000000000000000-0x00000000bfffffff   3G online       yes   0-23
 0x0000000100000000-0x000000033fffffff   9G online       yes 32-103

 Memory block size:       128M
 Total online memory:      12G
 Total offline memory:      0B

Then try to unplug as much as possible using virtio-mem. Observe which
memory blocks are still around. Without this patch set:

 [root@localhost ~]# lsmem
 RANGE                                  SIZE  STATE REMOVABLE   BLOCK
 0x0000000000000000-0x00000000bfffffff    3G online       yes    0-23
 0x0000000100000000-0x000000013fffffff    1G online       yes   32-39
 0x0000000148000000-0x000000014fffffff  128M online       yes      41
 0x0000000158000000-0x000000015fffffff  128M online       yes      43
 0x0000000168000000-0x000000016fffffff  128M online       yes      45
 0x0000000178000000-0x000000017fffffff  128M online       yes      47
 0x0000000188000000-0x0000000197ffffff  256M online       yes   49-50
 0x00000001a0000000-0x00000001a7ffffff  128M online       yes      52
 0x00000001b0000000-0x00000001b7ffffff  128M online       yes      54
 0x00000001c0000000-0x00000001c7ffffff  128M online       yes      56
 0x00000001d0000000-0x00000001d7ffffff  128M online       yes      58
 0x00000001e0000000-0x00000001e7ffffff  128M online       yes      60
 0x00000001f0000000-0x00000001f7ffffff  128M online       yes      62
 0x0000000200000000-0x0000000207ffffff  128M online       yes      64
 0x0000000210000000-0x0000000217ffffff  128M online       yes      66
 0x0000000220000000-0x0000000227ffffff  128M online       yes      68
 0x0000000230000000-0x0000000237ffffff  128M online       yes      70
 0x0000000240000000-0x0000000247ffffff  128M online       yes      72
 0x0000000250000000-0x0000000257ffffff  128M online       yes      74
 0x0000000260000000-0x0000000267ffffff  128M online       yes      76
 0x0000000270000000-0x0000000277ffffff  128M online       yes      78
 0x0000000280000000-0x0000000287ffffff  128M online       yes      80
 0x0000000290000000-0x0000000297ffffff  128M online       yes      82
 0x00000002a0000000-0x00000002a7ffffff  128M online       yes      84
 0x00000002b0000000-0x00000002b7ffffff  128M online       yes      86
 0x00000002c0000000-0x00000002c7ffffff  128M online       yes      88
 0x00000002d0000000-0x00000002d7ffffff  128M online       yes      90
 0x00000002e0000000-0x00000002e7ffffff  128M online       yes      92
 0x00000002f0000000-0x00000002f7ffffff  128M online       yes      94
 0x0000000300000000-0x0000000307ffffff  128M online       yes      96
 0x0000000310000000-0x0000000317ffffff  128M online       yes      98
 0x0000000320000000-0x0000000327ffffff  128M online       yes     100
 0x0000000330000000-0x000000033fffffff  256M online       yes 102-103

 Memory block size:       128M
 Total online memory:     8.1G
 Total offline memory:      0B

With this patch set:

 [root@localhost ~]# lsmem
 RANGE                                 SIZE  STATE REMOVABLE BLOCK
 0x0000000000000000-0x00000000bfffffff   3G online       yes  0-23
 0x0000000100000000-0x000000013fffffff   1G online       yes 32-39

 Memory block size:       128M
 Total online memory:       4G
 Total offline memory:      0B

All memory can get unplugged, all memory block can get removed.  Of
course, no workload ran and the system was basically idle, but it
highlights the issue - the fairly deterministic chain of unmovable
allocations.  When a huge page for the 2MB memmap is needed, a
just-onlined 4MB page will be split.  The remaining 2MB page will be used
for the memmap of the next memory block.  So one memory block will hold
the memmap of the two following memory blocks.  Finally the pages of the
last-onlined memory block will get used for the next bigger allocations -
if any allocation is unmovable, all dependent memory blocks cannot get
unplugged and removed until that allocation is gone.

Note that with bigger memory blocks (e.g., 256MB), *all* memory
blocks are dependent and none can get unplugged again!

b) Experiment with memory intensive workload

I performed an experiment with an older version of this patch set (before
we used undo_isolate_page_range() in online_pages(): Hotplug 56GB to a VM
with an initial 4GB, onlining all memory to ZONE_NORMAL right from the
kernel when adding it.  I then run various memory intensive workloads that
consume most system memory for a total of 45 minutes.  Once finished, I
try to unplug as much memory as possible.

With this change, I am able to remove via virtio-mem (adding individual
128MB memory blocks) 413 out of 448 added memory blocks.  Via individual
(256MB) DIMMs 380 out of 448 added memory blocks.  (I don't have any
numbers without this patchset, but looking at the above example, it's at
most half of the 448 memory blocks for virtio-mem, and most probably none
for DIMMs).

Again, there are workloads that might behave very differently due to the
nature of ZONE_NORMAL.

This change also affects (besides memory onlining):
- Other users of undo_isolate_page_range(): Pages are always placed to the
  tail.
-- When memory offlining fails
-- When memory isolation fails after having isolated some pageblocks
-- When alloc_contig_range() either succeeds or fails
- Other users of __putback_isolated_page(): Pages are always placed to the
  tail.
-- Free page reporting
- Other users of __free_pages_core()
-- AFAIKs, any memory that is getting exposed to the buddy during boot.
   IIUC we will now usually allocate memory from lower addresses within
   a zone first (especially during boot).
- Other users of generic_online_page()
-- Hyper-V balloon

This patch (of 5):

Let's prepare for additional flags and avoid long parameter lists of
bools.  Follow-up patches will also make use of the flags in
__free_pages_ok().
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005121534.15649-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005121534.15649-2-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Conflicts:
	mm/page_alloc.c
[Peng Liu: cherry-pick from f04a5d5d]
Signed-off-by: NPeng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      22d4ccfa
    • A
      mm: add function __putback_isolated_page · 91bac231
      由 Alexander Duyck 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.7-rc1
commit 624f58d8
category: feature
bugzilla: 182882
CVE: NA

-----------------------------------------------

There are cases where we would benefit from avoiding having to go through
the allocation and free cycle to return an isolated page.

Examples for this might include page poisoning in which we isolate a page
and then put it back in the free list without ever having actually
allocated it.

This will enable us to also avoid notifiers for the future free page
reporting which will need to avoid retriggering page reporting when
returning pages that have been reported on.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>
Cc: wei qi <weiqi4@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211224624.29318.89287.stgit@localhost.localdomainSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Conflicts:
        mm/internal.h
[Peng Liu: cherry-pick from 624f58d8]
Signed-off-by: NPeng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      91bac231
    • A
      mm/page_alloc.c: memory hotplug: free pages as higher order · c479b04b
      由 Arun KS 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.1-rc1
commit a9cd410a
category: feature
bugzilla: 182882
CVE: NA

-----------------------------------------------

When freeing pages are done with higher order, time spent on coalescing
pages by buddy allocator can be reduced.  With section size of 256MB,
hot add latency of a single section shows improvement from 50-60 ms to
less than 1 ms, hence improving the hot add latency by 60 times.  Modify
external providers of online callback to align with the change.

[arunks@codeaurora.org: v11]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547792588-18032-1-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local, per Arun]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid return of void-returning __free_pages_core(), per Oscar]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix it for mm-convert-totalram_pages-and-totalhigh_pages-variables-to-atomic.patch]
[arunks@codeaurora.org: v8]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547032395-24582-1-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org
[arunks@codeaurora.org: v9]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547098543-26452-1-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1538727006-5727-1-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.orgSigned-off-by: NArun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Conflicts:
	mm/page_alloc.c
	mm/memory_hotplug.c
[Peng Liu: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: NPeng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      c479b04b
  9. 03 9月, 2021 1 次提交
    • J
      page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast · 283a76a5
      由 Jaewon Kim 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.9-rc1
commit f27ce0e1
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 41086
CVE: NA

-----------------------------------------------

zone_watermark_fast was introduced by commit 48ee5f36 ("mm,
page_alloc: shortcut watermark checks for order-0 pages").  The commit
simply checks if free pages is bigger than watermark without additional
calculation such like reducing watermark.

It considered free cma pages but it did not consider highatomic reserved.
This may incur exhaustion of free pages except high order atomic free
pages.

Assume that reserved_highatomic pageblock is bigger than watermark min,
and there are only few free pages except high order atomic free.  Because
zone_watermark_fast passes the allocation without considering high order
atomic free, normal reclaimable allocation like GFP_HIGHUSER will consume
all the free pages.  Then finally order-0 atomic allocation may fail on
allocation.

This means watermark min is not protected against non-atomic allocation.
The order-0 atomic allocation with ALLOC_HARDER unwantedly can be failed.
Additionally the __GFP_MEMALLOC allocation with ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS also
can be failed.

To avoid the problem, zone_watermark_fast should consider highatomic
reserve.  If the actual size of high atomic free is counted accurately
like cma free, we may use it.  On this patch just use
nr_reserved_highatomic.  Additionally introduce
__zone_watermark_unusable_free to factor out common parts between
zone_watermark_fast and __zone_watermark_ok.

This is an example of ALLOC_HARDER allocation failure using v4.19 based
kernel.

 Binder:9343_3: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x480020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null)
 Call trace:
 [<ffffff8008f40f8c>] dump_stack+0xb8/0xf0
 [<ffffff8008223320>] warn_alloc+0xd8/0x12c
 [<ffffff80082245e4>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x120c/0x1250
 [<ffffff800827f6e8>] new_slab+0x128/0x604
 [<ffffff800827b0cc>] ___slab_alloc+0x508/0x670
 [<ffffff800827ba00>] __kmalloc+0x2f8/0x310
 [<ffffff80084ac3e0>] context_struct_to_string+0x104/0x1cc
 [<ffffff80084ad8fc>] security_sid_to_context_core+0x74/0x144
 [<ffffff80084ad880>] security_sid_to_context+0x10/0x18
 [<ffffff800849bd80>] selinux_secid_to_secctx+0x20/0x28
 [<ffffff800849109c>] security_secid_to_secctx+0x3c/0x70
 [<ffffff8008bfe118>] binder_transaction+0xe68/0x454c
 Mem-Info:
 active_anon:102061 inactive_anon:81551 isolated_anon:0
  active_file:59102 inactive_file:68924 isolated_file:64
  unevictable:611 dirty:63 writeback:0 unstable:0
  slab_reclaimable:13324 slab_unreclaimable:44354
  mapped:83015 shmem:4858 pagetables:26316 bounce:0
  free:2727 free_pcp:1035 free_cma:178
 Node 0 active_anon:408244kB inactive_anon:326204kB active_file:236408kB inactive_file:275696kB unevictable:2444kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):256kB mapped:332060kB dirty:252kB writeback:0kB shmem:19432kB writeback_tmp:0kB unstable:0kB all_unreclaimable? no
 Normal free:10908kB min:6192kB low:44388kB high:47060kB active_anon:409160kB inactive_anon:325924kB active_file:235820kB inactive_file:276628kB unevictable:2444kB writepending:252kB present:3076096kB managed:2673676kB mlocked:2444kB kernel_stack:62512kB pagetables:105264kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:4140kB local_pcp:40kB free_cma:712kB
 lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0
 Normal: 505*4kB (H) 357*8kB (H) 201*16kB (H) 65*32kB (H) 1*64kB (H) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 10236kB
 138826 total pagecache pages
 5460 pages in swap cache
 Swap cache stats: add 8273090, delete 8267506, find 1004381/4060142

This is an example of ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS allocation failure using v4.14
based kernel.

 kswapd0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x140000a(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_MOVABLE), nodemask=(null)
 kswapd0 cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0
 CPU: 4 PID: 1221 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 4.14.113-18770262-userdebug #1
 Call trace:
 [<0000000000000000>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x248
 [<0000000000000000>] show_stack+0x18/0x20
 [<0000000000000000>] __dump_stack+0x20/0x28
 [<0000000000000000>] dump_stack+0x68/0x90
 [<0000000000000000>] warn_alloc+0x104/0x198
 [<0000000000000000>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xdc0/0xdf0
 [<0000000000000000>] zs_malloc+0x148/0x3d0
 [<0000000000000000>] zram_bvec_rw+0x410/0x798
 [<0000000000000000>] zram_rw_page+0x88/0xdc
 [<0000000000000000>] bdev_write_page+0x70/0xbc
 [<0000000000000000>] __swap_writepage+0x58/0x37c
 [<0000000000000000>] swap_writepage+0x40/0x4c
 [<0000000000000000>] shrink_page_list+0xc30/0xf48
 [<0000000000000000>] shrink_inactive_list+0x2b0/0x61c
 [<0000000000000000>] shrink_node_memcg+0x23c/0x618
 [<0000000000000000>] shrink_node+0x1c8/0x304
 [<0000000000000000>] kswapd+0x680/0x7c4
 [<0000000000000000>] kthread+0x110/0x120
 [<0000000000000000>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
 Mem-Info:
 active_anon:111826 inactive_anon:65557 isolated_anon:0\x0a active_file:44260 inactive_file:83422 isolated_file:0\x0a unevictable:4158 dirty:117 writeback:0 unstable:0\x0a            slab_reclaimable:13943 slab_unreclaimable:43315\x0a mapped:102511 shmem:3299 pagetables:19566 bounce:0\x0a free:3510 free_pcp:553 free_cma:0
 Node 0 active_anon:447304kB inactive_anon:262228kB active_file:177040kB inactive_file:333688kB unevictable:16632kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB mapped:410044kB d irty:468kB writeback:0kB shmem:13196kB writeback_tmp:0kB unstable:0kB all_unreclaimable? no
 Normal free:14040kB min:7440kB low:94500kB high:98136kB reserved_highatomic:32768KB active_anon:447336kB inactive_anon:261668kB active_file:177572kB inactive_file:333768k           B unevictable:16632kB writepending:480kB present:4081664kB managed:3637088kB mlocked:16632kB kernel_stack:47072kB pagetables:78264kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:2280kB local_pcp:720kB free_cma:0kB        [ 4738.329607] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0
 Normal: 860*4kB (H) 453*8kB (H) 180*16kB (H) 26*32kB (H) 34*64kB (H) 6*128kB (H) 2*256kB (H) 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 14232kB

This is trace log which shows GFP_HIGHUSER consumes free pages right
before ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS.

  <...>-22275 [006] ....   889.213383: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000d2be5665 pfn=970744 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO
  <...>-22275 [006] ....   889.213385: mm_page_alloc: page=000000004b2335c2 pfn=970745 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO
  <...>-22275 [006] ....   889.213387: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000017272e1 pfn=970278 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO
  <...>-22275 [006] ....   889.213389: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000c4be79fb pfn=970279 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO
  <...>-22275 [006] ....   889.213391: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000f8a51d4f pfn=970260 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO
  <...>-22275 [006] ....   889.213393: mm_page_alloc: page=000000006ba8f5ac pfn=970261 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO
  <...>-22275 [006] ....   889.213395: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000819f1cd3 pfn=970196 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO
  <...>-22275 [006] ....   889.213396: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000f6b72a64 pfn=970197 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO
kswapd0-1207  [005] ...1   889.213398: mm_page_alloc: page= (null) pfn=0 order=0 migratetype=1 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_NOWAIT|__GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_MOVABLE

[jaewon31.kim@samsung.com: remove redundant code for high-order]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200623035242.27232-1-jaewon31.kim@samsung.comReported-by: NYong-Taek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com>
Suggested-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Yong-Taek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200619235958.11283-1-jaewon31.kim@samsung.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Conflicts:
    mm/page_alloc.c
[Peng Liu: cherry-pick from f27ce0e1]
Signed-off-by: NPeng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ntong tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      283a76a5
  11. 29 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 30 6月, 2021 1 次提交
    • Y
      mm, oom: reorganize the oom report in dump_header · 0201217c
      由 yuzhoujian 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-5.0-rc1
commit ef8444ea
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 51815, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I3IJ9I
CVE: NA

-------------------------------------------------
OOM report contains several sections.  The first one is the allocation
context that has triggered the OOM.  Then we have cpuset context followed
by the stack trace of the OOM path.  The tird one is the OOM memory
information.  Followed by the current memory state of all system tasks.
At last, we will show oom eligible tasks and the information about the
chosen oom victim.

One thing that makes parsing more awkward than necessary is that we do not
have a single and easily parsable line about the oom context.  This patch
is reorganizing the oom report to

1) who invoked oom and what was the allocation request

[  515.902945] tuned invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x6200ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE), order=0, oom_score_adj=0

2) OOM stack trace

[  515.904273] CPU: 24 PID: 1809 Comm: tuned Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3+ #3
[  515.905518] Hardware name: Inspur SA5212M4/YZMB-00370-107, BIOS 4.1.10 11/14/2016
[  515.906821] Call Trace:
[  515.908062]  dump_stack+0x5a/0x73
[  515.909311]  dump_header+0x55/0x28c
[  515.914260]  oom_kill_process+0x2d8/0x300
[  515.916708]  out_of_memory+0x145/0x4a0
[  515.917932]  __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x7d2/0xa16
[  515.919157]  __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x277/0x290
[  515.920367]  filemap_fault+0x3d0/0x6c0
[  515.921529]  ? filemap_map_pages+0x2b8/0x420
[  515.922709]  ext4_filemap_fault+0x2c/0x40 [ext4]
[  515.923884]  __do_fault+0x20/0x80
[  515.925032]  __handle_mm_fault+0xbc0/0xe80
[  515.926195]  handle_mm_fault+0xfa/0x210
[  515.927357]  __do_page_fault+0x233/0x4c0
[  515.928506]  do_page_fault+0x32/0x140
[  515.929646]  ? page_fault+0x8/0x30
[  515.930770]  page_fault+0x1e/0x30

3) OOM memory information

[  515.958093] Mem-Info:
[  515.959647] active_anon:26501758 inactive_anon:1179809 isolated_anon:0
 active_file:4402672 inactive_file:483963 isolated_file:1344
 unevictable:0 dirty:4886753 writeback:0 unstable:0
 slab_reclaimable:148442 slab_unreclaimable:18741
 mapped:1347 shmem:1347 pagetables:58669 bounce:0
 free:88663 free_pcp:0 free_cma:0
...

4) current memory state of all system tasks

[  516.079544] [    744]     0   744     9211     1345   114688       82             0 systemd-journal
[  516.082034] [    787]     0   787    31764        0   143360       92             0 lvmetad
[  516.084465] [    792]     0   792    10930        1   110592      208         -1000 systemd-udevd
[  516.086865] [   1199]     0  1199    13866        0   131072      112         -1000 auditd
[  516.089190] [   1222]     0  1222    31990        1   110592      157             0 smartd
[  516.091477] [   1225]     0  1225     4864       85    81920       43             0 irqbalance
[  516.093712] [   1226]     0  1226    52612        0   258048      426             0 abrtd
[  516.112128] [   1280]     0  1280   109774       55   299008      400             0 NetworkManager
[  516.113998] [   1295]     0  1295    28817       37    69632       24             0 ksmtuned
[  516.144596] [  10718]     0 10718  2622484  1721372 15998976   267219             0 panic
[  516.145792] [  10719]     0 10719  2622484  1164767  9818112    53576             0 panic
[  516.146977] [  10720]     0 10720  2622484  1174361  9904128    53709             0 panic
[  516.148163] [  10721]     0 10721  2622484  1209070 10194944    54824             0 panic
[  516.149329] [  10722]     0 10722  2622484  1745799 14774272    91138             0 panic

5) oom context (contrains and the chosen victim).

oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0-1,task=panic,pid=10737,uid=0

An admin can easily get the full oom context at a single line which
makes parsing much easier.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1542799799-36184-1-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Nyuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit ef8444ea)
Signed-off-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
(cherry picked from commit 985eab72d54b5ac73189d609486526b5e30125ac)
Signed-off-by: NLu Jialin <lujialin4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NJing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      0201217c
  15. 17 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  17. 22 2月, 2021 5 次提交
  19. 04 11月, 2020 2 次提交
  21. 15 10月, 2020 2 次提交
    • C
      mm, page_alloc: fix core hung in free_pcppages_bulk() · bd946649
      由 Charan Teja Reddy 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from linux-4.19.142
commit c666936d8d8b0ace4f3260d71a4eedefd53011d9

--------------------------------

commit 88e8ac11 upstream.

The following race is observed with the repeated online, offline and a
delay between two successive online of memory blocks of movable zone.

P1						P2

Online the first memory block in
the movable zone. The pcp struct
values are initialized to default
values,i.e., pcp->high = 0 &
pcp->batch = 1.

					Allocate the pages from the
					movable zone.

Try to Online the second memory
block in the movable zone thus it
entered the online_pages() but yet
to call zone_pcp_update().
					This process is entered into
					the exit path thus it tries
					to release the order-0 pages
					to pcp lists through
					free_unref_page_commit().
					As pcp->high = 0, pcp->count = 1
					proceed to call the function
					free_pcppages_bulk().
Update the pcp values thus the
new pcp values are like, say,
pcp->high = 378, pcp->batch = 63.
					Read the pcp's batch value using
					READ_ONCE() and pass the same to
					free_pcppages_bulk(), pcp values
					passed here are, batch = 63,
					count = 1.

					Since num of pages in the pcp
					lists are less than ->batch,
					then it will stuck in
					while(list_empty(list)) loop
					with interrupts disabled thus
					a core hung.

Avoid this by ensuring free_pcppages_bulk() is called with proper count of
pcp list pages.

The mentioned race is some what easily reproducible without [1] because
pcp's are not updated for the first memory block online and thus there is
a enough race window for P2 between alloc+free and pcp struct values
update through onlining of second memory block.

With [1], the race still exists but it is very narrow as we update the pcp
struct values for the first memory block online itself.

This is not limited to the movable zone, it could also happen in cases
with the normal zone (e.g., hotplug to a node that only has DMA memory, or
no other memory yet).

[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11696389/

Fixes: 5f8dcc21 ("page-allocator: split per-cpu list into one-list-per-migrate-type")
Signed-off-by: NCharan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [2.6+]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1597150703-19003-1-git-send-email-charante@codeaurora.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      bd946649
    • D
      mm: include CMA pages in lowmem_reserve at boot · c2a701de
      由 Doug Berger 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from linux-4.19.142
commit 84b8dc232afadf3aab425a104def45a1e7346a58

--------------------------------

commit e08d3fdf upstream.

The lowmem_reserve arrays provide a means of applying pressure against
allocations from lower zones that were targeted at higher zones.  Its
values are a function of the number of pages managed by higher zones and
are assigned by a call to the setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve() function.

The function is initially called at boot time by the function
init_per_zone_wmark_min() and may be called later by accesses of the
/proc/sys/vm/lowmem_reserve_ratio sysctl file.

The function init_per_zone_wmark_min() was moved up from a module_init to
a core_initcall to resolve a sequencing issue with khugepaged.
Unfortunately this created a sequencing issue with CMA page accounting.

The CMA pages are added to the managed page count of a zone when
cma_init_reserved_areas() is called at boot also as a core_initcall.  This
makes it uncertain whether the CMA pages will be added to the managed page
counts of their zones before or after the call to
init_per_zone_wmark_min() as it becomes dependent on link order.  With the
current link order the pages are added to the managed count after the
lowmem_reserve arrays are initialized at boot.

This means the lowmem_reserve values at boot may be lower than the values
used later if /proc/sys/vm/lowmem_reserve_ratio is accessed even if the
ratio values are unchanged.

In many cases the difference is not significant, but for example
an ARM platform with 1GB of memory and the following memory layout

  cma: Reserved 256 MiB at 0x0000000030000000
  Zone ranges:
    DMA      [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000002fffffff]
    Normal   empty
    HighMem  [mem 0x0000000030000000-0x000000003fffffff]

would result in 0 lowmem_reserve for the DMA zone.  This would allow
userspace to deplete the DMA zone easily.

Funnily enough

  $ cat /proc/sys/vm/lowmem_reserve_ratio

would fix up the situation because as a side effect it forces
setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve.

This commit breaks the link order dependency by invoking
init_per_zone_wmark_min() as a postcore_initcall so that the CMA pages
have the chance to be properly accounted in their zone(s) and allowing
the lowmem_reserve arrays to receive consistent values.

Fixes: bc22af74 ("mm: update min_free_kbytes from khugepaged after core initialization")
Signed-off-by: NDoug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1597423766-27849-1-git-send-email-opendmb@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      c2a701de
  23. 22 9月, 2020 6 次提交
    • P
      mm: initialize deferred pages with interrupts enabled · 46909518
      由 Pavel Tatashin 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from linux-4.19.129
commit 88afa532c14135528b905015f1d9a5e740a95136

--------------------------------

commit 3d060856 upstream.

Initializing struct pages is a long task and keeping interrupts disabled
for the duration of this operation introduces a number of problems.

1. jiffies are not updated for long period of time, and thus incorrect time
   is reported. See proposed solution and discussion here:
   lkml/20200311123848.118638-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com
2. It prevents farther improving deferred page initialization by allowing
   intra-node multi-threading.

We are keeping interrupts disabled to solve a rather theoretical problem
that was never observed in real world (See 3a2d7fa8).

Let's keep interrupts enabled. In case we ever encounter a scenario where
an interrupt thread wants to allocate large amount of memory this early in
boot we can deal with that by growing zone (see deferred_grow_zone()) by
the needed amount before starting deferred_init_memmap() threads.

Before:
[    1.232459] node 0 initialised, 12058412 pages in 1ms

After:
[    1.632580] node 0 initialised, 12051227 pages in 436ms

Fixes: 3a2d7fa8 ("mm: disable interrupts while initializing deferred pages")
Reported-by: NShile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Yiqian Wei <yiwei@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[4.17+]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200403140952.17177-3-pasha.tatashin@soleen.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      46909518
    • D
      mm/page_alloc: fix watchdog soft lockups during set_zone_contiguous() · 5cb82e40
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from linux-4.19.123
commit dfe810bd92be7a50f491abd381f5a742d9844675

--------------------------------

commit e84fe99b upstream.

Without CONFIG_PREEMPT, it can happen that we get soft lockups detected,
e.g., while booting up.

  watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [swapper/0:1]
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.6.0-next-20200331+ #4
  Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014
  RIP: __pageblock_pfn_to_page+0x134/0x1c0
  Call Trace:
   set_zone_contiguous+0x56/0x70
   page_alloc_init_late+0x166/0x176
   kernel_init_freeable+0xfa/0x255
   kernel_init+0xa/0x106
   ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

The issue becomes visible when having a lot of memory (e.g., 4TB)
assigned to a single NUMA node - a system that can easily be created
using QEMU.  Inside VMs on a hypervisor with quite some memory
overcommit, this is fairly easy to trigger.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Reviewed-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NShile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416073417.5003-1-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      5cb82e40
    • A
      mm: Use fixed constant in page_frag_alloc instead of size + 1 · 54d789ed
      由 Alexander Duyck 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from linux-4.19.116
commit 695986163d66a9f55daf13aba5976d4b03a23cc9

--------------------------------

commit 86447726 upstream.

This patch replaces the size + 1 value introduced with the recent fix for 1
byte allocs with a constant value.

The idea here is to reduce code overhead as the previous logic would have
to read size into a register, then increment it, and write it back to
whatever field was being used. By using a constant we can avoid those
memory reads and arithmetic operations in favor of just encoding the
maximum value into the operation itself.

Fixes: 2c2ade81 ("mm: page_alloc: fix ref bias in page_frag_alloc() for 1-byte allocs")
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      54d789ed
    • D
      mm/page_alloc.c: fix uninitialized memmaps on a partially populated last section · d0a3efd5
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from linux-4.19.103
commit 0a69047d8235c60d88c6ca488d8dccc7c60d4d3c

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit e822969c ]

Patch series "mm: fix max_pfn not falling on section boundary", v2.

Playing with different memory sizes for a x86-64 guest, I discovered that
some memmaps (highest section if max_mem does not fall on the section
boundary) are marked as being valid and online, but contain garbage.  We
have to properly initialize these memmaps.

Looking at /proc/kpageflags and friends, I found some more issues,
partially related to this.

This patch (of 3):

If max_pfn is not aligned to a section boundary, we can easily run into
BUGs.  This can e.g., be triggered on x86-64 under QEMU by specifying a
memory size that is not a multiple of 128MB (e.g., 4097MB, but also
4160MB).  I was told that on real HW, we can easily have this scenario
(esp., one of the main reasons sub-section hotadd of devmem was added).

The issue is, that we have a valid memmap (pfn_valid()) for the whole
section, and the whole section will be marked "online".
pfn_to_online_page() will succeed, but the memmap contains garbage.

E.g., doing a "./page-types -r -a 0x144001" when QEMU was started with "-m
4160M" - (see tools/vm/page-types.c):

[  200.476376] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffffe
[  200.477500] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[  200.478334] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[  200.479076] PGD 59614067 P4D 59614067 PUD 59616067 PMD 0
[  200.479557] Oops: 0000 [#4] SMP NOPTI
[  200.479875] CPU: 0 PID: 603 Comm: page-types Tainted: G      D W         5.5.0-rc1-next-20191209 #93
[  200.480646] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu4
[  200.481648] RIP: 0010:stable_page_flags+0x4d/0x410
[  200.482061] Code: f3 ff 41 89 c0 48 b8 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 45 84 c0 0f 85 cd 02 00 00 48 8b 53 08 48 8b 2b 48f
[  200.483644] RSP: 0018:ffffb139401cbe60 EFLAGS: 00010202
[  200.484091] RAX: fffffffffffffffe RBX: fffffbeec5100040 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  200.484697] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9535c7cd RDI: 0000000000000246
[  200.485313] RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[  200.485917] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000144001
[  200.486523] R13: 00007ffd6ba55f48 R14: 00007ffd6ba55f40 R15: ffffb139401cbf08
[  200.487130] FS:  00007f68df717580(0000) GS:ffff9ec77fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  200.487804] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  200.488295] CR2: fffffffffffffffe CR3: 0000000135d48000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[  200.488897] Call Trace:
[  200.489115]  kpageflags_read+0xe9/0x140
[  200.489447]  proc_reg_read+0x3c/0x60
[  200.489755]  vfs_read+0xc2/0x170
[  200.490037]  ksys_pread64+0x65/0xa0
[  200.490352]  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xa0
[  200.490665]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

But it can be triggered much easier via "cat /proc/kpageflags > /dev/null"
after cold/hot plugging a DIMM to such a system:

[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/kpageflags > /dev/null
[  111.517275] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffffe
[  111.517907] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[  111.518333] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[  111.518771] PGD a240e067 P4D a240e067 PUD a2410067 PMD 0

This patch fixes that by at least zero-ing out that memmap (so e.g.,
page_to_pfn() will not crash).  Commit 907ec5fc ("mm: zero remaining
unavailable struct pages") tried to fix a similar issue, but forgot to
consider this special case.

After this patch, there are still problems to solve.  E.g., not all of
these pages falling into a memory hole will actually get initialized later
and set PageReserved - they are only zeroed out - but at least the
immediate crashes are gone.  A follow-up patch will take care of this.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211163201.17179-2-david@redhat.com
Fixes: f7f99100 ("mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap")
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NDaniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Bob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[4.15+]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      d0a3efd5
    • P
      mm: return zero_resv_unavail optimization · 809dc9f5
      由 Pavel Tatashin 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from linux-4.19.103
commit f19a50c1e3ba9f58ca5a591a82ac4852da8bc4ee

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit ec393a0f ]

When checking for valid pfns in zero_resv_unavail(), it is not necessary
to verify that pfns within pageblock_nr_pages ranges are valid, only the
first one needs to be checked.  This is because memory for pages are
allocated in contiguous chunks that contain pageblock_nr_pages struct
pages.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002143821.5112-3-msys.mizuma@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NMasayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      809dc9f5
    • N
      mm: zero remaining unavailable struct pages · f8d9d8ce
      由 Naoya Horiguchi 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from linux-4.19.103
commit 9ac5917a1d28220981512c4f4c391c90a997e0c6

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 907ec5fc ]

Patch series "mm: Fix for movable_node boot option", v3.

This patch series contains a fix for the movable_node boot option issue
which was introduced by commit 124049de ("x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM
regions into memblock.reserved").

The commit breaks the option because it changed the memory gap range to
reserved memblock.  So, the node is marked as Normal zone even if the SRAT
has Hot pluggable affinity.

First and second patch fix the original issue which the commit tried to
fix, then revert the commit.

This patch (of 3):

There is a kernel panic that is triggered when reading /proc/kpageflags on
the kernel booted with kernel parameter 'memmap=nn[KMG]!ss[KMG]':

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffffe
  PGD 9b20e067 P4D 9b20e067 PUD 9b210067 PMD 0
  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
  CPU: 2 PID: 1728 Comm: page-types Not tainted 4.17.0-rc6-mm1-v4.17-rc6-180605-0816-00236-g2dfb086ef02c+ #160
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.fc28 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:stable_page_flags+0x27/0x3c0
  Code: 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 85 ff 0f 84 a0 03 00 00 41 54 55 49 89 fc 53 48 8b 57 08 48 8b 2f 48 8d 42 ff 83 e2 01 48 0f 44 c7 <48> 8b 00 f6 c4 01 0f 84 10 03 00 00 31 db 49 8b 54 24 08 4c 89 e7
  RSP: 0018:ffffbbd44111fde0 EFLAGS: 00010202
  RAX: fffffffffffffffe RBX: 00007fffffffeff9 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000202 RDI: ffffed1182fff5c0
  RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: ffffbbd44111fed8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffed1182fff5c0
  R13: 00000000000bffd7 R14: 0000000002fff5c0 R15: ffffbbd44111ff10
  FS:  00007efc4335a500(0000) GS:ffff93a5bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: fffffffffffffffe CR3: 00000000b2a58000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
  Call Trace:
   kpageflags_read+0xc7/0x120
   proc_reg_read+0x3c/0x60
   __vfs_read+0x36/0x170
   vfs_read+0x89/0x130
   ksys_pread64+0x71/0x90
   do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x7efc42e75e23
  Code: 09 00 ba 9f 01 00 00 e8 ab 81 f4 ff 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 83 3d 29 0a 2d 00 00 75 13 49 89 ca b8 11 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 34 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 db d3 01 00 48 89 04 24

According to kernel bisection, this problem became visible due to commit
f7f99100 which changes how struct pages are initialized.

Memblock layout affects the pfn ranges covered by node/zone.  Consider
that we have a VM with 2 NUMA nodes and each node has 4GB memory, and the
default (no memmap= given) memblock layout is like below:

  MEMBLOCK configuration:
   memory size = 0x00000001fff75c00 reserved size = 0x000000000300c000
   memory.cnt  = 0x4
   memory[0x0]     [0x0000000000001000-0x000000000009efff], 0x000000000009e000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
   memory[0x1]     [0x0000000000100000-0x00000000bffd6fff], 0x00000000bfed7000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
   memory[0x2]     [0x0000000100000000-0x000000013fffffff], 0x0000000040000000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
   memory[0x3]     [0x0000000140000000-0x000000023fffffff], 0x0000000100000000 bytes on node 1 flags: 0x0
   ...

If you give memmap=1G!4G (so it just covers memory[0x2]),
the range [0x100000000-0x13fffffff] is gone:

  MEMBLOCK configuration:
   memory size = 0x00000001bff75c00 reserved size = 0x000000000300c000
   memory.cnt  = 0x3
   memory[0x0]     [0x0000000000001000-0x000000000009efff], 0x000000000009e000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
   memory[0x1]     [0x0000000000100000-0x00000000bffd6fff], 0x00000000bfed7000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
   memory[0x2]     [0x0000000140000000-0x000000023fffffff], 0x0000000100000000 bytes on node 1 flags: 0x0
   ...

This causes shrinking node 0's pfn range because it is calculated by the
address range of memblock.memory.  So some of struct pages in the gap
range are left uninitialized.

We have a function zero_resv_unavail() which does zeroing the struct pages
outside memblock.memory, but currently it covers only the reserved
unavailable range (i.e.  memblock.memory && !memblock.reserved).  This
patch extends it to cover all unavailable range, which fixes the reported
issue.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002143821.5112-2-msys.mizuma@gmail.com
Fixes: f7f99100 ("mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap")
Signed-off-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by-by: NMasayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Tested-by: NMasayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      f8d9d8ce
  25. 06 8月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 27 12月, 2019 2 次提交