Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 23 8月, 2012 2 次提交
  3. 21 8月, 2012 4 次提交
  5. 27 6月, 2012 9 次提交
  7. 12 6月, 2012 2 次提交
    • J
      crypto: serpent - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation · 7efe4076
      由 Johannes Goetzfried 提交于 
      This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Serpent block
cipher. The implementation is very similar to the sse2 implementation and
processes eight blocks in parallel. Because of the new non-destructive three
operand syntax all move-instructions can be removed and therefore a little
performance increase is provided.

Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests.

Tcrypt benchmark results:

Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7)

serpent-avx-x86_64 vs. serpent-sse2-x86_64
128bit key:                                             (lrw:256bit)    (xts:256bit)
size    ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec
16B     1.03x   1.01x   1.01x   1.01x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.01x
64B     1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   0.99x   1.00x   1.01x   1.00x   1.00x
256B    1.05x   1.03x   1.00x   1.02x   1.05x   1.06x   1.05x   1.02x   1.05x   1.02x
1024B   1.05x   1.02x   1.00x   1.02x   1.05x   1.06x   1.05x   1.03x   1.05x   1.02x
8192B   1.05x   1.02x   1.00x   1.02x   1.06x   1.06x   1.04x   1.03x   1.04x   1.02x

256bit key:                                             (lrw:384bit)    (xts:512bit)
size    ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec
16B     1.01x   1.00x   1.01x   1.01x   1.00x   1.00x   0.99x   1.03x   1.01x   1.01x
64B     1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.00x   1.01x   1.00x   1.02x
256B    1.05x   1.02x   1.00x   1.02x   1.05x   1.02x   1.04x   1.05x   1.05x   1.02x
1024B   1.06x   1.02x   1.00x   1.02x   1.07x   1.06x   1.05x   1.04x   1.05x   1.02x
8192B   1.05x   1.02x   1.00x   1.02x   1.06x   1.06x   1.04x   1.05x   1.05x   1.02x

serpent-avx-x86_64 vs aes-asm (8kB block):
         128bit  256bit
ecb-enc  1.26x   1.73x
ecb-dec  1.20x   1.64x
cbc-enc  0.33x   0.45x
cbc-dec  1.24x   1.67x
ctr-enc  1.32x   1.76x
ctr-dec  1.32x   1.76x
lrw-enc  1.20x   1.60x
lrw-dec  1.15x   1.54x
xts-enc  1.22x   1.64x
xts-dec  1.17x   1.57x
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      7efe4076
    • J
      crypto: twofish - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation · 107778b5
      由 Johannes Goetzfried 提交于 
      This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Twofish block
cipher. The implementation processes eight blocks in parallel (two 4 block
chunk AVX operations). The table-lookups are done in general-purpose registers.
For small blocksizes the 3way-parallel functions from the twofish-x86_64-3way
module are called. A good performance increase is provided for blocksizes
greater or equal to 128B.

Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests.

Tcrypt benchmark results:

Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7)

twofish-avx-x86_64 vs. twofish-x86_64-3way
128bit key:                                             (lrw:256bit)    (xts:256bit)
size    ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec
16B     0.96x   0.97x   1.00x   0.95x   0.97x   0.97x   0.96x   0.95x   0.95x   0.98x
64B     0.99x   0.99x   1.00x   0.99x   0.98x   0.98x   0.99x   0.98x   0.99x   0.98x
256B    1.20x   1.21x   1.00x   1.19x   1.15x   1.14x   1.19x   1.20x   1.18x   1.19x
1024B   1.29x   1.30x   1.00x   1.28x   1.23x   1.24x   1.26x   1.28x   1.26x   1.27x
8192B   1.31x   1.32x   1.00x   1.31x   1.25x   1.25x   1.28x   1.29x   1.28x   1.30x

256bit key:                                             (lrw:384bit)    (xts:512bit)
size    ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec
16B     0.96x   0.96x   1.00x   0.96x   0.97x   0.98x   0.95x   0.95x   0.95x   0.96x
64B     1.00x   0.99x   1.00x   0.98x   0.98x   1.01x   0.98x   0.98x   0.98x   0.98x
256B    1.20x   1.21x   1.00x   1.21x   1.15x   1.15x   1.19x   1.20x   1.18x   1.19x
1024B   1.29x   1.30x   1.00x   1.28x   1.23x   1.23x   1.26x   1.27x   1.26x   1.27x
8192B   1.31x   1.33x   1.00x   1.31x   1.26x   1.26x   1.29x   1.29x   1.28x   1.30x

twofish-avx-x86_64 vs aes-asm (8kB block):
         128bit  256bit
ecb-enc  1.19x   1.63x
ecb-dec  1.18x   1.62x
cbc-enc  0.75x   1.03x
cbc-dec  1.23x   1.67x
ctr-enc  1.24x   1.65x
ctr-dec  1.24x   1.65x
lrw-enc  1.15x   1.53x
lrw-dec  1.14x   1.52x
xts-enc  1.16x   1.56x
xts-dec  1.16x   1.56x
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      107778b5
  9. 10 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 24 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 14 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      crypto: camellia - add assembler implementation for x86_64 · 0b95ec56
      由 Jussi Kivilinna 提交于 
      Patch adds x86_64 assembler implementation of Camellia block cipher. Two set of
functions are provided. First set is regular 'one-block at time' encrypt/decrypt
functions. Second is 'two-block at time' functions that gain performance increase
on out-of-order CPUs. Performance of 2-way functions should be equal to 1-way
functions with in-order CPUs.

Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests.

Tcrypt benchmark results:

AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10):

camellia-asm vs camellia_generic:
128bit key:                                             (lrw:256bit)    (xts:256bit)
size    ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec
16B     1.27x   1.22x   1.30x   1.42x   1.30x   1.34x   1.19x   1.05x   1.23x   1.24x
64B     1.74x   1.79x   1.43x   1.87x   1.81x   1.87x   1.48x   1.38x   1.55x   1.62x
256B    1.90x   1.87x   1.43x   1.94x   1.94x   1.95x   1.63x   1.62x   1.67x   1.70x
1024B   1.96x   1.93x   1.43x   1.95x   1.98x   2.01x   1.67x   1.69x   1.74x   1.80x
8192B   1.96x   1.96x   1.39x   1.93x   2.01x   2.03x   1.72x   1.64x   1.71x   1.76x

256bit key:                                             (lrw:384bit)    (xts:512bit)
size    ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec
16B     1.23x   1.23x   1.33x   1.39x   1.34x   1.38x   1.04x   1.18x   1.21x   1.29x
64B     1.72x   1.69x   1.42x   1.78x   1.81x   1.89x   1.57x   1.52x   1.56x   1.65x
256B    1.85x   1.88x   1.42x   1.86x   1.93x   1.96x   1.69x   1.65x   1.70x   1.75x
1024B   1.88x   1.86x   1.45x   1.95x   1.96x   1.95x   1.77x   1.71x   1.77x   1.78x
8192B   1.91x   1.86x   1.42x   1.91x   2.03x   1.98x   1.73x   1.71x   1.78x   1.76x

camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block):
         128bit  256bit
ecb-enc  1.15x   1.22x
ecb-dec  1.16x   1.16x
cbc-enc  0.85x   0.90x
cbc-dec  1.20x   1.23x
ctr-enc  1.28x   1.30x
ctr-dec  1.27x   1.28x
lrw-enc  1.12x   1.16x
lrw-dec  1.08x   1.10x
xts-enc  1.11x   1.15x
xts-dec  1.14x   1.15x

Intel Core2 T8100 (fam:6, model:23, step:6):

camellia-asm vs camellia_generic:
128bit key:                                             (lrw:256bit)    (xts:256bit)
size    ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec
16B     1.10x   1.12x   1.14x   1.16x   1.16x   1.15x   1.02x   1.02x   1.08x   1.08x
64B     1.61x   1.60x   1.17x   1.68x   1.67x   1.66x   1.43x   1.42x   1.44x   1.42x
256B    1.65x   1.73x   1.17x   1.77x   1.81x   1.80x   1.54x   1.53x   1.58x   1.54x
1024B   1.76x   1.74x   1.18x   1.80x   1.85x   1.85x   1.60x   1.59x   1.65x   1.60x
8192B   1.77x   1.75x   1.19x   1.81x   1.85x   1.86x   1.63x   1.61x   1.66x   1.62x

256bit key:                                             (lrw:384bit)    (xts:512bit)
size    ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec
16B     1.10x   1.07x   1.13x   1.16x   1.11x   1.16x   1.03x   1.02x   1.08x   1.07x
64B     1.61x   1.62x   1.15x   1.66x   1.63x   1.68x   1.47x   1.46x   1.47x   1.44x
256B    1.71x   1.70x   1.16x   1.75x   1.69x   1.79x   1.58x   1.57x   1.59x   1.55x
1024B   1.78x   1.72x   1.17x   1.75x   1.80x   1.80x   1.63x   1.62x   1.65x   1.62x
8192B   1.76x   1.73x   1.17x   1.78x   1.80x   1.81x   1.64x   1.62x   1.68x   1.64x

camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block):
         128bit  256bit
ecb-enc  1.17x   1.21x
ecb-dec  1.17x   1.20x
cbc-enc  0.80x   0.82x
cbc-dec  1.22x   1.24x
ctr-enc  1.25x   1.26x
ctr-dec  1.25x   1.26x
lrw-enc  1.14x   1.18x
lrw-dec  1.13x   1.17x
xts-enc  1.14x   1.18x
xts-dec  1.14x   1.17x
Signed-off-by: NJussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      0b95ec56
  15. 20 12月, 2011 5 次提交
  17. 30 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 21 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  21. 14 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 09 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  25. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 26 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  29. 21 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  31. 22 9月, 2011 2 次提交
  33. 10 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      crypto: sha1 - SSSE3 based SHA1 implementation for x86-64 · 66be8951
      由 Mathias Krause 提交于 
      This is an assembler implementation of the SHA1 algorithm using the
Supplemental SSE3 (SSSE3) instructions or, when available, the
Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX).

Testing with the tcrypt module shows the raw hash performance is up to
2.3 times faster than the C implementation, using 8k data blocks on a
Core 2 Duo T5500. For the smalest data set (16 byte) it is still 25%
faster.

Since this implementation uses SSE/YMM registers it cannot safely be
used in every situation, e.g. while an IRQ interrupts a kernel thread.
The implementation falls back to the generic SHA1 variant, if using
the SSE/YMM registers is not possible.

With this algorithm I was able to increase the throughput of a single
IPsec link from 344 Mbit/s to 464 Mbit/s on a Core 2 Quad CPU using
the SSSE3 variant -- a speedup of +34.8%.

Saving and restoring SSE/YMM state might make the actual throughput
fluctuate when there are FPU intensive userland applications running.
For example, meassuring the performance using iperf2 directly on the
machine under test gives wobbling numbers because iperf2 uses the FPU
for each packet to check if the reporting interval has expired (in the
above test I got min/max/avg: 402/484/464 MBit/s).

Using this algorithm on a IPsec gateway gives much more reasonable and
stable numbers, albeit not as high as in the directly connected case.
Here is the result from an RFC 2544 test run with a EXFO Packet Blazer
FTB-8510:

 frame size    sha1-generic     sha1-ssse3    delta
    64 byte     37.5 MBit/s    37.5 MBit/s     0.0%
   128 byte     56.3 MBit/s    62.5 MBit/s   +11.0%
   256 byte     87.5 MBit/s   100.0 MBit/s   +14.3%
   512 byte    131.3 MBit/s   150.0 MBit/s   +14.2%
  1024 byte    162.5 MBit/s   193.8 MBit/s   +19.3%
  1280 byte    175.0 MBit/s   212.5 MBit/s   +21.4%
  1420 byte    175.0 MBit/s   218.7 MBit/s   +25.0%
  1518 byte    150.0 MBit/s   181.2 MBit/s   +20.8%

The throughput for the largest frame size is lower than for the
previous size because the IP packets need to be fragmented in this
case to make there way through the IPsec tunnel.
Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Maxim Locktyukhin <maxim.locktyukhin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      66be8951
  35. 11 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  37. 30 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  39. 16 5月, 2011 1 次提交