- 09 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Prepare to allow the execlists submission to be run from underneath a hardirq timer context (and not just the current softirq context) as is required for fast preemption resets and context switches. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180508210318.10274-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 08 5月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Auld 提交于
Add some onion to populate_lr_context. v2: prefer err_unpin_ctx drop the fixes tag, worst case we just spew a warn before everything is cleaned up and balance is restored Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180301114639.510-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
When rescheduling a change of dependencies, they all need to be added to the same priolist (at least the ones on the same engine!). Since we likely want to move a batch of requests, keep the priolist around. v2: Throw in an assert to catch trivial errors quickly. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180508003046.2633-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
lookup_priolist() no longer attaches the request into the priolist, it just returns the priolist for the given priority instead. Drop the unused parameter. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180508003046.2633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 04 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Limit the arbitration (where preemption may occur) to inside the batch, and prevent it from happening on the pipecontrols/flushes we use to write the breadcrumb seqno. Once the user batch is complete, we have nothing left to do but serialise and emit the breadcrumb; switching contexts at this point is futile so don't. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195416.22498-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 03 5月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Move the tracepoint into the common execlists_context_schedule_out() and call it from preemption completion as well. A small bit of refactoring code should help with when tracing, or else we end up with requests mysteriously disappearing and some being emitted to HW multiple times. Reported-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502230202.6848-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We need to move to a more flexible timeline that doesn't assume one fence context per engine, and so allow for a single timeline to be used across a combination of engines. This means that preallocating a fence context per engine is now a hindrance, and so we want to introduce the singular timeline. From the code perspective, this has the notable advantage of clearing up a lot of mirky semantics and some clumsy pointer chasing. By splitting the timeline up into a single entity rather than an array of per-engine timelines, we can realise the goal of the previous patch of tracking the timeline alongside the ring. v2: Tweak wait_for_idle to stop the compiling thinking that ret may be uninitialised. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502163839.3248-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In the future, we want to move a request between engines. To achieve this, we first realise that we have two timelines in effect here. The first runs through the GTT is required for ordering vma access, which is tracked currently by engine. The second is implied by sequential execution of commands inside the ringbuffer. This timeline is one that maps to userspace's expectations when submitting requests (i.e. given the same context, batch A is executed before batch B). As the rings's timelines map to userspace and the GTT timeline an implementation detail, move the timeline from the GTT into the ring itself (per-context in logical-ring-contexts/execlists, or a global per-engine timeline for the shared ringbuffers in legacy submission. The two timelines are still assumed to be equivalent at the moment (no migrating requests between engines yet) and so we can simply move from one to the other without adding extra ordering. v2: Reinforce that one isn't allowed to mix the engine execution timeline with the client timeline from userspace (on the ring). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502163839.3248-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 02 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Due to the latency of the tasklet running from ksoftirqd, by the time we process the execlist dequeue may be a long time behind the GPU. If the request was completed when we ran reschedule, we will not have tweaked its priority, but if it is still listed as being in-flight for dequeue we will use it as a reference for the rest of the queue, including requests from its own context which will now be at higher priority. This can cause us to issue a preempt-to-idle request, even though the request we want to preempt is already complete. Reported-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180501122131.19435-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
-
- 30 4月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Make life easier in upcoming patches by moving the context_pin and context_unpin vfuncs into inline helpers. v2: Fixup mock_engine to mark the context as pinned on use. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180430131503.5375-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Previously, we just reset the ring register in the context image such that we could skip over the broken batch and emit the closing breadcrumb. However, on resume the context image and GPU state would be reloaded, which may have been left in an inconsistent state by the reset. The presumption was that at worst it would just cause another reset and skip again until it recovered, however it seems just as likely to cause an unrecoverable hang. Instead of risking loading an incomplete context image, restore it back to the default state. v2: Fix up off-by-one from including the ppHSWP in with the register state. v3: Use a ring local to compact a few lines. v4: Beware setting the ring local before checking for a NULL request. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105304Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> #v2 Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180428111532.15819-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 25 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oscar Mateo 提交于
Interrupt handling in Gen11 is quite different from previous platforms. v2: Rebased (Michel) v3: Rebased with wiggle v4: Rebased, remove TODO warning correctly (Daniele) v5: Rebased, made gen11_gtiir const while at it (Michel) v6: Rebased v7: Adapt to the style currently in upstream Suggested-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1524605995-22324-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
-
- 19 4月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Today we only want to pass along the priority to engine->schedule(), but in the future we want to have much more control over the various aspects of the GPU during a context's execution, for example controlling the frequency allowed. As we need an ever growing number of parameters for scheduling, move those into a struct for convenience. v2: Move the anonymous struct into its own function for legibility and ye olde gcc. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Having moved the priotree struct into i915_scheduler.h, identify it as the scheduling element and rebrand into i915_sched. This becomes more useful as we start attaching more information we require to propagate through the scheduler. v2: Use i915_sched_node for future distinctiveness Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 15 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Add a selftest to ensure that we restore the whitelisted registers after rewrite the registers everytime they might be scrubbed, e.g. module load, reset and resume. For the other volatile workaround registers, we export their presence via debugfs and check in igt/gem_workarounds. However, we don't export the whitelist and rather than do so, let's test them directly in the kernel. The test we use is to read the registers back from the CS (this helps us be sure that the registers will be valid for MI_LRI etc). In order to generate the expected list, we split intel_whitelist_workarounds_emit into two phases, the first to build the list and the second to apply. Inside the test, we only build the list and then check that list against the hw. v2: Filter out pre-gen8 as they do not have RING_NONPRIV. v3: Drop unused engine parameter, no plans to use it now or future. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180414122754.569-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 12 4月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Oscar Mateo 提交于
There are different kind of workarounds (those that modify registers that live in the context image, those that modify global registers, those that whitelist registers, etc...) and they have different requirements in terms of where they are applied and how. Also, by splitting them apart, it should be easier to decide where a new workaround should go. v2: - Add multiple MISSING_CASE - Rebased v3: - Rename mmio_workarounds to gt_workarounds (Chris, Mika) - Create empty placeholders for BDW and CHV GT WAs - Rebased v4: Rebased v5: - Rebased - FORCE_TO_NONPRIV register exists since BDW, so make a path for it to achieve universality, even if empty (Chris) Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [ickle: appease checkpatch] Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1523376767-18480-2-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
-
由 Oscar Mateo 提交于
This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment, we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied (incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal with it later. v2: Use intel_ prefix for code that deals with the hardware (Chris) v3: Rebased v4: - Rebased - New license header v5: - Rebased - Added some organisational notes to the file (Chris) v6: Include DOC section in the documentation build (Jani) Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [ickle: appease checkpatch, mostly] Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1523376767-18480-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We can refine our current execlists->queue_priority if we inspect ELSP[1] rather than the head of the unsubmitted queue. Currently, we use the unsubmitted queue and say that if a subsequent request is more important than the current queue, we will rerun the submission tasklet to evaluate the need for preemption. However, we only want to preempt if we need to jump ahead of a currently executing request in ELSP. The second reason for running the submission tasklet is amalgamate requests into the active context on ELSP[0] to avoid a stall when ELSP[0] drains. (Though repeatedly amalgamating requests into the active context and triggering many lite-restore is off question gain, the goal really is to put a context into ELSP[1] to cover the interrupt.) So if instead of looking at the head of the queue, we look at the context in ELSP[1] we can answer both of the questions more accurately -- we don't need to rerun the submission tasklet unless our new request is important enough to feed into, at least, ELSP[1]. v2: Add some comments from the discussion with Tvrtko. v3: More commentary to cross-reference queue_request() References: f6322edd ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180411103929.27374-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 09 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
Include fence context and seqno in low level tracing so it is easier to follow flows of individual requests when things go bad. Also added tracing on the reset side of things. v2: Chris Wilson: * Standardize global_seqno and seqno as global. * Include current hws seqno in execlists_cancel_port_requests. v3: * Fix port printk format for all builds. Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v2 Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406123514.5809-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
-
- 05 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Before adding a new feature to execlists submission, we should endeavour to cover the baseline behaviour with selftests. So start the ball rolling. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180404093329.5383-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 04 4月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue (preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set even though the system is now idle. We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests() as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared. Fixes: f6322edd ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180324125829.27026-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit eed7ec52) Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Let's avoid having to delve down the pointer chain to see if the i915 device has support for preemption and store that on the engine, which made the decision in the first place! v2: Refactor common preemption policy between execlists/guc. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180403183537.5522-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 03 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We would like to start doing some bookkeeping at the beginning, between contexts and at the end of execlists submission. We already mark the beginning and end using EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER, to provide an indication when the HW is idle. This give us a pair of sequence points we can then expand on for further bookkeeping. v2: Refactor guc submission to share the same begin/end. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> Reviewed-by: NFrancisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180331130626.10712-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 29 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
When we include a request's global_seqno in a GEM_TRACE it often helps to know how that relates to the current breadcrumb as seen by the hardware. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180327210157.16896-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Tvrtko uncovered a fun issue with recovering from a wedge device. In his tests, he wedged the driver by injecting an unrecoverable hang whilst a batch was spinning. As we reset the gpu in the middle of the spinner, when resumed it would continue on from the next instruction in the ring and write it's breadcrumb. However, on wedging we updated our bookkeeping to indicate that the GPU had completed executing and would restart from after the breadcrumb; so the emission of the stale breadcrumb from before the reset came as a bit of a surprise. A simple fix is to when rebinding the context into the GPU, we update the ring register state in the context image to match our bookkeeping. We already have to update the RING_START and RING_TAIL, so updating RING_HEAD as well is trivial. This works because whenever we unbind the context, we keep the bookkeeping in check; and on wedging we unbind all contexts. Testcase: igt/gem_eio Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180327210136.16750-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukTested-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
If the request is still waiting on external fences, it has not yet been submitted to the HW queue and so we can forgo kicking the submission tasklet when re-evaluating its priority. This should have no impact other than reducing the number of tasklet wakeups under signal heavy workloads (e.g. switching between engines). v2: Use prebaked container_of() References: f6322edd ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180326115044.2505-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue (preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set even though the system is now idle. We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests() as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared. Fixes: f6322edd ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180324125829.27026-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We were relying on the uncached reads when processing the CSB to provide ourselves with the serialisation with the interrupt handler (so we could detect new interrupts in the middle of processing the old one). However, in commit 767a983a ("drm/i915/execlists: Read the context-status HEAD from the HWSP") those uncached reads were eliminated (on one path at least) and along with them our serialisation. The result is that we would very rarely miss notification of a new interrupt and leave a context-switch unprocessed, hanging the GPU. Fixes: 767a983a ("drm/i915/execlists: Read the context-status HEAD from the HWSP") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180321091027.21034-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 9153e6b7) Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
-
- 24 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Commit 0f36a85c ("drm/i915: Flush pending interrupt following a GPU reset") got confused and only applied the flush to the set-wedge path (which itself is proving troublesome), but we also need the serialisation on the regular reset path. Oops. Move the interrupt into reset_irq() and make it common to the reset and final set-wedge. v2: reset_irq() after port cancellation, as we assert that execlists->active is sane for cancellation (and is being reset by reset_irq). References: 0f36a85c ("drm/i915: Flush pending interrupt following a GPU reset") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180323101824.14645-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 23 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
After resetting the GPU (or subset of engines), call synchronize_irq() to flush any pending irq before proceeding with the cleanup. For a device level reset, we disable the interupts around the reset, but when resetting just one engine, we have to avoid such global disabling. This leaves us open to an interrupt arriving for the engine as we try to reset it. We already do try to flush the IIR following the reset, but we have to ensure that the in-flight interrupt does not land after we start cleaning up after the reset; enter synchronize_irq(). As it current stands, we very rarely, but fatally, see sequences such as: 2.... 57964564us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0 2.... 57964613us : execlists_reset: rcs0 seqno=424 0d.h1 57964615us : gen8_cs_irq_handler: rcs0 CS active=1 2d..1 57964617us : __i915_request_unsubmit: rcs0 fence 29:1056 <- global_seqno 1060 2.... 57964703us : execlists_reset_finish: rcs0 0..s. 57964705us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=0, irq-posted?=1 v2: Move the sync into the execlists reset handler so that we coordinate the flush with disabling the interrupt handling and canceling the pending interrupt. v3: Just use synchronize_hardirq() to avoid the might_sleep(), we do not yet have threaded-irq to worry about. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322073533.5313-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We were relying on the uncached reads when processing the CSB to provide ourselves with the serialisation with the interrupt handler (so we could detect new interrupts in the middle of processing the old one). However, in commit 767a983a ("drm/i915/execlists: Read the context-status HEAD from the HWSP") those uncached reads were eliminated (on one path at least) and along with them our serialisation. The result is that we would very rarely miss notification of a new interrupt and leave a context-switch unprocessed, hanging the GPU. Fixes: 767a983a ("drm/i915/execlists: Read the context-status HEAD from the HWSP") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180321091027.21034-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 15 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
The only usage outside the intel_lrc.c file is in the ringbuffer init, but the irq mask calculated there is then overwritten for all engines that have a non-zero shift, so we can drop it. This change is not aimed at code saving but at removing from intel_engines information that does not apply to all gens that have the engine. When checking without the temporary WARN_ON, code size is basically unchanged. v2: make the irq_shifts array static const v3: rebase, move irq_shifts array to logical_ring_default_irqs v4: move array inside the if and use u8 for it (Chris) Suggested-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180314182653.26981-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
The "reset" value and the "keep" value are the same. While we are here, add a TODO for gen11 interrupt reset Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180314182653.26981-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 08 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Weinan Li 提交于
There is one corner case missing schedule out notification of the preempted request. The preempted request is just completed when preemption happen, then it will be canceled and won't be resubmitted later, GVT-g will lost the schedule out notification. Here add schedule out notification if found the preempted request has been completed. v2: - refine description, add completed check and notification in execlists_cancel_port_requests. (Chris) v3: - use ternary confitional, remove local variable. (Tvrtko) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NWeinan Li <weinan.z.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NZhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520302557-25079-1-git-send-email-weinan.z.li@intel.com
-
由 Lionel Landwerlin 提交于
Up to now, subslice mask was assumed to be uniform across slices. But starting with Cannonlake, slices can be asymmetric (for example slice0 has different number of subslices as slice1+). This change stores all subslices masks for all slices rather than having a single mask that applies to all slices. v2: Rework how we store total numbers in sseu_dev_info (Tvrtko) Fix CHV eu masks, was reading disabled as enabled (Tvrtko) Readability changes (Tvrtko) Add EU index helper (Tvrtko) v3: Turn ALIGN(v, 8) / 8 into DIV_ROUND_UP(v, BITS_PER_BYTE) (Tvrtko) Reuse sseu_eu_idx() for setting eu_mask on CHV (Tvrtko) Reformat debug prints for subslices (Tvrtko) v4: Change eu_mask helper into sseu_set_eus() (Tvrtko) v5: With Haswell reporting masks & counts, bump sseu_*_eus() functions to use u16 (Lionel) v6: Fix sseu_get_eus() for > 8 EUs per subslice (Lionel) v7: Change debugfs enabels for number of subslices per slice, will need a small igt/pm_sseu change (Lionel) Drop subslice_total field from sseu_dev_info, rely on sseu_subslice_total() to recompute the value instead (Lionel) v8: Remove unused function compute_subslice_total() (Lionel) Signed-off-by: NLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306122857.27317-2-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com
-
- 07 3月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
v2: rebased to intel_lr_indirect_ctx_offset v3: rebase, move define to intel_lrc_reg.h BSpec: 11740 Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-5-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Thomas Daniel 提交于
Enhanced Execlists is an upgraded version of execlists which supports up to 8 ports. The lrcs to be submitted are written to a submit queue (the ExecLists Submission Queue - ELSQ), which is then loaded on the HW. When writing to the ELSP register, the lrcs are written cyclically in the queue from position 0 to position 7. Alternatively, it is possible to write directly in the individual positions of the queue using the ELSQC registers. To be able to re-use all the existing code we're using the latter method and we're currently limiting ourself to only using 2 elements. v2: Rebase. v3: Switch from !IS_GEN11 to GEN < 11 (Daniele Ceraolo Spurio). v4: Use the elsq registers instead of elsp. (Daniele Ceraolo Spurio) v5: Reword commit, rename regs to be closer to specs, turn off preemption (Daniele), reuse engine->execlists.elsp (Chris) v6: use has_logical_ring_elsq to differentiate the new paths v7: add preemption support, rename els to submit_reg (Chris) v8: save the ctrl register inside the execlists struct, drop CSB handling updates (superseded by preempt_complete_status) (Chris) v9: s/drm_i915_gem_request/i915_request (Mika) v10: resolved conflict in inject_preempt_context (Mika) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-4-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
Starting from Gen11 the context descriptor format has been updated in the HW. The hw_id field has been considerably reduced in size and engine class and instance fields have been added. There is a slight name clashing issue because the field that we call hw_id is actually called SW Context ID in the specs for Gen11+. With the current size of the hw_id field we can have a maximum of 2k contexts at any time, but we could use the sw_counter field (which is sw defined) to increase that because the HW requirement is that engine_id + sw id + sw_counter is a unique number. GuC uses a similar method to support more contexts but does its tracking at lrc level. To avoid doing an implementation that will need to be reworked once GuC support lands, defer it for now and mark it as TODO. v2: rebased, add documentation, fix GEN11_ENGINE_INSTANCE_SHIFT v3: rebased, bring back lost code from i915_gem_context.c v4: make TODO comment more generic v5: be consistent with bit ordering, add extra checks (Chris) Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-3-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
After staring hard at sequences like [ 28.199013] systemd-1 2..s. 26062228us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=0 [0?], tail=1 [1?] [ 28.199095] systemd-1 2..s. 26062229us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x00000018:0x00000000, active=0x1 [ 28.199177] systemd-1 2..s. 26062230us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.1, seqno=3, prio=-1024 [ 28.199258] systemd-1 2..s. 26062231us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 completed ctx=0 [ 28.199340] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26066853us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.1, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199421] <idle>-0 2..s. 26066863us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=1 [1?], tail=2 [2?] [ 28.199503] <idle>-0 2..s. 26066865us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1 [ 28.199585] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067077us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[1]: ctx=3.1, seqno=2, prio=0 [ 28.199667] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067078us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199749] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=2 [2?], tail=3 [3?] [ 28.199830] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067085us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[3]: status=0x00008002:0x00000001, active=0x1 [ 28.199912] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067086us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199994] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=3 [3?], tail=4 [4?] [ 28.200096] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246088us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000014:0x00000001, active=0x5 [ 28.200178] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246089us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.0, seqno=0, prio=0 [ 28.200260] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246127us : execlists_submission_tasklet: execlists_submission_tasklet:886 GEM_BUG_ON(buf[2 * head + 1] != port->context_id) the conclusion is that the only place where the ports are reset to zero, is from engine->cancel_requests called during i915_gem_set_wedged(). The race is horrible as it results from calling set-wedged on active HW (the GPU reset failed) and as such we need to be careful as the HW state changes beneath us. Fortunately, it's the same scary conditions as affect normal reset, so we can reuse the same machinery to disable state tracking as we clobber it. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104945Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Fixes: af7a8ffa ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged") Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302113324.23189-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 963ddd63) Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
On Gen11 interrupt masks need to be clear to allow C6 entry. We keep them all enabled knowing that we generate extra interrupts. v2: Rebase. v3: Remove gen 11 extra check in logical_render_ring_init. v4: Rebase fixes. v5: Rebase/refactor. v6: Rebase. v7: Rebase. v8: Update comment and commit message (Daniele) Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-