- 15 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Archit Taneja 提交于
Partial update suppport was removed from DISPC and DSI sometime back. The RFBI driver still tries to support partial update without the underlying support in DISPC. Remove partial update support from RFBI, only support updates which span acros the whole panel size. This also helps in DSI and RFBI having similar update ops. Signed-off-by: NArchit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
-
- 29 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Archit Taneja 提交于
Remove OMAP_DSS_LCD_TFT as a omap_panel_config flag. We don't support passive matrix displays any more. Remove this flag from all the panel drivers. Force the display_type to OMAP_DSS_LCD_DISPLAY_TFT in the interface drivers. Signed-off-by: NArchit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
-
- 23 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Grazvydas Ignotas 提交于
With this we can eliminate some duplicate code in panel drivers. Also lgphilips-lb035q02, nec-nl8048hl11-01b, picodlp and tpo-td043mtea1 gain support of reading timings over sysfs. Signed-off-by: NGrazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lars-Peter Clausen 提交于
In ancient times it was necessary to manually initialize the bus field of an spi_driver to spi_bus_type. These days this is done in spi_driver_register(), so we can drop the manual assignment. The patch was generated using the following coccinelle semantic patch: // <smpl> @@ identifier _driver; @@ struct spi_driver _driver = { .driver = { - .bus = &spi_bus_type, }, }; // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NLars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> Acked-by: NTomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NFlorian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
-
- 30 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tomi Valkeinen 提交于
This is a driver for N800's display, ported from the old omapfb. This is a slightly lighter version of the driver as not all features of the old driver can be ported without big changes to DSS2, and also because some of the HW features used in the old driver are unclear (e.g. the power management part). That said, the new driver works fine for basic use. Architecturally the driver is not as neat as it could be. N800's display HW consists of a display buffer chip and a panel, and ideally they would be represented by separate, independent drivers. This is not currently possible, and this driver contains both buffer chip and panel driver. Signed-off-by: NTomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
-