Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 7月, 2019 3 次提交
  3. 05 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 24 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 21 6月, 2019 5 次提交
  9. 17 6月, 2019 9 次提交
  11. 03 6月, 2019 6 次提交
    • E
      s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes · 9b6e57e5
      由 Eric Farman 提交于 
      If the CCW being processed is a No-Operation, then by definition no
data is being transferred.  Let's fold those checks into the normal
CCW processors, rather than skipping out early.

Likewise, if the CCW being processed is a "test" (a category defined
here as an opcode that contains zero in the lowest four bits) then no
special processing is necessary as far as vfio-ccw is concerned.
These command codes have not been valid since the S/370 days, meaning
they are invalid in the same way as one that ends in an eight [1] or
an otherwise valid command code that is undefined for the device type
in question.  Considering that, let's just process "test" CCWs like
any other CCW, and send everything to the hardware.

[1] POPS states that a x08 is a TIC CCW, and that having any high-order
bits enabled is invalid for format-1 CCWs.  For format-0 CCWs, the
high-order bits are ignored.
Signed-off-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190516161403.79053-4-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NFarhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      9b6e57e5
    • E
      s390/cio: Allow zero-length CCWs in vfio-ccw · 453eac31
      由 Eric Farman 提交于 
      It is possible that a guest might issue a CCW with a length of zero,
and will expect a particular response.  Consider this chain:

   Address   Format-1 CCW
   --------  -----------------
 0 33110EC0  346022CC 33177468
 1 33110EC8  CF200000 3318300C

CCW[0] moves a little more than two pages, but also has the
Suppress Length Indication (SLI) bit set to handle the expectation
that considerably less data will be moved.  CCW[1] also has the SLI
bit set, and has a length of zero.  Once vfio-ccw does its magic,
the kernel issues a start subchannel on behalf of the guest with this:

   Address   Format-1 CCW
   --------  -----------------
 0 021EDED0  346422CC 021F0000
 1 021EDED8  CF240000 3318300C

Both CCWs were converted to an IDAL and have the corresponding flags
set (which is by design), but only the address of the first data
address is converted to something the host is aware of.  The second
CCW still has the address used by the guest, which happens to be (A)
(probably) an invalid address for the host, and (B) an invalid IDAW
address (doubleword boundary, etc.).

While the I/O fails, it doesn't fail correctly.  In this example, we
would receive a program check for an invalid IDAW address, instead of
a unit check for an invalid command.

To fix this, revert commit 4cebc5d6 ("vfio: ccw: validate the
count field of a ccw before pinning") and allow the individual fetch
routines to process them like anything else.  We'll make a slight
adjustment to our allocation of the pfn_array (for direct CCWs) or
IDAL (for IDAL CCWs) memory, so that we have room for at least one
address even though no guest memory will be pinned and thus the
IDAW will not be populated with a host address.
Signed-off-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190516161403.79053-3-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NFarhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      453eac31
    • E
      s390/cio: Don't pin vfio pages for empty transfers · 5d87fbf7
      由 Eric Farman 提交于 
      The skip flag of a CCW offers the possibility of data not being
transferred, but is only meaningful for certain commands.
Specifically, it is only applicable for a read, read backward, sense,
or sense ID CCW and will be ignored for any other command code
(SA22-7832-11 page 15-64, and figure 15-30 on page 15-75).

(A sense ID is xE4, while a sense is x04 with possible modifiers in the
upper four bits.  So we will cover the whole "family" of sense CCWs.)

For those scenarios, since there is no requirement for the target
address to be valid, we should skip the call to vfio_pin_pages() and
rely on the IDAL address we have allocated/built for the channel
program.  The fact that the individual IDAWs within the IDAL are
invalid is fine, since they aren't actually checked in these cases.

Set pa_nr to zero when skipping the pfn_array_pin() call, since it is
defined as the number of pages pinned and is used to determine
whether to call vfio_unpin_pages() upon cleanup.

The pfn_array_pin() routine returns the number of pages that were
pinned, but now might be skipped for some CCWs.  Thus we need to
calculate the expected number of pages ourselves such that we are
guaranteed to allocate a reasonable number of IDAWs, which will
provide a valid address in CCW.CDA regardless of whether the IDAWs
are filled in with pinned/translated addresses or not.
Signed-off-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190516161403.79053-2-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NFarhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      5d87fbf7
    • E
      s390/cio: Initialize the host addresses in pfn_array · c34a12e6
      由 Eric Farman 提交于 
      Let's initialize the host address to something that is invalid,
rather than letting it default to zero.  This just makes it easier
to notice when a pin operation has failed or been skipped.
Signed-off-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190514234248.36203-5-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NFarhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      c34a12e6
    • E
      s390/cio: Split pfn_array_alloc_pin into pieces · e4f3f18b
      由 Eric Farman 提交于 
      The pfn_array_alloc_pin routine is doing too much.  Today, it does the
alloc of the pfn_array struct and its member arrays, builds the iova
address lists out of a contiguous piece of guest memory, and asks vfio
to pin the resulting pages.

Let's effectively revert a significant portion of commit 5c1cfb1c
("vfio: ccw: refactor and improve pfn_array_alloc_pin()") such that we
break pfn_array_alloc_pin() into its component pieces, and have one
routine that allocates/populates the pfn_array structs, and another
that actually pins the memory.  In the future, we will be able to
handle scenarios where pinning memory isn't actually appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190514234248.36203-4-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NFarhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      e4f3f18b
    • E
      s390/cio: Update SCSW if it points to the end of the chain · 15f0eb3d
      由 Eric Farman 提交于 
      Per the POPs [1], when processing an interrupt the SCSW.CPA field of an
IRB generally points to 8 bytes after the last CCW that was executed
(there are exceptions, but this is the most common behavior).

In the case of an error, this points us to the first un-executed CCW
in the chain.  But in the case of normal I/O, the address points beyond
the end of the chain.  While the guest generally only cares about this
when possibly restarting a channel program after error recovery, we
should convert the address even in the good scenario so that we provide
a consistent, valid, response upon I/O completion.

[1] Figure 16-6 in SA22-7832-11.  The footnotes in that table also state
that this is true even if the resulting address is invalid or protected,
but moving to the end of the guest chain should not be a surprise.
Signed-off-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190514234248.36203-2-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NFarhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      15f0eb3d
  13. 24 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 27 2月, 2019 2 次提交
    • E
      s390/cio: Use cpa range elsewhere within vfio-ccw · 2904337f
      由 Eric Farman 提交于 
      Since we have a little function to see whether a channel
program address falls within a range of CCWs, let's use
it in the other places of code that make these checks.

(Why isn't ccw_head fully removed?  Well, because this
way some longs lines don't have to be reflowed.)
Signed-off-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190222183941.29596-3-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NFarhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      2904337f
    • E
      s390/cio: Fix vfio-ccw handling of recursive TICs · 48bd0eee
      由 Eric Farman 提交于 
      The routine ccwchain_calc_length() is tasked with looking at a
channel program, seeing how many CCWs are chained together by
the presence of the Chain-Command flag, and returning a count
to the caller.

Previously, it also considered a Transfer-in-Channel CCW as being
an appropriate mechanism for chaining.  The problem at the time
was that the TIC CCW will almost certainly not go to the next CCW
in memory (because the CC flag would be sufficient), and so
advancing to the next 8 bytes will cause us to read potentially
invalid memory.  So that comparison was removed, and the target
of the TIC is processed as a new chain.

This is fine when a TIC goes to a new chain (consider a NOP+TIC to
a channel program that is being redriven), but there is another
scenario where this falls apart.  A TIC can be used to "rewind"
a channel program, for example to find a particular record on a
disk with various orientation CCWs.  In this case, we DO want to
consider the memory after the TIC since the TIC will be skipped
once the requested criteria is met.  This is due to the Status
Modifier presented by the device, though software doesn't need to
operate on it beyond understanding the behavior change of how the
channel program is executed.

So to handle this, we will re-introduce the check for a TIC CCW
but limit it by examining the target of the TIC.  If the TIC
doesn't go back into the current chain, then current behavior
applies; we should stop counting CCWs and let the target of the
TIC be handled as a new chain.  But, if the TIC DOES go back into
the current chain, then we need to keep looking at the memory after
the TIC for when the channel breaks out of the TIC loop.  We can't
use tic_target_chain_exists() because the chain in question hasn't
been built yet, so we will redefine that comparison with some small
functions to make it more readable and to permit refactoring later.

Fixes: 405d566f ("vfio-ccw: Don't assume there are more ccws after a TIC")
Signed-off-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190222183941.29596-2-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NHalil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NFarhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      48bd0eee
  17. 04 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 13 11月, 2018 2 次提交
  21. 02 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  23. 29 5月, 2018 4 次提交
  25. 27 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  27. 05 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  29. 08 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  31. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • G
      License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license · b2441318
      由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于 
      Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
 - file had no licensing information it it.
 - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
 - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
 - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
 - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
   lines of source
 - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
   lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

 - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
   considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
   COPYING file license applied.

   For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|-------
   GPL-2.0                                              11139

   and resulted in the first patch in this series.

   If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
   Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0".  Results of that was:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|-------
   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930

   and resulted in the second patch in this series.

 - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
   of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
   any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
   it (per prior point).  Results summary:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|------
   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270
   GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17
   LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15
   GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14
   ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5
   LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4
   LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1

   and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

 - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
   the concluded license(s).

 - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
   license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
   licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

 - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
   resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
   which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

 - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
   confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

 - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
   the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
   in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
 - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
   license ids and scores
 - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
   files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
 - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
   was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
   SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: NKate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      b2441318