Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 11 3月, 2011 5 次提交
    • J
      nfs: fix compilation warning · 43b7c3f0
      由 Jovi Zhang 提交于 
      this commit fix compilation warning as following:
linux-2.6/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:3265: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
Signed-off-by: NJovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      43b7c3f0
    • S
      nfs: add kmalloc return value check in decode_and_add_ds · b9f81057
      由 Stanislav Fomichev 提交于 
      add kmalloc return value check in decode_and_add_ds
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Fomichev <kernel@fomichev.me>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      b9f81057
    • J
      SUNRPC: Remove resource leak in svc_rdma_send_error() · a5e50268
      由 Jesper Juhl 提交于 
      We leak the memory allocated to 'ctxt' when we return after
'ib_dma_mapping_error()' returns !=0.
Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      a5e50268
    • J
      nfs: close NFSv4 COMMIT vs. CLOSE race · d2224e7a
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      I've been adding in more artificial delays in the NFSv4 commit and close
codepaths to uncover races. The kernel I'm testing has the patch to
close the race in __rpc_wait_for_completion_task that's in Trond's
cthon2011 branch. The reproducer I've been using does this in a loop:

	mkdir("DIR");
	fd = open("DIR/FILE", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0644);
	write(fd, "abcdefg", 7);
	close(fd);
	unlink("DIR/FILE");
	rmdir("DIR");

The above reproducer shouldn't result in any silly-renaming. However,
when I add a "msleep(100)" just after the nfs_commit_clear_lock call in
nfs_commit_release, I can almost always force one to occur. If I can
force it to occur with that, then it can happen without that delay
given the right timing.

nfs_commit_inode waits for the NFS_INO_COMMIT bit to clear when called
with FLUSH_SYNC set. nfs_commit_rpcsetup on the other hand does not wait
for the task to complete before putting its reference to it, so the last
reference get put in rpc_release task and gets queued to a workqueue.

In this situation, the last open context reference may be put by the
COMMIT release instead of the close() syscall. The close() syscall
returns too quickly and the unlink runs while the d_count is still
high since the COMMIT release hasn't put its dentry reference yet.

Fix this by having rpc_commit_rpcsetup wait for the RPC call to complete
before putting the task reference when FLUSH_SYNC is set. With this, the
last reference is put by the process that's initiating the FLUSH_SYNC
commit and the race is closed.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      d2224e7a
    • T
      SUNRPC: Close a race in __rpc_wait_for_completion_task() · bf294b41
      由 Trond Myklebust 提交于 
      Although they run as rpciod background tasks, under normal operation
(i.e. no SIGKILL), functions like nfs_sillyrename(), nfs4_proc_unlck()
and nfs4_do_close() want to be fully synchronous. This means that when we
exit, we want all references to the rpc_task to be gone, and we want
any dentry references etc. held by that task to be released.

For this reason these functions call __rpc_wait_for_completion_task(),
followed by rpc_put_task() in the expectation that the latter will be
releasing the last reference to the rpc_task, and thus ensuring that the
callback_ops->rpc_release() has been called synchronously.

This patch fixes a race which exists due to the fact that
rpciod calls rpc_complete_task() (in order to wake up the callers of
__rpc_wait_for_completion_task()) and then subsequently calls
rpc_put_task() without ensuring that these two steps are done atomically.

In order to avoid adding new spin locks, the patch uses the existing
waitqueue spin lock to order the rpc_task reference count releases between
the waiting process and rpciod.
The common case where nobody is waiting for completion is optimised for by
checking if the RPC_TASK_ASYNC flag is cleared and/or if the rpc_task
reference count is 1: in those cases we drop trying to grab the spin lock,
and immediately free up the rpc_task.

Those few processes that need to put the rpc_task from inside an
asynchronous context and that do not care about ordering are given a new
helper: rpc_put_task_async().
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      bf294b41
  3. 08 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 07 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  7. 06 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 05 3月, 2011 22 次提交
  11. 04 3月, 2011 7 次提交