1. 10 4月, 2017 12 次提交
  2. 24 1月, 2017 1 次提交
    • N
      inotify: Convert to using per-namespace limits · 1cce1eea
      Nikolay Borisov 提交于
      This patchset converts inotify to using the newly introduced
      per-userns sysctl infrastructure.
      
      Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted in the
      user_struct structure. This means that in setups where multiple
      users in unprivileged containers map to the same underlying
      real user (i.e. pointing to the same user_struct) the inotify limits
      are going to be shared as well, allowing one user(or application) to exhaust
      all others limits.
      
      Fix this by switching the inotify sysctls to using the
      per-namespace/per-user limits. This will allow the server admin to
      set sensible global limits, which can further be tuned inside every
      individual user namespace. Additionally, in order to preserve the
      sysctl ABI make the existing inotify instances/watches sysctls
      modify the values of the initial user namespace.
      Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      1cce1eea
  3. 24 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      fsnotify: Remove fsnotify_duplicate_mark() · e3ba7307
      Jan Kara 提交于
      There are only two calls sites of fsnotify_duplicate_mark(). Those are
      in kernel/audit_tree.c and both are bogus. Vfsmount pointer is unused
      for audit tree, inode pointer and group gets set in
      fsnotify_add_mark_locked() later anyway, mask and free_mark are already
      set in alloc_chunk(). In fact, calling fsnotify_duplicate_mark() is
      actively harmful because following fsnotify_add_mark_locked() will leak
      group reference by overwriting the group pointer. So just remove the two
      calls to fsnotify_duplicate_mark() and the function.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      [PM: line wrapping to fit in 80 chars]
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
      e3ba7307
  4. 06 12月, 2016 3 次提交
  5. 08 10月, 2016 2 次提交
  6. 20 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  7. 30 5月, 2016 2 次提交
    • A
      trim fsnotify hooks a bit · affda484
      Al Viro 提交于
      fsnotify_d_move()/__fsnotify_d_instantiate()/__fsnotify_update_dcache_flags()
      are identical to each other, regardless of the config.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      affda484
    • A
      undo "fs: allow d_instantiate to be called with negative parent dentry" · 2853908a
      Al Viro 提交于
      Background: spufs used to mangle the order in which it had been building
      dentry trees.  It was broken in a lot of ways, but most of them required
      the right timing to trigger until an fsnotify change had added one more
      - the one that was always triggered.
      
      Unfortunately, insteading of fixing their long-standing bug the spufs
      folks had chosen to paper over the fsnotify trigger.  Eventually said
      bug had been spotted and killed off, but the pointless check in
      fsnotify has remained, complete with the implication that one *could*
      do that kind of crap.
      
      Again, a parent of any dentry should always be positive.  Any code
      can rely upon that and anything violating that assert is a bug,
      *not* something to be accomodated.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      2853908a
  8. 20 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      fsnotify: avoid spurious EMFILE errors from inotify_init() · 35e48176
      Jan Kara 提交于
      Inotify instance is destroyed when all references to it are dropped.
      That not only means that the corresponding file descriptor needs to be
      closed but also that all corresponding instance marks are freed (as each
      mark holds a reference to the inotify instance).  However marks are
      freed only after SRCU period ends which can take some time and thus if
      user rapidly creates and frees inotify instances, number of existing
      inotify instances can exceed max_user_instances limit although from user
      point of view there is always at most one existing instance.  Thus
      inotify_init() returns EMFILE error which is hard to justify from user
      point of view.  This problem is exposed by LTP inotify06 testcase on
      some machines.
      
      We fix the problem by making sure all group marks are properly freed
      while destroying inotify instance.  We wait for SRCU period to end in
      that path anyway since we have to make sure there is no event being
      added to the instance while we are tearing down the instance.  So it
      takes only some plumbing to allow for marks to be destroyed in that path
      as well and not from a dedicated work item.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Reported-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Tested-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      35e48176
  9. 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 19 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      Revert "fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread" · 13d34ac6
      Jeff Layton 提交于
      This reverts commit c510eff6 ("fsnotify: destroy marks with
      call_srcu instead of dedicated thread").
      
      Eryu reported that he was seeing some OOM kills kick in when running a
      testcase that adds and removes inotify marks on a file in a tight loop.
      
      The above commit changed the code to use call_srcu to clean up the
      marks.  While that does (in principle) work, the srcu callback job is
      limited to cleaning up entries in small batches and only once per jiffy.
      It's easily possible to overwhelm that machinery with too many call_srcu
      callbacks, and Eryu's reproduer did just that.
      
      There's also another potential problem with using call_srcu here.  While
      you can obviously sleep while holding the srcu_read_lock, the callbacks
      run under local_bh_disable, so you can't sleep there.
      
      It's possible when putting the last reference to the fsnotify_mark that
      we'll end up putting a chain of references including the fsnotify_group,
      uid, and associated keys.  While I don't see any obvious ways that that
      could occurs, it's probably still best to avoid using call_srcu here
      after all.
      
      This patch reverts the above patch.  A later patch will take a different
      approach to eliminated the dedicated thread here.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
      Reported-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
      Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      13d34ac6
  11. 15 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread · c510eff6
      Jeff Layton 提交于
      At the time that this code was originally written, call_srcu didn't
      exist, so this thread was required to ensure that we waited for that
      SRCU grace period to settle before finally freeing the object.
      
      It does exist now however and we can much more efficiently use call_srcu
      to handle this.  That also allows us to potentially use srcu_barrier to
      ensure that they are all of the callbacks have run before proceeding.
      In order to conserve space, we union the rcu_head with the g_list.
      
      This will be necessary for nfsd which will allocate marks from a
      dedicated slabcache.  We have to be able to ensure that all of the
      objects are destroyed before destroying the cache.  That's fairly
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
      Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
      Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com>
      Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c510eff6
  12. 05 9月, 2015 3 次提交
  13. 18 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 25 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 14 12月, 2014 2 次提交
  16. 07 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  17. 04 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  18. 25 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      fsnotify: Allocate overflow events with proper type · ff57cd58
      Jan Kara 提交于
      Commit 7053aee2 "fsnotify: do not share events between notification
      groups" used overflow event statically allocated in a group with the
      size of the generic notification event. This causes problems because
      some code looks at type specific parts of event structure and gets
      confused by a random data it sees there and causes crashes.
      
      Fix the problem by allocating overflow event with type corresponding to
      the group type so code cannot get confused.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      ff57cd58
  19. 18 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      inotify: Fix reporting of cookies for inotify events · 45a22f4c
      Jan Kara 提交于
      My rework of handling of notification events (namely commit 7053aee2
      "fsnotify: do not share events between notification groups") broke
      sending of cookies with inotify events. We didn't propagate the value
      passed to fsnotify() properly and passed 4 uninitialized bytes to
      userspace instead (so it is also an information leak). Sadly I didn't
      notice this during my testing because inotify cookies aren't used very
      much and LTP inotify tests ignore them.
      
      Fix the problem by passing the cookie value properly.
      
      Fixes: 7053aee2Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      45a22f4c
  20. 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交