- 06 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
7000.c was released as GPL only by mistake: it should be dual licensed - GPL / BSD. The file that contains the license in the kernel is COPYING and not LICENSE.GPL. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
With new transports coming up, move to threaded interrupt handling now. This has the advantage that we can use the same locking scheme with all different transports we may need to implement. Note that the TX path obviously still runs in a tasklet, so some spin_lock() calls need to change to spin_lock_bh() calls to properly lock out the TX path. In my test on a Calpella platform this has no impact on throughput or latency. Also add lockdep annotations to avoid lockups due to catch sending synchronous commands or using locks that connect with them from the irq thread. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lilach Edelstein 提交于
Move the reg_lock that protects HW register access into the transport implementation. Locking is no longer exposed, but handled internally in grab and release NIC access. This simplifies the users. Signed-off-by: NLilach Edelstein <lilach.edelstein@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Lilach Edelstein 提交于
Express iwl_set_bit() and iwl_clear_bit() through iwl_set_bits_mask() and add the latter to the transport's API in order to allow different implementation for different transport types in the future. Signed-off-by: NLilach Edelstein <lilach.edelstein@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 24 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Update Copyright notices to 2013. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Also when things go wrong (queues don't get emtpy), try to get some data from the HW. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
On resuming, the opmode may have to be able to talk to the WoWLAN/D3 firmware in order to query it about its status and wakeup reasons. To do that, the opmode has to call the new d3_resume() transport API which will set up the device for command communcation. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Sending a NULL pointer to iwl_trans_write_mem allows now to zero SRAM. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Enabling the RF-kill interrupt is sufficient for getting RF-kill notifications, and no other interrupt is needed as the device isn't functional when suspended and will be restarted/reconfigured when mac80211 resumes it later. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 03 1月, 2013 7 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This allows to let sparse check that the NIC access is always released. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Synchronizing the IRQ is pointless when we will then enable the RF-Kill interrupt again, but is needed before we free it and the data needed to handle IRQs; move it to the free function. Simiarly, cancelling the replenish work struct can move to the function that frees the RX data structures. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
There's no need to request the IRQ every time the device is started, we can request it just once. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Different transports implement the access to the SRAM in different ways. Virtualize it. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since different transports have different ways to wake the up the NIC, we need to virtualize it. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
In some cases, the fw should run even if the NIC is in RFKILL. Make the API more flexible to allow that. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This is needed for newer NICs. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 08 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Use the standard #defines rather than creating local definitions for PCIe Capability ASPM fields. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
iwl_pciexp_link_ctrl() has only one call site and no longer provides any useful abstraction, so collapse it into the caller. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since the device is taken down in stop_hw, call reset_ict from there too. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
New transports may handle it internally for better performance. Also move the tracing inside PRPH access which will make the output more readable: iwlwifi_dev_ioread_prph32: Read 0x0 from SCD_AGGR_SEL (32-bit) instead of the corresponding accesses to HBUS_TARG_PRPH_*. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Really trivial clean up. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Rename static functions. Function moved from trans.c to tx.c. A few could be made static, others had to be exported. Functions that implement the transport API are prefixed by iwl_trans_pcie_, the others by iwl_pcie_. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Functions that implement the transport API are prefixed by iwl_trans_pcie_, the others by iwl_pcie_. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Rename static functions. Function moved from trans.c to rx.c. A few could be made static, others had to be exported. Also, don't use rxb or rxbuf, but rb which stands for receive buffer. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This is its natural place Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
1) s/tx_queue/txq for the sake of consistency. 2) s/rx_queue/rxq for the sake of consistency. 3) Make all functions begin with iwl_pcie_ iwl_queue_init and iwl_queue_space are an exception since they are not PCIE specific although they are in pcie subdir. 4) s/trans_pcie_get_cmd_string/get_cmd_string it is much shorter and used in debug prints which are long lines. 5) s/iwl_bg_rx_replenish/iwl_pcie_rx_replenish_work this better emphasizes that it is a work 6) remove invalid kernelDOC markers pcie/tx.c and pcie/trans.c still needs to be cleaned up. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
dev_<level> calls take less code than dev_printk(KERN_<LEVEL> and reducing object size is good. Coalesce formats for easier grep. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 14 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This is not needed, the comment there was wrong, it is only needed when MSI was *not* enabled. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The allocation failure will already be very verbose. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 10 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When a firmware error occurs, don't just abort synchronous commands but also return an error (-EIO) and block any new commands as well. Currently, an error is only returned if WANT_SKB was set which is confusing and can lead to issues. Blocking is done until a new firmware image is loaded. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
There's no need to print the PCI resource length and base address, nor the hardware revision ID (which can be found in lspci) Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 05 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The ALIVE response of new fw inclues the base address of the SCD in SRAM. Until we read it from a prph register, which was set by the fw. Since the fw might well stop updating the prph register, add a WARN when there is an inconsitency between the ALIVE response and the register to catch any change in the behavior. Reviewed-by: NGregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 01 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
No HCMD can be sent while RFKILL is asserted. If a SYNC command is running while RFKILL is asserted the fw will silently discard it. This means that the driver needs to wake the process that sleeps on the CMD_SYNC. Since the RFKILL interrupt is handled in the transport layer and the code that sleeps in CMD_SYNC is also in the transport layer, all this logic can be handled there. This simplifies the work of the op_mode. So the transport layer will now return -ERFKILL when a CMD is sent and RFKILL is asserted. This will be the case even when the CMD is SYNC. The transport layer will return -ERFKILL straight away. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
In addition to the NOCOPY flag, add a DUP flag that tells the transport to kmemdup() the buffer and free it after the command completes. Currently this is only supported for a single buffer in a given command, but that could be extended if it should be needed. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 23 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since the queue might not be empty, we need to free the pending Tx packets. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 16 10月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Instead of hardcoding the expression, use the macro provided in the previous patch. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Remove a number of variables that are assigned, but not used. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When tracing in iwlwifi, we get all data. Most of the time, we don't need it, and it just takes up a lot of extra space in the trace. Make this optional by recording the data into two separate trace events if it is needed. Without it, record only the content of non-data and EAPOL TX frames. As a result, tracing without the data tracepoints will record meta information including the 802.11 headers for all frames but will not record the contents of data frames to reduce trace overhead. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 19 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
When the driver can't get the HW ready, we would release the interrupt twice which made the kernel complain loudly. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NBrian Cockrell <brian.cockrell@intel.com> Tested-by: NBrian Cockrell <brian.cockrell@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Instead of allocating one big chunk of DMA-coherent memory for the firmware and keeping it around, only vmalloc() the firmware and copy it into a single page of DMA-coherent memory for the upload. The advantage is that we don't need DMA memory for the firmware image that is stored while the driver is operating, we only need it while uploading. This will make it easier for the driver to work if the system has fragmented memory. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-