- 17 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Extend the write_tx_data callback with a txdesc parameter to allow access to the tx desciptor while preparing the tx data. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 15 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Xose Vazquez Perez 提交于
A very useful information was provided by Sitecom R&D guys: Please find the information regarding our latest Ralink adapters below; WL-302 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x002D - Ralink RT2771 WL-315 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x0039 - Ralink RT2770 WL-319 - VID: 0x182D, PID: 0x0037 - Ralink RT2860 WL-321 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x003B - Ralink RT2770 WL-324 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x003D - Ralink RT2870 WL-329 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x0041 - Ralink RT3572 WL-343 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x003E - Ralink RT3070 WL-344 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x0040 - Ralink RT3071 WL-345 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x0042 - Ralink RT3072 WL-608 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x003F - Ralink RT2070 Note: PID: 0x003C, 0x004A, and 0x004D: --these products do not exist; devices were never produced/shipped-- The WL-349v4 USB dongle (0x0df6,0x0050) will be shipped soon (it isn't available yet), and uses a Ralink RT3370 chipset. Signed-off-by: NXose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2010 9 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Add RT3390 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3390 vendor driver. Untested as I don't actually own an RT3390 based device, but given experiences on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work.. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Add RT3090 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3090 vendor driver. Untested as I don't actually own an RT3090 based device, but given experiences on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work.. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Add RT3071 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3070 vendor driver. With this patch my RT3071 based devices start showing a sign of life. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was incomplete. Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink vendor driver. With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Align the rt2800 register initializations with the latest versions of the Ralink vendor driver. This patch is also preparation for the addition of support for RT3070 / RT3071 / RT3090 / RT3390 based devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't mean a lot of things anyway. Refactor the constants to have some more meaningful names, and introduce and use some new helpers to check these chipset revisions. At the same time rename to revision, as they are more revision numbers rather than version numbers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Only include definitions for RT chipsets that are also used inside the Ralink vendor drivers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Definitions taken from the latest rt2860 / rt2870 / rt3070 / rt3090 Ralink vendor drivers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
It seems that the distinction between RF channel switch method is solely based on the RF chipset that is used. Refactor the channel switch decision to just take the RF chipset into account, thereby greatly simplifying the check. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 09 4月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
rt2872 needs the same rf register setup as rt3070 and rt3090, hence use rt2800_config_channel_rt3x instead of rt2800_config_channel_rt2x. This change allows me to actually switch channels and hence scan all configured channels on the RT305x SoC platform (which uses a rt2872) here. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Tested-by: NLuis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Now that the powersave issues on rt2500usb have been tackled, powersave can be enabled by default again. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 07 4月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
This is needed to wake up the device automatically for receiving beacons, and is required for proper powersave handling. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
This is needed to wake up the device automatically for receiving beacons, and is required for proper powersave handling. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
In all drivers ensure that auto wakeup is disabled before waking up the device. This is needed to prevent connection stability issues and problems in waking up the device. Based upon a patch from Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 03 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luis Correia 提交于
The ralink SoC platforms do not have an MCU. Signed-off-by: NLuis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
-
- 01 4月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 Xose Vazquez Perez 提交于
Taken from latest ralink linux driver(RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208) All of them are RT3070 devices. Signed-off-by: NXose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Xose Vazquez Perez 提交于
Taken from latest ralink linux driver, it's a RT3593 PCI/PCIe. Signed-off-by: NXose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Xose Vazquez Perez 提交于
It was removed in the windows inf file by ralink. And it isn't on ralink linux drivers. Signed-off-by: NXose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Xose Vazquez Perez 提交于
Taken from ralink linux drivers: RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0B05,0x1784)}, /* Asus 3072 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x13D3,0x3305)}, /* AzureWave 3070*/ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x07D1,0x3C16)}, /* D-Link 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x203D,0x14A9)}, /* Encore 3070*/ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x1740,0x9707)}, /* EnGenius 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x1740,0x9708)}, /* EnGenius 3071 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x1740,0x9709)}, /* EnGenius 3072 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x04BB,0x0947)}, /* I-O DATA 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x04BB,0x0948)}, /* I-O DATA 3072 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x3822)}, /* MSI 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x3821)}, /* Ralink 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x3870)}, /* MSI 3070*/ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x3871)}, /* MSI 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x821A)}, /* Ralink 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x822A)}, /* MSI 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x870A)}, /* MSI 3070*/ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x871A)}, /* MSI 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DB0,0x899A)}, /* MSI 3070*/ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x20B8,0x8888)}, /* PARA INDUSTRIAL 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DF6,0x0048)}, /* Sitecom 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x0DF6,0x0047)}, /* Sitecom 3071 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x083A,0xA701)}, /* SMC 3070 */ RT3070_LinuxSTA_V2.3.0.1_20100208/common/rtusb_dev_id.c: {USB_DEVICE(0x083A,0xA702)}, /* SMC 3072 */ Signed-off-by: NXose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Recent bug reports have shown that rt2500usb also suffers from the powersave problems that the PCI rt2x00 drivers suffer from. So disable powersaving by default for rt2500usb as well. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 17 3月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alban Browaeys 提交于
After testing, we found that TX_STA_FIFO_MCS is the last MCS value tried. If the transmission failed, 8 frames have been transmitted. If the transmission succeed, we can easily compute the number of retry. This patch fix the way status is reported to mac80211 rate control. It has 2 bugs : 1. mcs can contain the short preamble flag and it will lead to wrong computations. 2. minstrel nearly always say that 54 Mbits is the best rate, even if we are very far from the AP Signed-off-by: NBenoit Papillault <benoit.papillault@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NAlban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Alban Browaeys 提交于
This is an implementation that support WCID being the encryption key. Wireless Cli Id was set to be the encryption key in rt2800pci_write_tx_desc and read (TX_STA_FIFO_WCID) as the current queue entry index. Signed-off-by: NBenoit Papillault <benoit.papillault@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NAlban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 16 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Fix compile warning "rt2800pci.c:1248: warning: 'rt2800pci_device_table' defined but not used" when building rt2800pci with only soc support (without pci). Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 11 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Remove the KSEG1ADDR define from rt2x00soc.h as it redefines and covers the correct one from the arch/mips/include/asm/addrspace.h. Otherwise the driver oopses on the target platform (Ralink rt3050 board). Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Export rt2x00soc_probe from rt2x00soc as it is used in rt2800pci. Otherwise loading rt2800pci gives "rt2800pci: Unknown symbol rt2x00soc_probe". Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 03 3月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Compiling rt2800pci with CONFIG_RT2800PCI_SOC fails with "... rt2880pci.c: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'rt2x00soc_probe'". Fix this by using &rt2800pci_ops instead of rt2800pci_ops. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Bryan Polk 提交于
This adds support for CEIVA USB wireless adapters to the rt73usb driver. Signed-off-by: NBryan Polk <sainth@eidolons.org> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Support for rt30xx- and rt35xx-based devices is currently not functional in rt2800pci and rt2800usb. In order to not confuse users we shouldn't claim the PCI and USB device ID's for these devices. However, to allow for testing it is good to still have them available, although disabled by default. Make support for these device configuration options that default to off. For rt2800usb a 3rd class of devices is added, which are the unknown devices. For these devices it is known that they are either based on rt28xx, rt30xx or rt35xx, but it is not known on what chipset exactly. These devices are disabled by default as well, until it can be established on what chipset exactly they are based. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The recent rt2800 devices are no longer really identified by their PCI ID's, but rather by the contents of their CSR0 register. Also for the other chipsets is the contents of this CSR0 register important. Change the chipset determination logic to be more aligned with the rt2800 model. Preparation for the support of rt3070 / rt3090 based devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Don't set the RT chipset for a device from within the generic PCI/SOC code, but rather from the individual drivers, so that individual drivers have more control over what RT chipset is set. Preparation for chip handling updates for rt2800 devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Introduce the SoC interface type to detect SoC devices, instead of having them mimic being PCI devices. This allows for easier detection of SoC devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kalle Valo 提交于
get_tx_stats() will be removed from mac80211. Compile-tested only. Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 13 1月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
It is only used within the rt2800lib module itself. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The rt2800pci_wait_wpdma_ready and rt2800usb_wait_wpdma_ready functions are exactly the same, so unify them into rt200lib. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The RF3052 chipset is now also being integrated onto USB devices, so allow the RF chipset and don't treat it as PCI/SOC only. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE() so we get place PCI ids table into correct section in every case. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Current rt2x00 drivers may result in a "ieee80211_tx_status: headroom too small" error message when a frame needs to be properly aligned before transmitting it. This is because the space needed to ensure proper alignment isn't requested from mac80211. Fix this by adding sufficient amount of alignment space to the amount of headroom requested for TX frames. Reported-by: NDavid Ellingsworth <david@identd.dyndns.org> Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-