- 02 12月, 2020 7 次提交
-
-
由 Danielle Ratson 提交于
After adding support for QinQ, a.k.a 802.1ad protocol, there are a few scenarios that should be vetoed. The vetoes are motivated by various ASIC limitations. For example, a port that is member in a 802.1ad bridge cannot have 802.1q uppers as the port needs to be configured to treat 802.1q packets as untagged packets. Veto all those unsupported scenarios and return suitable messages. Signed-off-by: NDanielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
802.1ad, also known as QinQ is an extension to the 802.1q standard, which is concerned with passing possibly 802.1q-tagged packets through another VLAN-like tunnel. The format of 802.1ad tag is the same as 802.1q, except it uses the EtherType of 0x88a8, unlike 802.1q's 0x8100. Add support for 802.1ad protocol. Most of the configuration is the same as 802.1q. The difference is that before a port joins an 802.1ad bridge it needs to be configured to recognize 802.1ad packets as tagged and other packets (e.g., 802.1q) as untagged. VXLAN is not currently supported with 802.1ad bridge, so return an error with an appropriate extack message. Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
The code in mlxsw_sp_bridge_8021q_port_{join, leave}() can be used also for 802.1ad bridge. Move the code to functions called mlxsw_sp_bridge_vlan_aware_port_{join, leave}() and call them from mlxsw_sp_bridge_8021q_port_{join, leave}() respectively to enable code reuse. Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
Currently, when pushing a PVID at ingress, mlxsw always uses 802.1q EtherType. Make this EtherType configurable by extending mlxsw_sp_port_pvid_set() with an EtherType argument. This is a preparation for QinQ support, that needs to push a PVID with 802.1ad EtherType. Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
By default, the device considers both 802.1ad and 802.1q packets as tagged, but this is not supported by the driver. It only supports VLAN and bridge devices that use 802.1q protocol. Instead, configure the device to only treat 802.1q packets as tagged packets. Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
et_vlan field is used to configure which EtherType is used when VLAN is pushed at ingress (for untagged packets or for QinQ push mode). It will be used to configure tagging with ether_type1 (i.e., 0x88A8) for QinQ mode. Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
SPVC configures the port to identify packets as untagged / single tagged / double tagged packets based on the packet EtherTypes. It will be used to classify 802.1q packets as untagged and 802.1ad packets as tagged when received by ports member in a 802.1ad bridge. Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 28 11月, 2020 5 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The device supports an operation that allows the driver to issue one request to update the adjacency index for all the routes in a given virtual router (VR) from old index and size to new ones. This is useful in case the configuration of a certain nexthop group is updated and its adjacency index changes. Currently, the driver does not use this operation in an efficient manner. It iterates over all the routes using the nexthop group and issues an update request for the VR if it is not the same as the previous VR. Instead, use the VR tracking added in the previous patch to update the adjacency index once for each VR currently using the nexthop group. Example: 8k IPv6 routes were added in an alternating manner to two VRFs. All the routes are using the same nexthop object ('nhid 1'). Before: # perf stat -e devlink:devlink_hwmsg --filter='incoming==0' -- ip nexthop replace id 1 via 2001:db8:1::2 dev swp3 Performance counter stats for 'ip nexthop replace id 1 via 2001:db8:1::2 dev swp3': 16,385 devlink:devlink_hwmsg 4.255933213 seconds time elapsed 0.000000000 seconds user 0.666923000 seconds sys Number of EMAD transactions corresponds to number of routes using the nexthop group. After: # perf stat -e devlink:devlink_hwmsg --filter='incoming==0' -- ip nexthop replace id 1 via 2001:db8:1::2 dev swp3 Performance counter stats for 'ip nexthop replace id 1 via 2001:db8:1::2 dev swp3': 3 devlink:devlink_hwmsg 0.077655094 seconds time elapsed 0.000000000 seconds user 0.076698000 seconds sys Number of EMAD transactions corresponds to number of VRFs / VRs. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
For each nexthop group, track in which virtual routers (VRs) the group is used. This is going to be used by the next patch to perform a more efficient adjacency index update whenever the group's adjacency index changes. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In the rare case where the adjacency pointer cannot be updated for a given virtual router, rollback the operation so that virtual routers that are already using the new index will use the old one again. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
mlxsw_sp_adj_index_mass_update_vr() only needs the virtual router's identifier and protocol, so pass them directly. In a subsequent patch the caller will not have access to the pointer. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Return error to the caller instead of suppressing it. Fixes: e3ddfb45 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Allow returning errors from mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_refresh()") Addresses-Coverity: ("Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN)") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 26 11月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christian Eggers 提交于
Use recently introduced PTP wide defines instead of a driver internal enumeration. Signed-off-by: NChristian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Cc: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NRichard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 25 11月, 2020 6 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Register with devlink the blackhole_nexthop trap so that mlxsw will be able to report packets dropped due to a blackhole nexthop. The internal trap identifier is "DISCARD_ROUTER3", which traps packets dropped in the adjacency table. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Add support for blackhole nexthops by programming them to the adjacency table with a discard action. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The two are the same, but for blackhole nexthops we will not have an associated neighbour struct, so resolve the RIF from the nexthop struct itself instead. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that the driver creates a loopback RIF during its initialization, it can be used to program the adjacency entries for unresolved nexthops instead of other RIFs. The loopback RIF is guaranteed to exist for the entire life time of the driver, unlike other RIFs that come and go. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Unresolved nexthops are currently written to the adjacency table with a discard action. Packets hitting such entries are trapped to the CPU via the 'DISCARD_ROUTER3' trap which can be enabled or disabled on demand, but is always enabled in order to ensure the kernel can resolve the unresolved neighbours. This trap will be needed for blackhole nexthops support. Therefore, move unresolved nexthops to explicitly program the adjacency entries with a trap action and a different trap identifier, 'RTR_EGRESS0'. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Up until now RIFs (router interfaces) were created on demand (e.g., when an IP address was added to a netdev). However, sometimes the device needs to be provided with a RIF when one might not be available. For example, adjacency entries that drop packets need to be programmed with an egress RIF despite the RIF not being used to forward packets. Create such a RIF during initialization so that it could be used later on to support blackhole nexthops. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 24 11月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
linux/netdevice.h is included in very many places, touching any of its dependecies causes large incremental builds. Drop the linux/ethtool.h include, linux/netdevice.h just needs a forward declaration of struct ethtool_ops. Fix all the places which made use of this implicit include. Acked-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Acked-by: NShannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io> Reviewed-by: NJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201120225052.1427503-1-kuba@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 21 11月, 2020 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that the driver supports nexthop objects, the check is no longer necessary. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
If the FIB info (i.e, 'struct fib_info', 'struct fib6_info') uses a nexthop object, then use the object's identifier to resolve the nexthop group. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Register a listener to the nexthop notification chain and parse notified nexthop objects into the existing mlxsw nexthop data structures. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 20 11月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jacob Keller 提交于
All drivers which implement the devlink flash update support, with the exception of netdevsim, use either request_firmware or request_firmware_direct to locate the firmware file. Rather than having each driver do this separately as part of its .flash_update implementation, perform the request_firmware within net/core/devlink.c Replace the file_name parameter in the struct devlink_flash_update_params with a pointer to the fw object. Use request_firmware rather than request_firmware_direct. Although most Linux distributions today do not have the fallback mechanism implemented, only about half the drivers used the _direct request, as compared to the generic request_firmware. In the event that a distribution does support the fallback mechanism, the devlink flash update ought to be able to use it to provide the firmware contents. For distributions which do not support the fallback userspace mechanism, there should be essentially no difference between request_firmware and request_firmware_direct. Signed-off-by: NJacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Acked-by: NShannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io> Acked-by: NVasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 19 11月, 2020 11 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The function is responsible for allocating the adjacency entries used by the nexthop group and populating them with the adjacency information such as egress RIF and MAC address. Allow the function to return an error when it encounters a problem and have the relevant call sites check it. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Currently, a nexthop group is destroyed when the last FIB entry is detached from it. When nexthop objects are supported, this can no longer be the case, as the group is a separate object whose lifetime is managed by user space. Add an indication if a nexthop group can be destroyed and always set it to true for the existing IPv4 and IPv6 nexthop groups. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When the IPv6 FIB info has a nexthop object, the nexthop offload indication is set on the nexthop object and not on the FIB info itself. Therefore, do not try to clear the offload indication from the FIB info when it has a nexthop object. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Attach the FIB entry to the nexthop group after setting the offload flag on the IPv6 FIB info (i.e., 'struct fib6_info'). The second operation is not needed when the nexthop group is a nexthop object. This will allow us to have a common exit path from the function, regardless of the nexthop group's type. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The previous patch associated a nexthop group with the FIB entry before the entry's type is determined. Make use of the nexthop group when determining the entry's type instead of relying on helpers that assume that the nexthop info is not a nexthop object (i.e., 'struct nexthop'). Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Each FIB entry has a type (e.g., remote, local) that determines how the entry is programmed to the device. In order to determine if the entry is local (directly connected) or remote (has a gateway) the relevant FIB info structures (e.g., 'struct fib_info') are checked. When entries that use nexthop objects are supported, these checks will need to be changed to take into account 'struct nexthop'. Instead, first associate the entry with a nexthop group so that the next patch could determine the entry's type based on the associated nexthop group's type. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The sole caller of the function will soon only have the ifindex available, instead of the pointer itself. Therefore, change the function to take the ifindex as input and have it get the pointer. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The ifindex of the nexthop device was never set for IPv4 nexthops, unlike IPv6 nexthops. This went unnoticed since only IPv6 nexthops use it. Set the ifindex for IPv4 nexthops in order to be consistent with IPv6 and also because it will be used by a later patch. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The function allocates 'nhgi', not 'nh_grp', so it needs to free the former in its error path. Fixes: 7f7a417e ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Split nexthop group configuration to a different struct") Addresses-Coverity: ("Memory - corruptions (USE_AFTER_FREE)") Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The driver sends Ethernet Management Datagram (EMAD) packets to the device for configuration purposes and waits for up to 200ms for a reply. A request is retried up to 5 times. When the system is under heavy load, replies are not always processed in time and EMAD transactions fail. Make the process more robust to such delays by using exponential backoff. First wait for up to 200ms, then retransmit and wait for up to 400ms and so on. Fixes: caf7297e ("mlxsw: core: Introduce support for asynchronous EMAD register access") Reported-by: NDenis Yulevich <denisyu@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NDenis Yulevich <denisyu@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The commit cited below moved firmware flashing functionality from mlxsw_spectrum to mlxsw_core, but did not adjust the Kconfig dependencies. This makes it possible to have mlxsw_core as built-in and mlxfw as a module. The mlxfw code is therefore not reachable from mlxsw_core and firmware flashing fails: # devlink dev flash pci/0000:01:00.0 file mellanox/mlxsw_spectrum-13.2008.1310.mfa2 devlink answers: Operation not supported Fix by having mlxsw_core select mlxfw. Fixes: b79cb787 ("mlxsw: Move fw flashing code into core.c") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reported-by: NVadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NVadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 15 11月, 2020 5 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Since commit 21151f64 ("mlxsw: Add new FIB entry type for reject routes") this comment is no longer correct. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The two functions are identical, so consolidate them to mlxsw_sp_nexthop_type_fini(). Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The two functions are now identical, so consolidate them to mlxsw_sp_nexthop_type_init(). Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Remove it as it is unused. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Instead of passing the nexthop and resolving the nexthop netdev from it, pass the nexthop netdev directly. This will later allow us to consolidate code paths between IPv4 and IPv6 code. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-