- 05 1月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 02 12月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Add the calculations to set plane selective fetch registers depending in the value of the area damaged. It is still using the whole plane area as damaged but that will change in next patches. v2: - fixed new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y2 typo in intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() - do not shifthing new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format BSpec: 55229 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130125750.17820-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 05 11月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Replace the previous approach to force compute the initial PSR state after i915 take over from firmware by the better and recently added initial_fastset_check() hook. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201102221048.104294-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 29 10月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
The atomic check hooks must look up the encoder to be used with a connector from the connector's atomic state, and not assume that it's the connector's current attached encoder. The latter one can change under the atomic check func, or can be unset yet as in the case of MST connectors. This fixes [ 7.940719] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 7.944407] CPU: 2 PID: 143 Comm: kworker/2:2 Not tainted 5.6.0-1023-oem #23-Ubuntu [ 7.952102] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude 7320/, BIOS 88.87.11 09/07/2020 [ 7.959278] Workqueue: events output_poll_execute [drm_kms_helper] [ 7.965511] RIP: 0010:intel_psr_atomic_check+0x37/0xa0 [i915] [ 7.971327] Code: 80 2d 06 00 00 20 74 42 80 b8 34 71 00 00 00 74 39 48 8b 72 08 48 85 f6 74 30 80 b8 f8 71 00 00 00 74 27 4c 8b 87 80 04 00 00 <41> 8b 78 78 83 ff 08 77 19 31 c9 83 ff 05 77 19 48 81 c1 20 01 00 [ 7.977541] input: PS/2 Generic Mouse as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input5 [ 7.990154] RSP: 0018:ffffb864c073fac8 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 7.990155] RAX: ffff8c5d55ce0000 RBX: ffff8c5d54519000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 7.990155] RDX: ffff8c5d55cb30c0 RSI: ffff8c5d89a0c800 RDI: ffff8c5d55fcf800 [ 7.990156] RBP: ffffb864c073fac8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8c5d55d9f3a0 [ 7.990156] R10: ffff8c5d55cb30c0 R11: 0000000000000009 R12: ffff8c5d55fcf800 [ 7.990156] R13: ffff8c5d55cb30c0 R14: ffff8c5d56989cc0 R15: ffff8c5d56989cc0 [ 7.990158] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c5d8e480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 8.047193] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 8.052970] CR2: 0000000000000078 CR3: 0000000856500005 CR4: 0000000000760ee0 [ 8.060137] PKRU: 55555554 [ 8.062867] Call Trace: [ 8.065361] intel_digital_connector_atomic_check+0x53/0x130 [i915] [ 8.071703] intel_dp_mst_atomic_check+0x5b/0x200 [i915] [ 8.077074] drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset+0x1db/0x790 [drm_kms_helper] [ 8.083942] intel_atomic_check+0x92/0xc50 [i915] [ 8.088705] ? drm_plane_check_pixel_format+0x4f/0xb0 [drm] [ 8.094345] ? drm_atomic_plane_check+0x7a/0x3a0 [drm] [ 8.099548] drm_atomic_check_only+0x2b1/0x450 [drm] [ 8.104573] drm_atomic_commit+0x18/0x50 [drm] [ 8.109070] drm_client_modeset_commit_atomic+0x1c9/0x200 [drm] [ 8.115056] drm_client_modeset_commit_force+0x55/0x160 [drm] [ 8.120866] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x54/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 8.128415] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x34/0x50 [drm_kms_helper] [ 8.134225] drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event.part.0+0xb4/0xe0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 8.141150] drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event+0x1c/0x30 [drm_kms_helper] [ 8.147481] intel_fbdev_output_poll_changed+0x6f/0xa0 [i915] [ 8.153287] drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event+0x2c/0x40 [drm_kms_helper] [ 8.159709] output_poll_execute+0x1aa/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 8.165506] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x3b0 [ 8.169561] worker_thread+0x4d/0x400 [ 8.173249] kthread+0x104/0x140 [ 8.176515] ? process_one_work+0x3b0/0x3b0 [ 8.180726] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [ 8.184416] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2361 References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2486Reported-by: NWilliam Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com> Reported-by: NCooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201027160928.3665377-1-imre.deak@intel.com
-
- 24 10月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Writes to CURSURFLIVE in TGL are causing IOMMU errors and visual glitches that are often reproduced when executing CPU intensive workloads while a eDP 4K panel is attached. Manually exiting PSR causes the frontbuffer to be updated without glitches and the IOMMU errors are also gone but this comes at the cost of less time with PSR active. So using this workaround until this issue is root caused and a better fix is found. The current code is already ready to enable PSR after this exit if there is not other frontbuffer modifications. Adding a new if block in psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() instead of reuse the else/gen8- block because the plan is to revert this workaround as soon as a better solution is found. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Tested-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201002231627.24528-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 10 10月, 2020 3 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes. The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step. v2: - removed warn on when no plane is visible in state - removed calculations using plane damaged area in intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch() v3: - do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is shifted v4: - only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL v5: - not masking bits for cursor BSpec: 55229 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Due to the debugfs flag, has_psr2 in CRTC state could have a different value than psr.psr2_enabled and it was causing PSR2 subfeatures(DC3CO and selective fetch) to be set to not a expected state. So here only taking in consideration the parameter and debugfs flag when computing PSR state, this way the CRTC state will also have the correct state. intel_psr_fastset_force() was already broken as intel_psr_compute_config() was already only enabling PSR when psr_global_enabled() and all other PSR requirements are met. So some changes was required in this function, now it iterates over all connectors, if it is a eDP connector and is active force a modeset in the CRTC driving this connector, what will cause the new PSR state to be set based on the debugfs flag. v2: - end connector iterator in error cases Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-2-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
For platforms without selective fetch this register is reserved so do not write 0 to it. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 29 8月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f ("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks"). But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL. So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right revids table. All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly. v2: - removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL. - fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha) BSpec: 52890 BSpec: 55378 BSpec: 44455 Reviewed-by: NAnusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com> Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 18 8月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
From the 3 WAs for PSR2 man track/selective fetch this is only one needed when doing single full frames at every flip. Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-2-jose.souza@intel.comSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL). This feature consists in software programming registers with the damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel, saving even more power. But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future patch. Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added. v3: - calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase (Ville) BSpec: 55229 Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.comSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
- 03 7月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
We have a mix of dport, intel_dport, intel_dig_port and dig_port to reference a intel_digital_port struct. Numbers are around 5 intel_dport 36 dport 479 intel_dig_port 352 dig_port Since we already removed the intel_ prefix from most of our other structs, do the same here and prefer dig_port. v2: rename everything in i915, not just a few display sources and reword commit message (from Matt Roper) Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200701045054.23357-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
-
- 01 7月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Future patches will bring PSR2 selective fetch configuration validation but most of the configuration checks will be used for HW tracking and selective fetch so the reoder was necessary. Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200626010151.221388-2-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 23 6月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only reflected in the debugfs. The stragglers are: * i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never modified. * i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work. * i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module, not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs. v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski) Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com> Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 08 6月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gwan-gyeong Mun 提交于
The IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake bit size and value have been changed from Gen12+. It programs the default value of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake on Gen12+. It adds definitions of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake for pre Gen12 and Gen12+. And it aligns PSR2 definition macros. v2: Fix macro definitions. (José) v3: Addressed review comments from José - Add missing default values of IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE for GEN9+ - Change a style of macro naming in order to use lines as input. - Update Todo comments. v4: Add parentheses to macros to avoid precedence issues. Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607143614.185246-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
-
- 05 6月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
This parameter is meant to be used when PSR issues are found as some issues in the past was due wrong values set in VBT so this would be a quick and easy way to ask users or for us to check if the issue is due VBT values. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200520212756.354623-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
RKL doesn't have PSR2 HW tracking, it was replaced by software/manual tracking. The driver is required to track the areas that needs update and program hardware to send selective updates. So until the software tracking is implemented, PSR2 needs to be disabled for platforms without PSR2 HW tracking. BSpec: 50422 BSpec: 50424 Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200603211529.3005059-15-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
-
- 14 5月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gwan-gyeong Mun 提交于
In order to use a common VSC SDP Colorimetry calculating code on PSR, it uses a new psr vsc sdp compute routine. Because PSR routine has its own scenario and timings of writing a VSC SDP, the current PSR routine needs to have its own drm_dp_vsc_sdp structure member variable on struct i915_psr. In order to calculate colorimetry information, intel_psr_update() function and intel_psr_enable() function extend a drm_connector_state argument. There are no changes to PSR mechanism. v3: Replace a structure name to drm_dp_vsc_sdp from intel_dp_vsc_sdp v4: Rebased v8: Rebased v10: When a PSR is enabled, it needs to add DP_SDP_VSC to infoframes.enable. It is needed for comparing between HW and pipe_state of VSC_SDP. v11: If PSR is disabled by flag, it don't enable psr on pipe compute. v12: Fix an inconsistent indenting Signed-off-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NUma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-15-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
-
- 26 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Convert all the DRM_* logging macros to the struct drm_device based macros to provide device specific logging. No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch, originally written by Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>, with manual fixups on top: @@ identifier fn, T; @@ fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) { <+... ( -DRM_INFO( +drm_info(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_NOTE( +drm_notice(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_ERROR( +drm_err(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_WARN( +drm_warn(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_KMS( +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC( +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } @@ identifier fn, T; @@ fn(...) { ... struct drm_i915_private *T = ...; <+... ( -DRM_INFO( +drm_info(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_NOTE( +drm_notice(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_ERROR( +drm_err(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_WARN( +drm_warn(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_KMS( +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC( +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } Cc: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/cac03aba0a363c8f704035f1f771c73385235a35.1584714939.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 04 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lyude Paul 提交于
The whole point of using OUIs is so that we can recognize certain devices and potentially apply quirks for them. Normally this should work quite well, but there appears to be quite a number of laptop panels out there that will fill the OUI but not the device ID. As such, for devices like this I can't imagine it's a very good idea to try relying on OUIs for applying quirks. As well, some laptop vendors have confirmed to us that their panels have this exact issue. So, let's introduce the ability to apply DP quirks based on EDID identification. We reuse the same quirk bits for OUI-based quirks, so that callers can simply check all possible quirks using drm_dp_has_quirk(). Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAdam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200211183358.157448-2-lyude@redhat.com
-
- 02 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Commit 60c6a14b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here moving to the end of i915_driver_modeset_probe() when the display is all initialized. Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking and it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens. Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable() or intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not allow PSR to be enabled. v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() v3: Check intel_dp before get dev_priv v4: - renamed intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() to intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() - removed the set parameter from intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() - not calling intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() from intel_psr_enable/update(), directly setting it after the same checks that intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() does - moved intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() arm call to i915_driver_modeset_probe() as it is a better for a PSR call, all the functions calls happening between the old and the new function call will cause issue [backported to v5.6-rc3] Fixes: 60c6a14b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151Tested-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Reported-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221212635.11614-1-jose.souza@intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227205540.126135-1-jose.souza@intel.com (cherry picked from commit df1a5bfc) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 25 2月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Commit 60c6a14b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here moving to the end of i915_driver_modeset_probe() when the display is all initialized. Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking and it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens. Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable() or intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not allow PSR to be enabled. v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() v3: Check intel_dp before get dev_priv v4: - renamed intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() to intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() - removed the set parameter from intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() - not calling intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() from intel_psr_enable/update(), directly setting it after the same checks that intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() does - moved intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() arm call to i915_driver_modeset_probe() as it is a better for a PSR call, all the functions calls happening between the old and the new function call will cause issue Fixes: 60c6a14b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151Tested-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Reported-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221212635.11614-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 11 2月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Add a basic description about how DC3CO works to help people not familiar with it. While at it, I also improved the delayed work handle and function names and removed a debug message that is ambiguous and not much useful, no changes in behavior here. Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200205214945.131012-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 10 2月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Make future work slightly easier. Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200204135217.21974-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 04 2月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wambui Karuga 提交于
Converts instances of the printk based logging macros to the struct drm_device based logging macros in i915/display/intel_psr.c using the following coccinelle script that transforms based on the existence of a drm_i915_private device pointer: @@ identifier fn, T; @@ fn(...) { ... struct drm_i915_private *T = ...; <+... ( -DRM_INFO( +drm_info(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_ERROR( +drm_err(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_WARN( +drm_warn(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_KMS( +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC( +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } @@ identifier fn, T; @@ fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) { <+... ( -DRM_INFO( +drm_info(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_ERROR( +drm_err(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_WARN( +drm_warn(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_KMS( +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC( +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } Checkpatch warnings were addressed manually. Signed-off-by: NWambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130083229.12889-11-wambui.karugax@gmail.com
-
由 Pankaj Bharadiya 提交于
drm specific WARN* calls include device information in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from. Covert all the calls of WARN* with device specific drm_WARN* variants in functions where drm_i915_private struct pointer is readily available. The conversion was done automatically with below coccinelle semantic patch. @rule1@ identifier func, T; @@ func(...) { ... struct drm_i915_private *T = ...; <+... ( -WARN( +drm_WARN(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON( +drm_WARN_ON(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ONCE(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } @rule2@ identifier func, T; @@ func(struct drm_i915_private *T,...) { <+... ( -WARN( +drm_WARN(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON( +drm_WARN_ON(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ONCE(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } Signed-off-by: NPankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128181603.27767-17-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
-
- 29 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/652e16e6168691f89b5cb8c91278a0d960f8f1a9.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 28 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b7865c858374e9ab04cf2bc4ceb3d7d89c27db83.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 25 1月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
A recent change in BSpec allow us to change EXTLINE while transcoder is enabled so this allow us to change it even when doing the first fastset after taking over previous hardware state set by BIOS. BIOS don't enable PSR, so if sink supports PSR it will be enabled on the first fastset, so moving the EXTLINE compute and set to PSR flows allow us to simplfy a bunch of code. This will save a lot of time in all the IGT tests that uses CRC, as when PSR2 is enabled CRCs are not generated, so we switch to PSR1, so the previous code would compute dc3co_exitline=0 causing a full modeset that would shutdown pipe, enable and train link. v2: only programming EXTLINE when DC3CO is enabled BSpec: 49196 Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122182617.18597-2-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
This will calculaet the DC3CO exit delay only once per full modeset. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122182617.18597-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 22 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
It's easy to confuse the drm_connector->encoder (legacy state adjusted during modeset) and intel_connector->encoder (the statically (sans. MST) attached encoder of the connector). For the latter let's use intel_attached_encoder() consistently. @@ identifier F !~ "^intel_attached_encoder$"; struct intel_connector *C; expression E; @@ F(...) { <... ( C->encoder = E | - C->encoder + intel_attached_encoder(C) ) ...> } @@ identifier F !~ "^intel_attached_encoder$"; struct drm_connector *C; expression E; @@ F(...) { <... ( to_intel_connector(C)->encoder = E | - to_intel_connector(C)->encoder + intel_attached_encoder(to_intel_connector(C)) ) ...> } v2: Regenerated Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191204180549.1267-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJuha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Both activate functions and the dc3co disable function were doing the same thing, so better move to a function and share. Also while at it adding a WARN_ON to catch invalid values. Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200113214603.52158-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 14 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Lots of enc_to_foo(&encoder->base) around. Simplify by passing in the intel_encoder instead. @find@ identifier F =~ "^enc_to_.*"; identifier E; @@ F(struct drm_encoder *E) { ... } @@ identifier find.F; identifier find.E; @@ F( - struct drm_encoder *E + struct intel_encoder *encoder ) { <... - E + &encoder->base ...> } @@ identifier find.F; expression E; @@ - F(E) + F(to_intel_encoder(E)) @@ expression E; @@ - to_intel_encoder(&E->base) + E Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191204180549.1267-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJuha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
-
- 09 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
Recent improvements in the state tracking in i915 caused PSR to not be enabled when reusing firmware/BIOS modeset, this is due to all initial commits returning ealier in intel_atomic_check() as needs_modeset() is always false. To fix that here forcing the state compute phase in CRTC that is driving the eDP that supports PSR once. Enable or disable PSR do not require a fullmodeset, so user will still experience glitch free boot process plus the power savings that PSR brings. It was tried to set mode_changed in intel_initial_commit() but at this point the connectors are not registered causing a crash when computing encoder state. v2: - removed function return - change arguments to match intel_hdcp_atomic_check v3: - replaced drm includes in intel_psr.h by forward declaration(Jani) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112253 Reported-by: <s.zharkoff@gmail.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106152128.195171-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 03 12月, 2019 4 次提交
-
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
eDP specification states that sink can have its PSR capability changed, I have never found any panel doing that but lets add that for completeness. For now it is not reading back the PSR capabilities and if possible re-enabling PSR, this will be added if a panel is found using this feature. v4: Cleaning DP_PSR_CAPS_CHANGE Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-4-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
When this error happens sink link is not stable after the required FW_EXIT_LATENCY period so it will miss the selective update. As the other PSR errors, for now we are not trying to recover from it. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-3-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
eDP spec states that when sink enconters a problem that prevents it to keep PSR running it should set PSR status to internal error and set the reason why it happen to PSR_ERROR_STATUS but it is not how it was implemented. But also I don't want to change this behavior, who knows if there is a panel out there that only set the PSR_ERROR_STATUS. So here refactoring the code a bit to make more easy to read what was state above as more checks will be added to this function. v2: returning a int instead of a bool in psr_get_status_and_error_status() Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-2-jose.souza@intel.com
-
由 José Roberto de Souza 提交于
PSR2 HW only support a limited number of bits per pixel, if mode has more than supported PSR2 should not be enabled. BSpec: 50422 BSpec: 7713 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-1-jose.souza@intel.com
-
- 01 11月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Maarten Lankhorst 提交于
Split up crtc_state->base to uapi. This is done using the following patch, ran after the previous commit that splits out any hw references: @@ struct intel_crtc_state *T; @@ -T->base +T->uapi Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
-
由 Maarten Lankhorst 提交于
Split up crtc_state->base to hw where appropriate. This is done using the following patch: @@ struct intel_crtc_state *T; identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$"; @@ -T->base.x +T->hw.x @@ struct drm_crtc_state *T; identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$"; @@ -to_intel_crtc_state(T)->base.x +to_intel_crtc_state(T)->hw.x Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-4-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
-