Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 14 5月, 2020 12 次提交
    • X
      md: add a newline when printing parameter 'start_ro' by sysfs · 3f99980c
      由 Xiongfeng Wang 提交于 
      Add a missing newline when printing module parameter 'start_ro' by
sysfs.
Signed-off-by: NXiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      3f99980c
    • C
      md: stop using ->queuedata · e4fc5a74
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Pointer to mddev is already available in private_data.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      e4fc5a74
    • D
      md/raid1: release pending accounting for an I/O only after write-behind is also finished · c91114c2
      由 David Jeffery 提交于 
      When using RAID1 and write-behind, md can deadlock when errors occur. With
write-behind, r1bio structs can be accounted by raid1 as queued but not
counted as pending. The pending count is dropped when the original bio is
returned complete but write-behind for the r1bio may still be active.

This breaks the accounting used in some conditions to know when the raid1
md device has reached an idle state. It can result in calls to
freeze_array deadlocking. freeze_array will never complete from a negative
"unqueued" value being calculated due to a queued count larger than the
pending count.

To properly account for write-behind, move the call to allow_barrier from
call_bio_endio to raid_end_bio_io. When using write-behind, md can call
call_bio_endio before all write-behind I/O is complete. Using
raid_end_bio_io for the point to call allow_barrier will release the
pending count at a point where all I/O for an r1bio, even write-behind, is
done.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      c91114c2
    • C
      md: remove redundant memalloc scope API usage · 3024ba2d
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      In mddev_create_serial_pool(), memalloc scope APIs memalloc_noio_save()
and memalloc_noio_restore() are used when allocating memory by calling
mempool_create_kmalloc_pool(). After adding the memalloc scope APIs in
raid array suspend context, it is unncessary to explicitly call them
around mempool_create_kmalloc_pool() any longer.

This patch removes the redundant memalloc scope APIs in
mddev_create_serial_pool().
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      3024ba2d
    • C
      raid5: update code comment of scribble_alloc() · 7f8a30e5
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      Code comments of scribble_alloc() is outdated for a while. This patch
update the comments in function header for the new parameter list.
Suggested-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      7f8a30e5
    • C
      raid5: remove gfp flags from scribble_alloc() · ba54d4d4
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      Using GFP_NOIO flag to call scribble_alloc() from resize_chunk() does
not have the expected behavior. kvmalloc_array() inside scribble_alloc()
which receives the GFP_NOIO flag will eventually call kmalloc_node() to
allocate physically continuous pages.

Now we have memalloc scope APIs in mddev_suspend()/mddev_resume() to
prevent memory reclaim I/Os during raid array suspend context, calling
to kvmalloc_array() with GFP_KERNEL flag may avoid deadlock of recursive
I/O as expected.

This patch removes the useless gfp flags from parameters list of
scribble_alloc(), and call kvmalloc_array() with GFP_KERNEL flag. The
incorrect GFP_NOIO flag does not exist anymore.

Fixes: b330e6a4 ("md: convert to kvmalloc")
Suggested-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      ba54d4d4
    • C
      md: use memalloc scope APIs in mddev_suspend()/mddev_resume() · 78f57ef9
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      In raid5.c:resize_chunk(), scribble_alloc() is called with GFP_NOIO
flag, then it is sent into kvmalloc_array() inside scribble_alloc().

The problem is kvmalloc_array() eventually calls kvmalloc_node() which
does not accept non GFP_KERNEL compatible flag like GFP_NOIO, then
kmalloc_node() is called indeed to allocate physically continuous
pages. When system memory is under heavy pressure, and the requesting
size is large, there is high probability that allocating continueous
pages will fail.

But simply using GFP_KERNEL flag to call kvmalloc_array() is also
progblematic. In the code path where scribble_alloc() is called, the
raid array is suspended, if kvmalloc_node() triggers memory reclaim I/Os
and such I/Os go back to the suspend raid array, deadlock will happen.

What is desired here is to allocate non-physically (a.k.a virtually)
continuous pages and avoid memory reclaim I/Os. Michal Hocko suggests
to use the mmealloc sceope APIs to restrict memory reclaim I/O in
allocating context, specifically to call memalloc_noio_save() when
suspend the raid array and to call memalloc_noio_restore() when
resume the raid array.

This patch adds the memalloc scope APIs in mddev_suspend() and
mddev_resume(), to restrict memory reclaim I/Os during the raid array
is suspended. The benifit of adding the memalloc scope API in the
unified entry point mddev_suspend()/mddev_resume() is, no matter which
md raid array type (personality), we are sure the deadlock by recursive
memory reclaim I/O won't happen on the suspending context.

Please notice that the memalloc scope APIs only take effect on the raid
array suspending context, if the memory allocation is from another new
created kthread after raid array suspended, the recursive memory reclaim
I/Os won't be restricted. The mddev_suspend()/mddev_resume() entries are
used for the critical section where the raid metadata is modifying,
creating a kthread to allocate memory inside the critical section is
queer and very probably being buggy.

Fixes: b330e6a4 ("md: convert to kvmalloc")
Suggested-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      78f57ef9
    • G
      md: remove the extra line for ->hot_add_disk · 3f79cc22
      由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于 
      It is not not necessary to add a newline for them since they don't exceed
80 characters, and it is not intutive to distinguish ->hot_add_disk() from
hot_add_disk() too.
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      3f79cc22
    • G
      md: flush md_rdev_misc_wq for HOT_ADD_DISK case · 78b990cf
      由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于 
      Since rdev->kobj is removed asynchronously, it is possible that the
rdev->kobj still exists when try to add the rdev again after rdev
is removed. But this path md_ioctl (HOT_ADD_DISK) -> hot_add_disk
-> bind_rdev_to_array missed it.
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      78b990cf
    • G
      md: don't flush workqueue unconditionally in md_open · f6766ff6
      由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于 
      We need to check mddev->del_work before flush workqueu since the purpose
of flush is to ensure the previous md is disappeared. Otherwise the similar
deadlock appeared if LOCKDEP is enabled, it is due to md_open holds the
bdev->bd_mutex before flush workqueue.

kernel: [  154.522645] ======================================================
kernel: [  154.522647] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
kernel: [  154.522650] 5.6.0-rc7-lp151.27-default #25 Tainted: G           O
kernel: [  154.522651] ------------------------------------------------------
kernel: [  154.522653] mdadm/2482 is trying to acquire lock:
kernel: [  154.522655] ffff888078529128 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522673]
kernel: [  154.522673] but task is already holding lock:
kernel: [  154.522675] ffff88804efa9338 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590
kernel: [  154.522691]
kernel: [  154.522691] which lock already depends on the new lock.
kernel: [  154.522691]
kernel: [  154.522694]
kernel: [  154.522694] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
kernel: [  154.522696]
kernel: [  154.522696] -> #4 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}:
kernel: [  154.522704]        __mutex_lock+0x87/0x950
kernel: [  154.522706]        __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590
kernel: [  154.522708]        blkdev_get+0x65/0x140
kernel: [  154.522709]        blkdev_get_by_dev+0x2f/0x40
kernel: [  154.522716]        lock_rdev+0x3d/0x90 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522719]        md_import_device+0xd6/0x1b0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522723]        new_dev_store+0x15e/0x210 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522728]        md_attr_store+0x7a/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522732]        kernfs_fop_write+0x117/0x1b0
kernel: [  154.522735]        vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0
kernel: [  154.522737]        ksys_write+0xa4/0xe0
kernel: [  154.522745]        do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0
kernel: [  154.522748]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
kernel: [  154.522749]
kernel: [  154.522749] -> #3 (&mddev->reconfig_mutex){+.+.}:
kernel: [  154.522752]        __mutex_lock+0x87/0x950
kernel: [  154.522756]        new_dev_store+0xc9/0x210 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522759]        md_attr_store+0x7a/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522761]        kernfs_fop_write+0x117/0x1b0
kernel: [  154.522763]        vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0
kernel: [  154.522765]        ksys_write+0xa4/0xe0
kernel: [  154.522767]        do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0
kernel: [  154.522769]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
kernel: [  154.522770]
kernel: [  154.522770] -> #2 (kn->count#253){++++}:
kernel: [  154.522775]        __kernfs_remove+0x253/0x2c0
kernel: [  154.522778]        kernfs_remove+0x1f/0x30
kernel: [  154.522780]        kobject_del+0x28/0x60
kernel: [  154.522783]        mddev_delayed_delete+0x24/0x30 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522786]        process_one_work+0x2a7/0x5f0
kernel: [  154.522788]        worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0
kernel: [  154.522793]        kthread+0x117/0x130
kernel: [  154.522795]        ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
kernel: [  154.522796]
kernel: [  154.522796] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&mddev->del_work)){+.+.}:
kernel: [  154.522800]        process_one_work+0x27e/0x5f0
kernel: [  154.522802]        worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0
kernel: [  154.522804]        kthread+0x117/0x130
kernel: [  154.522806]        ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
kernel: [  154.522807]
kernel: [  154.522807] -> #0 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}:
kernel: [  154.522813]        __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690
kernel: [  154.522816]        lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1a0
kernel: [  154.522818]        flush_workqueue+0xab/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522821]        md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522823]        __blkdev_get+0xea/0x590
kernel: [  154.522825]        blkdev_get+0x65/0x140
kernel: [  154.522828]        do_dentry_open+0x1d1/0x380
kernel: [  154.522831]        path_openat+0x567/0xcc0
kernel: [  154.522834]        do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110
kernel: [  154.522836]        do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0
kernel: [  154.522838]        do_sys_open+0x57/0x80
kernel: [  154.522840]        do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0
kernel: [  154.522842]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
kernel: [  154.522844]
kernel: [  154.522844] other info that might help us debug this:
kernel: [  154.522844]
kernel: [  154.522846] Chain exists of:
kernel: [  154.522846]   (wq_completion)md_misc --> &mddev->reconfig_mutex --> &bdev->bd_mutex
kernel: [  154.522846]
kernel: [  154.522850]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
kernel: [  154.522850]
kernel: [  154.522852]        CPU0                    CPU1
kernel: [  154.522853]        ----                    ----
kernel: [  154.522854]   lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
kernel: [  154.522856]                                lock(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
kernel: [  154.522858]                                lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
kernel: [  154.522860]   lock((wq_completion)md_misc);
kernel: [  154.522861]
kernel: [  154.522861]  *** DEADLOCK ***
kernel: [  154.522861]
kernel: [  154.522864] 1 lock held by mdadm/2482:
kernel: [  154.522865]  #0: ffff88804efa9338 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590
kernel: [  154.522868]
kernel: [  154.522868] stack backtrace:
kernel: [  154.522873] CPU: 1 PID: 2482 Comm: mdadm Tainted: G           O      5.6.0-rc7-lp151.27-default #25
kernel: [  154.522875] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
kernel: [  154.522878] Call Trace:
kernel: [  154.522881]  dump_stack+0x8f/0xcb
kernel: [  154.522884]  check_noncircular+0x194/0x1b0
kernel: [  154.522888]  ? __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690
kernel: [  154.522890]  __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690
kernel: [  154.522893]  lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1a0
kernel: [  154.522895]  ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522898]  flush_workqueue+0xab/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522900]  ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522905]  ? md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522908]  md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522910]  __blkdev_get+0xea/0x590
kernel: [  154.522912]  ? bd_acquire+0xc0/0xc0
kernel: [  154.522914]  blkdev_get+0x65/0x140
kernel: [  154.522916]  ? bd_acquire+0xc0/0xc0
kernel: [  154.522918]  do_dentry_open+0x1d1/0x380
kernel: [  154.522921]  path_openat+0x567/0xcc0
kernel: [  154.522923]  ? __lock_acquire+0x380/0x1690
kernel: [  154.522926]  do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110
kernel: [  154.522929]  ? __alloc_fd+0xe5/0x1f0
kernel: [  154.522935]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x28c/0x630
kernel: [  154.522939]  ? do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0
kernel: [  154.522941]  do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0
kernel: [  154.522944]  do_sys_open+0x57/0x80
kernel: [  154.522946]  do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0
kernel: [  154.522948]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
kernel: [  154.522951] RIP: 0033:0x7f98d279d9ae

And md_alloc also flushed the same workqueue, but the thing is different
here. Because all the paths call md_alloc don't hold bdev->bd_mutex, and
the flush is necessary to avoid race condition, so leave it as it is.
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      f6766ff6
    • G
      md: add new workqueue for delete rdev · cc1ffe61
      由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于 
      Since the purpose of call flush_workqueue in new_dev_store is to ensure
md_delayed_delete() has completed, so we should check rdev->del_work is
pending or not.

To suppress lockdep warning, we have to check mddev->del_work while
md_delayed_delete is attached to rdev->del_work, so it is not aligned
to the purpose of flush workquee. So a new workqueue is needed to avoid
the awkward situation, and introduce a new func flush_rdev_wq to flush
the new workqueue after check if there was pending work.

Also like new_dev_store, ADD_NEW_DISK ioctl has the same purpose to flush
workqueue while it holds bdev->bd_mutex, so make the same change applies
to the ioctl to avoid similar lock issue.

And md_delayed_delete actually wants to delete rdev, so rename the function
to rdev_delayed_delete.
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      cc1ffe61
    • G
      md: add checkings before flush md_misc_wq · 21e0958e
      由 Guoqing Jiang 提交于 
      Coly reported possible circular locking dependencyi with LOCKDEP enabled,
quote the below info from the detailed report [1].

[ 1607.673903] Chain exists of:
[ 1607.673903]   kn->count#256 --> (wq_completion)md_misc -->
(work_completion)(&rdev->del_work)
[ 1607.673903]
[ 1607.827946]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1607.827946]
[ 1607.898780]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1607.952980]        ----                    ----
[ 1608.007173]   lock((work_completion)(&rdev->del_work));
[ 1608.069690]                                lock((wq_completion)md_misc);
[ 1608.149887]                                lock((work_completion)(&rdev->del_work));
[ 1608.242563]   lock(kn->count#256);
[ 1608.283238]
[ 1608.283238]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1608.283238]
[ 1608.354078] 2 locks held by kworker/5:0/843:
[ 1608.405152]  #0: ffff8889eecc9948 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}, at:
process_one_work+0x42b/0xb30
[ 1608.512399]  #1: ffff888a1d3b7e10
((work_completion)(&rdev->del_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x42b/0xb30
[ 1608.632130]

Since works (rdev->del_work and mddev->del_work) are queued in md_misc_wq,
then lockdep_map lock is held if either of them are running, then both of
them try to hold kernfs lock by call kobject_del. Then if new_dev_store
or array_state_store are triggered by write to the related sysfs node, so
the write operation gets kernfs lock, but need the lockdep_map because all
of them would trigger flush_workqueue(md_misc_wq) finally, then the same
lockdep_map lock is needed.

To suppress the lockdep warnning, we should flush the workqueue in case the
related work is pending. And several works are attached to md_misc_wq, so
we need to check which work should be checked:

1. for __md_stop_writes, the purpose of call flush workqueue is ensure sync
thread is started if it was starting, so check mddev->del_work is pending
or not since md_start_sync is attached to mddev->del_work.

2. __md_stop flushes md_misc_wq to ensure event_work is done, check the
event_work is enough. Assume raid_{ctr,dtr} -> md_stop -> __md_stop doesn't
need the kernfs lock.

3. both new_dev_store (holds kernfs lock) and ADD_NEW_DISK ioctl (holds the
bdev->bd_mutex) call flush_workqueue to ensure md_delayed_delete has
completed, this case will be handled in next patch.

4. md_open flushes workqueue to ensure the previous md is disappeared, but
it holds bdev->bd_mutex then try to flush workqueue, so it is better to
check mddev->del_work as well to avoid potential lock issue, this will be
done in another patch.

[1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=158518958031584&w=2

Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reported-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
      21e0958e
  3. 13 5月, 2020 28 次提交