Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 6
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 19 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 13 5月, 2011 6 次提交
    • D
      arch/x86/xen/setup: Cleanup code/data sections definitions · ae15a3b4
      由 Daniel Kiper 提交于 
      Cleanup code/data sections definitions
accordingly to include/linux/init.h.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl>
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      ae15a3b4
    • D
      arch/x86/xen/enlighten: Cleanup code/data sections definitions · ad3062a0
      由 Daniel Kiper 提交于 
      Cleanup code/data sections definitions
accordingly to include/linux/init.h.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl>
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      ad3062a0
    • D
      arch/x86/xen/irq: Cleanup code/data sections definitions · 251511a1
      由 Daniel Kiper 提交于 
      Cleanup code/data sections definitions
accordingly to include/linux/init.h.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl>
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      251511a1
    • S
      x86/mm: Fix section mismatch derived from native_pagetable_reserve() · 53f8023f
      由 Sedat Dilek 提交于 
      With CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y I see these warnings in next-20110415:

  LD      vmlinux.o
  MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1ba48): Section mismatch in reference from the function native_pagetable_reserve() to the function .init.text:memblock_x86_reserve_range()
The function native_pagetable_reserve() references
the function __init memblock_x86_reserve_range().
This is often because native_pagetable_reserve lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of memblock_x86_reserve_range is wrong.

This patch fixes the issue.
Thanks to pipacs from PaX project for help on IRC.
Acked-by: N"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NSedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      53f8023f
    • S
      x86,xen: introduce x86_init.mapping.pagetable_reserve · 279b706b
      由 Stefano Stabellini 提交于 
      Introduce a new x86_init hook called pagetable_reserve that at the end
of init_memory_mapping is used to reserve a range of memory addresses for
the kernel pagetable pages we used and free the other ones.

On native it just calls memblock_x86_reserve_range while on xen it also
takes care of setting the spare memory previously allocated
for kernel pagetable pages from RO to RW, so that it can be used for
other purposes.

A detailed explanation of the reason why this hook is needed follows.

As a consequence of the commit:

commit 4b239f45
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri Dec 17 16:58:28 2010 -0800

    x86-64, mm: Put early page table high

at some point init_memory_mapping is going to reach the pagetable pages
area and map those pages too (mapping them as normal memory that falls
in the range of addresses passed to init_memory_mapping as argument).
Some of those pages are already pagetable pages (they are in the range
pgt_buf_start-pgt_buf_end) therefore they are going to be mapped RO and
everything is fine.
Some of these pages are not pagetable pages yet (they fall in the range
pgt_buf_end-pgt_buf_top; for example the page at pgt_buf_end) so they
are going to be mapped RW.  When these pages become pagetable pages and
are hooked into the pagetable, xen will find that the guest has already
a RW mapping of them somewhere and fail the operation.
The reason Xen requires pagetables to be RO is that the hypervisor needs
to verify that the pagetables are valid before using them. The validation
operations are called "pinning" (more details in arch/x86/xen/mmu.c).

In order to fix the issue we mark all the pages in the entire range
pgt_buf_start-pgt_buf_top as RO, however when the pagetable allocation
is completed only the range pgt_buf_start-pgt_buf_end is reserved by
init_memory_mapping. Hence the kernel is going to crash as soon as one
of the pages in the range pgt_buf_end-pgt_buf_top is reused (b/c those
ranges are RO).

For this reason we need a hook to reserve the kernel pagetable pages we
used and free the other ones so that they can be reused for other
purposes.
On native it just means calling memblock_x86_reserve_range, on Xen it
also means marking RW the pagetable pages that we allocated before but
that haven't been used before.

Another way to fix this is without using the hook is by adding a 'if
(xen_pv_domain)' in the 'init_memory_mapping' code and calling the Xen
counterpart, but that is just nasty.
Signed-off-by: NStefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      279b706b
    • K
      Revert "xen/mmu: Add workaround "x86-64, mm: Put early page table high"" · 92bdaef7
      由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于 
      This reverts commit a3864783.

It does not work with certain AMD machines.

last_pfn = 0x100000 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000
initial memory mapped : 0 - 02c3a000
Base memory trampoline at [ffff88000009b000] 9b000 size 20480
init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-0000000100000000
 0000000000 - 0100000000 page 4k
kernel direct mapping tables up to 100000000 @ ff7fb000-100000000
init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-00000001e0800000
 0100000000 - 01e0800000 page 4k
kernel direct mapping tables up to 1e0800000 @ 1df0f3000-1e0000000
xen: setting RW the range fffdc000 - 100000000
RAMDISK: 0203b000 - 02c3a000
No NUMA configuration found
Faking a node at 0000000000000000-00000001e0800000
NUMA: Using 63 for the hash shift.
Initmem setup node 0 0000000000000000-00000001e0800000
  NODE_DATA [00000001dfffb000 - 00000001dfffffff]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
IP: [<ffffffff81cf6a75>] setup_node_bootmem+0x18a/0x1ea
PGD 0
Oops: 0003 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file:
CPU 0
Modules linked in:

Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-0-virtual #6~smb1
RIP: e030:[<ffffffff81cf6a75>]  [<ffffffff81cf6a75>] setup_node_bootmem+0x18a/0x1ea
RSP: e02b:ffffffff81c01e38  EFLAGS: 00010046
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000001e0800000 RCX: 0000000000001040
RDX: 0000000000004100 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8801dfffb000
RBP: ffffffff81c01e58 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000bfe400
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff81cca000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001c03000 CR4: 0000000000000660
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffffffff81c00000, task ffffffff81c0b020)
Stack:
 0000000000000040 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff
 ffffffff81c01e88 ffffffff81cf6c25 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
 ffffffff81cf687f 0000000000000000 ffffffff81c01ea8 ffffffff81cf6e45
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81cf6c25>] numa_register_memblks.constprop.3+0x150/0x181
 [<ffffffff81cf687f>] ? numa_add_memblk+0x7c/0x7c
 [<ffffffff81cf6e45>] numa_init.part.2+0x1c/0x7c
 [<ffffffff81cf687f>] ? numa_add_memblk+0x7c/0x7c
 [<ffffffff81cf6f67>] numa_init+0x6c/0x70
 [<ffffffff81cf7057>] initmem_init+0x39/0x3b
 [<ffffffff81ce5865>] setup_arch+0x64e/0x769
 [<ffffffff815e43c1>] ? printk+0x51/0x53
 [<ffffffff81cdf92b>] start_kernel+0xd4/0x3f3
 [<ffffffff81cdf388>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x132/0x136
 [<ffffffff81ce2ed4>] xen_start_kernel+0x588/0x58f
Code: 41 00 00 48 8b 3c c5 a0 24 cc 81 31 c0 40 f6 c7 01 74 05 aa 66 ba ff 40 40 f6 c7 02 74 05 66 ab 83 ea 02 89 d1 c1 e9 02 f6 c2 02 <f3> ab 74 02 66 ab 80 e2 01 74 01 aa 49 63 c4 48 c1 eb 0c 44 89
RIP  [<ffffffff81cf6a75>] setup_node_bootmem+0x18a/0x1ea
 RSP <ffffffff81c01e38>
CR2: 0000000000000000
---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G      D     2.6.39-0-virtual #6~smb1
Reported-by: NStefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      92bdaef7
  5. 12 5月, 2011 4 次提交
    • C
      ARM: 6870/1: The mandatory barrier rmb() must be a dsb() in for device accesses · a904f5f9
      由 Catalin Marinas 提交于 
      Since mandatory barriers may be used (explicitly or implicitly via readl
etc.) to ensure the ordering between Device and Normal memory accesses,
a DMB is not enough. This patch converts it to a DSB.

Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      a904f5f9
    • A
      ARM: 6892/1: handle ptrace requests to change PC during interrupted system calls · 2af68df0
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      GDB's interrupt.exp test cases currenly fail on ARM.  The problem is how do_signal
handled restarting interrupted system calls:

The entry.S assembler code determines that we come from a system call; and that
information is passed as "syscall" parameter to do_signal.  That routine then
calls get_signal_to_deliver [*] and if a signal is to be delivered, calls into
handle_signal.  If a system call is to be restarted either after the signal
handler returns, or if no handler is to be called in the first place, the PC
is updated after the get_signal_to_deliver call, either in handle_signal (if
we have a handler) or at the end of do_signal (otherwise).

Now the problem is that during [*], the call to get_signal_to_deliver, a ptrace
intercept may happen.  During this intercept, the debugger may change registers,
including the PC.  This is done by GDB if it wants to execute an "inferior call",
i.e. the execution of some code in the debugged program triggered by GDB.

To this purpose, GDB will save all registers, allocate a stack frame, set up
PC and arguments as appropriate for the call, and point the link register to
a dummy breakpoint instruction.  Once the process is restarted, it will execute
the call and then trap back to the debugger, at which point GDB will restore
all registers and continue original execution.

This generally works fine.  However, now consider what happens when GDB attempts
to do exactly that while the process was interrupted during execution of a to-be-
restarted system call:  do_signal is called with the syscall flag set; it calls
get_signal_to_deliver, at which point the debugger takes over and changes the PC
to point to a completely different place.  Now get_signal_to_deliver returns
without a signal to deliver; but now do_signal decides it should be restarting
a system call, and decrements the PC by 2 or 4 -- so it now points to 2 or 4
bytes before the function GDB wants to call -- which leads to a subsequent crash.

To fix this problem, two things need to be supported:
- do_signal must be able to recognize that get_signal_to_deliver changed the PC
  to a different location, and skip the restart-syscall sequence
- once the debugger has restored all registers at the end of the inferior call
  sequence, do_signal must recognize that *now* it needs to restart the pending
  system call, even though it was now entered from a breakpoint instead of an
  actual svc instruction

This set of issues is solved on other platforms, usually by one of two
mechanisms:

- The status information "do_signal is handling a system call that may need
  restarting" is itself carried in some register that can be accessed via
  ptrace.  This is e.g. on Intel the "orig_eax" register; on Sparc the kernel
  defines a magic extra bit in the flags register for this purpose.
  This allows GDB to manage that state: reset it when doing an inferior call,
  and restore it after the call is finished.

- On s390, do_signal transparently handles this problem without requiring
  GDB interaction, by performing system call restarting in the following
  way: first, adjust the PC as necessary for restarting the call.  Then,
  call get_signal_to_deliver; and finally just continue execution at the
  PC.  This way, if GDB does not change the PC, everything is as before.
  If GDB *does* change the PC, execution will simply continue there --
  and once GDB restores the PC it saved at that point, it will automatically
  point to the *restarted* system call.  (There is the minor twist how to
  handle system calls that do *not* need restarting -- do_signal will undo
  the PC change in this case, after get_signal_to_deliver has returned, and
  only if ptrace did not change the PC during that call.)

Because there does not appear to be any obvious register to carry the
syscall-restart information on ARM, we'd either have to introduce a new
artificial ptrace register just for that purpose, or else handle the issue
transparently like on s390.  The patch below implements the second option;
using this patch makes the interrupt.exp test cases pass on ARM, with no
regression in the GDB test suite otherwise.

Cc: patches@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: NUlrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      2af68df0
    • W
      ARM: 6890/1: memmap: only free allocated memmap entries when using SPARSEMEM · 9af386c8
      由 Will Deacon 提交于 
      The SPARSEMEM code allocates memmap entries only for sections which are
present (i.e. those which contain some valid memory). The membank checks
in free_unused_memmap do not take this into account and can incorrectly
attempt to free memory which is not allocated, resulting in a BUG() in
the bootmem code.

However, if memory is configured as follows:

    |<----section---->|<----hole---->|<----section---->|
    +--------+--------+--------------+--------+--------+
    | bank 0 | unused |              | bank 1 | unused |
    +--------+--------+--------------+--------+--------+

where a bank only occupies part of a section, the memmap allocated for
the remainder of the section *can* be freed.

This patch modifies the checks in free_unused_memmap so that only valid
memmap entries are considered for removal.
Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      9af386c8
    • T
      sparc32: Fixed unaligned memory copying in function __csum_partial_copy_sparc_generic · b1054282
      由 Tkhai Kirill 提交于 
      When we are in the label cc_dword_align, registers %o0 and %o1 have the same last 2 bits,
but it's not guaranteed one of them is zero. So we can get unaligned memory access
in label ccte. Example of parameters which lead to this:
%o0=0x7ff183e9, %o1=0x8e709e7d, %g1=3

With the parameters I had a memory corruption, when the additional 5 bytes were rewritten.
This patch corrects the error.

One comment to the patch. We don't care about the third bit in %o1, because cc_end_cruft
stores word or less.
Signed-off-by: NTkhai Kirill <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b1054282
  7. 11 5月, 2011 28 次提交
  9. 10 5月, 2011 1 次提交