Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 2月, 2015 3 次提交
    • Y
      perf tools: Remove the '--(null)' long_name for --list-opts · 3ef1e65c
      由 Yunlong Song 提交于 
      If the long_name of a 'struct option' is defined as NULL, --list-opts
will incorrectly print '--(null)' in its output. As a result, '--(null)'
will finally appear in the case of bash completion, e.g. 'perf record
--'.

Example:

Before this patch:

 $ perf record --list-opts

 --event --filter --pid --tid --realtime --no-buffering --raw-samples
 --all-cpus --cpu --count --output --no-inherit --freq --mmap-pages
 --group --(null) --call-graph --verbose --quiet --stat --data
 --timestamp --period --no-samples --no-buildid-cache --no-buildid
 --cgroup --delay --uid --branch-any --branch-filter --weight
 --transaction --per-thread --intr-regs

After this patch:

 $ perf record --list-opts

 --event --filter --pid --tid --realtime --no-buffering --raw-samples
 --all-cpus --cpu --count --output --no-inherit --freq --mmap-pages
 --group --call-graph --verbose --quiet --stat --data --timestamp
 --period --no-samples --no-buildid-cache --no-buildid --cgroup --delay
 --uid --branch-any --branch-filter --weight --transaction --per-thread
 --intr-regs
Signed-off-by: NYunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425032491-20224-7-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      3ef1e65c
    • Y
      perf list: Avoid confusion of perf output and the next command prompt · ed457520
      由 Yunlong Song 提交于 
      Distinguish the output of 'perf list --list-opts' or 'perf --list-cmds'
with the next command prompt, which also happens in other cases (e.g.
record, report ...).

Example:

Before this patch:

 $perf list --list-opts
 --raw-dump $          <-- the output and the next command prompt are at
                           the same line

After this patch:

 $perf list --list-opts
 --raw-dump
 $                     <-- the new line
Signed-off-by: NYunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425032491-20224-6-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      ed457520
    • Y
      perf list: Sort the output of 'perf list' to view more clearly · ab0e4800
      由 Yunlong Song 提交于 
      Sort the output according to ASCII character list (using strcmp), which
supports both number sequence and alphabet sequence.

Example:

Before this patch:

 $ perf list

 List of pre-defined events (to be used in -e):
   cpu-cycles OR cycles                               [Hardware event]
   instructions                                       [Hardware event]
   cache-references                                   [Hardware event]
   cache-misses                                       [Hardware event]
   branch-instructions OR branches                    [Hardware event]
   branch-misses                                      [Hardware event]
   bus-cycles                                         [Hardware event]
   ...                                                ...

   jbd2:jbd2_start_commit                             [Tracepoint event]
   jbd2:jbd2_commit_locking                           [Tracepoint event]
   jbd2:jbd2_run_stats                                [Tracepoint event]
   block:block_rq_issue                               [Tracepoint event]
   block:block_bio_complete                           [Tracepoint event]
   block:block_bio_backmerge                          [Tracepoint event]
   block:block_getrq                                  [Tracepoint event]
   ...                                                ...

After this patch:

 $ perf list

 List of pre-defined events (to be used in -e):
   branch-instructions OR branches                    [Hardware event]
   branch-misses                                      [Hardware event]
   bus-cycles                                         [Hardware event]
   cache-misses                                       [Hardware event]
   cache-references                                   [Hardware event]
   cpu-cycles OR cycles                               [Hardware event]
   instructions                                       [Hardware event]
   ...                                                ...

   block:block_bio_backmerge                          [Tracepoint event]
   block:block_bio_complete                           [Tracepoint event]
   block:block_getrq                                  [Tracepoint event]
   block:block_rq_issue                               [Tracepoint event]
   jbd2:jbd2_commit_locking                           [Tracepoint event]
   jbd2:jbd2_run_stats                                [Tracepoint event]
   jbd2:jbd2_start_commit                             [Tracepoint event]
   ...                                                ...
Signed-off-by: NYunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425032491-20224-2-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com
[ Don't forget closedir({sys,evt}_dir) when handling errors ]
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      ab0e4800
  3. 27 2月, 2015 4 次提交
    • H
      perf probe: Fix a precedence bug · f56847c2
      由 He Kuang 提交于 
      The minus operator has higher precedence than ?: Add parentheses around
?: fix this.

Before this patch:

  $ echo 'p:myprobe do_sys_open' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
  $ perf probe -l -k ../vmlinux
    kprobes:myprobe      (on do_sys_open)

After this patch:

  $ echo 'p:myprobe do_sys_open' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
  $ perf probe -l -k ../vmlinux
    kprobes:myprobe      (on do_sys_open@linux.git/fs/open.c)
Signed-off-by: NHe Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425034373-14511-1-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      f56847c2
    • K
      perf diff: Support for different binaries · 94ba462d
      由 Kan Liang 提交于 
      Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the perf.data
comes from different binaries. This patch matches the symbol names.

Actually, perf diff once intended to compare the symbol names.  The
commit as below can look for a pair by name.

604c5c92 (perf diff: Change the default sort order to "dso,symbol")
However, at that time, perf diff used a global list of dsos. That means
the binaries which has same name can only be loaded once. That's a
problem for comparing different binaries.

For example, we have an old binary and an updated binary. They very
likely have same name and most of the functions, so only dsos from old
binary will be loaded. When processing the data from updated binary,
perf still use the symbol information from old binary. That's wrong.

Then the commit as below used IP to replace symbol name.
9c443dfd ("perf diff: Fix support for all --sort combinations")
>From that time, perf diff starts to compare the symbol address.

The global dsos is discarded from a patch in 2010.
a1645ce1 ("perf: 'perf kvm' tool for monitoring guest performance
from host")
However, at that time, perf diff already compared by address. So perf
diff cannot work for different binaries as well.

This patch actually rolls back the perf diff to original design. The
document is also changed, so everybody knows the original design is to
compare the symbol names.

Here are some examples:

The only difference between example_v1.c and example_v2.c is the
location of f2 and f3. There is no change in behavior, but the previous
perf diff display the wrong differential profile.

example_v1.c
noinline void f3(void)
{
        volatile int i;
        for (i = 0; i < 10000;) {

                if(i%2)
                        i++;
                else
                        i++;
        }
}

noinline void f2(void)
{
        volatile int a = 100, b, c;
        for (b = 0; b < 10000; b++)
                c = a * b;

}

noinline void f1(void)
{
                f2();
                f3();
}

int main()
{
        int i;
        for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
                f1();
}

example_v2.c
noinline void f2(void)
{
        volatile int a = 100, b, c;
        for (b = 0; b < 10000; b++)
                c = a * b;
}

noinline void f3(void)
{
        volatile int i;
        for (i = 0; i < 10000;) {
                if(i%2)
                        i++;
                else
                        i++;
        }
}

noinline void f1(void)
{
                f2();
                f3();
}

int main()
{
        int i;
        for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
                f1();
}

[lk@localhost perf_diff]$ gcc example_v1.c -o example
[lk@localhost perf_diff]$ perf record -o example_v1.data ./example
[ perf record: Woken up 4 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.813 MB example_v1.data (~35522 samples) ]

[lk@localhost perf_diff]$ gcc example_v2.c -o example
[lk@localhost perf_diff]$ perf record -o example_v2.data ./example
[ perf record: Woken up 4 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.824 MB example_v2.data (~36015 samples) ]

Old perf diff result:

[lk@localhost perf_diff]$ perf diff example_v1.data example_v2.data
 Event 'cycles'
 Baseline    Delta  Shared Object     Symbol
 ........  .......  ................  ...............................

                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __perf_event_task_sched_out
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] apic_timer_interrupt
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] idle_cpu
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] intel_pstate_timer_func
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] native_read_msr_safe
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] native_read_tsc
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] native_write_msr_safe
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] ntp_tick_length
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] rb_erase
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] tick_sched_timer
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] unmap_single_vma
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] update_wall_time
     0.00%           example           [.] f1
    46.24%           example           [.] f2
    53.71%   -7.55%  example           [.] f3
            +53.81%  example           [.] f3
     0.02%           example           [.] main

New perf diff result:

[lk@localhost perf_diff]$ perf diff example_v1.data example_v2.data
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __perf_event_task_sched_out
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] apic_timer_interrupt
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] idle_cpu
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] intel_pstate_timer_func
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] native_read_msr_safe
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] native_read_tsc
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] native_write_msr_safe
                     [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] ntp_tick_length
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] rb_erase
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] tick_sched_timer
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] unmap_single_vma
     0.00%           [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] update_wall_time
     0.00%           example           [.] f1
    46.24%   -0.08%  example           [.] f2
    53.71%   +0.11%  example           [.] f3
     0.02%           example           [.] main
Signed-off-by: NKan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1423460384-11645-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      94ba462d
    • M
      perf buildid-cache: Add new buildid cache if update target is not cached · a50d11a1
      由 Masami Hiramatsu 提交于 
      Add new buildid cache if the update target file is not cached.

This can happen when an old binary is replaced by new one after caching
the old one. In this case, user sees his operation just failed.

But it does not look straight, since user just pass the binary "path",
not "build-id".

  ----
  # ./perf buildid-cache --add ./perf
  (update ./perf to new binary)
  # ./perf buildid-cache --update ./perf
  ./perf wasn't in the cache
  #
  ----

This patch adds given new binary to cache if the new binary is
not cached. So we'll not see the above error.

  ----
  # ./perf buildid-cache --add ./perf
  (update ./perf to new binary)
  # ./perf buildid-cache --update ./perf
  #
  ----
Signed-off-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Hemant Kumar <hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150226065440.23912.1494.stgit@localhost.localdomainSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      a50d11a1
    • A
      perf probe: Handle strdup() failure · 38ae502b
      由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于 
      We could end up returning 0 (Ok) with a NULL raw_path. Fix it.
Acked-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Naohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-l0kcbcg5f4nnzqt01cv42vec@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      38ae502b
  5. 26 2月, 2015 4 次提交
  7. 25 2月, 2015 3 次提交
  9. 23 2月, 2015 8 次提交
  11. 19 2月, 2015 2 次提交
    • K
      perf tools: Construct LBR call chain · 384b6055
      由 Kan Liang 提交于 
      LBR call stack only has user-space callchains. It is output in the
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK data format. For kernel callchains, it's
still in the form of PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN.

The perf tool has to handle both data sources to construct a
complete callstack.

For the "perf report -D" option, both lbr and fp information will be
displayed.

A new call chain recording option "lbr" is introduced into the perf
tool for LBR call stack. The user can use --call-graph lbr to get
the call stack information from hardware.

Here are some examples.

When profiling bc(1) on Fedora 19:

  echo 'scale=2000; 4*a(1)' > cmd; perf record --call-graph lbr bc -l < cmd

If enabling LBR, perf report output looks like:

    50.36%       bc  bc                 [.] bc_divide
                 |
                 --- bc_divide
                     execute
                     run_code
                     yyparse
                     main
                     __libc_start_main
                     _start
    33.66%       bc  bc                 [.] _one_mult
                 |
                 --- _one_mult
                     bc_divide
                     execute
                     run_code
                     yyparse
                     main
                     __libc_start_main
                     _start
     7.62%       bc  bc                 [.] _bc_do_add
                 |
                 --- _bc_do_add
                    |
                    |--99.89%-- 0x2000186a8
                     --0.11%-- [...]
     6.83%       bc  bc                 [.] _bc_do_sub
                 |
                 --- _bc_do_sub
                    |
                    |--99.94%-- bc_add
                    |          execute
                    |          run_code
                    |          yyparse
                    |          main
                    |          __libc_start_main
                    |          _start
                     --0.06%-- [...]
     0.46%       bc  libc-2.17.so       [.] __memset_sse2
                 |
                 --- __memset_sse2
                    |
                    |--54.13%-- bc_new_num
                    |          |
                    |          |--51.00%-- bc_divide
                    |          |          execute
                    |          |          run_code
                    |          |          yyparse
                    |          |          main
                    |          |          __libc_start_main
                    |          |          _start
                    |          |
                    |          |--30.46%-- _bc_do_sub
                    |          |          bc_add
                    |          |          execute
                    |          |          run_code
                    |          |          yyparse
                    |          |          main
                    |          |          __libc_start_main
                    |          |          _start
                    |          |
                    |           --18.55%-- _bc_do_add
                    |                     bc_add
                    |                     execute
                    |                     run_code
                    |                     yyparse
                    |                     main
                    |                     __libc_start_main
                    |                     _start
                    |
                     --45.87%-- bc_divide
                               execute
                               run_code
                               yyparse
                               main
                               __libc_start_main
                               _start

If using FP, perf report output looks like:

  echo 'scale=2000; 4*a(1)' > cmd; perf record --call-graph fp bc -l < cmd

    50.49%       bc  bc                 [.] bc_divide
                 |
                 --- bc_divide
    33.57%       bc  bc                 [.] _one_mult
                 |
                 --- _one_mult
     7.61%       bc  bc                 [.] _bc_do_add
                 |
                 --- _bc_do_add
                     0x2000186a8
     6.88%       bc  bc                 [.] _bc_do_sub
                 |
                 --- _bc_do_sub
     0.42%       bc  libc-2.17.so       [.] __memcpy_ssse3_back
                 |
                 --- __memcpy_ssse3_back

If using LBR, perf report -D output looks like:

3458145275743 0x2fd750 [0xd8]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x2): 9748/9748: 0x408ea8 period: 609644 addr: 0
... LBR call chain: nr:8
.....  0: fffffffffffffe00
.....  1: 0000000000408e50
.....  2: 000000000040a458
.....  3: 000000000040562e
.....  4: 0000000000408590
.....  5: 00000000004022c0
.....  6: 00000000004015dd
.....  7: 0000003d1cc21b43
... FP chain: nr:2
.....  0: fffffffffffffe00
.....  1: 0000000000408ea8
 ... thread: bc:9748
 ...... dso: /usr/bin/bc

The LBR call stack has the following known limitations:

 - Zero length calls are not filtered out by the hardware

 - Exception handing such as setjmp/longjmp will have calls/returns not
   match

 - Pushing different return address onto the stack will have
   calls/returns not match

 - If callstack is deeper than the LBR, only the last entries are
   captured
Tested-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Simon Que <sque@chromium.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1420482185-29830-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      384b6055
    • K
      perf tools: Enable LBR call stack support · aad2b21c
      由 Kan Liang 提交于 
      Currently, there are two call chain recording options, fp and dwarf.

Haswell has a new feature that utilizes the existing LBR facility to
record call chains. Kernel side LBR support code provides this as a
third option to record call chains. This patch enables the lbr call
stack support on the tooling side.

LBR call stack has some limitations:

 - It reuses current LBR facility, so LBR call stack and branch record
   can not be enabled at the same time.

 - It is only available for user-space callchains.

However, it also offers some advantages:

 - LBR call stack can work on user apps which don't have frame-pointers
   or dwarf debug info compiled. It is a good alternative when nothing
   else works.
Tested-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1420482185-29830-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      aad2b21c
  13. 13 2月, 2015 5 次提交
  15. 12 2月, 2015 7 次提交
  17. 11 2月, 2015 4 次提交