Now that we have soft-rc6 in place, we can use that instead of the
forcewake to disable rc6 while active; preferred by a few
microbenchmarks.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191202110836.2342685-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we rapidly park the GT when the GPU idles, we often find
ourselves idling faster than the RC6 promotion timer. Thus if we tell
the GPU to enter RC6 manually as we park, we can do so quicker (by
around 50ms, half an EI on average) and marginally increase our
powersaving across all execlists platforms.

v2: Now with a selftest to check we can enter RC6 manually
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Acked-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127095657.3209854-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Previously, we assumed we could use mutex_trylock() within an atomic
context, falling back to a worker if contended. However, such trickery
is illegal inside interrupt context, and so we need to always use a
worker under such circumstances. As we normally are in process context,
we can typically use a plain mutex, and only defer to a work when we
know we are being called from an interrupt path.

Fixes: 51fbd8de ("drm/i915/pmu: Atomically acquire the gt_pm wakeref")
References: a0855d24 ("locking/mutex: Complain upon mutex API misuse in IRQ contexts")
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111626Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120125433.3767149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 07779a76)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

pm_suspend_target_state is declared under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP but only
defined under CONFIG_SUSPEND. Play safe and only use the symbol if it is
both declared and defined.

Reported-by: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fixes: a70a9e99 ("drm/i915: Defer rc6 shutdown to suspend_late")
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120182209.3967833-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

pm_suspend_target_state is declared under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP but only
defined under CONFIG_SUSPEND. Play safe and only use the symbol if it is
both declared and defined.

Reported-by: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fixes: a70a9e99 ("drm/i915: Defer rc6 shutdown to suspend_late")
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120182209.3967833-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Previously, we assumed we could use mutex_trylock() within an atomic
context, falling back to a worker if contended. However, such trickery
is illegal inside interrupt context, and so we need to always use a
worker under such circumstances. As we normally are in process context,
we can typically use a plain mutex, and only defer to a work when we
know we are being called from an interrupt path.

Fixes: 51fbd8de ("drm/i915/pmu: Atomically acquire the gt_pm wakeref")
References: a0855d24 ("locking/mutex: Complain upon mutex API misuse in IRQ contexts")
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111626Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120125433.3767149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Retire all requests if we resort to wedged the driver on suspend. They
will now be idle, so we might as we free them before shutting down.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191118230254.2615942-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

RC6 is tracked underneath the intel_gt, so use our local pointers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191115114800.725061-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In some circumstances the RC6 context can get corrupted. We can detect
this and take the required action, that is disable RC6 and runtime PM.
The HW recovers from the corrupted state after a system suspend/resume
cycle, so detect the recovery and re-enable RC6 and runtime PM.

v2: rebase (Mika)
v3:
- Move intel_suspend_gt_powersave() to the end of the GEM suspend
  sequence.
- Add commit message.
v4:
- Rebased on intel_uncore_forcewake_put(i915->uncore, ...) API
  change.
v5:
- Rebased on latest upstream gt_pm refactoring.
v6:
- s/i915_rc6_/intel_rc6_/
- Don't return a value from i915_rc6_ctx_wa_check().
v7:
- Rebased on latest gt rc6 refactoring.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
[airlied: pull this later version of this patch into drm-next
to make resolving the conflict mess easier.]
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

In some circumstances the RC6 context can get corrupted. We can detect
this and take the required action, that is disable RC6 and runtime PM.
The HW recovers from the corrupted state after a system suspend/resume
cycle, so detect the recovery and re-enable RC6 and runtime PM.

v2: rebase (Mika)
v3:
- Move intel_suspend_gt_powersave() to the end of the GEM suspend
  sequence.
- Add commit message.
v4:
- Rebased on intel_uncore_forcewake_put(i915->uncore, ...) API
  change.
v5: rebased on gem/gt split (Mika)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

The counter is removed from the pm wakeref count, but it remains intact
so that we can restore it upon resume. Ergo inside suspend, it may have
a value.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191104090158.2959-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 83c55ee8)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Currently we shutdown rc6 during i915_gem_resume() but this is called
during the preparation phase (i915_drm_prepare) for all suspend paths,
but we only want to shutdown rc6 for S3+. Move the actual shutdown to
i915_gem_suspend_late().

We then need to differentiate between suspend targets, to distinguish S0
(s2idle) where the device is kept awake but needs to be in a low power
mode (the same as runtime suspend) from the device suspend levels where
we lose control of HW and so must disable any HW access to dangling
memory.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111909
Fixes: c1132367 ("drm/i915: Extract GT render sleep (rc6) management")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_suspend/power-S0
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit c601cb21)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

We already track the debugfs user_forcewake on the GT, so it is natural
to pull the suspend/resume handling under gt/ as well.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 9ab3fe2d)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Assume all responsibility for operating on the HW to sanitize the GT
state upon load/resume in intel_gt_sanitize() itself.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 797a6153)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

The counter is removed from the pm wakeref count, but it remains intact
so that we can restore it upon resume. Ergo inside suspend, it may have
a value.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191104090158.2959-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Currently we shutdown rc6 during i915_gem_resume() but this is called
during the preparation phase (i915_drm_prepare) for all suspend paths,
but we only want to shutdown rc6 for S3+. Move the actual shutdown to
i915_gem_suspend_late().

We then need to differentiate between suspend targets, to distinguish S0
(s2idle) where the device is kept awake but needs to be in a low power
mode (the same as runtime suspend) from the device suspend levels where
we lose control of HW and so must disable any HW access to dangling
memory.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111909
Fixes: c1132367 ("drm/i915: Extract GT render sleep (rc6) management")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_suspend/power-S0
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We already track the debugfs user_forcewake on the GT, so it is natural
to pull the suspend/resume handling under gt/ as well.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Assume all responsibility for operating on the HW to sanitize the GT
state upon load/resume in intel_gt_sanitize() itself.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

i915_irq.c is large. One reason for this is that has a large chunk of
the GT render power management stashed away in it. Extract that logic
out of i915_irq.c and intel_pm.c and put it under one roof.

Based on a patch by Chris Wilson.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191024211642.7688-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Replace sampling the engine state every so often with a periodic
heartbeat request to measure the health of an engine. This is coupled
with the forced-preemption to allow long running requests to survive so
long as they do not block other users.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023133108.21401-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The actual conditions are that we know the GPU is not accessing the
context, and we hold a pin on the context image to allow CPU access. We
used a fake lock on ce->pin_mutex so that we could try and use lockdep
to assert that access is serialised, but the various different
hardirq/softirq contexts where we need to *fake* holding the pin_mutex
are causing more trouble.

Still it would be nice if we did have a way to reassure ourselves that
the direct update to the context image is serialised with GPU execution.
In the meantime, stop lockdep complaining about false irq inversions.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111923Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022122845.25038-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

With the last user, i915_vma_parked(), retired, there are no more users
of the per-gt pm notifications and we can remove the unused
infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021183236.21790-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Currently even though i915_vma_parked() operates on a per-gt struct, it
is called from a global pm notify. This oddity was only because the long
term plan is to decouple the vma cache from the pm notification, but
right now the oddity stands out like a sore thumb!
Suggested-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021183236.21790-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Where the function, or code segment, operates on intel_gt, we need to
start passing it instead of i915 to for_each_engine(_masked).

This is another partial step in migration of i915->engines[] to
gt->engines[].
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191017094500.21831-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

We rely on only the tasklet being allowed to call into process_csb(), so
assert that is locked when we do. As the tasklet uses a simple bitlock,
there is no strong lockdep checking so we must make do with a plain
assertion that the tasklet is running and assume that we are the
tasklet!

v2: Fixup intel_gt_sanitize() to prepare each engine for the reset so
that the locks are marked as held during the reset
v3: Check for existent function pointers for very early sanitisation.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014121336.30137-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Avoid going to the base i915 device when we already have a path from gt
to the runtime powermanagement interface. The benefit is that it looks a
bit more self-consistent to always be acquiring the gt->uncore->rpm for
use with the gt->uncore.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191007154531.1750-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As our global unpark/park keep track of the number of active users, we
can simply move the accounting from the GEM layer to the base GT layer.
It was placed originally inside GEM to benefit from the 100ms extra
delay on idleness, but that has been eliminated and now there is no
substantive difference between the layers. In moving it, we move another
piece of the puzzle out from underneath struct_mutex.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-13-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Requests are run from the gt and are tided into the gt runtime power
management, so pull the runtime request management under gt/
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

wait_for_timelines is essentially the same loop as retiring requests
(with an extra timeout), so merge the two into one routine.

v2: i915_retire_requests_timeout and keep VT'd w/a as !interruptible
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We don't need to hold struct_mutex now for retiring requests, so drop it
from i915_retire_requests() and i915_gem_wait_for_idle(), finally
removing I915_WAIT_LOCKED for good.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we are mocking the device, skip trying to sanitize the pm HW state.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190927210646.29664-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Continuing the theme of breaking intel_pm.c up in a reasonable chunk of
powermanagement utilities, pull out the rc6 setup into its GT handler.

Based on a patch by Chris Wilson.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919143840.20384-1-andi.shyti@intel.com
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190927110849.28734-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

These notifications operate on intel_gt so make the code take what it
needs.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190910143823.10686-5-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

Both in the container_of and getting to gt->awake there is no need to go
via i915 since both the wakeref and awake are members of gt.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190910143823.10686-4-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

Refactor the GT power management interface to work through the GT now
that it is under the control of gt/

Based on a patch by Chris Wilson.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190905111403.10071-1-andi.shyti@intel.com

We use the context->pin_mutex to serialise updates to the OA config and
the registers values written into each new context. Document this
relationship and assert we do hold the context->pin_mutex as used by
gen8_configure_all_contexts() to serialise updates to the OA config
itself.

v2: Add a white-lie for when we call intel_gt_resume() from init.
v3: Lie while we have the context pinned inside atomic reset.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> #v1
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190830181929.18663-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we need to acquire a mutex to serialise the final
intel_wakeref_put, we need to ensure that we are in process context at
that time. However, we want to allow operation on the intel_wakeref from
inside timer and other hardirq context, which means that need to defer
that final put to a workqueue.

Inside the final wakeref puts, we are safe to operate in any context, as
we are simply marking up the HW and state tracking for the potential
sleep. It's only the serialisation with the potential sleeping getting
that requires careful wait avoidance. This allows us to retain the
immediate processing as before (we only need to sleep over the same
races as the current mutex_lock).

v2: Add a selftest to ensure we exercise the code while lockdep watches.
v3: That test was extremely loud and complained about many things!
v4: Not a whale!

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111295
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111245
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111256
Fixes: 18398904 ("drm/i915: Only recover active engines")
Fixes: 51fbd8de ("drm/i915/pmu: Atomically acquire the gt_pm wakeref")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190808202758.10453-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

To be called from the top level runtime functions, to hide the
gt-specific bits (mainly related to intel_uc).

v2: rebased
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190801005709.34092-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Since the reset path wants to recover the engines itself, it only wants
to reinitialise the hardware using i915_gem_init_hw(). Pull the call to
intel_engines_resume() to the module init/resume path so we can avoid it
during reset.

Fixes: 79ffac85 ("drm/i915: Invert the GEM wakeref hierarchy")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190626154549.10066-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 092be382)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The microcontrollers are part of GT so it makes logical sense to have
them sanitized at the same time. This also fixed an issue with our
status tracking where the FW load status is not reset around
hibernation.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190723091404.6449-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk