Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

After calling into the lower filesystem to do a rename, the lower target
inode's attributes were not copied up to the eCryptfs target inode. This
resulted in the eCryptfs target inode staying around, rather than being
evicted, because i_nlink was not updated for the eCryptfs inode. This
also meant that eCryptfs didn't do the final iput() on the lower target
inode so it stayed around, as well. This would result in a failure to
free up space occupied by the target file in the rename() operation.
Both target inodes would eventually be evicted when the eCryptfs
filesystem was unmounted.

This patch calls fsstack_copy_attr_all() after the lower filesystem
does its ->rename() so that important inode attributes, such as i_nlink,
are updated at the eCryptfs layer. ecryptfs_evict_inode() is now called
and eCryptfs can drop its final reference on the lower inode.

http://launchpad.net/bugs/561129Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Tested-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [2.6.39+]

less work on failure that way
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

* ->lookup() never gets hit with . or ..
* dentry it gets is unhashed, so unless we had gone and hashed it ourselves, there's
no need to d_drop() the sucker.
* wrong name printed in one of the printks (NULL, in fact)
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
	unlock_new_inode(inode);

is a bad idea; do it the other way round...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

all we want is a boolean flag, same as the method gets now
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead;
Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed
not to be there yet.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are
legitimate uses for such argument.  And getting rid of that
completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple
of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

A change was made about a year ago to get eCryptfs to better utilize its
page cache during writes. The idea was to do the page encryption
operations during page writeback, rather than doing them when initially
writing into the page cache, to reduce the number of page encryption
operations during sequential writes. This meant that the encrypted page
would only be written to the lower filesystem during page writeback,
which was a change from how eCryptfs had previously wrote to the lower
filesystem in ecryptfs_write_end().

The change caused a few eCryptfs-internal bugs that were shook out.
Unfortunately, more grave side effects have been identified that will
force changes outside of eCryptfs. Because the lower filesystem isn't
consulted until page writeback, eCryptfs has no way to pass lower write
errors (ENOSPC, mainly) back to userspace. Additionaly, it was reported
that quotas could be bypassed because of the way eCryptfs may sometimes
open the lower filesystem using a privileged kthread.

It would be nice to resolve the latest issues, but it is best if the
eCryptfs commits be reverted to the old behavior in the meantime.

This reverts:
32001d6f "eCryptfs: Flush file in vma close"
5be79de2 "eCryptfs: Flush dirty pages in setattr"
57db4e8d "ecryptfs: modify write path to encrypt page in writepage"
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Tested-by: NColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Thieu Le <thieule@google.com>

Historically, eCryptfs has only initialized lower files in the
ecryptfs_create() path. Lower file initialization is the act of writing
the cryptographic metadata from the inode's crypt_stat to the header of
the file. The ecryptfs_open() path already expects that metadata to be
in the header of the file.

A number of users have reported empty lower files in beneath their
eCryptfs mounts. Most of the causes for those empty files being left
around have been addressed, but the presence of empty files causes
problems due to the lack of proper cryptographic metadata.

To transparently solve this problem, this patch initializes empty lower
files in the ecryptfs_open() error path. If the metadata is unreadable
due to the lower inode size being 0, plaintext passthrough support is
not in use, and the metadata is stored in the header of the file (as
opposed to the user.ecryptfs extended attribute), the lower file will be
initialized.

The number of nested conditionals in ecryptfs_open() was getting out of
hand, so a helper function was created. To avoid the same nested
conditional problem, the conditional logic was reversed inside of the
helper function.

https://launchpad.net/bugs/911507Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

ecryptfs_create() creates a lower inode, allocates an eCryptfs inode,
initializes the eCryptfs inode and cryptographic metadata attached to
the inode, and then writes the metadata to the header of the file.

If an error was to occur after the lower inode was created, an empty
lower file would be left in the lower filesystem. This is a problem
because ecryptfs_open() refuses to open any lower files which do not
have the appropriate metadata in the file header.

This patch properly unlinks the lower inode when an error occurs in the
later stages of ecryptfs_create(), reducing the chance that an empty
lower file will be left in the lower filesystem.

https://launchpad.net/bugs/872905Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

switch to generic_readlink(), while we are at it
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

After passing through a ->setxattr() call, eCryptfs needs to copy the
inode attributes from the lower inode to the eCryptfs inode, as they
may have changed in the lower filesystem's ->setxattr() path.

One example is if an extended attribute containing a POSIX Access
Control List is being set. The new ACL may cause the lower filesystem to
modify the mode of the lower inode and the eCryptfs inode would need to
be updated to reflect the new mode.

https://launchpad.net/bugs/926292Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Reported-by: NSebastien Bacher <seb128@ubuntu.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Most filesystems call inode_change_ok() very early in ->setattr(), but
eCryptfs didn't call it at all. It allowed the lower filesystem to make
the call in its ->setattr() function. Then, eCryptfs would copy the
appropriate inode attributes from the lower inode to the eCryptfs inode.

This patch changes that and actually calls inode_change_ok() on the
eCryptfs inode, fairly early in ecryptfs_setattr(). Ideally, the call
would happen earlier in ecryptfs_setattr(), but there are some possible
inode initialization steps that must happen first.

Since the call was already being made on the lower inode, the change in
functionality should be minimal, except for the case of a file extending
truncate call. In that case, inode_newsize_ok() was never being
called on the eCryptfs inode. Rather than inode_newsize_ok() catching
maximum file size errors early on, eCryptfs would encrypt zeroed pages
and write them to the lower filesystem until the lower filesystem's
write path caught the error in generic_write_checks(). This patch
introduces a new function, called ecryptfs_inode_newsize_ok(), which
checks if the new lower file size is within the appropriate limits when
the truncate operation will be growing the lower file.

In summary this change prevents eCryptfs truncate operations (and the
resulting page encryptions), which would exceed the lower filesystem
limits or FSIZE rlimits, from ever starting.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NLi Wang <liwang@nudt.edu.cn>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

it's a just a wrapper for vfs_create()
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

vfs_create() ignores everything outside of 16bit subset of its
mode argument; switching it to umode_t is obviously equivalent
and it's the only caller of the method
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

vfs_mkdir() gets int, but immediately drops everything that might not
fit into umode_t and that's the only caller of ->mkdir()...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

The file creation path prematurely called d_instantiate() and
unlock_new_inode() before the eCryptfs inode info was fully
allocated and initialized and before the eCryptfs metadata was written
to the lower file.

This could result in race conditions in subsequent file and inode
operations leading to unexpected error conditions or a null pointer
dereference while attempting to use the unallocated memory.

https://launchpad.net/bugs/813146Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

Replace remaining direct i_nlink updates with a new set_nlink()
updater function.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Tested-by: NToshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Make the inode mapping bdi consistent with the superblock bdi so that
dirty pages are flushed properly.
Signed-off-by: NThieu Le <thieule@chromium.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.39+]
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Instead of playing with removal of LOOKUP_OPEN, mangling (and
restoring) nd->path, just pass NULL to vfs_create().  The whole
point of what's being done there is to suppress any attempts
to open file by underlying fs, which is what nd == NULL indicates.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

... now that inode_permission() can take MAY_NOT_BLOCK and handle it
properly.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

not used by the instances anymore.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

ecryptfs_lookup_interpose() has turned into spaghetti code over the
years. This is an effort to clean it up.

 - Shorten overly descriptive variable names such as ecryptfs_dentry
 - Simplify gotos and error paths
 - Create helper function for reading plaintext i_size from metadata

It also includes an optimization when reading i_size from the metadata.
A complete page-sized kmem_cache_alloc() was being done to read in 16
bytes of metadata. The buffer for that is now statically declared.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Only unlock and d_add() new inodes after the plaintext inode size has
been read from the lower filesystem. This fixes a race condition that
was sometimes seen during a multi-job kernel build in an eCryptfs mount.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36002Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: NDavid <david@unsolicited.net>
Tested-by: NDavid <david@unsolicited.net>

The eCryptfs inode get, initialization, and dentry interposition code
has two separate paths. One is for when dentry interposition is needed
after doing things like a mkdir in the lower filesystem and the other
is needed after a lookup. Unlocking new inodes and doing a d_add() needs
to happen at different times, depending on which type of dentry
interposing is being done.

This patch cleans up the inode get and initialization code paths and
splits them up so that the locking and d_add() differences mentioned
above can be handled appropriately in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NDavid <david@unsolicited.net>

These functions should live in inode.c since their focus is on inodes
and they're primarily used by functions in inode.c.

Also does a simple cleanup of ecryptfs_inode_test() and rolls
ecryptfs_init_inode() into ecryptfs_inode_set().
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NDavid <david@unsolicited.net>

ecryptfs does not have problems with references to unlinked directories.

CC: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
CC: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

eCryptfs wasn't clearing the eCryptfs inode's i_nlink after a successful
vfs_rmdir() on the lower directory. This resulted in the inode evict and
destroy paths to be missed.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/723518Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>

Only a few file systems need this.  Start by pushing it down into each
rename method (except gfs2 and xfs) so that it can be dealt with on a
per-fs basis.
Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Only a few file systems need this.  Start by pushing it down into each
fs rmdir method (except gfs2 and xfs) so it can be dealt with on a per-fs
basis.

This does not change behavior for any in-tree file systems.
Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

After 57db4e8d changed eCryptfs to
write-back caching, eCryptfs page writeback updates the lower inode
times due to the use of vfs_write() on the lower file.

To preserve inode metadata changes, such as 'cp -p' does with
utimensat(), we need to flush all dirty pages early in
ecryptfs_setattr() so that the user-updated lower inode metadata isn't
clobbered later in writeback.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33372Reported-by: NRocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

When failing to read the lower file's crypto metadata during a lookup,
eCryptfs must continue on without throwing an error. For example, there
may be a plaintext file in the lower mount point that the user wants to
delete through the eCryptfs mount.

If an error is encountered while reading the metadata in lookup(), the
eCryptfs inode's size could be incorrect. We must be sure to reread the
plaintext inode size from the metadata when performing an open() or
setattr(). The metadata is already being read in those paths, so this
adds minimal performance overhead.

This patch introduces a flag which will track whether or not the
plaintext inode size has been read so that an incorrect i_size can be
fixed in the open() or setattr() paths.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509180

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

For any given lower inode, eCryptfs keeps only one lower file open and
multiplexes all eCryptfs file operations through that lower file. The
lower file was considered "persistent" and stayed open from the first
lookup through the lifetime of the inode.

This patch keeps the notion of a single, per-inode lower file, but adds
reference counting around the lower file so that it is closed when not
currently in use. If the reference count is at 0 when an operation (such
as open, create, etc.) needs to use the lower file, a new lower file is
opened. Since the file is no longer persistent, all references to the
term persistent file are changed to lower file.

Locking is added around the sections of code that opens the lower file
and assign the pointer in the inode info, as well as the code the fputs
the lower file when all eCryptfs users are done with it.

This patch is needed to fix issues, when mounted on top of the NFSv3
client, where the lower file is left silly renamed until the eCryptfs
inode is destroyed.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Call dput on the dentries previously returned by dget_parent() in
ecryptfs_rename(). This is needed for supported eCryptfs mounts on top
of the NFSv3 client.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

vfs_rmdir() already calls d_delete() on the lower dentry. That was being
duplicated in ecryptfs_rmdir() and caused a NULL pointer dereference
when NFSv3 was the lower filesystem.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Now that grow_file() is not called in the ecryptfs_create() path, the
ECRYPTFS_NEW_FILE flag is no longer needed. It helped
ecryptfs_readpage() know not to decrypt zeroes that were read from the
lower file in the grow_file() path.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

When creating a new eCryptfs file, the crypto metadata is written out
and then the lower file was being "grown" with 4 kB of encrypted zeroes.
I suspect that growing the encrypted file was to prevent an information
leak that the unencrypted file was empty. However, the unencrypted file
size is stored, in plaintext, in the metadata so growing the file is
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>