Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 28 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 24 12月, 2009 6 次提交
  7. 23 12月, 2009 16 次提交
  9. 22 12月, 2009 5 次提交
    • A
      ACPI: processor: remove _PDC object list from struct acpi_processor · e59897fe
      由 Alex Chiang 提交于 
      When we call _PDC, we get a handle to the processor, allocate the
object list buffer as needed, and free it immediately after calling
_PDC.

There's no need to drag around this object list with us everywhere
else, so let's just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      e59897fe
    • A
      ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_set_pdc() interface · 43bab25c
      由 Alex Chiang 提交于 
      When calling _PDC, we really only need the handle to the processor
to call the method; we don't look at any other parts of the
struct acpi_processor * given to us.

In the early path, when we walk the namespace, we are given the
handle directly, so just pass it through to acpi_processor_set_pdc()
without stuffing it into a wasteful struct acpi_processor allocated
on the stack each time

This saves 2834 bytes of stack.

Update the interface accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      43bab25c
    • A
      ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc · 47817254
      由 Alex Chiang 提交于 
      The x86 and ia64 implementations of the function in $subject are
exactly the same.

Also, since the arch-specific implementations of setting _PDC have
been completely hollowed out, remove the empty shells.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      47817254
    • A
      ACPI: processor: finish unifying arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc() · 6c5807d7
      由 Alex Chiang 提交于 
      The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get
set in the input obj_list buffer.

There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those
bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer,
we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire
struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      6c5807d7
    • A
      ACPI: processor: call _PDC early · 78f16996
      由 Alex Chiang 提交于 
      We discovered that at least one machine (HP Envy), methods in the DSDT
attempt to call external methods defined in a dynamically loaded SSDT.

Unfortunately, the DSDT methods we are trying to call are part of the
EC initialization, which happens very early, and the the dynamic SSDT
is only loaded when a processor _PDC method runs much later.

This results in namespace lookup errors for the (as of yet) undefined
methods.

Since Windows doesn't have any issues with this machine, we take it
as a hint that they must be evaluating _PDC much earlier than we are.

Thus, the proper thing for Linux to do should be to match the Windows
implementation more closely.

Provide a mechanism to call _PDC before we enable the EC. Doing so loads
the dynamic tables, and allows the EC to be enabled correctly.

The ACPI processor driver will still evaluate _PDC in its .add() method
to cover the hotplug case.

Resolves: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14824

Cc: ming.m.lin@intel.com
Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      78f16996
  11. 19 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 18 12月, 2009 10 次提交