Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 01 6月, 2012 7 次提交
  3. 12 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 18 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 15 2月, 2012 4 次提交
  9. 01 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 20 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 02 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h

percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.

percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.

  http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py

The script does the followings.

* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
  only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
  gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.

* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
  blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
  to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
  core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
  alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
  doesn't seem to be any matching order.

* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
  because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
  an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
  file.

The conversion was done in the following steps.

1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
   over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
   and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
   files.

2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
   some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
   embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
   inclusions to around 150 files.

3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
   from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.

4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
   e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
   APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.

5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
   editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
   files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
   inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
   wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
   slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
   necessary.

6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.

7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
   were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
   distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
   more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
   build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).

   * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
   * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
   * s390 SMP allmodconfig
   * alpha SMP allmodconfig
   * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig

8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
   a separate patch and serve as bisection point.

Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  19. 27 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  21. 19 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 12 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 07 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      lockd: fix list corruption on lockd restart · 89996df4
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      If lockd is signalled soon enough after restart then locks_start_grace()
will try to re-add an entry to a list and trigger a lock corruption
warning.

Thanks to Wang Chen for the problem report and diagnosis.

WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add+0x27/0x5c()
...
list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (ef8fe958), but was ef8ff128.  (next=ef8ff128).
...
Pid: 23062, comm: lockd Tainted: G        W  2.6.30-rc2 #3
Call Trace:
[<c042d5b5>] warn_slowpath+0x71/0xa0
[<c0422a96>] ? update_curr+0x11d/0x125
[<c044b12d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x18/0x150
[<c044b270>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
[<c051c61a>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x53/0xfa
[<c051c89f>] __list_add+0x27/0x5c
[<ef8f6daa>] locks_start_grace+0x22/0x30 [lockd]
[<ef8f34da>] set_grace_period+0x39/0x53 [lockd]
[<c06b8921>] ? lock_kernel+0x1c/0x28
[<ef8f3558>] lockd+0x64/0x164 [lockd]
[<c044b12d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x18/0x150
[<c04227b0>] ? complete+0x34/0x3e
[<ef8f34f4>] ? lockd+0x0/0x164 [lockd]
[<ef8f34f4>] ? lockd+0x0/0x164 [lockd]
[<c043dd42>] kthread+0x45/0x6b
[<c043dcfd>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6b
[<c0403c23>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
Reported-by: NWang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
      89996df4
  27. 29 3月, 2009 4 次提交
  29. 08 1月, 2009 2 次提交
  31. 07 1月, 2009 4 次提交
  33. 24 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  35. 25 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  37. 05 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  39. 04 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      nfsd: common grace period control · af558e33
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      Rewrite grace period code to unify management of grace period across
lockd and nfsd.  The current code has lockd and nfsd cooperate to
compute a grace period which is satisfactory to them both, and then
individually enforce it.  This creates a slight race condition, since
the enforcement is not coordinated.  It's also more complicated than
necessary.

Here instead we have lockd and nfsd each inform common code when they
enter the grace period, and when they're ready to leave the grace
period, and allow normal locking only after both of them are ready to
leave.

We also expect the locks_start_grace()/locks_end_grace() interface here
to be simpler to build on for future cluster/high-availability work,
which may require (for example) putting individual filesystems into
grace, or enforcing grace periods across multiple cluster nodes.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
      af558e33
  41. 30 9月, 2008 3 次提交
    • J
      lockd: don't depend on lockd main loop to end grace · c8ab5f2a
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      End lockd's grace period using schedule_delayed_work() instead of a
check on every pass through the main loop.

After a later patch, we'll depend on lockd to end its grace period even
if it's not currently handling requests; so it shouldn't depend on being
woken up from the main loop to do so.

Also, Nakano Hiroaki (who independently produced a similar patch)
noticed that the current behavior is buggy in the face of jiffies
wraparound:

	"lockd uses time_before() to determine whether the grace period
	has expired. This would seem to be enough to avoid timer
	wrap-around issues, but, unfortunately, that is not the case.
	The time_* family of comparison functions can be safely used to
	compare jiffies relatively close in time, but they stop working
	after approximately LONG_MAX/2 ticks. nfsd can suffer this
	problem because the time_before() comparison in lockd() is not
	performed until the first request comes in, which means that if
	there is no lockd traffic for more than LONG_MAX/2 ticks we are
	screwed.

	"The implication of this is that once time_before() starts
	misbehaving any attempt from a NFS client to execute fcntl()
	will be received with a NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD message for
	25 days (assuming HZ=1000). In other words, the 50 seconds grace
	period could turn into a grace period of 50 days or more.

	"Note: This bug was analyzed independently by Oda-san
	<oda@valinux.co.jp> and myself."
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Nakano Hiroaki <nakano.hiroaki@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Itsuro Oda <oda@valinux.co.jp>
      c8ab5f2a
    • J
      locks: allow lockd to process blocked locks during grace period · 8fafa900
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      The check here is currently harmless but unnecessary, since, as the
comment notes, there aren't any blocked-lock callbacks to process
during the grace period anyway.

And eventually we want to allow multiple grace periods that come and go
for different filesystems over the course of the lifetime of lockd, at
which point this check is just going to get in the way.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
      8fafa900
    • C
      SUNRPC: Add address family field to svc_serv data structure · e851db5b
      由 Chuck Lever 提交于 
      Introduce and initialize an address family field in the svc_serv structure.

This field will determine what family to use for the service's listener
sockets and what families are advertised via the local rpcbind daemon.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
      e851db5b