Make policy->cur match the current frequency returned by the driver's
->get() callback before starting the governor in case they went out of
sync in the meantime and drop the piece of code attempting to
resync policy->cur with the real frequency of the boot CPU from
cpufreq_resume() as it serves no purpose any more (and it's racy and
super-ugly anyway).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Move the part of cpufreq_update_policy() that obtains the current
frequency from the driver and updates policy->cur if necessary to
a separate function, cpufreq_get_current_freq().

That should not introduce functional changes and subsequent change
set will need it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Starting a governor in cpufreq always follows the same pattern
involving two calls to cpufreq_governor(), one with the event
argument set to CPUFREQ_GOV_START and one with that argument set to
CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS.

Introduce cpufreq_start_governor() that will carry out those two
operations and make all places where governors are started use it.

That slightly modifies the behavior of cpufreq_set_policy() which
now also will go back to the old governor if the second call to
cpufreq_governor() (the one with event equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS)
fails, but that really is how it should work in the first place.

Also cpufreq_resume() will now pring an error message if the
CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS call to cpufreq_governor() fails, but that
makes it follow cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() and cpufreq_offline()
in that respect.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

The function, cpufreq_quick_get, accesses the global 'cpufreq_driver' and
its fields without taking the associated lock, cpufreq_driver_lock.

Without the locking, nothing guarantees that 'cpufreq_driver' remains
consistent during the call.  This patch fixes the issue by taking the lock
before accessing the data structure.
Signed-off-by: NRichard Cochran <rcochran@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Create cpufreq.c under kernel/sched/ and move the cpufreq code
related to the scheduler to that file and to sched.h.

Redefine cpufreq_update_util() as a static inline function to avoid
function calls at its call sites in the scheduler code (as suggested
by Peter Zijlstra).

Also move the definition of struct update_util_data and declaration
of cpufreq_set_update_util_data() from include/linux/cpufreq.h to
include/linux/sched.h.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Revert commit 3510fac4 (cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the
first CPU in related_cpus).

Earlier, the policy->kobj was added to the kobject core, before ->init()
callback was called for the cpufreq drivers. Which allowed those drivers
to add or remove, driver dependent, sysfs files/directories to the same
kobj from their ->init() and ->exit() callbacks.

That isn't possible anymore after commit 3510fac4.

Now, there is no other clean alternative that people can adopt.

Its better to revert the earlier commit to allow cpufreq drivers to
create/remove sysfs files from ->init() and ->exit() callbacks.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use the observation that cpufreq_update_util() is only called
by the scheduler with rq->lock held, so the callers of
cpufreq_set_update_util_data() can use synchronize_sched()
instead of synchronize_rcu() to wait for cpufreq_update_util()
to complete.  Moreover, if they are updated to do that,
rcu_read_(un)lock() calls in cpufreq_update_util() might be
replaced with rcu_read_(un)lock_sched(), respectively, but
those aren't really necessary, because the scheduler calls
that function from RCU-sched read-side critical sections
already.

In addition to that, if cpufreq_set_update_util_data() checks
the func field in the struct update_util_data before setting
the per-CPU pointer to it, the data->func check may be dropped
from cpufreq_update_util() as well.

Make the above changes to reduce the overhead from
cpufreq_update_util() in the scheduler paths invoking it
and to make the cleanup after removing its callbacks less
heavy-weight somewhat.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

The entire sequence of events (like INIT/START or STOP/EXIT) for which
cpufreq_governor() is called, is guaranteed to be protected by
policy->rwsem now.

The additional checks that were added earlier (as we were forced to drop
policy->rwsem before calling cpufreq_governor() for EXIT event), aren't
required anymore.

Over that, they weren't sufficient really. They just take care of
START/STOP events, but not INIT/EXIT and the state machine was never
maintained properly by them.

Kill the unnecessary checks and policy->governor_enabled field.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The __ at the beginning of the routine aren't really necessary at all.
Rename it to cpufreq_governor() instead.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

handle_update() is declared at the top of the file as its user appear
before its definition. Relocate the routine to get rid of this.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We used to drop policy->rwsem just before calling __cpufreq_governor()
in some cases earlier and so it was possible that __cpufreq_governor()
ran concurrently via separate threads for the same policy.

In order to guarantee valid state transitions for governors,
'governor_enabled' was required to be protected using some locking
and cpufreq_governor_lock was added for that.

But now __cpufreq_governor() is always called under policy->rwsem,
and 'governor_enabled' is protected against races even without
cpufreq_governor_lock.

Get rid of the extra lock now.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Tested-by: NShilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ rjw : Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The cpufreq core code is not consistent with respect to invoking
__cpufreq_governor() under policy->rwsem.

Changing all code to always hold policy->rwsem around
__cpufreq_governor() invocations will allow us to remove
cpufreq_governor_lock that is used today because we can't
guarantee that __cpufreq_governor() isn't executed twice in
parallel for the same policy.

We should also ensure that policy->rwsem is held across governor
state changes.

For example, while adding a CPU to the policy in the CPU online path,
we need to stop the governor, change policy->cpus, start the governor
and then refresh its limits. The complete sequence must be guaranteed
to complete without interruptions by concurrent governor state
updates.  That can be achieved by holding policy->rwsem around those
sequences of operations.

Also note that after this patch cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu() and
->exit() will get called under policy->rwsem which wasn't the case
earlier. That shouldn't have any side effects, though.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Tested-by: NShilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 1aee40ac (cpufreq: Invoke __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
after releasing cpu_hotplug.lock) split the cpufreq's CPU offline
routine in two pieces, one of them to be run with CPU offline/online
locked and the other to be called later.  The reason for that split
was a possible deadlock scenario involving cpufreq sysfs attributes
and CPU offline.

However, the handling of CPU offline in cpufreq has changed since
then.  Policy sysfs attributes are never removed during CPU offline,
so there's no need to worry about accessing them during CPU offline,
because that can't lead to any deadlocks now.  Governor sysfs
attributes are still removed in __cpufreq_governor(_EXIT), but
there is a new kobject type for them now and its show/store
callbacks don't lock CPU offline/online (they don't need to do
that).

This means that the CPU offline code in cpufreq doesn't need to
be split any more, so combine cpufreq_offline_prepare() with
cpufreq_offline_finish().
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Tested-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Tested-by: NShilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Earlier, when the struct freq-attr was used to represent governor
attributes, the standard cpufreq show/store sysfs attribute callbacks
were applied to the governor tunable attributes and they always acquire
the policy->rwsem lock before carrying out the operation.  That could
have resulted in an ABBA deadlock if governor tunable attributes are
removed under policy->rwsem while one of them is being accessed
concurrently (if sysfs attributes removal wins the race, it will wait
for the access to complete with policy->rwsem held while the attribute
callback will block on policy->rwsem indefinitely).

We attempted to address this issue by dropping policy->rwsem around
governor tunable attributes removal (that is, around invocations of the
->governor callback with the event arg equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT)
in cpufreq_set_policy(), but that opened up race conditions that had not
been possible with policy->rwsem held all the time.

The previous commit, "cpufreq: governor: New sysfs show/store callbacks
for governor tunables", fixed the original ABBA deadlock by adding new
governor specific show/store callbacks.

We don't have to drop rwsem around invocations of governor event
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT anymore, and original fix can be reverted now.

Fixes: 955ef483 (cpufreq: Drop rwsem lock around CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT)
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reported-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Tested-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Tested-by: NShilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Introduce a mechanism by which parts of the cpufreq subsystem
("setpolicy" drivers or the core) can register callbacks to be
executed from cpufreq_update_util() which is invoked by the
scheduler's update_load_avg() on CPU utilization changes.

This allows the "setpolicy" drivers to dispense with their timers
and do all of the computations they need and frequency/voltage
adjustments in the update_load_avg() code path, among other things.

The update_load_avg() changes were suggested by Peter Zijlstra.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Drop a pointless label at a return statement from
__cpufreq_driver_target() and rearrange that function
to reduce the indentation level.

No intentional functional changes.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806
("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering").
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The show() and store() routines in the cpufreq core don't need to
check if the struct freq_attr they want to use really provides the
callbacks they need as expected (if that's not the case, it means
a bug in the code anyway), so change them to avoid doing that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

The preprocessor magic used for setting the default cpufreq governor
(and for using the performance governor as a fallback one for that
matter) is really nasty, so replace it with __weak functions and
overrides.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
primitive instead.
Signed-off-by: NGautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Notice that the boost_supported field in struct cpufreq_driver is
redundant, because the driver's ->set_boost callback may be left
unset if "boost" is not supported.  Moreover, the only driver
populating the ->set_boost callback is acpi_cpufreq, so make it
avoid populating that callback if "boost" is not supported, rework
the core to check ->set_boost instead of boost_supported to
verify "boost" support and drop boost_supported which isn't
used any more.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq_boost_supported() is not used outside of cpufreq.c, so make
it static.

While at it, refactor it as a one-liner (which it really is).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

For cpufreq drivers which use setpolicy interface, after offline->online
the policy is set to default. This can be reproduced by setting the
default policy of intel_pstate or longrun to ondemand and then change to
"performance". After offline and online, the setpolicy will be called with
the policy=ondemand.

For drivers using governors this condition is handled by storing
last_governor, during offline and restoring during online. The same should
be done for drivers using setpolicy interface. Storing last_policy during
offline and restoring during online.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Subsys interface's ->remove_dev() is called when the cpufreq driver is
unregistering or the CPU is getting physically removed. We keep removing
the cpuX/cpufreq link for all CPUs except the last one, which is a
mistake as all CPUs contain a link now.

Because of this, one CPU from each policy will still contain a link (to
an already removed policyX directory), after the cpufreq driver is
unregistered.

Fix that by removing the link first and then only see if the policy is
required to be freed. That will make sure that no links are left out.

Fixes: 96bdda61 ("cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories")
Reported-and-tested-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The sysfs policy directory is postfixed currently with the CPU number
for which the policy was created, which isn't necessarily the first CPU
in related_cpus mask.

To make it more consistent and predictable, lets postfix the policy with
the first cpu in related-cpus mask.
Suggested-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The cpufreq sysfs interface had been a bit inconsistent as one of the
CPUs for a policy had a real directory within its sysfs 'cpuX' directory
and all other CPUs had links to it. That also made the code a bit
complex as we need to take care of moving the sysfs directory if the CPU
containing the real directory is getting physically hot-unplugged.

Solve this by creating 'policyX' directories (per-policy) in
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ directory, where X is the CPU for which
the policy was first created.

This also removes the need of keeping kobj_cpu and we can remove it now.
Suggested-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: is more of a general agreement from the person that he is
Reviewed-by: is a more strict tag and implies that the reviewer has
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

They don't do anything special now, remove the unnecessary wrapper.
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Later patches will need to create policy specific directories in
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ directory and so the cpufreq directory
wouldn't be ever empty.

And so no fun creating/destroying it on need basis anymore. Create it
once on system boot.
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

->related_cpus is empty at this point of time and copying ->cpus to it
or orring ->related_cpus with ->cpus would result in the same value. But
cpumask_copy makes it rather clear.
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We just made sure policy->cpu is online and this check will always fail
as the policy is active. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When scaling_available_frequencies is read on an offlined cpu, then
either lockup or junk values are displayed. This is caused by
freed freq_table, which policy is using.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_cpu_get() called by get_cur_freq_on_cpu() is overkill,
because the ->get() callback is always invoked in a context in
which all of the conditions checked by cpufreq_cpu_get() are
guaranteed to be satisfied.

Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead of it and drop the
corresponding cpufreq_cpu_put() from get_cur_freq_on_cpu().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Some cpufreq drivers may set suspend frequency only for
selected setups but still would like to use the generic
suspend handler.  Thus don't treat !policy->suspend_freq
condition as an incorrect one.
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its better to use __func__ to print functions name instead of writing
the name in the print statement. This also has the advantage that a
change in function's name doesn't force us to change the print message
as well.
Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() isn't used by any external users, staticize it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Driver is guaranteed to be present on a call to cpufreq_parse_governor()
and there is no need to check for !cpufreq_driver. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its always same as policy->policy, and there is no need to keep another
copy of it. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its always same as policy->governor, and there is no need to keep
another copy of it. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

'user_policy' caches properties of a policy that are set by userspace.
And these must be updated only if cpufreq core was successful in
updating them based on request from user space.

In store_scaling_governor(), we are updating user_policy.policy and
user_policy.governor even if cpufreq_set_policy() failed. That's
incorrect.

Fix this by updating user_policy.* only if we were successful in
updating the properties.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>