Instead of doing everything inside of pin_mutex, we move all pinning
outside. Because i915_active has its own reference counting and
pinning is also having the same issues vs mutexes, we make sure
everything is pinned first, so the pinning in i915_active only needs
to bump refcounts. This allows us to take pin refcounts correctly
all the time.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-14-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

On the virtual engines, we only use the intel_breadcrumbs for tracking
signaling of stale breadcrumbs from the irq_workers. They do not have
any associated interrupt handling, active requests are passed to a
physical engine and associated breadcrumb interrupt handler. This causes
issues for us as we need to ensure that we do not actually try and
enable interrupts and the powermanagement required for them on the
virtual engine, as they will never be disabled. Instead, let's
specify the physical engine used for interrupt handler on a particular
breadcrumb.

v2: Drop b->irq_armed = true mocking for no interrupt HW

Fixes: 4fe6abb8 ("drm/i915/gt: Ignore irq enabling on the virtual engines")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731154834.8378-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

One more complication of preempt-to-busy with respect to the virtual
engine is that we may have retired the last request along the virtual
engine at the same time as preparing to submit the completed request to
a new engine. That submit will be shortcircuited, but not before we have
updated the context with the new register offsets and marked the virtual
engine as bound to the new engine (by calling swap on ve->siblings[]).
As we may have just retired the completed request, we may also be in the
middle of calling virtual_context_exit() to turn off the power management
associated with the virtual engine, and that in turn walks the
ve->siblings[]. If we happen to call swap() on the array as we walk, we
will call intel_engine_pm_put() twice on the same engine.

In this patch, we prevent this by only updating the bound engine after a
successful submission which weeds out the already completed requests.

Alternatively, we could walk a non-volatile array for the pm, such as
using the engine->mask. The small advantage to performing the update
after the submit is that we then only have to do a swap for active
requests.

Fixes: 22b7a426 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
References: 6d06779e ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine"
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: "Nayana, Venkata Ramana" <venkata.ramana.nayana@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731154834.8378-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

After staring at the breadcrumb enabling/cancellation and coming to the
conclusion that the cause of the mysterious stale breadcrumbs must the
act of submitting a completed requests, we can then redirect those
completed requests onto a dedicated signaled_list at the time of
construction and so eliminate intel_engine_transfer_stale_breadcrumbs().
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731154834.8378-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Since the breadcrumb enabling/cancelling itself is serialised by the
breadcrumbs.irq_lock, with a bit of care we can remove the outer
serialisation with i915_request.lock for concurrent
dma_fence_enable_signaling(). This has the important side-effect of
eliminating the nested i915_request.lock within request submission.

The challenge in serialisation is around the unsubmission where we take
an active request that wants a breadcrumb on the signaling engine and
put it to sleep. We do not want a concurrent
dma_fence_enable_signaling() to attach a breadcrumb as we unsubmit, so
we must mark the request as no longer active before serialising with the
concurrent enable-signaling.

On retire, we serialise with the concurrent enable-signaling, but
instead of clearing ACTIVE, we mark it as SIGNALED.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731154834.8378-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[Joonas: Rebased and reordered into drm-intel-gt-next branch]
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

We may need to allocate more than one pinned context/timeline for each
engine which can utilise the per-engine HWSP, so we need to give each
a different offset within it.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200730183906.25422-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Unlike rcs where we have conclusive evidence from our selftesting that
disabling the preparser before performing the TLB invalidate and
relocations does impact upon the GPU execution, the evidence for the
same requirement on xcs is much more circumstantial. Let's apply the
preparser disable between batches as we invalidate the TLB as a dose of
healthy paranoia, just in case.

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2169Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200728152110.830-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

We usually assume that increasing PCI device revision ID's translates to
newer steppings; macros like IS_KBL_REVID() that we use rely on this
behavior.  Unfortunately this turns out to not be true on KBL; the
newer device 2 revision ID's sometimes go backward to older steppings.
The situation is further complicated by different GT and display
steppings associated with each revision ID.

Let's work around this by providing a table to map the revision ID to
specific GT and display steppings, and then perform our comparisons on
the mapped values.

v2:
 - Move the kbl_revids[] array to intel_workarounds.c to avoid compiler
   warnings about an unused variable in files that don't call the
   macros (kernel test robot).

Bspec: 18329
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200811032105.2819370-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.comReviewed-by: NSwathi Dhanavanthri <swathi.dhanavanthri@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
(or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings
(e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized,
either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes.

In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining
needless uses with the following script:

git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \
	xargs perl -pi -e \
		's/\buninitialized_var\(([^\)]+)\)/\1/g;
		 s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;'

drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid
pathological white-space.

No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0
for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64,
alpha, and m68k.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/

Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5
Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> # IB
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> # wireless drivers
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> # erofs
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

The danger in switching at random upon intel_context_pin is that the
context may still actually be inflight, as it will not be scheduled out
until a context switch after it is complete -- that may be a long time
after we do a final intel_context_unpin.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2118
Fixes: 6d06779e ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200713160549.17344-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 90a98720)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

We do not use the virtual engines for interrupts (they have physical
components), but we do use them to decouple the fence signaling during
submission. Currently, when we submit a completed request, we try to
enable the interrupt handler for the virtual engine, but we never disarm
it. A quick fix is then to mark the irq as enabled, and it will then
remain enabled -- and this prevents us from waking the device and never
letting it sleep again.

Fixes: f8db4d05 ("drm/i915: Initialise breadcrumb lists on the virtual engine")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200711203236.12330-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 4fe6abb8)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The danger in switching at random upon intel_context_pin is that the
context may still actually be inflight, as it will not be scheduled out
until a context switch after it is complete -- that may be a long time
after we do a final intel_context_unpin.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2118
Fixes: 6d06779e ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200713160549.17344-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We do not use the virtual engines for interrupts (they have physical
components), but we do use them to decouple the fence signaling during
submission. Currently, when we submit a completed request, we try to
enable the interrupt handler for the virtual engine, but we never disarm
it. A quick fix is then to mark the irq as enabled, and it will then
remain enabled -- and this prevents us from waking the device and never
letting it sleep again.

Fixes: f8db4d05 ("drm/i915: Initialise breadcrumb lists on the virtual engine")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200711203236.12330-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If something has gone awry with the CSB processing, we need to pause,
unwind and restart the request submission and event processing. However,
currently we skip the engine reset if we raise an error but discover no
active context, in the mistaken belief that it was merely a glitch in
the matrix. The glitches are real enough, and we do need to unwind even
if the engine appears idle (as it has gone permanently idle!) The
simplest way to unwind and recover is simply do the engine reset, which
should be very fast and _safe_ as nothing is active.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200711091349.28865-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If the HW throws a curve ball and reports either en event before it is
possible, or just a completely impossible event, we have to grin and
bear it. The first few events, we will likely not notice as we would be
expecting some event, but as soon as we stop expecting an event and yet
they still keep coming, then we enter into undefined state territory.
In which case, bail out, stop processing the events, and reset the
engine and our set of queued requests to recover.

The sporadic hangs and warnings will continue to plague CI, but at least
system stability should not be compromised.

v2: Commentary and force the reset-on-error.
v3: Customised user facing message for forced resets from internal errors.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2045Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200710133125.30194-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Some objects we map once during their construction, and then never
access their mappings again, even if they are kept around for the
duration of the driver. Keeping those pages mapped, often vmapped, is
therefore wasteful and we should release the maps as soon as we no
longer need them.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200708173748.32734-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we have a pin_map interface, that knows how to flush the data to the
device, use it. The only downside is that we keep the kmap around, as
once acquired we keep the mapping cached until the object's backing
store is released.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200708173748.32734-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

SSEUs are a GT capability, so track them under gt_info.
Signed-off-by: NVenkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200708003952.21831-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

In commit 5ba32c7b ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context
reload when rewinding RING_TAIL"), we placed the check for rewinding a
context on actually submitting the next request in that context. This
was so that we only had to check once, and could do so with precision
avoiding as many forced restores as possible. For example, to ensure
that we can resubmit the same request a couple of times, we include a
small wa_tail such that on the next submission, the ring->tail will
appear to move forwards when resubmitting the same request. This is very
common as it will happen for every lite-restore to fill the second port
after a context switch.

However, intel_ring_direction() is limited in precision to movements of
upto half the ring size. The consequence being that if we tried to
unwind many requests, we could exceed half the ring and flip the sense
of the direction, so missing a force restore. As no request can be
greater than half the ring (i.e. 2048 bytes in the smallest case), we
can check for rollback incrementally. As we check against the tail that
would be submitted, we do not lose any sensitivity and allow lite
restores for the simple case. We still need to double check upon
submitting the context, to allow for multiple preemptions and
resubmissions.

Fixes: 5ba32c7b ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: NBruce Chang <yu.bruce.chang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200609151723.12971-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit e36ba817)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent
the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to
honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request,
or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the
timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band,
leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running
uninterrupted on the HW.

v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than
I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request
(heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current
non-premptable request.

Fixes: 2a98f4e6 ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit b72f02d7)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

It was quite the oversight to only factor in the normal queue to decide
the timeslicing switch priority. By leaving out the next virtual request
from the priority decision, we would not timeslice the current engine if
there was an available virtual request.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/sliced
Fixes: 3df2deed ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable timeslice on partial virtual engine dequeue")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519132046.22443-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 6ad249ba)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Since the process_csb() does not require us to hold the
engine->active.lock, we can move the opportunistic flush before
direction submission to outside of the lock.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200612221113.9129-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In commit 5ba32c7b ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context
reload when rewinding RING_TAIL"), we placed the check for rewinding a
context on actually submitting the next request in that context. This
was so that we only had to check once, and could do so with precision
avoiding as many forced restores as possible. For example, to ensure
that we can resubmit the same request a couple of times, we include a
small wa_tail such that on the next submission, the ring->tail will
appear to move forwards when resubmitting the same request. This is very
common as it will happen for every lite-restore to fill the second port
after a context switch.

However, intel_ring_direction() is limited in precision to movements of
upto half the ring size. The consequence being that if we tried to
unwind many requests, we could exceed half the ring and flip the sense
of the direction, so missing a force restore. As no request can be
greater than half the ring (i.e. 2048 bytes in the smallest case), we
can check for rollback incrementally. As we check against the tail that
would be submitted, we do not lose any sensitivity and allow lite
restores for the simple case. We still need to double check upon
submitting the context, to allow for multiple preemptions and
resubmissions.

Fixes: 5ba32c7b ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: NBruce Chang <yu.bruce.chang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200609151723.12971-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Sentinels are supposed to be last requests in the elsp queue, not the
only one, so adjust the assert accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607222108.14401-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

We may choose not to submit for a number of reasons, yet not fill both
ELSP. In which case we must start timeslicing (there will be no ACK
event on which to hook the start) if the queue would benefit from the
currently active context being evicted.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200605122334.2798-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we only submit the first port, leaving the second empty yet have
ready requests pending in the queue, use that to set the timeslicing
priority (i.e. the priority at which we will decided to enabling
timeslicing and evict the currently active context if the queue is of
equal priority after its quantum expired).
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200605122334.2798-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Sometimes an engine might need to keep forcewake active while it is busy
submitting requests for a particular workaround. Track such nuisance
with engine->fw_domain.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200604153145.21068-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We infrequently use the direct i915 backpointer from the i915_request,
so do we really need to waste the space in the struct for it? 8 bytes
from the most frequently allocated struct vs an 3 bytes and pointer
chasing in using rq->engine->i915?
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAkeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200602220953.21178-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We may choose to only submit ELSP[0], even though we have sufficient
requests to fill the whole ELSP. Normally, we only start timeslicing if
we fill more than one port, but in this case we need to start
timeslicing for the queue that we choose not to submit.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200528205727.20309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent
the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to
honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request,
or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the
timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band,
leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running
uninterrupted on the HW.

v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than
I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request
(heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current
non-premptable request.

Fixes: 2a98f4e6 ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If there are no internal levels and the user priority-shift is zero, we
can help the compiler eliminate some dead code:

Function                                     old     new   delta
start_timeslice                              169     154     -15
__execlists_submission_tasklet              4696    4659     -37
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200525075347.582-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

It was quite the oversight to only factor in the normal queue to decide
the timeslicing switch priority. By leaving out the next virtual request
from the priority decision, we would not timeslice the current engine if
there was an available virtual request.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/sliced
Fixes: 3df2deed ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable timeslice on partial virtual engine dequeue")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519132046.22443-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we decide to timeslice out the current virtual request, we will
unsubmit it while it is still busy (ve->context.inflight == sibling[0]).
If the virtual tasklet and then the other sibling tasklets run before we
completely schedule out the active virtual request for the preemption,
those other tasklets will see that the virtul request is still inflight
on sibling[0] and leave it be. Therefore when we finally schedule-out
the virtual request and if we see that we have passed it back to the
virtual engine, reschedule the virtual tasklet so that it may be
resubmitted on any of the siblings.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519132046.22443-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In order to keep all the tasklets in the same execution lists and so
fifo ordered, be consistent and use the same priority for all.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200518081440.17948-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The second try at staging the transfer of the breadcrumb. In part one,
we realised we could not simply move to the second engine as we were
only holding the breadcrumb lock on the first. So in commit 6c81e21a
("drm/i915/gt: Stage the transfer of the virtual breadcrumb"), we
removed it from the first engine and marked up this request to reattach
the signaling on the new engine. However, this failed to take into
account that we only attach the breadcrumb if the new request is added
at the start of the queue, which if we are transferring, it is because
we know there to be a request to be signaled (and hence we would not be
attached).

In this attempt, we try to transfer the completed requests to the
irq_worker on its rq->engine->breadcrumbs. This preserves the coupling
between the rq and its breadcrumbs, so that
i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb() does not attempt to manipulate the list
under the wrong lock.

v2: Code sharing is fun.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1862
Fixes: 6c81e21a ("drm/i915/gt: Stage the transfer of the virtual breadcrumb")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513074809.18194-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we have fast timeslicing on semaphores, we no longer need to
prioritise none-semaphore work as we will yield any work blocked on a
semaphore to the next in the queue. Previously with no timeslicing,
blocking on the semaphore caused extremely bad scheduling with multiple
clients utilising multiple rings. Now, there is no impact and we can
remove the complication.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513173504.28322-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The initial-breadcrumb is used to mark the end of the awaiting and the
beginning of the user payload. We verify that we do not start the user
payload before all signaler are completed, checking our semaphore setup
by looking for the initial breadcrumb being written too early. We also
want to ensure that we do not add semaphore waits after we have already
closed the semaphore section, an issue for later deferred waits.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513165937.9508-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Upon gt resume, we first poison then sanitize the engine. However, our
testing shows that gen9 will very rarely retain the poisoned value from
the HWSP mappings of the execlists status registers. This suggests that
it is reading back from the HWSP, so rejig the register reset.

v2: Maybe RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR is write masked. It is.

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1812Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513100120.11617-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could
correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the
common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset
handling, the dependency is weak -- as we the pair of requests are
allowed to run in parallel and not in strict succession.

The real significance though is that this allows us to rearrange
groups of WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT linked requests along the single engine, and
so can resolve user level inter-batch scheduling dependencies from user
semaphores.

Fixes: c81471f5 ("drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fences")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_fence/submit
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200507155109.8892-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 6b6cd2eb)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

This reverts commit 0b718ba1.

There are still some residual issues with asynchronous binding and
execution, but since commit 92581f9f ("drm/i915: Immediately execute
the fenced work") we prefer not to use asynchronous binds, and the
remaining issues do not seem restricted to Cherryview [at least the ones
seen over a few dozen CI runs, less frequent issues are sure to be
discovered!]

These issues seem to be mitigated, if not eliminated entirely, by the
previous commit 84eac0c6 ("drm/i915/gt: Force pte cacheline to main
memory").
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200510102431.21959-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk