Let's move the fatal signal check even earlier so that we can directly use
the new fault_signal_pending() in x86 mm code.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NBrian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>
Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220155353.8676-5-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

For most architectures, we've got a quick path to detect fatal signal
after a handle_mm_fault().  Introduce a helper for that quick path.

It cleans the current codes a bit so we don't need to duplicate the same
check across archs.  More importantly, this will be an unified place that
we handle the signal immediately right after an interrupted page fault, so
it'll be much easier for us if we want to change the behavior of handling
signals later on for all the archs.

Note that currently only part of the archs are using this new helper,
because some archs have their own way to handle signals.  In the follow up
patches, we'll try to apply this helper to all the rest of archs.

Another note is that the "regs" parameter in the new helper is not used
yet.  It'll be used very soon.  Now we kept it in this patch only to avoid
touching all the archs again in the follow up patches.

[peterx@redhat.com: fix sparse warnings]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200311145921.GD479302@xz-x1Signed-off-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NBrian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>
Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220155353.8676-4-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When follow_hugetlb_page() returns with *locked==0, it means we've got a
VM_FAULT_RETRY within the fauling process and we've released the mmap_sem.
When that happens, we should stop and bail out.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NBrian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>
Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220155353.8676-3-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm: Page fault enhancements", v6.

This series contains cleanups and enhancements to current page fault
logic.  The whole idea comes from the discussion between Andrea and Linus
on the bug reported by syzbot here:

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/2/833

Basically it does two things:

  (a) Allows the page fault logic to be more interactive on not only
      SIGKILL, but also the rest of userspace signals, and,

  (b) Allows the page fault retry (VM_FAULT_RETRY) to happen for more
      than once.

For (a): with the changes we should be able to react faster when page
faults are working in parallel with userspace signals like SIGSTOP and
SIGCONT (and more), and with that we can remove the buggy part in
userfaultfd and benefit the whole page fault mechanism on faster signal
processing to reach the userspace.

For (b), we should be able to allow the page fault handler to loop for
even more than twice.  Some context: for now since we have
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY we can allow to retry the page fault once with the
same interrupt context, however never more than twice.  This can be not
only a potential cleanup to remove this assumption since AFAIU the code
itself doesn't really have this twice-only limitation (though that should
be a protective approach in the past), at the same time it'll greatly
simplify future works like userfaultfd write-protect where it's possible
to retry for more than twice (please have a look at [1] below for a
possible user that might require the page fault to be handled for a third
time; if we can remove the retry limitation we can simply drop that patch
and those complexity).

This patch (of 16):

There's plenty of places around __get_user_pages() that has a parameter
"nonblocking" which does not really mean that "it won't block" (because it
can really block) but instead it shows whether the mmap_sem is released by
up_read() during the page fault handling mostly when VM_FAULT_RETRY is
returned.

We have the correct naming in e.g.  get_user_pages_locked() or
get_user_pages_remote() as "locked", however there're still many places
that are using the "nonblocking" as name.

Renaming the places to "locked" where proper to better suite the
functionality of the variable.  While at it, fixing up some of the
comments accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NBrian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com>
Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220155353.8676-2-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The documentation currently does not include the deathless prose written
to describe functions in pagemap.h because it's not included in any rst
file.  Fix up the mismatches between parameter names and the documentation
and add the file to mm-api.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200221220045.24989-1-willy@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Currently the declaration and definition for is_vma_temporary_stack() are
scattered.  Lets make is_vma_temporary_stack() helper available for
general use and also drop the declaration from (include/linux/huge_mm.h)
which is no longer required.  While at this, rename this as
vma_is_temporary_stack() in line with existing helpers.  This should not
cause any functional change.
Signed-off-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1582782965-3274-4-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Idea of a foreign VMA with respect to the present context is very generic.
But currently there are two identical definitions for this in powerpc and
x86 platforms.  Lets consolidate those redundant definitions while making
vma_is_foreign() available for general use later.  This should not cause
any functional change.
Signed-off-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1582782965-3274-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm/vma: some more minor changes", v2.

The motivation here is to consolidate VMA flags and helpers in generic
memory header and reduce code duplication when ever applicable.  If there
are other possible similar instances which might be missing here, please
do let me me know.  I will be happy to incorporate them.

This patch (of 3):

Move VM_NO_KHUGEPAGED into generic header (include/linux/mm.h).  This just
makes sure that no VMA flag is scattered in individual function files any
longer.  While at this, fix an old comment which is no longer valid.  This
should not cause any functional change.
Signed-off-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1582782965-3274-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Following the update of pagewalk code commit a07984d48146 ("mm: pagewalk:
add p4d_entry() and pgd_entry()") we can modify the mapping_dirty_helpers'
huge page-table entry callbacks to avoid splitting when a huge pud or -pmd
is encountered.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NSteven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200203154305.15045-1-thomas_os@shipmail.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If a task is getting moved out of the OOMing cgroup, it might result in
unexpected OOM killings if memory.oom.group is used anywhere in the cgroup
tree.

Imagine the following example:

          A (oom.group = 1)
         / \
  (OOM) B   C

Let's say B's memory.max is exceeded and it's OOMing.  The OOM killer
selects a task in B as a victim, but someone asynchronously moves the task
into C.  mem_cgroup_get_oom_group() will iterate over all ancestors of C
up to the root cgroup.  In theory it had to stop at the oom_domain level -
the memory cgroup which is OOMing.  But because B is not an ancestor of C,
it's not happening.  Instead it chooses A (because it's oom.group is set),
and kills all tasks in A.  This behavior is wrong because the OOM happened
in B, so there is no reason to kill anything outside.

Fix this by checking it the memory cgroup to which the task belongs is a
descendant of the oom_domain.  If not, memory.oom.group should be ignored,
and the OOM killer should kill only the victim task.
Reported-by: NDan Schatzberg <dschatzberg@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200316223510.3176148-1-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The read side of this is all protected, but we can still tear if multiple
iterations of mem_cgroup_protected are going at the same time.

There's some intentional racing in mem_cgroup_protected which is ok, but
load/store tearing should be avoided.
Signed-off-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d1e9fbc0379fe8db475d82c8b6fbe048876e12ae.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.nameSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The write side of this is xchg()/smp_mb(), so that's all good.  Just a few
sites missing a READ_ONCE.
Signed-off-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bbec2c3d822217334855c8877a9d28b2a6d395fb.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.nameSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This can be set concurrently with reads, which may cause the wrong value
to be propagated.
Signed-off-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e809b4e6b0c1626dac6945970de06409a180ee65.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.nameSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This can be set concurrently with reads, which may cause the wrong value
to be propagated.
Signed-off-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/448206f44b0fa7be9dad2ca2601d2bcb2c0b7844.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.nameSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This one is a bit more nuanced because we have memcg_max_mutex, which is
mostly just used for enforcing invariants, but we still need to READ_ONCE
since (despite its name) it doesn't really protect memory.max access.

On write (page_counter_set_max() and memory_max_write()) we use xchg(),
which uses smp_mb(), so that's already fine.
Signed-off-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/50a31e5f39f8ae6c8fb73966ba1455f0924e8f44.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.nameSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

A mem_cgroup's high attribute can be concurrently set at the same time as
we are trying to read it -- for example, if we are in memory_high_write at
the same time as we are trying to do high reclaim.
Signed-off-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2f66f7038ed1d4688e59de72b627ae0ea52efa83.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.nameSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mem_cgroup_id_get_many() is currently used only when MMU or MEMCG_SWAP
configuration options are enabled.  Having them disabled triggers the
following warning at compile time:

  linux/mm/memcontrol.c:4797:13: warning: `mem_cgroup_id_get_many' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
   static void mem_cgroup_id_get_many(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int n)

Make mem_cgroup_id_get_many() __maybe_unused to address the issue.
Signed-off-by: NVincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200305164354.48147-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Currently multiple locations in memcg code, css_tryget_online() is being
used. However it doesn't matter whether the cgroup is online for the
callers. Online used to matter when we had reparenting on offlining and
we needed a way to prevent new ones from showing up.

The failure case for couple of these css_tryget_online usage is to
fallback to root_mem_cgroup which kind of make bypassing the memcg
limits possible for some workloads. For example creating an inotify
group in a subcontainer and then deleting that container after moving the
process to a different container will make all the event objects
allocated for that group to the root_mem_cgroup. So, using
css_tryget_online() is dangerous for such cases.

Two locations still use the online version. The swapin of offlined
memcg's pages and the memcg kmem cache creation. The kmem cache indeed
needs the online version as the kernel does the reparenting of memcg
kmem caches. For the swapin case, it has been left for later as the
fallback is not really that concerning.

With swap accounting enabled, if the memcg of the swapped out page is
not online then the memcg extracted from the given 'mm' will be charged
and if 'mm' is NULL then root memcg will be charged.  However I could
not find a code path where the given 'mm' will be NULL for swap-in
case.
Signed-off-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302203109.179417-1-shakeelb@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Right now, the effective protection of any given cgroup is capped by its
own explicit memory.low setting, regardless of what the parent says.  The
reasons for this are mostly historical and ease of implementation: to make
delegation of memory.low safe, effective protection is the min() of all
memory.low up the tree.

Unfortunately, this limitation makes it impossible to protect an entire
subtree from another without forcing the user to make explicit protection
allocations all the way to the leaf cgroups - something that is highly
undesirable in real life scenarios.

Consider memory in a data center host.  At the cgroup top level, we have a
distinction between system management software and the actual workload the
system is executing.  Both branches are further subdivided into individual
services, job components etc.

We want to protect the workload as a whole from the system management
software, but that doesn't mean we want to protect and prioritize
individual workload wrt each other.  Their memory demand can vary over
time, and we'd want the VM to simply cache the hottest data within the
workload subtree.  Yet, the current memory.low limitations force us to
allocate a fixed amount of protection to each workload component in order
to get protection from system management software in general.  This
results in very inefficient resource distribution.

Another concern with mandating downward allocation is that, as the
complexity of the cgroup tree grows, it gets harder for the lower levels
to be informed about decisions made at the host-level.  Consider a
container inside a namespace that in turn creates its own nested tree of
cgroups to run multiple workloads.  It'd be extremely difficult to
configure memory.low parameters in those leaf cgroups that on one hand
balance pressure among siblings as the container desires, while also
reflecting the host-level protection from e.g.  rpm upgrades, that lie
beyond one or more delegation and namespacing points in the tree.

It's highly unusual from a cgroup interface POV that nested levels have to
be aware of and reflect decisions made at higher levels for them to be
effective.

To enable such use cases and scale configurability for complex trees, this
patch implements a resource inheritance model for memory that is similar
to how the CPU and the IO controller implement work-conserving resource
allocations: a share of a resource allocated to a subree always applies to
the entire subtree recursively, while allowing, but not mandating,
children to further specify distribution rules.

That means that if protection is explicitly allocated among siblings,
those configured shares are being followed during page reclaim just like
they are now.  However, if the memory.low set at a higher level is not
fully claimed by the children in that subtree, the "floating" remainder is
applied to each cgroup in the tree in proportion to its size.  Since
reclaim pressure is applied in proportion to size as well, each child in
that tree gets the same boost, and the effect is neutral among siblings -
with respect to each other, they behave as if no memory control was
enabled at all, and the VM simply balances the memory demands optimally
within the subtree.  But collectively those cgroups enjoy a boost over the
cgroups in neighboring trees.

E.g.  a leaf cgroup with a memory.low setting of 0 no longer means that
it's not getting a share of the hierarchically assigned resource, just
that it doesn't claim a fixed amount of it to protect from its siblings.

This allows us to recursively protect one subtree (workload) from another
(system management), while letting subgroups compete freely among each
other - without having to assign fixed shares to each leaf, and without
nested groups having to echo higher-level settings.

The floating protection composes naturally with fixed protection.
Consider the following example tree:

		A            A: low = 2G
               / \          A1: low = 1G
              A1 A2         A2: low = 0G

As outside pressure is applied to this tree, A1 will enjoy a fixed
protection from A2 of 1G, but the remaining, unclaimed 1G from A is split
evenly among A1 and A2, coming out to 1.5G and 0.5G.

There is a slight risk of regressing theoretical setups where the
top-level cgroups don't know about the true budgeting and set bogusly high
"bypass" values that are meaningfully allocated down the tree.  Such
setups would rely on unclaimed protection to be discarded, and
distributing it would change the intended behavior.  Be safe and hide the
new behavior behind a mount option, 'memory_recursiveprot'.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227195606.46212-4-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The effective protection of any given cgroup is a somewhat complicated
construct that depends on the ancestor's configuration, siblings'
configurations, as well as current memory utilization in all these groups.
It's done this way to satisfy hierarchical delegation requirements while
also making the configuration semantics flexible and expressive in complex
real life scenarios.

Unfortunately, all the rules and requirements are sparsely documented, and
the code is a little too clever in merging different scenarios into a
single min() expression.  This makes it hard to reason about the
implementation and avoid breaking semantics when making changes to it.

This patch documents each semantic rule individually and splits out the
handling of the overcommit case from the regular case.

Michal Koutný also points out that the points of equilibrium as described
in the existing example scenarios aren't actually accurate.  Delete these
examples for now to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227195606.46212-3-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low protection", v3.

The current memory.low (and memory.min) semantics require protection to be
assigned to a cgroup in an untinterrupted chain from the top-level cgroup
all the way to the leaf.

In practice, we want to protect entire cgroup subtrees from each other
(system management software vs.  workload), but we would like the VM to
balance memory optimally *within* each subtree, without having to make
explicit weight allocations among individual components.  The current
semantics make that impossible.

They also introduce unmanageable complexity into more advanced resource
trees.  For example:

          host root
          `- system.slice
             `- rpm upgrades
             `- logging
          `- workload.slice
             `- a container
                `- system.slice
                `- workload.slice
                   `- job A
                      `- component 1
                      `- component 2
                   `- job B

At a host-level perspective, we would like to protect the outer
workload.slice subtree as a whole from rpm upgrades, logging etc.  But for
that to be effective, right now we'd have to propagate it down through the
container, the inner workload.slice, into the job cgroup and ultimately
the component cgroups where memory is actually, physically allocated.
This may cross several tree delegation points and namespace boundaries,
which make such a setup near impossible.

CPU and IO on the other hand are already distributed recursively.  The
user would simply configure allowances at the host level, and they would
apply to the entire subtree without any downward propagation.

To enable the above-mentioned usecases and bring memory in line with other
resource controllers, this patch series extends memory.low/min such that
settings apply recursively to the entire subtree.  Users can still assign
explicit shares in subgroups, but if they don't, any ancestral protection
will be distributed such that children compete freely amongst each other -
as if no memory control were enabled inside the subtree - but enjoy
protection from neighboring trees.

In the above example, the user would then be able to configure shares of
CPU, IO and memory at the host level to comprehensively protect and
isolate the workload.slice as a whole from system.slice activity.

Patch #1 fixes an existing bug that can give a cgroup tree more protection
than it should receive as per ancestor configuration.

Patch #2 simplifies and documents the existing code to make it easier to
reason about the changes in the next patch.

Patch #3 finally implements recursive memory protection semantics.

Because of a risk of regressing legacy setups, the new semantics are
hidden behind a cgroup2 mount option, 'memory_recursiveprot'.

More details in patch #3.

This patch (of 3):

When memory.low is overcommitted - i.e.  the children claim more
protection than their shared ancestor grants them - the allowance is
distributed in proportion to how much each sibling uses their own declared
protection:

	low_usage = min(memory.low, memory.current)
	elow = parent_elow * (low_usage / siblings_low_usage)

However, siblings_low_usage is not the sum of all low_usages. It sums
up the usages of *only those cgroups that are within their memory.low*
That means that low_usage can be *bigger* than siblings_low_usage, and
consequently the total protection afforded to the children can be
bigger than what the ancestor grants the subtree.

Consider three groups where two are in excess of their protection:

  A/memory.low = 10G
  A/A1/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G
  A/A2/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G
  A/A3/memory.low = 10G, memory.current =  8G
  siblings_low_usage = 8G (only A3 contributes)

  A1/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 12.5G -> 10G
  A2/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 12.5G -> 10G
  A3/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(8G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 10.0G

  (the 12.5G are capped to the explicit memory.low setting of 10G)

With that, the sum of all awarded protection below A is 30G, when A
only grants 10G for the entire subtree.

What does this mean in practice? A1 and A2 would still be in excess of
their 10G allowance and would be reclaimed, whereas A3 would not. As
they eventually drop below their protection setting, they would be
counted in siblings_low_usage again and the error would right itself.

When reclaim was applied in a binary fashion (cgroup is reclaimed when
it's above its protection, otherwise it's skipped) this would actually
work out just fine. However, since 1bc63fb1 ("mm, memcg: make scan
aggression always exclude protection"), reclaim pressure is scaled to
how much a cgroup is above its protection. As a result this
calculation error unduly skews pressure away from A1 and A2 toward the
rest of the system.

But why did we do it like this in the first place?

The reasoning behind exempting groups in excess from
siblings_low_usage was to go after them first during reclaim in an
overcommitted subtree:

  A/memory.low = 2G, memory.current = 4G
  A/A1/memory.low = 3G, memory.current = 2G
  A/A2/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 2G

  siblings_low_usage = 2G (only A1 contributes)
  A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(2G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 2G
  A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G

While the children combined are overcomitting A and are technically
both at fault, A2 is actively declaring unprotected memory and we
would like to reclaim that first.

However, while this sounds like a noble goal on the face of it, it
doesn't make much difference in actual memory distribution: Because A
is overcommitted, reclaim will not stop once A2 gets pushed back to
within its allowance; we'll have to reclaim A1 either way. The end
result is still that protection is distributed proportionally, with A1
getting 3/4 (1.5G) and A2 getting 1/4 (0.5G) of A's allowance.

[ If A weren't overcommitted, it wouldn't make a difference since each
  cgroup would just get the protection it declares:

  A/memory.low = 2G, memory.current = 3G
  A/A1/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 1G
  A/A2/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 2G

  With the current calculation:

  siblings_low_usage = 1G (only A1 contributes)
  A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(1G) = 2G -> 1G
  A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(1G) = 2G -> 1G

  Including excess groups in siblings_low_usage:

  siblings_low_usage = 2G
  A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G -> 1G
  A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G -> 1G ]

Simplify the calculation and fix the proportional reclaim bug by
including excess cgroups in siblings_low_usage.

After this patch, the effective memory.low distribution from the
example above would be as follows:

  A/memory.low = 10G
  A/A1/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G
  A/A2/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G
  A/A3/memory.low = 10G, memory.current =  8G
  siblings_low_usage = 28G

  A1/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 3.5G
  A2/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 3.5G
  A3/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(8G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 2.8G

Fixes: 1bc63fb1 ("mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection")
Fixes: 23067153 ("mm: memory.low hierarchical behavior")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227195606.46212-2-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Drop the _memcg suffix from (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge functions.  It's
shorter and more obvious.

These are the most basic functions which are just (un)charging the given
cgroup with the given amount of pages.

Also fix up the corresponding comments.
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-7-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There are many places in memcg_charge_slab() and memcg_uncharge_slab()
which are calculating the number of pages to charge, css references to
grab etc depending on the order of the slab page.

Let's simplify the code by calculating it once and caching in the local
variable.
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-6-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

These functions are charging the given number of kernel pages to the given
memory cgroup.  The number doesn't have to be a power of two.  Let's make
them to take the unsigned int nr_pages as an argument instead of the page
order.

It makes them look consistent with the corresponding uncharge functions
and functions like: mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(memcg, nr_pages).
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-5-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Rename (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge() into (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge_page()
to better reflect what they are actually doing:

1) call __memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg() to actually charge or uncharge
   the current memcg

2) set or clear the PageKmemcg flag
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-4-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Drop the unused page argument and put the memcg pointer at the first
place.  This make the function consistent with its peers:
__memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg(), memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(), etc.
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-3-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm: memcg: kmem API cleanup", v2.

This patchset aims to clean up the kernel memory charging API.  It doesn't
bring any functional changes, just removes unused arguments, renames some
functions and fixes some comments.

Currently it's not obvious which functions are most basic
(memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg()) and which are based on them
(memcg_kmem_(un)charge()).  The patchset renames these functions and
removes unused arguments:

TL;DR:
was:
  memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(page, gfp, order, memcg)
  memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg(memcg, nr_pages)
  memcg_kmem_charge(page, gfp, order)
  memcg_kmem_uncharge(page, order)

now:
  memcg_kmem_charge(memcg, gfp, nr_pages)
  memcg_kmem_uncharge(memcg, nr_pages)
  memcg_kmem_charge_page(page, gfp, order)
  memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(page, order)

This patch (of 6):

The first argument of memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() and
__memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() is the page pointer and it's not used.  Let's
drop it.

Memcg pointer is passed as the last argument.  Move it to the first place
for consistency with other memcg functions, e.g.
__memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg() or try_charge().
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-2-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Sometimes we need to get a memcg pointer from a charged kernel object.
The right way to get it depends on whether it's a proper slab object or
it's backed by raw pages (e.g.  it's a vmalloc alloction).  In the first
case the kmem_cache->memcg_params.memcg indirection should be used; in
other cases it's just page->mem_cgroup.

To simplify this task and hide the implementation details let's use the
mem_cgroup_from_obj() helper, which takes a pointer to any kernel object
and returns a valid memcg pointer or NULL.

Passing a kernel address rather than a pointer to a page will allow to use
this helper for per-object (rather than per-page) tracked objects in the
future.

The caller is still responsible to ensure that the returned memcg isn't
going away underneath: take the rcu read lock, cgroup mutex etc; depending
on the context.

mem_cgroup_from_kmem() defined in mm/list_lru.c is now obsolete and can be
removed.
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NYafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200117203609.3146239-1-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The shrinker_map may be touched from any cpu (e.g., a bit there may be set
by a task running everywhere) but kswapd is always bound to specific node.
So allocate shrinker_map from the related NUMA node to respect its NUMA
locality.  Also, this follows generic way we use for allocation of memcg's
per-node data.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fff0e636-4c36-ed10-281c-8cdb0687c839@virtuozzo.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When I manually set default n to MEMCG_KMEM in init/Kconfig, bellow error
occurs,

  mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_start':
  mm/slab_common.c:1530:30: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named
  'kmem_caches'
    return seq_list_start(&memcg->kmem_caches, *pos);
                                ^
  mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_next':
  mm/slab_common.c:1537:32: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named
  'kmem_caches'
    return seq_list_next(p, &memcg->kmem_caches, pos);
                                  ^
  mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_show':
  mm/slab_common.c:1551:16: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named
  'kmem_caches'
    if (p == memcg->kmem_caches.next)
                  ^
    CC      arch/x86/xen/smp.o
  mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_start':
  mm/slab_common.c:1531:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
  [-Wreturn-type]
   }
   ^
  mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_next':
  mm/slab_common.c:1538:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
  [-Wreturn-type]
   }
   ^

That's because kmem_caches is defined only when CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is set,
while memcg_slab_start() will use it no matter CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is defined
or not.

By the way, the reason I mannuly undefined CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is to verify
whether my some other code change is still stable when CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is
not set. Unfortunately, the existing code has been already unstable since
v4.11.

Fixes: bc2791f8 ("slab: link memcg kmem_caches on their associated memory cgroup")
Signed-off-by: NYafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1580970260-2045-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

add_to_swap_cache() and delete_from_swap_cache() are counterparts, while
currently they use different ways to count pages.

It doesn't break anything because we only have two sizes for PageAnon, but
this is confusing and not good practice.

This patch corrects it by making both functions use hpage_nr_pages().
Signed-off-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200315012920.2687-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Memory barrier is needed after setting LRU bit, but smp_mb() is too
strong.  Some architectures, i.e.  x86, imply memory barrier with atomic
operations, so replacing it with smp_mb__after_atomic() sounds better,
which is nop on strong ordered machines, and full memory barriers on
others.  With this change the vm-scalability cases would perform better on
x86, I saw total 6% improvement with this patch and previous inline fix.

The test data (lru-file-readtwice throughput) against v5.6-rc4:
	mainline	w/ inline fix	w/ both (adding this)
	150MB		154MB		159MB

Fixes: 9c4e6b1a ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs")
Signed-off-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1584500541-46817-2-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When backporting commit 9c4e6b1a ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping
pagevecs") to our 4.9 kernel, our test bench noticed around 10% down with
a couple of vm-scalability's test cases (lru-file-readonce,
lru-file-readtwice and lru-file-mmap-read).  I didn't see that much down
on my VM (32c-64g-2nodes).  It might be caused by the test configuration,
which is 32c-256g with NUMA disabled and the tests were run in root memcg,
so the tests actually stress only one inactive and active lru.  It sounds
not very usual in mordern production environment.

That commit did two major changes:
1. Call page_evictable()
2. Use smp_mb to force the PG_lru set visible

It looks they contribute the most overhead.  The page_evictable() is a
function which does function prologue and epilogue, and that was used by
page reclaim path only.  However, lru add is a very hot path, so it sounds
better to make it inline.  However, it calls page_mapping() which is not
inlined either, but the disassemble shows it doesn't do push and pop
operations and it sounds not very straightforward to inline it.

Other than this, it sounds smp_mb() is not necessary for x86 since
SetPageLRU is atomic which enforces memory barrier already, replace it
with smp_mb__after_atomic() in the following patch.

With the two fixes applied, the tests can get back around 5% on that test
bench and get back normal on my VM.  Since the test bench configuration is
not that usual and I also saw around 6% up on the latest upstream, so it
sounds good enough IMHO.

The below is test data (lru-file-readtwice throughput) against the v5.6-rc4:
	mainline	w/ inline fix
          150MB            154MB

With this patch the throughput gets 2.67% up.  The data with using
smp_mb__after_atomic() is showed in the following patch.

Shakeel Butt did the below test:

On a real machine with limiting the 'dd' on a single node and reading 100
GiB sparse file (less than a single node).  Just ran a single instance to
not cause the lru lock contention.  The cmdline used is "dd if=file-100GiB
of=/dev/null bs=4k".  Ran the cmd 10 times with drop_caches in between and
measured the time it took.

Without patch: 56.64143 +- 0.672 sec

With patches: 56.10 +- 0.21 sec

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: move page_evictable() to internal.h]
Fixes: 9c4e6b1a ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs")
Signed-off-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1584500541-46817-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Currently we use a tmp pointer, pentry, to transfer and reset swap cache
slot, which is a little redundant.  Swap cache slot stores the entry value
directly, assign and reset it by value would be straight forward.

Also this patch merges the else and if, since this is the only case we
refill and repeat swap cache.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200311055352.50574-1-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

si->inuse_pages could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,

 write to 0xffff98b00ebd04dc of 4 bytes by task 82262 on cpu 92:
  swap_range_free+0xbe/0x230
  swap_range_free at mm/swapfile.c:719
  swapcache_free_entries+0x1be/0x250
  free_swap_slot+0x1c8/0x220
  __swap_entry_free.constprop.19+0xa3/0xb0
  free_swap_and_cache+0x53/0xa0
  unmap_page_range+0x7e0/0x1ce0
  unmap_single_vma+0xcd/0x170
  unmap_vmas+0x18b/0x220
  exit_mmap+0xee/0x220
  mmput+0xe7/0x240
  do_exit+0x598/0xfd0
  do_group_exit+0x8b/0x180
  get_signal+0x293/0x13d0
  do_signal+0x37/0x5d0
  prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1b7/0x2c0
  ret_from_intr+0x32/0x42

 read to 0xffff98b00ebd04dc of 4 bytes by task 82499 on cpu 46:
  try_to_unuse+0x86b/0xc80
  try_to_unuse at mm/swapfile.c:2185
  __x64_sys_swapoff+0x372/0xd40
  do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

The plain reads in try_to_unuse() are outside si->lock critical section
which result in data races that could be dangerous to be used in a loop.
Fix them by adding READ_ONCE().
Signed-off-by: NQian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1582578903-29294-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pwSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__pagevec_lru_add() is only used in mm directory now.

Remove the export symbol.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200126011436.22979-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The -EEXIST returned by __swap_duplicate means there is a swap cache
instead -EBUSY
Signed-off-by: NChen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200212145754.27123-1-chenwandun@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

FOLL_LONGTERM is a special case of FOLL_PIN.  It suggests a pin which is
going to be given to hardware and can't move.  It would truncate CMA
permanently and should be excluded.

In gup slow path, where
__gup_longterm_locked->check_and_migrate_cma_pages() handles
FOLL_LONGTERM, but in fast path, there lacks such a check, which means a
possible leak of CMA page to longterm pinned.

Place a check in try_grab_compound_head() in the fast path to fix the
leak, and if FOLL_LONGTERM happens on CMA, it will fall back to slow path
to migrate the page.

Some note about the check: Huge page's subpages have the same migrate type
due to either allocation from a free_list[] or alloc_contig_range() with
param MIGRATE_MOVABLE.  So it is enough to check on a single subpage by
is_migrate_cma_page(subpage)
Signed-off-by: NPingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1584876733-17405-3-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

To better reflect the held state of pages and make code self-explaining,
rename nr as nr_pinned.
Signed-off-by: NPingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1584876733-17405-2-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

With the introduction of protected KVM guests on s390 there is now a
concept of inaccessible pages.  These pages need to be made accessible
before the host can access them.

While cpu accesses will trigger a fault that can be resolved, I/O accesses
will just fail.  We need to add a callback into architecture code for
places that will do I/O, namely when writeback is started or when a page
reference is taken.

This is not only to enable paging, file backing etc, it is also necessary
to protect the host against a malicious user space.  For example a bad
QEMU could simply start direct I/O on such protected memory.  We do not
want userspace to be able to trigger I/O errors and thus the logic is
"whenever somebody accesses that page (gup) or does I/O, make sure that
this page can be accessed".  When the guest tries to access that page we
will wait in the page fault handler for writeback to have finished and for
the page_ref to be the expected value.

On s390x the function is not supposed to fail, so it is ok to use a
WARN_ON on failure.  If we ever need some more finegrained handling we can
tackle this when we know the details.
Signed-off-by: NClaudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200306132537.783769-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>