- 05 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thiemo Nagel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
The ext4_ext_search_right() function is confusing; it uses a "depth" variable which is 0 at the root and maximum at the leaves, but the on-disk metadata uses a "depth" (actually eh_depth) which is opposite: maximum at the root, and 0 at the leaves. The ext4_ext_check_header() function is given a depth and checks the header agaisnt that depth; it expects the on-disk semantics, but we are giving it the opposite in the while loop in this function. We should be giving it the on-disk notion of "depth" which we can get from (p_depth - depth) - and if you look, the last (more commonly hit) call to ext4_ext_check_header() does just this. Sending in the wrong depth results in (incorrect) messages about corruption: EXT4-fs error (device sdb1): ext4_ext_search_right: bad header in inode #2621457: unexpected eh_depth - magic f30a, entries 340, max 340(0), depth 1(2) http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12821Reported-by: NDavid Dindorp <ddi@dubex.dk> Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Make sure we validate extent details only when read from the disk. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NThiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 12 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
This patch adds checks to validate the extent entries along with extent headers, to avoid crashes caused by corrupt filesystems. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The find_group_flex() inode allocator is now only used if the filesystem is mounted using the "oldalloc" mount option. It is replaced with the original Orlov allocator that has been updated for flex_bg filesystems (it should behave the same way if flex_bg is disabled). The inode allocator now functions by taking into account each flex_bg group, instead of each block group, when deciding whether or not it's time to allocate a new directory into a fresh flex_bg. The block allocator has also been changed so that the first block group in each flex_bg is preferred for use for storing directory blocks. This keeps directory blocks close together, which is good for speeding up e2fsck since large directories are more likely to look like this: debugfs: stat /home/tytso/Maildir/cur Inode: 1844562 Type: directory Mode: 0700 Flags: 0x81000 Generation: 1132745781 Version: 0x00000000:0000ad71 User: 15806 Group: 15806 Size: 1060864 File ACL: 0 Directory ACL: 0 Links: 2 Blockcount: 2072 Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0 ctime: 0x499c0ff4:164961f4 -- Wed Feb 18 08:41:08 2009 atime: 0x499c0ff4:00000000 -- Wed Feb 18 08:41:08 2009 mtime: 0x49957f51:00000000 -- Fri Feb 13 09:10:25 2009 crtime: 0x499c0f57:00d51440 -- Wed Feb 18 08:38:31 2009 Size of extra inode fields: 28 BLOCKS: (0):7348651, (1-258):7348654-7348911 TOTAL: 259 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 27 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
When bg_free_blocks_count was renamed to bg_free_blocks_count_lo in 560671a0, its uses under EXT4FS_DEBUG were not changed to the helper ext4_free_blks_count. Another commit, 498e5f24, also did not change everything needed under EXT4FS_DEBUG, thus making it spill some warnings related to printing format. This commit fixes both issues and makes ext4 build again when EXT4FS_DEBUG is enabled. Signed-off-by: NThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Coly Li 提交于
When I review ocfs2 code, find there are 2 typos to "successfull". After doing grep "successfull " in kernel tree, 22 typos found totally -- great minds always think alike :) This patch fixes all the similar typos. Thanks for Randy's ack and comments. Signed-off-by: NColy Li <coyli@suse.de> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Acked-by: NRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This mount option is largely superfluous, and in fact the way it was implemented was buggy; if a filesystem which did not have the extents feature flag was mounted -o extents, the filesystem would attempt to create and use extents-based file even though the extents feature flag was not eabled. The simplest thing to do is to nuke the mount option entirely. It's not all that useful to force the non-creation of new extent-based files if the filesystem can support it. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
* Change EXT4_HAS_*_FEATURE to return a boolean * Add a function prototype for ext4_fiemap() in ext4.h * Make ext4_ext_fiemap_cb() and ext4_xattr_fiemap() be static functions * Add lock annotations to mb_free_blocks() Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 11月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Convert the unsigned longs that are most responsible for bloating the stack usage on 64-bit systems. Nearly all places in the ext3/4 code which uses "unsigned long" is probably a bug, since on 32-bit systems a ulong a 32-bits, which means we are wasting stack space on 64-bit systems. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The i_ext_generation was incremented, but never used. Remove it to slim down the ext4_inode_info structure. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Mayhar 提交于
A few weeks ago I posted a patch for discussion that allowed ext4 to run without a journal. Since that time I've integrated the excellent comments from Andreas and fixed several serious bugs. We're currently running with this patch and generating some performance numbers against both ext2 (with backported reservations code) and ext4 with and without a journal. It just so happens that running without a journal is slightly faster for most everything. We did iozone -T -t 4 s 2g -r 256k -T -I -i0 -i1 -i2 which creates 4 threads, each of which create and do reads and writes on a 2G file, with a buffer size of 256K, using O_DIRECT for all file opens to bypass the page cache. Results: ext2 ext4, default ext4, no journal initial writes 13.0 MB/s 15.4 MB/s 15.7 MB/s rewrites 13.1 MB/s 15.6 MB/s 15.9 MB/s reads 15.2 MB/s 16.9 MB/s 17.2 MB/s re-reads 15.3 MB/s 16.9 MB/s 17.2 MB/s random readers 5.6 MB/s 5.6 MB/s 5.7 MB/s random writers 5.1 MB/s 5.3 MB/s 5.4 MB/s So it seems that, so far, this was a useful exercise. Signed-off-by: NFrank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Replace `if' with `goto' to assure gcc that ix has been initialized. Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The convenience function do_blk_alloc() is a static function with only one caller, so fold it into ext4_new_meta_blocks() to simplify the code and to make it easier to understand. To save more stack space, if count is a null pointer in ext4_new_meta_blocks() assume that caller wanted a single block (and if there is an error, no blocks were allocated). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 08 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
There were only two one callers of the function ext4_new_meta_block(), which just a very simpler wrapper function around ext4_new_meta_blocks(). Change those two functions to call ext4_new_meta_blocks() directly, to save code and stack space usage. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
ext4_ext_walk_space() was reinstated to be used for iterating over file extents with a callback; it is used by the ext4 fiemap implementation. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
-
- 10 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
With delayed allocation we use i_data_sem to update i_disksize. We need to update i_disksize only if the new size specified is greater than the current value and we need to make sure we don't race with other i_disksize update. With delayed allocation we will switch to the write_begin function for non-delayed allocation if we are low on free blocks. This means the write_begin function for non-delayed allocation also needs to use the same locking. We also need to check and update i_disksize even if the new size is less that inode.i_size because of delayed allocation. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 20 8月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
Previous delalloc writepages implementation started a new transaction outside of a loop which called get_block() to do the block allocation. Since we didn't know exactly how many blocks would need to be allocated, the estimated journal credits required was very conservative and caused many issues. With the reworked delayed allocation, a new transaction is created for each get_block(), thus we don't need to guess how many credits for the multiple chunk of allocation. We start every transaction with enough credits for inserting a single exent. When estimate the credits for indirect blocks to allocate a chunk of blocks, we need to know the number of data blocks to allocate. We use the total number of reserved delalloc datablocks; if that is too big, for non-extent files, we need to limit the number of blocks to EXT4_MAX_TRANS_BLOCKS. Code cleanup from Aneesh. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Reviewed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
DIO and fallocate credit calculation is different than writepage, as they do start a new journal right for each call to ext4_get_blocks_wrap(). This patch uses the helper function in DIO and fallocate case, passing a flag indicating that the modified data are contigous thus could account less indirect/index blocks. This patch also fixed the journal credit reservation for direct I/O (DIO). Previously the estimated credits for DIO only was calculated for non-extent files, which was not enough if the file is extent-based. Also fixed was fallocate double-counting credits for modifying the the superblock. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
This patch modified the writepage/write_begin credit calculation for extent files, to use the credits caculation helper function. The current calculation of how many index/leaf blocks should be accounted is too conservetive, it always considered the worse case, where the tree level is 5, and in the case of multiple chunk allocations, it always assumed no blocks were dirtied in common across the allocations. This path uses the accurate depth of the inode with some extras to calculate the index blocks, and also less conservative in the case of multiple allocation accounting. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
In ext4_ext_truncate(), we should use the more generic ext4_discard_reservations() call so we do the right thing when the filesystem is mounted with the nomballoc option. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
-
- 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 02 8月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
With the FLEX_BG layout, there is no reason why extents can't cross block groups, so make the truncate code reserve enough credits so we don't BUG if we come across such an extent. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The ext4_ext_journal_restart() is a convenience function which checks to see if the requested number of credits is present, and if so it closes the current transaction and attaches the current handle to the new transaction. Unfortunately, it wasn't proprely checking the return value from ext4_journal_extend(), so it was starting a new transaction when one was not necessary, and returning an error when all that was necessary was to restart the handle with a new transaction. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 03 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Inserting an extent can cause a new entry in the already existing index block. That doesn't increase the depth of the instead. Instead it adds a new leaf block. Now with the new leaf block the path information corresponding to the logical block should be fetched from the new block. The old path will be pointing to the old leaf block. We need to recalucate the path information on extent insert even if depth doesn't change. Without this change, the extent merge after converting an unwritten extent to initialized extent takes the wrong extent and cause data corruption. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 12 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
With the reverse locking, we need to start a transation before taking the page lock, so in ext4_da_writepages() we need to break the write-out into chunks, and restart the journal for each chunck to ensure the write-out fits in a single transaction. Updated patch from Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> which fixes delalloc sync hang with journal lock inversion, and address the performance regression issue. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
This patch does block reservation for delayed allocation, to avoid ENOSPC later at page flush time. Blocks(data and metadata) are reserved at da_write_begin() time, the freeblocks counter is updated by then, and the number of reserved blocks is store in per inode counter. At the writepage time, the unused reserved meta blocks are returned back. At unlink/truncate time, reserved blocks are properly released. Updated fix from Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> to fix the oldallocator block reservation accounting with delalloc, added lock to guard the counters and also fix the reservation for meta blocks. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 12 7月, 2008 9 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We cannot call ext4_orphan_add() from under i_data_sem because that causes a lock ordering violation between i_data_sem and and the superblock lock. Updated with Aneesh's locking order fix Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
This changes are needed to support data=ordered mode handling via inodes. This enables us to get rid of the journal heads and buffer heads for data buffers in the ordered mode. With the changes, during tranasaction commit we writeout the inode pages using the writepages()/writepage(). That implies we take page lock during transaction commit. This can cause a deadlock with the locking order page_lock -> jbd2_journal_start, since the jbd2_journal_start can wait for the journal_commit to happen and the journal_commit now needs to take the page lock. To avoid this dead lock reverse the locking order. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Use the BUFFER_FNS functions (set_buffer_foo) to set buffer head state atomically instead of nonatomic __set_bit(). Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Move the code related to block allocation to a single function and add helper funtions to differient allocation for data and meta data blocks Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
When mballoc is enabled, block allocation for old block-based files are allocated using mballoc allocator instead of old block-based allocator. The old ext3 block reservation is turned off when mballoc is turned on. However, the in-core preallocation is not enabled for block-based/ non-extent based file block allocation. This result in performance regression, as now we don't have "reservation" ore in-core preallocation to prevent interleaved fragmentation in multiple writes workload. This patch fix this by enable per inode in-core preallocation for non extent files when mballoc is used. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Shen Feng 提交于
Fix ext4_ext_journal_restart() so it returns any errors reported by ext4_journal_extend() and ext4_journal_restart(). Signed-off-by: NShen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Shen Feng 提交于
When pos=0 or depth, the fields of ext4_ext_path is are not completely filled. This patch also removes some unnecessary code. Signed-off-by: NShen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Shen Feng 提交于
ext4_ext_create_new_leaf must return error when its calling to ext4_ext_split failed. Signed-off-by: NShen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
When allocating unitialized space at the end of file which had been preallocated with the FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE option, the file size is not updated at that time. But the later we are not updating the file size when writing to that preallocated space. These changes are for code correctness. This patch allows us to update the i_disksize at the write_end() callback of filesystem properly. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Solofo Ramangalahy 提交于
The recently announced "Linux POSIX file system test suite" caught a truncate issue when using extents: mtime and ctime are not updated when truncate is successful. This is the single issue caught with "default" ext4 (mkfs and mount with minimal options). The testsuite does not report failure with -o noextents. With the following patch, all tests of the testsuite pass. Signed-off-by: NSolofo Ramangalahy <Solofo.Ramangalahy@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-