Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 6月, 2023 8 次提交
  3. 05 6月, 2023 11 次提交
  5. 03 6月, 2023 21 次提交
    • O
      !903 backport block bugfix · 4ac8d141
      由 openeuler-ci-bot 提交于 
      Merge Pull Request from: @zhangjialin11 
 
This patch series fix block layer bug.
3 patchs fix iocost bug. Other patchs fix raid10 and badblocks bug.
 
 
Link:https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/903 

Reviewed-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> 
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
      4ac8d141
    • L
      md/raid10: fix incorrect done of recovery · b0ac58c9
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188535, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6O61Q
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

Recovery will go to giveup and let chunks_skipped++ in raid10_sync_request
if there are some bad_blocks, and it will return max_sector when
chunks_skipped >= geo.raid_disks. Now, recovery fail and data is
inconsistent but user think recovery is done, it is wrong.

Fix it by set mirror's recovery_disabled and spare device shouln't be
added to here.
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      b0ac58c9
    • L
      md/raid10: fix null-ptr-deref in raid10_sync_request · 2de30b8f
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188378, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6GGV7
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

init_resync() init mempool and set conf->have_replacemnt at the begaining
of sync, close_sync() free the mempool when sync is completed.

After commit 7e83ccbe ("md/raid10: Allow skipping recovery when clean
arrays are assembled"), recovery might skipped and init_resync() is called
but close_sync() is not. null-ptr-deref occurs as below:
  1) creat a array, wait for resync to complete, mddev->recovery_cp is set
     to MaxSector.
  2) recovery is woken and it is skipped. conf->have_replacement is set to
     0 in init_resync(). close_sync() not called.
  3) some io errors and rdev A is set to WantReplacement.
  4) a new device is added and set to A's replacement.
  5) recovery is woken, A have replacement, but conf->have_replacemnt is
     0. r10bio->dev[i].repl_bio will not be alloced and null-ptr-deref
     occurs.

Fix it by not init_resync() if recovery skipped.

Fixes: 7e83ccbe md/raid10: Allow skipping recovery when clean arrays are assembled")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      2de30b8f
    • L
      block/badblocks: fix badblocks loss when badblocks combine · e35a7762
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188569, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6ZG5B
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

badblocks will loss if we set it as below:

  # echo 1 1 > bad_blocks
  # echo 3 1 > bad_blocks
  # echo 1 5 > bad_blocks
  # cat bad_blocks
    1 3

we will combine badblocks if there is an intersection between p[lo] and
p[hi] in badblocks_set(). The end of new badblocks is p[hi]'s end now. but
p[lo] may cross p[hi] and new end should be the larger of p[lo] and p[hi].
  lo: |------------------------|
  hi:		|--------|

Fixes: 9e0e252a ("badblocks: Add core badblock management code")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      e35a7762
    • L
      block/badblocks: fix the bug of reverse order · f9a3eea0
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188569, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6ZG5B
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

Order of badblocks will be reversed if we set a large area at once. 'hi'
remains unchanged while adding continuous badblocks is wrong, the next
setting is greater than 'hi', it should be added to the next position.
Let 'hi' +1 each cycle.

  # echo 0 2048 > bad_blocks
  # cat bad_blocks
    1536 512
    1024 512
    512 512
    0 512

Fixes: 9e0e252a ("badblocks: Add core badblock management code")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      f9a3eea0
    • L
      md: fix unexpected changes of return value in rdev_set_badblocks · bebf3d97
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188569, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6XBZQ
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

If we set any badblocks fail, we will remove this rdev(set it to Faulty
or set recovery_disabled). Previous patch "md/raid10: fix io hung in
md_wait_for_blocked_rdev()" check badblocks->changed instead of return
value in rdev_set_badblocks(), but return value of this func also changed
accordingly, which is not what we expected.

Keep the return value consistent with before.
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      bebf3d97
    • L
      md/raid10: fix io hung in md_wait_for_blocked_rdev() · c23e1cd1
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188569, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6XBZQ
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

If badblocks are merged but bb->count exceedded, badblocks_set() will
return 1 and merged badblocks will become un-ack. rdev_set_badblocks()
will not set sb_flags and wakeup mddev->thread, io wait in
md_wait_for_blocked_rdev() will hung because BlockedBadBlocks may not be
cleared.

Fix it by checking badblocks->changed instead of return value. This flag
is set when badblocks changes.
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      c23e1cd1
    • L
      block: Only set bb->changed when badblocks changes · 78cba163
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188569, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6XBZQ
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

bb->changed and unacked_exist is set and badblocks_update_acked() is
involked even if no badblocks changes in badblocks_set(). Only update
them when badblocks changes.

Fixes: 9e0e252a ("badblocks: Add core badblock management code")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      78cba163
    • L
      md/raid10: fix incorrect counting of rdev->nr_pending · 7b3b8187
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188605, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6ZJ3T
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

We get rdev from mirrors.replacement twice in raid10_write_request().
If replacement changes between two reads, it will increase A->nr_pending
and decrease B->nr_pending.

  T1 (write)	   T2 (remove)	    T3 (add)
                   raid10_remove_disk

  raid10_write_request
   rrdev = conf->mirrors[d].replacement; ->rdev A
   A nr_pending++

                    p->rdev = p->replacement; ->rdev A
                    p->replacement = NULL;

				    //A it set to WantReplacement
                                    raid10_add_disk
				     p->replacement = rdev; ->rdev B

   if blocked_rdev
    rdev = conf->mirrors[d].replacement; ->rdev B
    B nr_pending--

We will record rdev in r10bio, and get rdev from r10bio to fix it.

Fixes: 475b0321 ("md/raid10: writes should get directed to replacement as well as original.")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      7b3b8187
    • L
      md/raid10: remove WANR_ON_ONCE in raid10_end_write_request · a3ebeed7
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188605, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6GOYF
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

It might read mirror.redev first and then mirror->replacement because of
memory reordering in raid10_end_write_request(), WARN_ON occurs if we
remove disk at the same time.

  T1 remove			T2 io end
  raid10_remove_disk		raid10_end_write_request
   p->rdev = NULL
				 read rdev -> NULL
   smp_mb
   p->replacement = NULL
				 read replacement -> NULL

It is meaningless to compare rdev with mirror->rdev after we get it from
r10_bio in raid10_end_write_request(). Remove this WANR_ON_ONCE.

Fixes: 2ecf5e6ecbfd ("md/raid10: fix uaf if replacement replaces rdev")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      a3ebeed7
    • L
      md/raid10: fix uaf if replacement replaces rdev · af959500
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188377, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6GOYF
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

After commit 4ca40c2c ("md/raid10: Allow replacement device to be
replace old drive.") mirrors->replacement can replace rdev during
replacement's io pending, and repl_bio will write rdev (see
raid10_write_one_disk()). We will get wrong device by r10conf in
raid10_end_write_request(). In which case, r10_bio->devs[slot].repl_bio
will be put but not set to IO_MADE_GOOD, and it will be put again later in
raid_end_bio_io(), uaf occurs.

Fix it by using r10_bio to record rdev. Put the operations of io fail and
no replacement together, so no need to change repl.

  ==================================================================
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bio_flagged include/linux/bio.h:238 [inline]
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bio_put+0x78/0x80 block/bio.c:650
  Read of size 2 at addr ffff888116524dd4 by task md0_raid10/2618

  CPU: 0 PID: 2618 Comm: md0_raid10 Not tainted 5.10.0+ #3
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  sd 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
  Call Trace:
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
   dump_stack+0x107/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:118
   print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1c/0x270 mm/kasan/report.c:390
   __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:550 [inline]
   kasan_report.cold+0x22/0x3a mm/kasan/report.c:567
   bio_flagged include/linux/bio.h:238 [inline]
   bio_put+0x78/0x80 block/bio.c:650
   put_all_bios drivers/md/raid10.c:248 [inline]
   free_r10bio drivers/md/raid10.c:257 [inline]
   raid_end_bio_io+0x3b5/0x590 drivers/md/raid10.c:309
   handle_write_completed drivers/md/raid10.c:2699 [inline]
   raid10d+0x2f85/0x5af0 drivers/md/raid10.c:2759
   md_thread+0x444/0x4b0 drivers/md/md.c:7932
   kthread+0x38c/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:313
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:299

  Allocated by task 1400:
   kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:48
   kasan_set_track mm/kasan/common.c:56 [inline]
   set_alloc_info mm/kasan/common.c:498 [inline]
   __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xb5/0xe0 mm/kasan/common.c:530
   slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:512 [inline]
   slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2923 [inline]
   slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2931 [inline]
   kmem_cache_alloc+0x144/0x360 mm/slub.c:2936
   mempool_alloc+0x146/0x360 mm/mempool.c:391
   bio_alloc_bioset+0x375/0x610 block/bio.c:486
   bio_clone_fast+0x20/0x50 block/bio.c:711
   raid10_write_one_disk+0x166/0xd30 drivers/md/raid10.c:1240
   raid10_write_request+0x1600/0x2c90 drivers/md/raid10.c:1484
   __make_request drivers/md/raid10.c:1508 [inline]
   raid10_make_request+0x376/0x620 drivers/md/raid10.c:1537
   md_handle_request+0x699/0x970 drivers/md/md.c:451
   md_submit_bio+0x204/0x400 drivers/md/md.c:489
   __submit_bio block/blk-core.c:959 [inline]
   __submit_bio_noacct block/blk-core.c:1007 [inline]
   submit_bio_noacct+0x2e3/0xcf0 block/blk-core.c:1086
   submit_bio+0x1a0/0x3a0 block/blk-core.c:1146
   submit_bh_wbc+0x685/0x8e0 fs/buffer.c:3053
   ext4_commit_super+0x37e/0x6c0 fs/ext4/super.c:5696
   flush_stashed_error_work+0x28b/0x400 fs/ext4/super.c:791
   process_one_work+0x9a6/0x1590 kernel/workqueue.c:2280
   worker_thread+0x61d/0x1310 kernel/workqueue.c:2426
   kthread+0x38c/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:313
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:299

  Freed by task 2618:
   kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:48
   kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:56
   kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x40 mm/kasan/generic.c:361
   __kasan_slab_free+0x151/0x180 mm/kasan/common.c:482
   slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1569 [inline]
   slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa9/0x180 mm/slub.c:1608
   slab_free mm/slub.c:3179 [inline]
   kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x3d0 mm/slub.c:3196
   mempool_free+0xe3/0x3b0 mm/mempool.c:500
   bio_free+0xe2/0x140 block/bio.c:266
   bio_put+0x58/0x80 block/bio.c:651
   raid10_end_write_request+0x885/0xb60 drivers/md/raid10.c:516
   bio_endio+0x376/0x6a0 block/bio.c:1465
   req_bio_endio block/blk-core.c:289 [inline]
   blk_update_request+0x5f5/0xf40 block/blk-core.c:1525
   blk_mq_end_request+0x4c/0x510 block/blk-mq.c:654
   blk_flush_complete_seq+0x835/0xd80 block/blk-flush.c:204
   flush_end_io+0x7b7/0xb90 block/blk-flush.c:261
   __blk_mq_end_request+0x282/0x4c0 block/blk-mq.c:645
   scsi_end_request+0x3a8/0x850 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:607
   scsi_io_completion+0x3f5/0x1320 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:970
   scsi_softirq_done+0x11b/0x490 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1448
   blk_mq_complete_request block/blk-mq.c:788 [inline]
   blk_mq_complete_request+0x84/0xb0 block/blk-mq.c:785
   scsi_mq_done+0x155/0x360 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1603
   virtscsi_vq_done drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c:184 [inline]
   virtscsi_req_done+0x14c/0x220 drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c:199
   vring_interrupt drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:2061 [inline]
   vring_interrupt+0x27a/0x300 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:2047
   __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2f8/0x830 kernel/irq/handle.c:156
   handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:196 [inline]
   handle_irq_event+0x105/0x280 kernel/irq/handle.c:213
   handle_edge_irq+0x258/0xd20 kernel/irq/chip.c:828
   asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20
   __run_irq_on_irqstack arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h:48 [inline]
   run_irq_on_irqstack_cond arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h:101 [inline]
   handle_irq arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:230 [inline]
   __common_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:249 [inline]
   common_interrupt+0xe2/0x190 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:239
   asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:626

Fixes: 4ca40c2c ("md/raid10: Allow replacement device to be replace old drive.")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      af959500
    • L
      md/raid10: fix null-ptr-deref of mreplace in raid10_sync_request · 7718714e
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188527, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6O3HO
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

need_replace will be set to 1 if no-Faulty mreplace exists, and mreplace
will be deref later. However, the latter check of mreplace might set
mreplace to NULL, null-ptr-deref occurs if need_replace is 1 at this time.

Fix it by merging two checks into one.

Fixes: ee37d731 ("md/raid10: Fix raid10 replace hang when new added disk faulty")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      7718714e
    • L
      md/raid10: fix io loss while replacement replace rdev · e8025850
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188787, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I78YIW
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

When we remove a disk which has replacement, first set rdev to NULL
and then set replacement to rdev, finally set replacement to NULL (see
raid10_remove_disk()). If io is submitted during the same time, it might
read both rdev and replacement as NULL, and io will not be submitted.

  rdev -> NULL
                        read rdev
  replacement -> NULL
                        read replacement

Fix it by reading replacement first and rdev later, meanwhile, use smp_mb()
to prevent memory reordering.

Fixes: 475b0321 ("md/raid10: writes should get directed to replacement as well as original.")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      e8025850
    • L
      md/raid10: prioritize adding disk to 'removed' mirror · 2e2e7ab6
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188804, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I78YIS
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

When add a new disk to raid10, it will traverse conf->mirror from start
and find one of the following mirror:
  1. mirror->rdev is set to WantReplacement and it have no replacement,
     set new disk to mirror->replacement.
  2. no rdev, set new disk to mirror->rdev.

There is a array as below (sda is set to WantReplacement):

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       8        0        0      active sync set-A   /dev/sda
       -       0        0        1      removed
       2       8       32        2      active sync set-A   /dev/sdc
       3       8       48        3      active sync set-B   /dev/sdd

Use 'mdadm --add' to add a new disk to this array, the new disk will
become sda's replacement instead of add to removed position, which is
confusing for users. Meanwhile, after new disk recovery success, sda
will be set to Faulty.

Prioritize adding disk to 'removed' mirror is a better choice. In the
above scenario, the behavior is the same as before, except sda will not
be deleted. Before other disks are added, continued use sda is more
reliable.
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      2e2e7ab6
    • L
      md: fix io loss when remove rdev fail · 894f89fa
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I71EKW
bugzilla: 188628
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

We first set rdev to WantRemove, and check if there is any io
pending, if so, we will clear flag and return busy in
raid10_remove_disk(). io will loss as below:

  raid10_remove_disk
   set WantRemove
			write rdev
			 if WantRemove
			  do not submit io
   if rdev->nr_pending
    clear WantRemove
    return BUSY
					read rdev
					 get error data

Fix it by md_error the rdev which io pending while removing. When the code
reaches this point, it means this rdev will be removed later, so setting
it as faulty has little impact.
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      894f89fa
    • L
      md/raid10: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev · 4461a62e
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188533, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6O7YB
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

commit ceff49d9 ("md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and
access conf->mirrors[i].rdev") fix a null-ptr-deref about raid1. There
is same bug in raid10 and fix it in the same way.

There is no sync_thread running while removing rdev, no need to check
the flag in raid10_sync_request().
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      4461a62e
    • L
      md/raid10: fix taks hung in raid10d · 1fe782f0
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188380, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6GISC
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

commit fe630de0 ("md/raid10: avoid deadlock on recovery.") allowed
normal io and sync io to exist at the same time. Task hung will occur as
below:

T1                      T2		T3		T4
raid10d
 handle_read_error
  allow_barrier
   conf->nr_pending--
    -> 0
                        //submit sync io
                        raid10_sync_request
                         raise_barrier
			  ->will not be blocked
			  ...
			//submit to drivers
  raid10_read_request
   wait_barrier
    conf->nr_pending++
     -> 1
					//retry read fail
					raid10_end_read_request
					 reschedule_retry
					  add to retry_list
					  conf->nr_queued++
					   -> 1
							//sync io fail
							end_sync_read
							 __end_sync_read
							  reschedule_retry
							   add to retry_list
					                    conf->nr_queued++
							     -> 2
 ...
 handle_read_error
  freeze_array
   wait nr_pending == nr_queued+1
        ->1	      ->3
   //task hung

retry read and sync io will be added to retry_list(nr_queued->2) if they
fails. raid10d() called handle_read_error() and hung in freeze_array().
nr_queued will not decrease because raid10d is blocked, nr_pending will
not increase because conf->barrier is not released.

Fix it by moving allow_barrier() after raid10_read_request().
raise_barrier() will wait for nr_waiting to become 0. Therefore, sync io
and regular io will not be issued at the same time.

We also removed the check of nr_queued. It can be 0 but don't need to be
blocked. MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING always is set after this patch, because all
sync io is waitting in raise_barrier(), remove it, too.

Fixes: fe630de0 ("md/raid10: avoid deadlock on recovery.")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      1fe782f0
    • Y
      md/raid10: factor out code from wait_barrier() to stop_waiting_barrier() · 7aad54e0
      由 Yu Kuai 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.1-rc1
commit ed2e063f
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188380, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6GISC
CVE: NA

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=ed2e063f92c44c891ccd883e289dde6ca870edcc

--------------------------------

Currently the nasty condition in wait_barrier() is hard to read. This
patch factors out the condition into a function.

There are no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NPaul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reviewed-by: NLogan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Acked-by: NGuoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <song@kernel.org>

conflict:
	drivers/md/raid10.c
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      7aad54e0
    • L
      md/raid10: fix softlockup in raid10_unplug · f8cecf7a
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188628, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6WKDR
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

There is no limit to the number of io for raid10 plug, whitch may result
in excessive memory usage and potential softlockup when a large number of
io are submitted at once. There is no good way to fix it now, just add
schedule point to prevent softlockup.

Fixes: 57c67df4 ("md/raid10: submit IO from originating thread instead of md thread.")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      f8cecf7a
    • J
      md/raid1: stop mdx_raid1 thread when raid1 array run failed · 22eeb5d1
      由 Jiang Li 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.2-rc1
commit b611ad14
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188662, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6UMUF
CVE: NA

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=b611ad14006e5be2170d9e8e611bf49dff288911

--------------------------------

fail run raid1 array when we assemble array with the inactive disk only,
but the mdx_raid1 thread were not stop, Even if the associated resources
have been released. it will caused a NULL dereference when we do poweroff.

This causes the following Oops:
    [  287.587787] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000070
    [  287.594762] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
    [  287.599912] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
    [  287.605061] PGD 0 P4D 0
    [  287.607612] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
    [  287.611287] CPU: 3 PID: 5265 Comm: md0_raid1 Tainted: G     U            5.10.146 #0
    [  287.619029] Hardware name: xxxxxxx/To be filled by O.E.M, BIOS 5.19 06/16/2022
    [  287.626775] RIP: 0010:md_check_recovery+0x57/0x500 [md_mod]
    [  287.632357] Code: fe 01 00 00 48 83 bb 10 03 00 00 00 74 08 48 89 ......
    [  287.651118] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000433d78 EFLAGS: 00010202
    [  287.656347] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888105986800 RCX: 0000000000000000
    [  287.663491] RDX: ffffc90000433bb0 RSI: 00000000ffffefff RDI: ffff888105986800
    [  287.670634] RBP: ffffc90000433da0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000ffffefff
    [  287.677771] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffc90000433ba8 R12: ffff888105986800
    [  287.684907] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: fffffffffffffe00 R15: ffff888100b6b500
    [  287.692052] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888277f80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
    [  287.700149] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
    [  287.705897] CR2: 0000000000000070 CR3: 000000000320a000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
    [  287.713033] Call Trace:
    [  287.715498]  raid1d+0x6c/0xbbb [raid1]
    [  287.719256]  ? __schedule+0x1ff/0x760
    [  287.722930]  ? schedule+0x3b/0xb0
    [  287.726260]  ? schedule_timeout+0x1ed/0x290
    [  287.730456]  ? __switch_to+0x11f/0x400
    [  287.734219]  md_thread+0xe9/0x140 [md_mod]
    [  287.738328]  ? md_thread+0xe9/0x140 [md_mod]
    [  287.742601]  ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
    [  287.746097]  ? md_register_thread+0xe0/0xe0 [md_mod]
    [  287.751064]  kthread+0x11a/0x140
    [  287.754300]  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
    [  287.757974]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

In fact, when raid1 array run fail, we need to do
md_unregister_thread() before raid1_free().
Signed-off-by: NJiang Li <jiang.li@ugreen.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      22eeb5d1
    • L
      md: fix sysfs duplicate file while adding rdev · 5815341f
      由 Li Nan 提交于 
      hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 188553, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6TNFX
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

rdev->del_work has not been queued to md_rdev_misc_wq and flush_workqueue
will not flush it if tow threads add and remove same device. sysfs might
WARN duplicate filename as below.

    //T1	             //T2
    mdadm write super
			     add success
			     remove
			      unbind_rdev_from_array

    md_ioctl
     flush_workqueue
			      INIT_WORK
                               queue_work
     md_add_new_disk
      duplicate filename dev-xxx

Check if there is any kobj with the same name, and return busy if true.

Fixes: 5792a285 ("md: avoid a deadlock when removing a device from an md array via sysfs")
Signed-off-by: NLi Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      5815341f