Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • L
      mm: split 'tlb_flush_mmu()' into tlb flushing and memory freeing parts · 1cf35d47
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The mmu-gather operation 'tlb_flush_mmu()' has done two things: the
actual tlb flush operation, and the batched freeing of the pages that
the TLB entries pointed at.

This splits the operation into separate phases, so that the forced
batched flushing done by zap_pte_range() can now do the actual TLB flush
while still holding the page table lock, but delay the batched freeing
of all the pages to after the lock has been dropped.

This in turn allows us to avoid a race condition between
set_page_dirty() (as called by zap_pte_range() when it finds a dirty
shared memory pte) and page_mkclean(): because we now flush all the
dirty page data from the TLB's while holding the pte lock,
page_mkclean() will be held up walking the (recently cleaned) page
tables until after the TLB entries have been flushed from all CPU's.
Reported-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Tested-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Acked-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      1cf35d47
  3. 25 4月, 2014 6 次提交
  5. 24 4月, 2014 8 次提交
  7. 23 4月, 2014 7 次提交
  9. 22 4月, 2014 4 次提交
    • J
      locks: rename file-private locks to "open file description locks" · 0d3f7a2d
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      File-private locks have been merged into Linux for v3.15, and *now*
people are commenting that the name and macro definitions for the new
file-private locks suck.

...and I can't even disagree. The names and command macros do suck.

We're going to have to live with these for a long time, so it's
important that we be happy with the names before we're stuck with them.
The consensus on the lists so far is that they should be rechristened as
"open file description locks".

The name isn't a big deal for the kernel, but the command macros are not
visually distinct enough from the traditional POSIX lock macros. The
glibc and documentation folks are recommending that we change them to
look like F_OFD_{GETLK|SETLK|SETLKW}. That lessens the chance that a
programmer will typo one of the commands wrong, and also makes it easier
to spot this difference when reading code.

This patch makes the following changes that I think are necessary before
v3.15 ships:

1) rename the command macros to their new names. These end up in the uapi
   headers and so are part of the external-facing API. It turns out that
   glibc doesn't actually use the fcntl.h uapi header, but it's hard to
   be sure that something else won't. Changing it now is safest.

2) make the the /proc/locks output display these as type "OFDLCK"

Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      0d3f7a2d
    • S
      ARM: zynq: dt: Add I2C nodes to Zynq device tree · 0f6faa3f
      由 Soren Brinkmann 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NSoren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
      0f6faa3f
    • S
      ARM: zynq: DT: Add 'clock-latency' property · b2bf5d48
      由 Soren Brinkmann 提交于 
      Specify the 'clock-latency' property to avoid certain cpufreq governors
from refusing to work with the following error:
  ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor
Reported-by: NMike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Signed-off-by: NSoren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: NMike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
      b2bf5d48
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Fix oops for GPMC free · efe80723
      由 Tony Lindgren 提交于 
      If gpmc_cs_remap() fails we will get an error because we are calling
release_resource() on an uninitialized resource. Let's fix that by
checking the resource flags. And while at it, let's also make
gpmc_cs_delete_mem() use the res pointer that we already have to
avoid confusion.

Without this patch we can get the following error:

omap-gpmc 6e000000.gpmc: cannot remap GPMC CS 1 to 0x01000300
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000018
...
(gpmc_cs_free+0x94/0xc8)
(gpmc_probe_generic_child+0x178/0x1ec)
(gpmc_probe_dt+0x1bc/0x2cc)
(gpmc_probe+0x250/0x44c)
(platform_drv_probe+0x3c/0x6c)
(really_probe+0x74/0x208)
(driver_probe_device+0x34/0x50)
(bus_for_each_drv+0x60/0x8c)
(device_attach+0x80/0xa4)
(bus_probe_device+0x88/0xb0)
(device_add+0x320/0x450)
(of_platform_device_create_pdata+0x80/0x9c)
(of_platform_bus_create+0xd0/0x170)
(of_platform_bus_create+0x12c/0x170)
(of_platform_populate+0x60/0x98)
(pdata_quirks_init+0x30/0x48)
(customize_machine+0x20/0x48)
(do_one_initcall+0x2c/0x14c)
(do_basic_setup+0x98/0xd8)
(kernel_init_freeable+0x12c/0x1e0)
(kernel_init+0x8/0xf0)
(ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
Code: e1a04000 e59f0070 eb195136 e5942010 (e5923018)

Cc: Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Signed-off-by: Ntony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      efe80723
  11. 19 4月, 2014 11 次提交
  13. 15 4月, 2014 3 次提交