- 27 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
People often get tripped up by this function and think that it does not implemented the prescribed algorithms from RFC2414 and RFC3390, even though it does. So add a comment to head off such misunderstandings in the future. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 8月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
In case a DSACK is received, it's better to lower cwnd as it's a sign of data receival. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
tcp_cwnd_down must check for it too as it should be conservative in case of collapse stuff and also when receiver is trying to lie (though that wouldn't be very successful/useful anyway). Note: - Separated also is_dupack and do_lost in fast_retransalert * Much cleaner look-and-feel now * This time it really fixes cumulative ACK with many new SACK blocks recovery entry (I claimed this fixes with last patch but it wasn't). TCP will now call tcp_update_scoreboard regardless of is_dupack when in recovery as long as there is enough fackets_out. - Introduce FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED * Some prior_snd_una arguments are unnecessary after it - Added helper FLAG_ANY_PROGRESS to avoid long FLAG...|FLAG... constructs Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 7月, 2007 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
It's possible that new SACK blocks that should trigger new LOST markings arrive with new data (which previously made is_dupack false). In addition, I think this fixes a case where we get a cumulative ACK with enough SACK blocks to trigger the fast recovery (is_dupack would be false there too). I'm not completely pleased with this solution because readability of the code is somewhat questionable as 'is_dupack' in SACK case is no longer about dupacks only but would mean something like 'lost_marker_work_todo' too... But because of Eifel stuff done in CA_Recovery, the FLAG_DATA_SACKED check cannot be placed to the if statement which seems attractive solution. Nevertheless, I didn't like adding another variable just for that either... :-) Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Actually, the ratehalving seems to work too well, as cwnd is reduced on every second ACK even though the packets in flight remains unchanged. Recoveries in a bidirectional flows suffer quite badly because of this, both NewReno and SACK are affected. After this patch, rate halving is performed for ACK only if packets in flight was supposedly changed too. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
This patch changes the API for the callback that is done after an ACK is received. It solves a couple of issues: * Some congestion controls want higher resolution value of RTT (controlled by TCP_CONG_RTT_SAMPLE flag). These don't really want a ktime, but all compute a RTT in microseconds. * Other congestion control could use RTT at jiffies resolution. To keep API consistent the units should be the same for both cases, just the resolution should change. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
None of the existing TCP congestion controls use the rtt value pased in the ca_ops->cong_avoid interface. Which is lucky because seq_rtt could have been -1 when handling a duplicate ack. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
For yet unknown reason, something cleared SACKED_RETRANS bit underneath FRTO. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 6月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Commit 6f74651a is found guilty of breaking DSACK counting, which should be done only for the SACK block reported by the DSACK instead of every SACK block that is received along with DSACK information. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Commit 164891aa broke RTT sampling of congestion control modules. Inaccurate timestamps could be fed to them without providing any way for them to identify such cases. Previously RTT sampler was called only if FLAG_RETRANS_DATA_ACKED was not set filtering inaccurate timestamps nicely. In addition, the new behavior could give an invalid timestamp (zero) to RTT sampler if only skbs with TCPCB_RETRANS were ACKed. This solves both problems. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
This flaw does not affect any behavior (currently). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Without FRTO, the tcp_try_to_open is never called with lost_out > 0 (see tcp_time_to_recover). However, when FRTO is enabled, the !tp->lost condition is not used until end of FRTO because that way TCP avoids premature entry to fast recovery during FRTO. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The code used to ignore GSO completely, passing either way too small or zero pkts_acked when GSO skb or part of it got ACKed. In addition, there is no need to calculate the value in the loop but simple arithmetics after the loop is sufficient. There is no need to handle SYN case specially because congestion control modules are not yet initialized when FLAG_SYN_ACKED is set. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 5月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
State could become inconsistent in two cases: 1) Userspace disabled FRTO by tuning sysctl when one of the TCP flows was in the middle of FRTO algorithm (and then RTO is again triggered) 2) SACK reneging occurs during FRTO algorithm A simple solution is just to abort the previous FRTO when such obscure condition occurs... Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The conservative spurious RTO response did not queue CWR even though the sending rate was lowered. Whenever reduction happens regardless of reason, CWR should be sent (forgetting to send it is not very fatal though). A better approach would be to queue CWR when one of the sending rate reducing responses (rate-halving one or this conservative response) is used already at RTO. Doing that would allow CWR to be sent along with the two new data segments that are sent during FRTO. However, it's a bit "racy" because userland could tune the response sysctl to a more aggressive one in between. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 4月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
This is a corner case where less than MSS sized new data thingie is awaiting in the send queue. For F-RTO to work correctly, a new data segment must be sent at certain point or F-RTO cannot be used at all. RFC4138 allows overriding of Nagle at that point. Implementation uses frto_counter states 2 and 3 to distinguish when Nagle override is needed. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
No new data is needed until the first ACK comes, so no need to check for application limitedness until then. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 23 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Do some simple changes to make congestion control API faster/cleaner. * use ktime_t rather than timeval * merge rtt sampling into existing ack callback this means one indirect call versus two per ack. * use flags bits to store options/settings Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
This is (mostly) automated change using magic: sed -e '/struct sock \*sk/ N' -e '/struct sock \*sk/ N' -e '/struct sock \*sk/ N' -e '/struct sock \*sk/ N' -e 's|struct sock \*sk,[\n\t ]*struct tcp_sock \*tp\([^{]*\n{\n\)| struct sock \*sk\1\tstruct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);\n|g' -e 's|struct sock \*sk, struct tcp_sock \*tp| struct sock \*sk|g' -e 's|sk, tp\([^-]\)|sk\1|g' Fixed four unused variable (tp) warnings that were introduced. In addition, manually added newlines after local variables and tweaked function arguments positioning. $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1) ... $ codiff -fV built-in.o.old built-in.o.new net/ipv4/route.c: rt_cache_flush | +14 1 function changed, 14 bytes added net/ipv4/tcp.c: tcp_setsockopt | -5 tcp_sendpage | -25 tcp_sendmsg | -16 3 functions changed, 46 bytes removed net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: tcp_try_undo_recovery | +3 tcp_try_undo_dsack | +2 tcp_mark_head_lost | -12 tcp_ack | -15 tcp_event_data_recv | -32 tcp_rcv_state_process | -10 tcp_rcv_established | +1 7 functions changed, 6 bytes added, 69 bytes removed, diff: -63 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c: update_send_head | -9 tcp_transmit_skb | +19 tcp_cwnd_validate | +1 tcp_write_wakeup | -17 __tcp_push_pending_frames | -25 tcp_push_one | -8 tcp_send_fin | -4 7 functions changed, 20 bytes added, 63 bytes removed, diff: -43 built-in.o.new: 18 functions changed, 40 bytes added, 178 bytes removed, diff: -138 Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Spring cleaning time... There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a bogus semicolon after: switch() { } Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
When a transmitted packet is looped back directly, CHECKSUM_PARTIAL maps to the semantics of CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. Therefore we should treat it as such in the stack. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the transport header, it is still legal to touch skb->h.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the cases where the transport header is being set to a offset from skb->data. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the cases where the network header is being set to a offset from skb->data. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the network header, it is still legal to touch skb->nh.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the mac header, it is still legal to touch skb->mac.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. This one also converts some more cases to skb_reset_mac_header() that my regex missed as it had no spaces before nor after '=', ugh. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
That is equal to skb->head before skb_reserve, to help in the layer header changes. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Add whitespace around keywords. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This allows the write queue implementation to be changed, for example, to one which allows fast interval searching. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 James Morris 提交于
Where appropriate, convert references to xtime.tv_sec to the get_seconds() helper function. Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Undoing ssthresh is disabled in fastretrans_alert whenever FLAG_ECE is set by clearing prior_ssthresh. The clearing does not protect FRTO because FRTO operates before fastretrans_alert. Moving the clearing of prior_ssthresh earlier seems to be a suboptimal solution to the FRTO case because then FLAG_ECE will cause a second ssthresh reduction in try_to_open (the first occurred when FRTO was entered). So instead, FRTO falls back immediately to the rate halving response, which switches TCP to CA_CWR state preventing the latter reduction of ssthresh. If the first ECE arrived before the ACK after which FRTO is able to decide RTO as spurious, prior_ssthresh is already cleared. Thus no undoing for ssthresh occurs. Besides, FLAG_ECE should be set also in the following ACKs resulting in rate halving response that sees TCP is already in CA_CWR, which again prevents an extra ssthresh reduction on that round-trip. If the first ECE arrived before RTO, ssthresh has already been adapted and prior_ssthresh remains cleared on entry because TCP is in CA_CWR (the same applies also to a case where FRTO is entered more than once and ECE comes in the middle). High_seq must not be touched after tcp_enter_cwr because CWR round-trip calculation depends on it. I believe that after this patch, FRTO should be ECN-safe and even able to take advantage of synergy benefits. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
A local variable for icsk was created but this change was missing. Spotted by Jarek Poplawski. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
New sysctl tcp_frto_response is added to select amongst these responses: - Rate halving based; reuses CA_CWR state (default) - Very conservative; used to be the only one available (=1) - Undo cwr; undoes ssthresh and cwnd reductions (=2) The response with rate halving requires a new parameter to tcp_enter_cwr because FRTO has already reduced ssthresh and doing a second reduction there has to be prevented. In addition, to keep things nice on 80 cols screen, a local variable was added. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The reordering detection must work also when FRTO has not been used at all which was the original intention of mine, just the expression of the idea was flawed. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Implements the SACK-enhanced FRTO given in RFC4138 using the variant given in Appendix B. RFC4138, Appendix B: "This means that in order to declare timeout spurious, the TCP sender must receive an acknowledgment for non-retransmitted segment between SND.UNA and RecoveryPoint in algorithm step 3. RecoveryPoint is defined in conservative SACK-recovery algorithm [RFC3517]" The basic version of the FRTO algorithm can still be used also when SACK is enabled. To enabled SACK-enhanced version, tcp_frto sysctl is set to 2. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
To be honest, I'm not too sure how the reord stuff works in the first place but this seems necessary. When FRTO has been active, the one and only retransmission could be unnecessary but the state and sending order might not be what the sacktag code expects it to be (to work correctly). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
TCP without FRTO would be in Loss state with small cwnd. FRTO, however, leaves cwnd (typically) to a larger value which causes ssthresh to become too large in case RTO is triggered again compared to what conventional recovery would do. Because consecutive RTOs result in only a single ssthresh reduction, RTO+cumulative ACK+RTO pattern is required to trigger this event. A large comment is included for congestion control module writers trying to figure out what CA_EVENT_FRTO handler should do because there exists a remote possibility of incompatibility between FRTO and module defined ssthresh functions. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Previously RETRANS bits were cleared on the entry to FRTO. We postpone that into tcp_enter_frto_loss, which is really the place were the clearing should be done anyway. This allows simplification of the logic from a clearing loop to the head skb clearing only. Besides, the other changes made in the previous patches to tcp_use_frto made it impossible for the non-SACKed FRTO to be entered if other than the head has been rexmitted. With SACK-enhanced FRTO (and Appendix B), however, there can be a number retransmissions in flight when RTO expires (same thing could happen before this patchset also with non-SACK FRTO). To not introduce any jumpiness into the packet counting during FRTO, instead of clearing RETRANS bits from skbs during entry, do it later on. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-