In order for VLPIs to be delivered to the guest, we must make sure that
the virtual cpuif is always enabled, irrespective of the presence of
virtual interrupt in the LRs.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

The redistributor needs to be told which vPE is about to be run,
and tells us whether there is any pending VLPI on exit.

Let's add the scheduling calls to the vgic flush/sync functions,
allowing the VLPIs to be delivered to the guest.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

The doorbell interrupt is only useful if the vcpu is blocked on WFI.
In all other cases, recieving a doorbell interrupt is just a waste
of cycles.

So let's only enable the doorbell if a vcpu is getting blocked,
and disable it when it is unblocked. This is very similar to
what we're doing for the background timer.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

When a vPE is not running, a VLPI being made pending results in a
doorbell interrupt being delivered. Let's handle this interrupt
and update the pending_last flag that indicates that VLPIs are
pending. The corresponding vcpu is also kicked into action.

Special care is taken to prevent the doorbell from being enabled
at request time (this is controlled separately), and to make
the disabling on the interrupt non-lazy.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

When a vPE exits, the pending_last flag is set when there are pending
VLPIs stored in the pending table. Similarily, this flag will be set
when a doorbell interrupt fires, as it indicates the same condition.

Let's update kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() to account for that
flag as well, making a vcpu runnable when set.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

There is no need to perform an INV for each interrupt when updating
multiple interrupts.  Instead, we can rely on the final VINVALL that
gets sent to the ITS to do the work for all of them.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Upon updating a property, we propagate it all the way to the physical
ITS, and ask for an INV command to be executed there.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

The current implementation of MOVALL doesn't allow us to call
into the core ITS code as we hold a number of spinlocks.

Let's try a method used in other parts of the code, were we copy
the intids of the candicate interrupts, and then do whatever
we need to do with them outside of the critical section.

This allows us to move the interrupts one by one, at the expense
of a bit of CPU time. Who cares? MOVALL is such a stupid command
anyway...
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Handling CLEAR is pretty easy. Just ask the ITS driver to clear
the corresponding pending bit (which will turn into a CLEAR
command on the physical side).
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

When the guest issues an affinity change, we need to tell the physical
ITS that we're now targetting a new vcpu.  This is done by extracting
the current mapping, updating the target, and reapplying the mapping.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

When freeing an LPI (on a DISCARD command, for example), we need
to unmap the VLPI down to the physical ITS level.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

If the guest issues an INT command targetting a VLPI, let's
call into the irq_set_irqchip_state() helper to make it pending
on the physical side.

This works just as well if userspace decides to inject an interrupt
using the normal userspace API...
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Let's use the irq bypass mechanism also used for x86 posted interrupts
to intercept the virtual PCIe endpoint configuration and establish our
LPI->VLPI mapping.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

In order to control the GICv4 view of virtual CPUs, we rely
on an irqdomain allocated for that purpose. Let's add a couple
of helpers to that effect.

At the same time, the vgic data structures gain new fields to
track all this... erm... wonderful stuff.

The way we hook into the vgic init is slightly convoluted. We
need the vgic to be initialized (in order to guarantee that
the number of vcpus is now fixed), and we must have a vITS
(otherwise this is all very pointless). So we end-up calling
the init from both vgic_init and vgic_its_create.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Add a new has_gicv4 field in the global VGIC state that indicates
whether the HW is GICv4 capable, as a per-VM predicate indicating
if there is a possibility for a VM to support direct injection
(the above being true and the VM having an ITS).
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

In order to help integrating the vITS code with GICv4, let's add
a new helper that deals with updating the affinity of an LPI,
which will later be augmented with super duper extra GICv4
goodness.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

The whole MSI injection process is fairly monolithic. An MSI write
gets turned into an injected LPI in one swift go. But this is actually
a more fine-grained process:

- First, a virtual ITS gets selected using the doorbell address
- Then the DevID/EventID pair gets translated into an LPI
- Finally the LPI is injected

Since the GICv4 code needs the first two steps in order to match
an IRQ routing entry to an LPI, let's expose them as helpers,
and refactor the existing code to use them
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

The way we call kvm_vgic_destroy is a bit bizarre. We call it
*after* having freed the vcpus, which sort of defeats the point
of cleaning up things before that point.

Let's move kvm_vgic_destroy towards the beginning of kvm_arch_destroy_vm,
which seems more sensible.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

We want to reuse the core of the map/unmap functions for IRQ
forwarding. Let's move the computation of the hwirq in
kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq and pass the linux IRQ as parameter.
the host_irq is added to struct vgic_irq.

We introduce kvm_vgic_map/unmap_irq which take a struct vgic_irq
handle as a parameter.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

This patch selects IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER and HAVE_KVM_IRQ_BYPASS
configs for ARM/ARM64.

kvm_arch_has_irq_bypass() now is implemented and returns true.
As a consequence the irq bypass consumer will be registered for
ARM/ARM64 with the forwarding callbacks:

- stop/start: halt/resume guest execution
- add/del_producer: set/unset forwarding at vgic/irqchip level

We don't have any actual support yet, so nothing gets actually
forwarded.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
[maz: dropped the DEOI stuff for the time being in order to
      reduce the dependency chain, amended commit message]
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Both arm and arm64 implementations are capable of injecting
faults, and yet have completely divergent implementations,
leading to different bugs and reduced maintainability.

Let's elect the arm64 version as the canonical one
and move it into aarch32.c, which is common to both
architectures.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

On reset we clear the valid bits of GITS_CBASER and GITS_BASER<n>.
We also clear command queue registers and free the cache (device,
collection, and lpi lists).

As we need to take the same locks as save/restore functions, we
create a vgic_its_ctrl() wrapper that handles KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL
group functions.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

When the GITS_BASER<n>.Valid gets cleared, the data structures in
guest RAM are not valid anymore. The device, collection
and LPI lists stored in the in-kernel ITS represent the same
information in some form of cache. So let's void the cache.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

We create two new functions that free the device and
collection lists. They are currently called by vgic_its_destroy()
and other callers will be added in subsequent patches.

We also remove the check on its->device_list.next.
Lists are initialized in vgic_create_its() and the device
is added to the device list only if this latter succeeds.

vgic_its_destroy is the device destroy ops. This latter is called
by kvm_destroy_devices() which loops on all created devices. So
at this point the list is initialized.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nwanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Let's remove kvm_its_unmap_device and use kvm_its_free_device
as both functions are identical.
Signed-off-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

After being lazy with saving/restoring the timer state, we defer that
work to vcpu_load and vcpu_put, which ensure that the timer state is
loaded on the hardware timers whenever the VCPU runs.

Unfortunately, we are failing to do that the first time vcpu_load()
runs, because the timer has not yet been enabled at that time.  As long
as the initialized timer state matches what happens to be in the
hardware (a disabled timer, because we never leave the timer screaming),
this does not show up as a problem, but is nevertheless incorrect.

The solution is simple; disable preemption while setting the timer to be
enabled, and call the timer load function when first enabling the timer.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

kvm_timer_should_fire() can be called in two different situations from
the kvm_vcpu_block().

The first case is before calling kvm_timer_schedule(), used for wait
polling, and in this case the VCPU thread is running and the timer state
is loaded onto the hardware so all we have to do is check if the virtual
interrupt lines are asserted, becasue the timer interrupt handler
functions will raise those lines as appropriate.

The second case is inside the wait loop of kvm_vcpu_block(), where we
have already called kvm_timer_schedule() and therefore the hardware will
be disabled and the software view of the timer state is up to date
(timer->loaded is false), and so we can simply check if the timer should
fire by looking at the software state.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Now when both the vtimer and the ptimer when using both the in-kernel
vgic emulation and a userspace IRQ chip are driven by the timer signals
and at the vcpu load/put boundaries, instead of recomputing the timer
state at every entry/exit to/from the guest, we can get entirely rid of
the flush hwstate function.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

There is no need to schedule and cancel a hrtimer when entering and
exiting the guest, because we know when the physical timer is going to
fire when the guest programs it, and we can simply program the hrtimer
at that point.

Now when the register modifications from the guest go through the
kvm_arm_timer_set/get_reg functions, which always call
kvm_timer_update_state(), we can simply consider the timer state in this
function and schedule and cancel the timers as needed.

This avoids looking at the physical timer emulation state when entering
and exiting the VCPU, allowing for faster servicing of the VM when
needed.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We are about to call phys_timer_emulate() from kvm_timer_update_state()
and modify phys_timer_emulate() at the same time.  Moving the function
and modifying it in a single patch makes the diff hard to read, so do
this separately first.

No functional change.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Add suport for the physical timer registers in kvm_arm_timer_set_reg and
kvm_arm_timer_get_reg so that these functions can be reused to interact
with the rest of the system.

Note that this paves part of the way for the physical timer state
save/restore, but we still need to add those registers to
KVM_GET_REG_LIST before we support migrating the physical timer state.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>

We don't need to save and restore the hardware timer state and examine
if it generates interrupts on on every entry/exit to the guest.  The
timer hardware is perfectly capable of telling us when it has expired
by signaling interrupts.

When taking a vtimer interrupt in the host, we don't want to mess with
the timer configuration, we just want to forward the physical interrupt
to the guest as a virtual interrupt.  We can use the split priority drop
and deactivate feature of the GIC to do this, which leaves an EOI'ed
interrupt active on the physical distributor, making sure we don't keep
taking timer interrupts which would prevent the guest from running.  We
can then forward the physical interrupt to the VM using the HW bit in
the LR of the GIC, like we do already, which lets the guest directly
deactivate both the physical and virtual timer simultaneously, allowing
the timer hardware to exit the VM and generate a new physical interrupt
when the timer output is again asserted later on.

We do need to capture this state when migrating VCPUs between physical
CPUs, however, which we use the vcpu put/load functions for, which are
called through preempt notifiers whenever the thread is scheduled away
from the CPU or called directly if we return from the ioctl to
userspace.

One caveat is that we have to save and restore the timer state in both
kvm_timer_vcpu_[put/load] and kvm_timer_[schedule/unschedule], because
we can have the following flows:

  1. kvm_vcpu_block
  2. kvm_timer_schedule
  3. schedule
  4. kvm_timer_vcpu_put (preempt notifier)
  5. schedule (vcpu thread gets scheduled back)
  6. kvm_timer_vcpu_load (preempt notifier)
  7. kvm_timer_unschedule

And a version where we don't actually call schedule:

  1. kvm_vcpu_block
  2. kvm_timer_schedule
  7. kvm_timer_unschedule

Since kvm_timer_[schedule/unschedule] may not be followed by put/load,
but put/load also may be called independently, we call the timer
save/restore functions from both paths.  Since they rely on the loaded
flag to never save/restore when unnecessary, this doesn't cause any
harm, and we ensure that all invokations of either set of functions work
as intended.

An added benefit beyond not having to read and write the timer sysregs
on every entry and exit is that we no longer have to actively write the
active state to the physical distributor, because we configured the
irq for the vtimer to only get a priority drop when handling the
interrupt in the GIC driver (we called irq_set_vcpu_affinity()), and
the interrupt stays active after firing on the host.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>

As we are about to take physical interrupts for the virtual timer on the
host but want to leave those active while running the VM (and let the VM
deactivate them), we need to set the vtimer PPI affinity accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

As we are about to be lazy with saving and restoring the timer
registers, we prepare by moving all possible timer configuration logic
out of the hyp code.  All virtual timer registers can be programmed from
EL1 and since the arch timer is always a level triggered interrupt we
can safely do this with interrupts disabled in the host kernel on the
way to the guest without taking vtimer interrupts in the host kernel
(yet).

The downside is that the cntvoff register can only be programmed from
hyp mode, so we jump into hyp mode and back to program it.  This is also
safe, because the host kernel doesn't use the virtual timer in the KVM
code.  It may add a little performance performance penalty, but only
until following commits where we move this operation to vcpu load/put.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We were using the same hrtimer for emulating the physical timer and for
making sure a blocking VCPU thread would be eventually woken up.  That
worked fine in the previous arch timer design, but as we are about to
actually use the soft timer expire function for the physical timer
emulation, change the logic to use a dedicated hrtimer.

This has the added benefit of not having to cancel any work in the sync
path, which in turn allows us to run the flush and sync with IRQs
disabled.

Note that the hrtimer used to program the host kernel's timer to
generate an exit from the guest when the emulated physical timer fires
never has to inject any work, and to share the soft_timer_cancel()
function with the bg_timer, we change the function to only cancel any
pending work if the pointer to the work struct is not null.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>

As we are about to play tricks with the timer to be more lazy in saving
and restoring state, we need to move the timer sync and flush functions
under a disabled irq section and since we have to flush the vgic state
after the timer and PMU state, we do the whole flush/sync sequence with
disabled irqs.

The only downside is a slightly longer delay before being able to
process hardware interrupts and run softirqs.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

As we are about to introduce a separate hrtimer for the physical timer,
call this timer bg_timer, because we refer to this timer as the
background timer in the code and comments elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We are about to add an additional soft timer to the arch timer state for
a VCPU and would like to be able to reuse the functions to program and
cancel a timer, so we make them slightly more generic and rename to make
it more clear that these functions work on soft timers and not the
hardware resource that this code is managing.

The armed flag on the timer state is only used to assert a condition,
and we don't rely on this assertion in any meaningful way, so we can
simply get rid of this flack and slightly reduce complexity.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>

We are about to optimize our timer handling logic which involves
injecting irqs to the vgic directly from the irq handler.

Unfortunately, the injection path can take any AP list lock and irq lock
and we must therefore make sure to use spin_lock_irqsave where ever
interrupts are enabled and we are taking any of those locks, to avoid
deadlocking between process context and the ISR.

This changes a lot of the VGIC code, but the good news are that the
changes are mostly mechanical.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc,zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>

If the vgic is not initialized, don't try to grab its spinlocks or
traverse its data structures.

This is important because we soon have to start considering the active
state of a virtual interrupts when doing vcpu_load, which may happen
early on before the vgic is initialized.
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>