- 15 11月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
This is dead code, nothing uses the IWL_DEVICE_22560 macro and thus nothing every uses IWL_DEVICE_FAMILY_22560. Remove it all. While at it, remove some code and definitions used only in this case, and clean up some comments/names that still refer to it. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 25 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tova Mussai 提交于
The FW introduce new API to get the band from the rx mpdu, use this new API. Signed-off-by: NTova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 06 9月, 2019 5 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Sometimes the firmware won't be able to decrypt frames because the keys were not installed yet or other scenarios. The firmware will soon stop dropping multicast frames when MAC_FILTER_ACCEPT_GRP is not set. The firmware will simply always pass multicast frame in. In order to avoid logging any such frame coming in when we don't have the keys, drop the print. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
In prior hardware generations (e.g. 9000 series), we received the BAR frame with fake NSSN information to handle releasing frames from the reorder buffer for the default queue, the other queues were getting the FRAME_RELEASE notification in this case. With multi-TID block-ack, the firmware no longer sends us the BAR frame because the fake RX is quite big (just the metadata is around 48 bytes or so). Instead, it now sends us one (or multiple) special release notifications (0xc2). The hardware consumes these as well, but only generates the FRAME_RELEASE (0xc3) for queues other than the default queue. We thus need to handle them in the same way we handle the normal FRAME_RELEASE. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Certain APs (I think a certain Broadcom model) interact badly with our full state BA bitmap handling, and if triggered badly with many powersave transitions they keep sending frames from before the window, which our hardware then doesn't appear to ACK (to them) since it has moved on and is sending ACKs for higher SNs now. Try to detect this situation and if this keeps happening, disable the aggregation session. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Add a pointer to the iwl_trans structure and point it to the trans part of the cfg. This is the first step in disassociating the trans configuration from the rest of the configuration. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
In order to be able to select the cfg depending on the HW revision or on the RF ID, we need to set up the trans before selecting the cfg. To do so, move the elements from cfg that are needed by iwl_trans_alloc() to a separate struct at the top of the cfg, so it can be used by other cfg types as well, before selecting the rest of the configuration. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 31 7月, 2019 4 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
An earlier patch made sure that the queues are not lagging too far behind. This means that iwl_mvm_release_frames should not be called with a head_sn too far behind NSSN. Don't take the risk to change completely the entry condition to iwl_mvm_release_frames, but don't update the head_sn is the NSSN is more than 2048 packets ahead of us. Since this just cannot be right. This means that the scenario described here happened. We are queue 0. Q:0 Q:1 head_sn: 0 -> 2047 head_sn: 2048 Lots of packets arrive: head_sn: 2047 -> 2150 send NSSN_SYNC notification Handle notification from the firmware and do NOT move the head_sn back to 2048 Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
In order to support MSI-X efficiently, we want to avoid communication across Rx queues. Each Rx queue should have all the data it needs to process a packet. The reordering buffer is a challenge in the MSI-X world since we can have a single BA session whose packets are directed to different queues. This is why each queue has its own reordering buffer. The hardware is able to hint the driver whether we have a hole or not, which allows the driver to know whether it can release a packet or not. This indication is called NSSN. Roughly, if the packet's SN is lower than the NSSN, we can release the packet to the stack. The NSSN is the SN of the newest packet received without any holes + 1. This is working as long as we don't have packets that we release because of a timeout. When that happens, we could have taken the decision to release a packet after we have been waiting for its predecessor for too long. If this predecessor comes later, we have to drop it because we can't release packets out of order. In that case, the hardware will give us an indication that we can we release the packet (SN < NSSN), but the packet still needs to be dropped. This is why we sometimes need to ignore the NSSN and we track the head_sn in software. Here is a specific example of this: 1) Rx queue 1 got packets: 480, 482, 483 2) We release 480 to to the stack and wait for 481 3) NSSN is now 481 4) The timeout expires 5) We release 482 and 483, NSSN is still 480 6) 481 arrives its NSSN is 484. We need to drop 481 even if 481 < 484. This is why we'll update the head_sn to 484 at step 2. The flow now is: 1) Rx queue 1 got packets: 480, 482, 483 2) We release 480 to to the stack and wait for 481 3) NSSN is now 481 / head_sn is 481 4) The timeout expires 5) We release 482 and 483, NSSN is still 480 but head_sn is 484. 6) 481 arrives its NSSN is 484, but head_sn is 484 and we drop it. This code introduces another problem in case all the traffic goes well (no hole, no timeout): Rx queue 1: 0 -> 483 (head_sn = 484) Rx queue 2: 501 -> 4095 (head_sn = 0) Rx queue 2: 0 -> 480 (head_sn = 481) Rx queue 1: 481 but head_sn = 484 and we drop it. At this point, the SN of queue 1 is far behind: more than 4040 packets behind. Queue 1 will consider 481 "old" because 481 is in [501-64:501] whereas it is a very new packet. In order to fix that, send an Rx notification from time to time (twice across the full set of 4096 packets) to make sure no Rx queue is lagging too far behind. What will happen then is: Rx queue 1: 0 -> 483 (head_sn = 484) Rx queue 2: 501 -> 2047 (head_sn = 2048) Rx queue 1: Sync nofication (head_sn = 2048) Rx queue 2: 2048 -> 4095 (head_sn = 0) Rx queue 1: Sync notification (head_sn = 0) Rx queue 2: 1 -> 481 (head_sn = 482) Rx queue 1: 481 and head_sn = 0. In queue 1's data, head_sn is now 0, the packet coming in is 481, it'll understand that the new packet is new and it won't be dropped. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Instead of allocating memory for which we have an upper limit, use a small buffer on stack. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
We will soon be using a new notification that will be initiated by the driver, sent to the firmware and sent back to all the RSS queues by the firmware. This new notification will be useful to synchronize the NSSN across all the queues. For now, don't send the notification, just add the code to handle it. Later patch will add the code to actually send it. While at it, validate the baid coming from the firmware to avoid accessing an array with a bad index in the driver. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jason A. Donenfeld 提交于
This makes boot uniformly boottime and tai uniformly clocktai, to address the remaining oversights. Signed-off-by: NJason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621203249.3909-2-Jason@zx2c4.com
-
- 28 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
We don't check for the validity of the lengths in the packet received from the firmware. If the MPDU length received in the rx descriptor is too short to contain the header length and the crypt length together, we may end up trying to copy a negative number of bytes (headlen - hdrlen < 0) which will underflow and cause us to try to copy a huge amount of data. This causes oopses such as this one: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff896be2970000 PGD 5e201067 P4D 5e201067 PUD 5e205067 PMD 16110d063 PTE 8000000162970161 Oops: 0003 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 1824 Comm: irq/134-iwlwifi Not tainted 4.19.33-04308-geea41cf4930f #1 Hardware name: [...] RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10 Code: 90 90 90 90 eb 1e 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 d1 48 c1 e9 03 83 e2 07 f3 48 a5 89 d1 f3 a4 c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 d1 <f3> a4 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 83 fa 20 72 7e 40 38 fe RSP: 0018:ffffa4630196fc60 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: ffff896be2924618 RBX: ffff896bc8ecc600 RCX: 00000000fffb4610 RDX: 00000000fffffff8 RSI: ffff896a835e2a38 RDI: ffff896be2970000 RBP: ffffa4630196fd30 R08: ffff896bc8ecc600 R09: ffff896a83597000 R10: ffff896bd6998400 R11: 000000000200407f R12: ffff896a83597050 R13: 00000000fffffff8 R14: 0000000000000010 R15: ffff896a83597038 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff896be8280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff896be2970000 CR3: 000000005dc12002 CR4: 00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: iwl_mvm_rx_mpdu_mq+0xb51/0x121b [iwlmvm] iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x58c/0xa89 [iwlwifi] iwl_pcie_irq_rx_msix_handler+0xd9/0x12a [iwlwifi] irq_thread_fn+0x24/0x49 irq_thread+0xb0/0x122 kthread+0x138/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 Fix that by checking the lengths for correctness and trigger a warning to show that we have received wrong data. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Report all NO_DATA events to mac80211 so they get captured in radiotap for usage in sniffer scenarios; map the info type to a reasonable radiotap type for this. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The spatial reuse 4 words fields are fetched from the HE-SIGA by the firmware and propagated to the driver through the Rx info. This is useful to populate the radiotap header. We were looking at the wrong place in the firmware data and got bogus values. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Fixes: bdf180c8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: change PHY data RX for HE radiotap") Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
In HE-TB PPDUs (labeled HE-TRIG in radiotap), we were overwriting the data4.spatial_reuse_1 field with the spatial reuse data that the firmware gives us for SU/MU PPDUs. Fix that by moving that, we are already setting the data4.spatial_reuse_{1,2,3,4} fields in the TB PPDU case. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Fixes: 69f3ca8e ("iwlwifi: mvm: show more HE radiotap data for TB PPDUs") Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
We now no longer have any special code in iwl_mvm_pass_packet_to_mac80211(), so don't need to pass NO_PSDU packets through it. Stop doing so and clean up the code there. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 04 2月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Hiding the HE radiotap data for further processing of the SKB just caused another bug when adding the L-SIG data. Simply stop doing this and adjust the skb->data pointer accordingly when we need to get the 802.11 header. While at it, also verify and fix the data alignment, we need to add 2 bytes padding with the vendor data to ensure the whole length of all radiotap headers is a multiple of 4. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Fixes: 6721039d ("iwlwifi: mvm: add L-SIG length to radiotap") Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Expose the trigger-based PPDU SIG-A bandwidth to radiotap in the newly defined bits thereof. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Some switch-cases were missing a fall through comment, so the compiler may warn. Fix that by adding the comments where needed. In other cases there was more text in the comment, which the compiler doesn't recognize, so either remove the extra text or move it to a separate comment line as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 31 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
A call to iwl_mvm_add_rtap_sniffer_config() was missing due to a merge damage when I submitted the patch mentioned below. And this causes the following compilation warning: drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c:195:13: warning: 'iwl_mvm_add_rtap_sniffer_config' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static void iwl_mvm_add_rtap_sniffer_config(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Fix it by adding the if block that calls this function. Fixes: 9bf13bee ("iwlwifi: mvm: include configured sniffer AID in radiotap") Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 29 1月, 2019 7 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
In order to make more sense out of the captured radiotap data e.g. when the configured AID changes, add the currently configured AID to the radiotap data as a vendor extension field. This is made race-free by updating the included value from inside the RX path (using a notification wait) for the command response from the firmware, which thus means it's serialized with frame RX. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The reorder buffer is bypassed because the firmware won't have any BA sessions, document this. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Implement CSI (channel estimation matrix) reporting in the mvm driver, if the firmware has the capability. Currently only a debugfs API is provided as the API is still under discussion. For now, RX aggregation must be disabled to use this feature on data frames as we haven't found a good way to attach the data to A-MPDUs, given complexities with multi-queue. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The current code assigns the reference, and then goes to increment it if the toggle bit has changed. That way, we get Toggle 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 ID 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Fix that by assigning the post-toggle ID to get Toggle 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 ID 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 Reported-by: NDanny Alexander <danny.alexander@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Fixes: fbe41127 ("iwlwifi: mvm: update mpdu metadata API") Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Due to a general shortage of RX API bits, the firmware is going to reuse this bit on non-CCK frames to mean something else. Use it only on CCK frames to prepare for that change. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Shaul Triebitz 提交于
Take the NSS value from 'rx_vec' rather than from 'rate_n_flags'. The rate_n_flags has only 2 bits for the NSS giving a max of 4SS (0 = 1SS etc.). Since there may be up to 8SS use the rx_vec which has 3 bits for the NSS. While at it, fix the rx_vec array to length of 2. Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Shaul Triebitz 提交于
When setting the EOF bit in Rx flags (propagated to radiotap) do not depend it on the PPDU type (SU/MU/TB) since it doesn't. Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 20 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shaul Triebitz 提交于
Handle RX no data notification, which is used for advertising NDP to radiotap. Signed-off-by: NGolan Ben Ami <golan.ben.ami@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 14 12月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Shaul Triebitz 提交于
UL_DL is irrelevant to HE TRIG_BASED PPDU. Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Shaul Triebitz 提交于
We may have the L-SIG length depending on the phy_data info type; add it to radiotap when we do. Move getting the phy_data out one layer up and the info type into it so we can use this data more generically. We need to call the iwl_mvm_rx_he() function for other reasons as well, so can't just combine all of that into something like iwl_mvm_parse_phy_data(). Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Shaul Triebitz 提交于
The firmware changed the PHY data API, so follow suit. Some data is now available even for HT/VHT frames, so the info type in the metadata was changed. This change isn't backwards compatible, but 1) the firmware with the old API was never released; 2) the only overlap in the info type field is from the old type of TB to the new of HT, so this basically just means that with older FW and newer driver the data will be considered missing. While at it, remove the extra code to set the LTF syms corresponding to the streams and use the data from the device instead - we don't really need this in any case other than when we have it from the device. As the new API gives use the spatial reuse 1-4 fields for trigger-based PPDUs, also expose that to radiotap. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 11 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 YueHaibing 提交于
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning: drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c: In function 'iwl_mvm_rx_mpdu_mq': drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c:1386:7: warning: variable 'he_phy_data' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] u64 he_phy_data; 'he_phy_data' never used since be introduce in commit 18ead597 ("iwlwifi: support new rx_mpdu_desc api") Signed-off-by: NYueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 06 10月, 2018 7 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
For trigger-based PPDUs, most values aren't part of the HE-SIG-A because they're preconfigured by the trigger frame. However, we still have this information since we used the trigger frame to configure the hardware, so we can (and do) read it back out and can thus show it in radiotap. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When the info type is MU, we still have the data from the TSF overload words, so should decode that. When it's MU_EXT_INFO we additionally have the SIG-B common 0/1/2 fields. Also document the validity depending on the info type and fix the name of the regular TB PPDU info type accordingly. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
For SU/SU-ER/MU PPDUs we have spatial reuse. For those where it's relevant we also know the pre-FEC padding factor, PE disambiguity bit, beam change bit and doppler bit. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Add information about the LDCP extra symbol segment to the HE data when applicable (not for trigger-based PPDUs). While at it, clean up the code for UL/DL a bit. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
We have this data available, so add it. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
This code gets shorter if it doesn't have to check all the conditions, so move it to an appropriate place that has all of them validated already. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Split the code out into a separate routine, and move that to be called inside the previously introduced iwl_mvm_decode_he_phy_data() function. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-