- 17 9月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
In an attempt to avoid doing an unneeded flush after opening a (previously non-existent) file with O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, the code only triggered the hueristic if ei->disksize was non-zero. Turns out that the VFS doesn't call ->truncate() if the file doesn't exist, and ei->disksize is always zero even if the file previously existed. So remove the test, since it isn't necessary and in fact disabled the hueristic. Thanks to Clemens Eisserer that he was seeing problems with files written using kwrite and eclipse after sudden crashes caused by a buggy Intel video driver. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
EXT4_EXT_MIGRATE is only intended to be used for an in-memory flag, and the hex value assigned to it collides with FS_DIRECTIO_FL (which is also stored in i_flags). There's no reason for the EXT4_EXT_MIGRATE bit to be stored in i_flags, so we switch it to use i_state instead. Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Today, the ext4 allocator will happily allocate blocks past 2^32 for indirect-block files, which results in the block numbers getting truncated, and corruption ensues. This patch limits such allocations to < 2^32, and adds BUG_ONs if we do get blocks larger than that. This should address RH Bug 519471, ext4 bitmap allocator must limit blocks to < 2^32 * ext4_find_goal() is modified to choose a goal < UINT_MAX, so that our starting point is in an acceptable range. * ext4_xattr_block_set() is modified such that the goal block is < UINT_MAX, as above. * ext4_mb_regular_allocator() is modified so that the group search does not continue into groups which are too high * ext4_mb_use_preallocated() has a check that we don't use preallocated space which is too far out * ext4_alloc_blocks() and ext4_xattr_block_set() add some BUG_ONs No attempt has been made to limit inode locations to < 2^32, so we may wind up with blocks far from their inodes. Doing this much already will lead to some odd ENOSPC issues when the "lower 32" gets full, and further restricting inodes could make that even weirder. For high inodes, choosing a goal of the original, % UINT_MAX, may be a bit odd, but then we're in an odd situation anyway, and I don't know of a better heuristic. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Mayhar 提交于
Teach ext4_write_inode() and ext4_do_update_inode() about non-journal mode: If we're not using a journal, ext4_write_inode() now calls ext4_do_update_inode() (after getting the iloc via ext4_get_inode_loc()) with a new "do_sync" parameter. If that parameter is nonzero _and_ we're not using a journal, ext4_do_update_inode() calls sync_dirty_buffer() instead of ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(). This problem was found in power-fail testing, checking the amount of loss of files and blocks after a power failure when using fsync() and when not using fsync(). It turned out that using fsync() was actually worse than not doing so, possibly because it increased the likelihood that the inodes would remain unflushed and would therefore be lost at the power failure. Signed-off-by: NFrank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 08 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Drop the WARN_ON(1), as he stack trace is not appropriate, since it is triggered by file system corruption, and it misleads users into thinking there is a kernel bug. In addition, change the message displayed by ext4_error() to make it clear that this is a file system corruption problem. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
In order to check whether the buffer_heads are mapped we need to hold page lock. Otherwise a reclaim can cleanup the attached buffer_heads. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 01 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Add a new tracepoint which shows the pages that will be written using write_cache_pages() by ext4_da_writepages(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
To solve a lock inversion problem, we implement part of the range_cyclic algorithm in ext4_da_writepages(). (See commit 2acf2c26 for more details.) As part of that change wbc->range_start was modified by ext4's writepages function, which causes its callers to get confused since they aren't expecting the filesystem to modify it. The simplest fix is to save and restore wbc->range_start in ext4_da_writepages. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
During truncate we are sometimes forced to start a new transaction as the amount of blocks to be journaled is both quite large and hard to predict. So far we restarted a transaction while holding i_data_sem and that violates lock ordering because i_data_sem ranks below a transaction start (and it can lead to a real deadlock with ext4_get_blocks() mapping blocks in some page while having a transaction open). We fix the problem by dropping the i_data_sem before restarting the transaction and acquire it afterwards. It's slightly subtle that this works: 1) By the time ext4_truncate() is called, all the page cache for the truncated part of the file is dropped so get_block() should not be called on it (we only have to invalidate extent cache after we reacquire i_data_sem because some extent from not-truncated part could extend also into the part we are going to truncate). 2) Writes, migrate or defrag hold i_mutex so they are stopped for all the time of the truncate. This bug has been found and analyzed by Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roel Kluin 提交于
unsigned i_block cannot be less than 0. Signed-off-by: NRoel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于
We found a problem with buffer head reference leaks when using an ext4 partition without a journal. In particular, calls to ext4_forget() would not to a brelse() on the input buffer head, which will cause pages they belong to to not be reclaimable. Further investigation showed that all places where ext4_journal_forget() and ext4_journal_revoke() are called are subject to the same problem. The patch below changes __ext4_journal_forget/__ext4_journal_revoke to do an explicit release of the buffer head when the journal handle isn't valid. Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于
After the patch I posted last week regarding buffer head ref leaks in no-journal mode, I looked at all the code that uses buffer heads and searched for more potential leaks. The patch below fixes the issues I found; these can occur even when a journal is present. The change to inode.c fixes a double release if ext4_journal_get_create_access() fails. The changes to namei.c are more complicated. add_dirent_to_buf() will release the input buffer head EXCEPT when it returns -ENOSPC. There are some callers of this routine that don't always do the brelse() in the event that -ENOSPC is returned. Unfortunately, to put this fix into ext4_add_entry() required capturing the return value of make_indexed_dir() and add_dirent_to_buf(). Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 15 6月, 2009 5 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The VFS handles updating ctime, so we don't need to update the inode's ctime in ext4_splace_branch() to update the direct or indirect blocks. This was harmless when we did this in ext3, but in ext4, thanks to delayed allocation, updating the ctime in ext4_splice_branch() can cause the ctime to mysteriously jump when the blocks are finally allocated. Thanks to Björn Steinbrink for pointing out this problem on the git mailing list. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
In addition, fix two unused variable warnings. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
This patch fixes the mmap/truncate race that was fixed for delayed allocation by merging ext4_{journalled,normal,da}_writepage() into ext4_writepage(). Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
It is possible to see buffer_heads which are not mapped in the writepage callback in the following scneario (where the fs blocksize is 1k and the page size is 4k): 1) truncate(f, 1024) 2) mmap(f, 0, 4096) 3) a[0] = 'a' 4) truncate(f, 4096) 5) writepage(...) Now if we get a writepage callback immediately after (4) and before an attempt to write at any other offset via mmap address (which implies we are yet to get a pagefault and do a get_block) what we would have is the page which is dirty have first block allocated and the other three buffer_heads unmapped. In the above case the writepage should go ahead and try to write the first blocks and clear the page_dirty flag. Further attempts to write to the page will again create a fault and result in allocating blocks and marking page dirty. If we don't write any other offset via mmap address we would still have written the first block to the disk and rest of the space will be considered as a hole. So to address this, we change all of the places where we look for delayed, unmapped, or unwritten buffer heads, and only check for delayed or unwritten buffer heads instead. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This is a pure cleanup patch. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
We're running out of space in the mount options word, and EXT4_MOUNT_ABORT isn't really a mount option, but a run-time flag. So move it to become EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED in s_mount_flags. Also remove bogus ext2_fs.h / ext4.h simultaneous #include protection, which can never happen. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
We can only fit 32 options in s_mount_opt because an unsigned long is 32-bits on a x86 machine. So use an unsigned int to save space on 64-bit platforms. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If a non-existent file is opened via O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, there's no need to treat this as a true file truncation, so we shouldn't activate the replace-via-truncate hueristic. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
In generic_perform_write if we fail to copy the user data we don't update the inode->i_size. We should truncate the file in the above case so that we don't have blocks allocated outside inode->i_size. Add the inode to orphan list in the same transaction as block allocation This ensures that if we crash in between the recovery would do the truncate. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We should add inode to the orphan list in the same transaction as block allocation. This ensures that if we crash after a failed block allocation and before we do a vmtruncate we don't leak block (ie block marked as used in bitmap but not claimed by the inode). Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Get rid of EXTEND_DISKSIZE flag of ext4_get_blocks_handle(). This seems to be a relict from some old days and setting disksize in this function does not make much sense. Currently it was set only by ext4_getblk(). Since the parameter has some effect only if create == 1, it is easy to check by grepping through the sources that the three callers which end up calling ext4_getblk() with create == 1 (ext4_append, ext4_quota_write, ext4_mkdir) do the right thing and set disksize themselves. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Buffer heads outside i_size will be unmapped. So when we are doing "walk_page_buffers" limit ourself to i_size. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> ----
-
- 14 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Contents of long symlinks is written via standard write methods. So when the write fails, we add inode to orphan list. But symlinks don't have .truncate method defined so nobody properly removes them from the on disk orphan list. Fix this by calling ext4_truncate() directly instead of calling vmtruncate() (which is saner anyway since we don't need anything vmtruncate() does except from calling .truncate in these paths). We also add inode to orphan list only if ext4_can_truncate() is true (currently, it can be false for symlinks when there are no blocks allocated) - otherwise orphan list processing will complain and ext4_truncate() will not remove inode from on-disk orphan list. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The ext4_block_truncate_page() function previously called grab_cache_page(), which called find_or_create_page() with the __GFP_FS flag potentially set. This could cause a deadlock if the system is low on memory and it attempts a memory reclaim, which could potentially call back into ext4. So we need to call find_or_create_page() directly, and remove the __GFP_FP flag to avoid this potential deadlock. Thanks to Roland Dreier for reporting a lockdep warning which showed this problem. [20786.363249] ================================= [20786.363257] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [20786.363265] 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd4gitd960eea9 [20786.363270] --------------------------------- [20786.363276] inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage. [20786.363285] http/8397 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: [20786.363291] (jbd2_handle){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff812008bb>] jbd2_journal_start+0xdb/0x150 [20786.363314] {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} state was registered at: [20786.363320] [<ffffffff8108bef6>] mark_irqflags+0xc6/0x1a0 [20786.363334] [<ffffffff8108d347>] __lock_acquire+0x287/0x430 [20786.363345] [<ffffffff8108d595>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150 [20786.363355] [<ffffffff812008da>] jbd2_journal_start+0xfa/0x150 [20786.363365] [<ffffffff811d98a8>] ext4_journal_start_sb+0x58/0x90 [20786.363377] [<ffffffff811cce85>] ext4_delete_inode+0xc5/0x2c0 [20786.363389] [<ffffffff81146fa3>] generic_delete_inode+0xd3/0x1a0 [20786.363401] [<ffffffff81147095>] generic_drop_inode+0x25/0x30 [20786.363411] [<ffffffff81145ce2>] iput+0x62/0x70 [20786.363420] [<ffffffff81142878>] dentry_iput+0x98/0x110 [20786.363429] [<ffffffff81142a00>] d_kill+0x50/0x80 [20786.363438] [<ffffffff811444c5>] dput+0x95/0x180 [20786.363447] [<ffffffff8120de4b>] ecryptfs_d_release+0x2b/0x70 [20786.363459] [<ffffffff81142978>] d_free+0x28/0x60 [20786.363468] [<ffffffff81142a18>] d_kill+0x68/0x80 [20786.363477] [<ffffffff81142ad3>] prune_one_dentry+0xa3/0xc0 [20786.363487] [<ffffffff81142d61>] __shrink_dcache_sb+0x271/0x290 [20786.363497] [<ffffffff81142e89>] prune_dcache+0x109/0x1b0 [20786.363506] [<ffffffff81142f6f>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x3f/0x50 [20786.363516] [<ffffffff810f6d3d>] shrink_slab+0x12d/0x190 [20786.363527] [<ffffffff810f97d7>] balance_pgdat+0x4d7/0x640 [20786.363537] [<ffffffff810f9a57>] kswapd+0x117/0x170 [20786.363546] [<ffffffff810773ce>] kthread+0x9e/0xb0 [20786.363558] [<ffffffff8101430a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20 [20786.363569] [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff [20786.363598] irq event stamp: 15997 [20786.363603] hardirqs last enabled at (15997): [<ffffffff81125f9d>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xfd/0x1a0 [20786.363617] hardirqs last disabled at (15996): [<ffffffff81125f01>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x61/0x1a0 [20786.363628] softirqs last enabled at (15966): [<ffffffff810631ea>] __do_softirq+0x14a/0x220 [20786.363641] softirqs last disabled at (15861): [<ffffffff8101440c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [20786.363651] [20786.363653] other info that might help us debug this: [20786.363660] 3 locks held by http/8397: [20786.363665] #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8112ed24>] do_truncate+0x64/0x90 [20786.363685] #1: (&sb->s_type->i_alloc_sem_key#5){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffff81147f90>] notify_change+0x250/0x350 [20786.363707] #2: (jbd2_handle){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff812008bb>] jbd2_journal_start+0xdb/0x150 [20786.363724] [20786.363726] stack backtrace: [20786.363734] Pid: 8397, comm: http Tainted: G C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd4gitd960eea9 [20786.363741] Call Trace: [20786.363752] [<ffffffff8108ad7c>] print_usage_bug+0x18c/0x1a0 [20786.363763] [<ffffffff8108b0c0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x0/0xb0 [20786.363773] [<ffffffff8108bad2>] mark_lock_irq+0xf2/0x280 [20786.363783] [<ffffffff8108bd97>] mark_lock+0x137/0x1d0 [20786.363793] [<ffffffff8108c03c>] mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0 [20786.363803] [<ffffffff8108c11f>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xaf/0xe0 [20786.363813] [<ffffffff810efbac>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7c/0x180 [20786.363824] [<ffffffff810e9411>] ? find_get_page+0x91/0xf0 [20786.363835] [<ffffffff8111d3b7>] alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xd0 [20786.363845] [<ffffffff810e9827>] __page_cache_alloc+0x67/0x70 [20786.363856] [<ffffffff810eb7df>] find_or_create_page+0x4f/0xb0 [20786.363867] [<ffffffff811cb3be>] ext4_block_truncate_page+0x3e/0x460 [20786.363876] [<ffffffff812008da>] ? jbd2_journal_start+0xfa/0x150 [20786.363885] [<ffffffff812008bb>] ? jbd2_journal_start+0xdb/0x150 [20786.363895] [<ffffffff811c6415>] ? ext4_meta_trans_blocks+0x75/0xf0 [20786.363905] [<ffffffff811e8d8b>] ext4_ext_truncate+0x1bb/0x1e0 [20786.363916] [<ffffffff811072c5>] ? unmap_mapping_range+0x75/0x290 [20786.363926] [<ffffffff811ccc28>] ext4_truncate+0x498/0x630 [20786.363938] [<ffffffff8129b4ce>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0 [20786.363947] [<ffffffff81107306>] ? unmap_mapping_range+0xb6/0x290 [20786.363957] [<ffffffff8108c3ad>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [20786.363966] [<ffffffff811ffe58>] ? jbd2_journal_stop+0x1f8/0x2e0 [20786.363976] [<ffffffff81107690>] vmtruncate+0xb0/0x110 [20786.363986] [<ffffffff81147c05>] inode_setattr+0x35/0x170 [20786.363995] [<ffffffff811c9906>] ext4_setattr+0x186/0x370 [20786.364005] [<ffffffff81147eab>] notify_change+0x16b/0x350 [20786.364014] [<ffffffff8112ed30>] do_truncate+0x70/0x90 [20786.364021] [<ffffffff8112f48b>] T.657+0xeb/0x110 [20786.364021] [<ffffffff8112f4be>] sys_ftruncate+0xe/0x10 [20786.364021] [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Reported-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@digitalvampire.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 25 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The __ext4_write_dirty_metadata() function was introduced by commit 0390131b, "ext4: Allow ext4 to run without a journal", but nothing ever used the function, either then or since. So let's remove it and save a bit of space. Cc: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
To catch filesystem bugs or corruption which could lead to the filesystem getting severly damaged, this patch adds a facility for tracking all of the filesystem metadata blocks by contiguous regions in a red-black tree. This allows quick searching of the tree to locate extents which might overlap with filesystem metadata blocks. This facility is also used by the multi-block allocator to assure that it is not allocating blocks out of the system zone, as well as by the routines used when reading indirect blocks and extents information from disk to make sure their contents are valid. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 5月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
The BH_Unwritten flag indicates that the buffer is allocated on disk but has not been written; that is, the disk was part of a persistent preallocation area. That flag should only be set when a get_blocks() function is looking up a inode's logical to physical block mapping. When ext4_get_blocks_wrap() is called with create=1, the uninitialized extent is converted into an initialized one, so the BH_Unwritten flag is no longer appropriate. Hence, we need to make sure the BH_Unwritten is not left set, since the combination of BH_Mapped and BH_Unwritten is not allowed; among other things, it will result ext4's get_block() to be called over and over again during the write_begin phase of write(2). Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The ext4_get_blocks() function was depending on the value of bh_result->b_state as an input parameter to decide whether or not update the delalloc accounting statistics by calling ext4_da_update_reserve_space(). We now use a separate flag, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UPDATE_RESERVE_SPACE, to requests this update, so that all callers of ext4_get_blocks() can clear map_bh.b_state before calling ext4_get_blocks() without worrying about any consistency issues. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The static function ext4_da_get_block_write() was only used by mpage_da_map_blocks(). So to simplify the code, merge that function into mpage_da_map_blocks(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Use a very large unsigned number (~0xffff) as as the fake block number for the delayed new buffer. The VFS should never try to write out this number, but if it does, this will make it obvious. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We need to mark the buffer_head mapping preallocated space as new during write_begin. Otherwise we don't zero out the page cache content properly for a partial write. This will cause file corruption with preallocation. Now that we mark the buffer_head new we also need to have a valid buffer_head blocknr so that unmap_underlying_metadata() unmaps the correct block. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Enforce that noalloc_get_block_write() is only called to map one block at a time, and that it always is successful in finding a mapping for given an inode's logical block block number if it is called with create == 1. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 5月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This adds more documentation to various internal functions in fs/ext4/inode.c, most notably ext4_ind_get_blocks(), ext4_da_get_block_write(), ext4_da_get_block_prep(), ext4_normal_get_block_write(). In addition, the static function ext4_normal_get_block_write() has been renamed noalloc_get_block_write(), since it is used in many places far beyond ext4_normal_writepage(). Plenty of warnings have been added to the noalloc_get_block_write() function, since the way it is used is amazingly fragile. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The functions ext4_get_blocks(), ext4_ext_get_blocks(), and ext4_ind_get_blocks() used an ad-hoc set of integer variables used as boolean flags passed in as arguments. Use a single flags parameter and a setandard set of bitfield flags instead. This saves space on the call stack, and it also makes the code a bit more understandable. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Another function rename for clarity's sake. The _wrap prefix simply confuses people, and didn't add much people trying to follow the code paths. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 12 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The static function ext4_get_blocks_handle() is badly named. Of *course* it takes a handle. Since its counterpart for extent-based file is ext4_ext_get_blocks(), rename it to be ext4_ind_get_blocks(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-