- 26 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 09 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Venkatesh Pallipadi 提交于
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5737Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
This one fell through the automation at first because it initializes the semaphore to locked, but that's easily remedied Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
-
- 07 12月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Venkatesh Pallipadi 提交于
What is the value shown in "cpu MHz" of /proc/cpuinfo when CPUs are capable of changing frequency? Today the answer is: It depends. On i386: SMP kernel - It is always the boot frequency UP kernel - Scales with the frequency change and shows that was last set. On x86_64: There is one single variable cpu_khz that gets written by all the CPUs. So, the frequency set by last CPU will be seen on /proc/cpuinfo of all the CPUs in the system. What you see also depends on whether you have constant_tsc capable CPU or not. On ia64: It is always boot time frequency of a particular CPU that gets displayed. The patch below changes this to: Show the last known frequency of the particular CPU, when cpufreq is present. If cpu doesnot support changing of frequency through cpufreq, then boot frequency will be shown. The patch affects i386, x86_64 and ia64 architectures. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi<venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 31 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Schmielau 提交于
I recently picked up my older work to remove unnecessary #includes of sched.h, starting from a patch by Dave Jones to not include sched.h from module.h. This reduces the number of indirect includes of sched.h by ~300. Another ~400 pointless direct includes can be removed after this disentangling (patch to follow later). However, quite a few indirect includes need to be fixed up for this. In order to feed the patches through -mm with as little disturbance as possible, I've split out the fixes I accumulated up to now (complete for i386 and x86_64, more archs to follow later) and post them before the real patch. This way this large part of the patch is kept simple with only adding #includes, and all hunks are independent of each other. So if any hunk rejects or gets in the way of other patches, just drop it. My scripts will pick it up again in the next round. Signed-off-by: NTim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 08 7月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bernard Blackham 提交于
Fix u32 vs pm_message_t confusion in cpufreq. Signed-off-by: NBernard Blackham <bernard@blackham.com.au> Signed-off-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 01 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Fix up comment in cpufreq.h stating transition latency should be passed in microseconds -- it was decided long ago to switch to nanoseconds. Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 29 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
In order to properly fix some issues with cpufreq vs. sleep on PowerBooks, I had to add a suspend callback to the pmac_cpufreq driver. I must force a switch to full speed before sleep and I switch back to previous speed on resume. I also added a driver flag to disable the warnings in suspend/resume since it is expected in this case to have different speed (and I want it to fixup the jiffies properly). Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-