1. 26 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  2. 09 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  4. 07 12月, 2005 1 次提交
    • V
      [CPUFREQ] CPU frequency display in /proc/cpuinfo · 95235ca2
      Venkatesh Pallipadi 提交于
      What is the value shown in "cpu MHz" of /proc/cpuinfo when CPUs are capable of
      changing frequency?
      
      Today the answer is: It depends.
      On i386:
      SMP kernel - It is always the boot frequency
      UP kernel - Scales with the frequency change and shows that was last set.
      
      On x86_64:
      There is one single variable cpu_khz that gets written by all the CPUs. So,
      the frequency set by last CPU will be seen on /proc/cpuinfo of all the
      CPUs in the system. What you see also depends on whether you have constant_tsc
      capable CPU or not.
      
      On ia64:
      It is always boot time frequency of a particular CPU that gets displayed.
      
      The patch below changes this to:
      Show the last known frequency of the particular CPU, when cpufreq is present. If
      cpu doesnot support changing of frequency through cpufreq, then boot frequency
      will be shown. The patch affects i386, x86_64 and ia64 architectures.
      
      Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi<venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      95235ca2
  5. 31 10月, 2005 1 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] fix missing includes · 4e57b681
      Tim Schmielau 提交于
      I recently picked up my older work to remove unnecessary #includes of
      sched.h, starting from a patch by Dave Jones to not include sched.h
      from module.h. This reduces the number of indirect includes of sched.h
      by ~300. Another ~400 pointless direct includes can be removed after
      this disentangling (patch to follow later).
      However, quite a few indirect includes need to be fixed up for this.
      
      In order to feed the patches through -mm with as little disturbance as
      possible, I've split out the fixes I accumulated up to now (complete for
      i386 and x86_64, more archs to follow later) and post them before the real
      patch.  This way this large part of the patch is kept simple with only
      adding #includes, and all hunks are independent of each other.  So if any
      hunk rejects or gets in the way of other patches, just drop it.  My scripts
      will pick it up again in the next round.
      Signed-off-by: NTim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4e57b681
  6. 08 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  7. 01 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  8. 29 4月, 2005 1 次提交
  9. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4