[ Upstream commit 9a51c6b1 ]

Both acpi_pci_need_resume() and acpi_dev_needs_resume() check if the
current ACPI wakeup configuration of the device matches what is
expected as far as system wakeup from sleep states is concerned, as
reflected by the device_may_wakeup() return value for the device.

However, they only should do that if wakeup.flags.valid is set for
the device's ACPI companion, because otherwise the wakeup.prepare_count
value for it is meaningless.

Add the missing wakeup.flags.valid checks to these functions.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 6299cf9ec3985cac70bede8a855b5087b81a6640 ]

We enable power management automatically for bridges where
pci_bridge_d3_possible() returns true. However, these bridges may have
ACPI methods such as _DSW that need to be called before D3 entry. For
example in Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon 6th _DSW method is used to prepare
D3cold for the PCIe root port hosting Thunderbolt chain. Because wake is
not enabled _DSW method is never called and the port does not enter
D3cold properly consuming more power than necessary.

Users can work this around by writing "enabled" to "wakeup" sysfs file
under the device in question but that is not something an ordinary user
is expected to do.

Since we already automatically enable power management for PCIe ports
with ->bridge_d3 set extend that to enable wake for them as well,
assuming the port has any ACPI wakeup related objects implemented in the
namespace (adev->wakeup.flags.valid is true). This ensures the necessary
ACPI methods get called at appropriate times and allows the root port in
Thinkpad X1 Carbon 6th to go into D3cold.
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Commit 26112ddc (PCI / ACPI / PM: Resume bridges w/o drivers on
suspend-to-RAM) attempted to fix a functional regression resulting
from commit c62ec461 (PM / core: Fix direct_complete handling
for devices with no callbacks) by resuming PCI bridges without
drivers (that is, "parallel PCI" ones) during system-wide suspend if
the target system state is not ACPI S0 (working state).

That turns out insufficient, however, as it is reported that, at
least in one case, the platform firmware gets confused if a PCIe
root port is suspended before entering the ACPI S3 sleep state.
That issue was exposed by commit 77b3729ca03 (PCI / PM: Use
SMART_SUSPEND and LEAVE_SUSPENDED flags for PCIe ports) that allowed
PCIe ports to stay in runtime suspend during system-wide suspend
(which is OK for suspend-to-idle, but turns out to be problematic
otherwise).

For this reason, drop the driver check from acpi_pci_need_resume()
and resume all bridges (including PCIe ports with drivers) during
system-wide suspend if the target system state is not ACPI S0.

[If the target system state is ACPI S0, it means suspend-to-idle
 and the platform firmware is not going to be invoked to actually
 suspend the system, so there is no need to resume the bridges in
 that case.]

Fixes: 77b3729ca03 (PCI / PM: Use SMART_SUSPEND and LEAVE_SUSPENDED flags for PCIe ports)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200675Reported-by: Nteika kazura <teika@gmx.com>
Tested-by: Nteika kazura <teika@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: 4.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.16+: 26112ddc (PCI / ACPI / PM: Resume bridges ...)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It is reported that commit c62ec461 (PM / core: Fix direct_complete
handling for devices with no callbacks) introduced a system suspend
regression on Samsung 305V4A by allowing a PCI bridge (not a PCIe
port) to stay in D3 over suspend-to-RAM, which is a side effect of
setting power.direct_complete for the children of that bridge that
have no PM callbacks.

On the majority of systems PCI bridges are not allowed to be
runtime-suspended (the power/control sysfs attribute is set to "on"
for them by default), but user space can change that setting and if
it does so and a given bridge has no children with PM callbacks, the
direct_complete optimization will be applied to it and it will stay
in suspend over system suspend.  Apparently, that confuses the
platform firmware on the affected machine and that may very well
happen elsewhere, so avoid the direct_complete optimization for
PCI bridges with no drivers (if there is a driver, it should take
care of the PM handling) on suspend-to-RAM altogether (that should
not matter for suspend-to-idle as platform firmware is not involved
in it).

Fixes: c62ec461 (PM / core: Fix direct_complete handling for devices with no callbacks)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199941
Reported-by: n0000b.n000b@gmail.com
Tested-by: n0000b.n000b@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: 4.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.15+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The shpchp driver registers for all PCI bridge devices.  Its probe method
should fail if either (1) the bridge doesn't have an SHPC or (2) the OS
isn't allowed to use it (the platform firmware may be operating the SHPC
itself).

Separate these two tests into:

  - A new shpc_capable() that looks for the SHPC hardware and is applicable
    on all systems (ACPI and non-ACPI), and

  - A simplified acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware() that we call only
    when we already know an SHPC exists and there may be ACPI methods to
    either request permission to use it (_OSC) or transfer control to the
    OS (OSHP).

acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware() is implemented when CONFIG_ACPI=y,
but does nothing if the current platform doesn't support ACPI.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

In the same way we do for pciehp, add shpchp_is_native(), which returns
true if the bridge should be handled by the native SHPC driver.  Then
convert the driver to use this function.
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Previously pciehp_is_native() returned true for any PCI device in a
hierarchy where _OSC says we can use pciehp.  This is incorrect because
bridges without PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC capability should be managed by acpiphp
instead.

Improve pciehp_is_native() to return true only when PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC is
set and the pciehp driver is present.  In any other case return false
to let acpiphp handle those.
Suggested-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
[bhelgaas: remove NULL pointer check]
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Remove pointless comments that tell us the file name, remove blank line
comments, follow multi-line comment conventions.  No functional change
intended.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

b2441318 ("License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to
files with no license") added SPDX GPL-2.0 to several PCI files that
previously contained no license information.

Add SPDX GPL-2.0 to all other PCI files that did not contain any license
information and hence were under the default GPL version 2 license of the
kernel.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add PCI-specific dev_printk() wrappers and use them to simplify the code
slightly.  No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: NFrederick Lawler <fred@fredlawl.com>
[bhelgaas: squash into one patch]
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Hyper-V instances support PCI pass-through which is implemented through PV
pci-hyperv driver. When a device is passed through, a new root PCI bus is
created in the guest. The bus sits on top of VMBus and has no associated
information in ACPI. acpi_pci_add_bus() in this case proceeds all the way
to acpi_evaluate_dsm(), which reports

  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM (0x1001)

While acpi_pci_slot_enumerate() and acpiphp_enumerate_slots() are protected
against ACPI_HANDLE() being NULL and do nothing, acpi_evaluate_dsm() is not
and gives us the error. It seems the correct fix is to not do anything in
acpi_pci_add_bus() in such cases.
Signed-off-by: NVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() routine is there to handle cases in
which PCI bridges (or PCIe ports) are expected to signal wakeup
for devices below them, but currently it doesn't do that correctly.

The problem is that acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() uses
acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for bridges and if that routine is
called for multiple times to disable wakeup for the same device,
it will disable it on the first invocation and the next calls
will have no effect (it works analogously when called to enable
wakeup, but that is not a problem).

Now, say acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() has been called for two
different devices under the same bridge and it has called
acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for that bridge each time.  The
bridge is now enabled to generate wakeup signals.  Next,
suppose that one of the devices below it resumes and
acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() is called to disable wakeup for that
device.  It will then call acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for the bridge
and that will effectively disable remote wakeup for all devices under
it even though some of them may still be suspended and remote wakeup
may be expected to work for them.

To address this (arguably theoretical) issue, allow
wakeup.enable_count under struct acpi_device to grow beyond 1 in
certain situations.  In particular, allow that to happen in
acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() when wakeup is enabled or disabled
for PCI bridges, so that wakeup is actually disabled for the
bridge when all devices under it resume and not when just one
of them does that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether
or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at
run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction
between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always
been rather artificial.  The only practical reason for it to exist
at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases
differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.

For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable,
use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of
device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

After previous changes it is not necessary to distinguish between
device wakeup for run time and device wakeup from system sleep states
any more, so rework the PCI device wakeup settings code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The pme_interrupt flag in struct pci_dev is set when PMEs generated
by the device are going to be signaled via root port PME interrupts.

Ironically enough, that information is only used by the code setting
up device wakeup through ACPI which returns as soon as it sees the
pme_interrupt flag set while setting up "remote runtime wakeup".
That is questionable, however, because in theory there may be PCIe
devices using out-of-band PME signaling under root ports handled
by the native PME code or devices requiring wakeup power setup to be
carried out by AML.  For such devices, ACPI wakeup should be invoked
regardless of whether or not native PME signaling is used in general.

For this reason, drop the pme_interrupt flag and rework the code
using it which then allows the ACPI-based device wakeup handling
in PCI to be consolidated to use one code path for both "runtime
remote wakeup" and system wakeup (from sleep states).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Currently, there are two separate ways of handling device wakeup
settings in the ACPI core, depending on whether this is runtime
wakeup or system wakeup (from sleep states).  However, after the
previous commit eliminating the run_wake ACPI device wakeup flag,
there is no difference between the two any more at the ACPI level,
so they can be combined.

For this reason, introduce acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() to replace both
acpi_pm_device_run_wake() and acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() and make it
check the ACPI device object's wakeup.valid flag to determine whether
or not the device can be set up to generate wakeup signals.

Also notice that zpodd_enable/disable_run_wake() only call
device_set_run_wake() because acpi_pm_device_run_wake() called
device_run_wake(), which is not done by acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup(),
so drop the now redundant device_set_run_wake() calls from there.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The run_wake flag in struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags stores the
information on whether or not the device can generate wakeup
signals at run time, but in ACPI that really is equivalent to
being able to generate wakeup signals at all.

In fact, run_wake will always be set after successful executeion of
acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake(), but if that fails, the device will not be
able to use a wakeup GPE at all, so it won't be able to wake up the
systems from sleep states too.  Hence, run_wake actually means that
the device is capable of triggering wakeup and so it is equivalent
to the valid flag.

For this reason, drop run_wake from struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags
and make sure that the valid flag is only set if
acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake() has been successful.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The work functions provided by the users of acpi_add_pm_notifier()
should be run synchronously before re-enabling the wakeup GPE in
case they are used to clear the status and/or disable the wakeup
signaling at the source.  Otherwise, which is the case currently in
the PCI bus type code, the same wakeup event may be signaled for
multiple times while the execution of the work function in response
to it has already been queued up.

Fortunately, acpi_add_pm_notifier() is only used by PCI and by
ACPI device PM code internally, so the change is relatively
straightforward to make.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

acpi_evaluate_dsm() and friends take a pointer to a raw buffer of 16
bytes. Instead we convert them to use guid_t type. At the same time we
convert current users.

acpi_str_to_uuid() becomes useless after the conversion and it's safe to
get rid of it.
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NBenjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Acked-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NFelipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

The acpi_get_rc_resources() is used to get the RC register address that can
not be described in MCFG.  It takes the _HID & segment to look for and
outputs the RC address resource.  Use PNP0C02 devices to describe such RC
address resource.  Use _UID to match segment to tell which root bus the
PNP0C02 resource belongs to.

[bhelgaas: add dev argument, wrap in #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS]
Signed-off-by: NDongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NTomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

We're about to add runtime PM of hotplug ports, but we need to restrict it
to ports that are handled natively by the OS:  If they're handled by the
firmware (which is the case for Thunderbolt on non-Macs), things would
break if the OS put the ports into D3hot behind the firmware's back.

To determine if a hotplug port is handled natively, one has to walk up from
the port to the root bridge and check the cached _OSC Control Field for the
value of the "PCI Express Native Hot Plug control" bit.  There's already a
function to do that, device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp(), but it's private
to drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c and only compiled in if
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI is enabled.

Make it public and move it to drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c, so that it is
available in the more general CONFIG_ACPI case.

The function contains a check if the device in question is a hotplug port
and returns false if it's not.  The caller we're going to add doesn't need
this as it only calls the function if it actually *is* a hotplug port.
Move the check out of the function into the single existing caller.

Rename it to pciehp_is_native() and add some kerneldoc and polish.

No functional change intended.
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Usually the most accurate way to determine a PCI device's power state is to
read its PM Control & Status Register.  There are two cases however when
this is not an option:  If the device doesn't have the PM capability at
all, or if it is in D3cold (in which case its config space is
inaccessible).

In both cases, we can alternatively query the platform firmware for its
opinion on the device's power state.  To facilitate this, augment struct
pci_platform_pm_ops with a ->get_power callback and implement it for
acpi_pci_platform_pm (the only pci_platform_pm_ops existing so far).

It is used by a forthcoming commit to let pci_update_current_state()
recognize D3cold.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This patch introduces pci_msi_register_fwnode_provider() for irqchip
to register a callback, to provide a way to determine appropriate MSI
domain for a pci device.

It also introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which returns
the MSI domain of the specified PCI host bridge with DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI
bus token. Then, it is assigned to pci device.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Signed-off-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

The pci_platform_pm_ops structure is never modified, so declare it as
const.

Done with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The function takes ACPI handle, not the device itself. Fix the
comment
Signed-off-by: NSrinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The ACPI 6 specification has made some changes in the device power
management area.  In particular:

 * The D3hot power state is now supposed to be always available
   (instead of D3cold) and D3cold is only regarded as valid if the
   _PR3 object is present for the given device.

 * The required ordering of transitions into power states deeper than
   D0 is now such that for a transition into state Dx the _PSx method
   is supposed to be executed first, if present, and the states of
   the power resources the device depends on are supposed to be
   changed after that.

 * It is now explicitly forbidden to transition devices from
   lower-power (deeper) into higher-power (shallower) power states
   other than D0.

Those changes have been made so the specification reflects the
Windows' device power management code that the vast majority of
systems using ACPI is validated against.

To avoid artificial differences in ACPI device power management
between Windows and Linux, modify the ACPI device power management
code to follow the new specification.  Add comments explaining the
code flow in some unclear places.

This only may affect some real corner cases in which the OS behavior
expected by the firmware is different from the Windows one, but that's
quite unlikely.  The transition ordering change affects transitions
to D1 and D2 which are rarely used (if at all) and into D3hot and
D3cold for devices actually having _PR3, but those are likely to
be validated against Windows anyway.  The other changes may affect
code calling acpi_device_get_power() or acpi_device_update_power()
where ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may be returned instead of ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD
(that's why the ACPI fan driver needs to be updated too) and since
transitions into ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may remove power now, it is better
to avoid this one in acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() if the "no power
off" PM QoS flag is set.

The only existing user of acpi_device_can_poweroff() really cares
about the case when _PR3 is present, so the change in that function
should not cause any problems to happen too.

A plus is that PCI_D3hot can be mapped to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT
now and the compatibility with older systems should be covered
automatically.

In any case, if any real problems result from this, it still will
be better to follow the Windows' behavior (which now is reflected
by the specification too) in general and handle the cases when it
doesn't work via quirks.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The PCI "ACPI additions for FW latency optimizations" ECN (link below)
defines two functions in the PCI _DSM:

  Function 8, "Reset Delay," applies to the entire hierarchy below a PCI
  host bridge.  If it returns one, the OS may assume that all devices in
  the hierarchy have already completed power-on reset delays.

  Function 9, "Device Readiness Durations," applies only to the object
  where it is located.  It returns delay durations required after various
  events if the device requires less time than the spec requires.  Delays
  from this function take precedence over the Reset Delay function.

Add support for Reset Delay and part of Device Readiness Durations.

[bhelgaas: changelog, comments]
Link: https://www.pcisig.com/specifications/conventional/pci_firmware/ECN_fw_latency_optimization_final.pdfSigned-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The PCI Firmware Specification, r3.0, sec 4.6.4.1.3, defines a single UUID
for an ACPI _DSM method to provide device-specific control functions.  This
_DSM method support several functions, including PCI Express Slot
Information, PCI Express Slot Number, PCI Bus Capabilities, etc.

Move the UUID definition from pci/pci-label.c, where it could be used only
for one function, to pci/pci-acpi.c where it can be shared for all these
functions.

[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Booting a v3.18 or newer Xen domU kernel with PCI devices passed through
results in an oops (this is a 32-bit 3.13.11 dom0 with a 64-bit 4.4.0
hypervisor and 32-bit domU):

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0030303e
  IP: [<c06ed0e6>] acpi_ns_validate_handle+0x12/0x1a
  Call Trace:
   [<c06eda4d>] ? acpi_evaluate_object+0x31/0x1fc
   [<c06b78e1>] ? pci_get_hp_params+0x111/0x4e0
   [<c0407bc7>] ? xen_force_evtchn_callback+0x17/0x30
   [<c04085fb>] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_reloc+0x4/0x4
   [<c0699d34>] ? pci_device_add+0x24/0x450

Don't look for ACPI configuration information if ACPI has been disabled.

I don't think this is the best fix, because we can boot plain Linux (no
Xen) with "acpi=off", and we don't need this check in pci_get_hp_params().
There should be a better fix that would make Xen domU work the same way.
The domU kernel has ACPI support but it has no AML.  There should be a way
to initialize the ACPI data structures so things fail gracefully rather
than oopsing.  This is an interim fix to address the regression.

Fixes: 6cd33649 ("PCI: Add pci_configure_device() during enumeration")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96301Reported-by: NMichael D Labriola <mlabriol@gdeb.com>
Tested-by: NMichael D Labriola <mlabriol@gdeb.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v3.18+

Commit f25c0ae2 (ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM
domain during system suspend) modified the ACPI PM domain's system
suspend callbacks to allow devices attached to it to be left in the
runtime-suspended state during system suspend so as to optimize
the suspend process.

This was based on the general mechanism introduced by commit
aae4518b (PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended
devices unnecessarily).

Extend that approach to PCI devices by modifying the PCI bus type's
->prepare callback to return 1 for devices that are runtime-suspended
when it is being executed and that are in a suitable power state and
need not be resumed going forward.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The functions pci_dev_put(), pci_pme_wakeup_bus(), and put_device() return
immediately if their argument is NULL.  Thus the test before the call is
not needed.

Remove these unnecessary tests.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Move code around to put all the ACPI power management stuff together and
all the pieces related to ACPI methods (_CBA, _HPP, _HPX) together.

No functional change.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Whitespace fixes only; no functional change.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Move pci_get_hp_params() and related functions from
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c to drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c.

Previously, pci_get_hp_params() was used only by hotplug drivers.  But
future changes will move this into the normal device enumeration process,
so it will be used even when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI is not set.

No functional change.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The ACPI_HANDLE() macro evaluates ACPI_COMPANION() internally to
return the handle of the device's ACPI companion, so it is much
more straightforward and efficient to use ACPI_COMPANION()
directly to obtain the device's ACPI companion object instead of
using ACPI_HANDLE() and acpi_bus_get_device() on the returned
handle for the same thing.

Use ACPI_COMPANION() instead of ACPI_HANDLE() in the PCI ACPI support
code.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since ACPI wakeup GPEs are going to be enabled during system suspend
as well as for runtime wakeup by a subsequent patch and the same
notify handlers will be used in both cases, rework the ACPI device
wakeup notification framework so that the part specific to physical
devices is always run asynchronously from the PM workqueue.  This
prevents runtime resume callbacks for those devices from being
run during system suspend and resume which may not be appropriate,
among other things.

Also make ACPI device wakeup notification handling a bit more robust
agaist subsequent removal of ACPI device objects, whould that ever
happen, and create a wakeup source object for each ACPI device
configured for wakeup so that wakeup notifications for those
devices can wake up the system from the "freeze" sleep state.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use pci_is_bridge() to simplify code.  No functional change.

Requires: 326c1cda PCI: Rename pci_is_bridge() to pci_has_subordinate()
Requires: 1c86438c PCI: Add new pci_is_bridge() interface
Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

It turns out that some BIOSes don't report wakeup GPEs through
_PRW, but use them for signaling wakeup anyway, which causes GPE
storms to occur on some systems after resume from system suspend.
This issue has been uncovered by commit d2e5f0c1 (ACPI / PCI:
Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) during the 3.9
development cycle.

Work around the problem by installing wakeup notify handlers for all
PCI devices with ACPI support (i.e. having ACPI companions) regardless
of whether or not the BIOS reports ACPI wakeup support for them.  The
presence of the wakeup notify handlers alone is not harmful in any
way if there are no events for them to handle (they are simply never
executed then), but on some systems they are needed to take care of
spurious events.

Fixes: d2e5f0c1 (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup)
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63021Reported-and-tested-by: NAgustin Barto <abarto@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use dev_is_pci() instead of checking bus type directly.
Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Replace the .find_device function pointer in struct acpi_bus_type
with a new one, .find_companion, that is supposed to point to a
function returning struct acpi_device pointer (instead of an int)
and takes one argument (instead of two).  This way the role of
this callback is more clear and the implementation of it can
be more straightforward.

Update all of the users of struct acpi_bus_type (PCI, PNP/ACPI and
USB) to reflect the structure change.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> # for USB/ACPI