- 28 8月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
This reverts commit 134b23ee. Based on a lot of email and in-person discussions, this patch series is being reworked to address a number of issues that were pointed out that needed to be taken care of before it should be merged. It will be resubmitted with those changes hopefully soon. Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
This reverts commit 8f8184d6. Based on a lot of email and in-person discussions, this patch series is being reworked to address a number of issues that were pointed out that needed to be taken care of before it should be merged. It will be resubmitted with those changes hopefully soon. Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 01 8月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Saravana Kannan 提交于
This sync_state driver/bus callback is called once all the consumers of a supplier have probed successfully. This allows the supplier device's driver/bus to sync the supplier device's state to the software state with the guarantee that all the consumers are actively managing the resources provided by the supplier device. To maintain backwards compatibility and ease transition from existing frameworks and resource cleanup schemes, late_initcall_sync is the earliest when the sync_state callback might be called. There is no upper bound on the time by which the sync_state callback has to be called. This is because if a consumer device never probes, the supplier has to maintain its resources in the state left by the bootloader. For example, if the bootloader leaves the display backlight at a fixed voltage and the backlight driver is never probed, you don't want the backlight to ever be turned off after boot up. Also, when multiple devices are added after kernel init, some suppliers could be added before their consumer devices get added. In these instances, the supplier devices could get their sync_state callback called right after they probe because the consumers devices haven't had a chance to create device links to the suppliers. To handle this correctly, this change also provides APIs to pause/resume sync state callbacks so that when multiple devices are added, their sync_state callback evaluation can be postponed to happen after all of them are added. kbuild test robot reported missing documentation for device.state_synced Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NSaravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190731221721.187713-5-saravanak@google.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Saravana Kannan 提交于
The driver core/bus adding supplier-consumer dependencies by default enables functional dependencies to be tracked correctly even when the consumer devices haven't had their drivers registered or loaded (if they are modules). However, when the bus incorrectly adds dependencies that it shouldn't have added, the devices might never probe. For example, if device-C is a consumer of device-S and they have phandles to each other in DT, the following could happen: 1. Device-S get added first. 2. The bus add_links() callback will (incorrectly) try to link it as a consumer of device-C. 3. Since device-C isn't present, device-S will be put in "waiting-for-supplier" list. 4. Device-C gets added next. 5. All devices in "waiting-for-supplier" list are retried for linking. 6. Device-S gets linked as consumer to Device-C. 7. The bus add_links() callback will (correctly) try to link it as a consumer of device-S. 8. This isn't allowed because it would create a cyclic device links. Neither devices will get probed since the supplier is marked as dependent on the consumer. And the consumer will never probe because the consumer can't get resources from the supplier. Without this patch, things stay in this broken state. However, with this patch, the execution will continue like this: 9. Device-C's driver is loaded. 10. Device-C's driver removes Device-S as a consumer of Device-C. 11. Device-C's driver adds Device-C as a consumer of Device-S. 12. Device-S probes. 14. Device-C probes. kbuild test robot reported missing documentation for device.has_edit_links Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NSaravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190731221721.187713-3-saravanak@google.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Saravana Kannan 提交于
When devices are added, the bus might want to create device links to track functional dependencies between supplier and consumer devices. This tracking of supplier-consumer relationship allows optimizing device probe order and tracking whether all consumers of a supplier are active. The add_links bus callback is added to support this. However, when consumer devices are added, they might not have a supplier device to link to despite needing mandatory resources/functionality from one or more suppliers. A waiting_for_suppliers list is created to track such consumers and retry linking them when new devices get added. Signed-off-by: NSaravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190731221721.187713-2-saravanak@google.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 31 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Muchun Song 提交于
There is a race condition between removing glue directory and adding a new device under the glue dir. It can be reproduced in following test: CPU1: CPU2: device_add() get_device_parent() class_dir_create_and_add() kobject_add_internal() create_dir() // create glue_dir device_add() get_device_parent() kobject_get() // get glue_dir device_del() cleanup_glue_dir() kobject_del(glue_dir) kobject_add() kobject_add_internal() create_dir() // in glue_dir sysfs_create_dir_ns() kernfs_create_dir_ns(sd) sysfs_remove_dir() // glue_dir->sd=NULL sysfs_put() // free glue_dir->sd // sd is freed kernfs_new_node(sd) kernfs_get(glue_dir) kernfs_add_one() kernfs_put() Before CPU1 remove last child device under glue dir, if CPU2 add a new device under glue dir, the glue_dir kobject reference count will be increase to 2 via kobject_get() in get_device_parent(). And CPU2 has been called kernfs_create_dir_ns(), but not call kernfs_new_node(). Meanwhile, CPU1 call sysfs_remove_dir() and sysfs_put(). This result in glue_dir->sd is freed and it's reference count will be 0. Then CPU2 call kernfs_get(glue_dir) will trigger a warning in kernfs_get() and increase it's reference count to 1. Because glue_dir->sd is freed by CPU1, the next call kernfs_add_one() by CPU2 will fail(This is also use-after-free) and call kernfs_put() to decrease reference count. Because the reference count is decremented to 0, it will also call kmem_cache_free() to free the glue_dir->sd again. This will result in double free. In order to avoid this happening, we also should make sure that kernfs_node for glue_dir is released in CPU1 only when refcount for glue_dir kobj is 1 to fix this race. The following calltrace is captured in kernel 4.14 with the following patch applied: commit 726e4109 ("drivers: core: Remove glue dirs from sysfs earlier") -------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ 3.633703] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 513 at .../fs/kernfs/dir.c:494 Here is WARN_ON(!atomic_read(&kn->count) in kernfs_get(). .... [ 3.633986] Call trace: [ 3.633991] kernfs_create_dir_ns+0xa8/0xb0 [ 3.633994] sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x54/0xe8 [ 3.634001] kobject_add_internal+0x22c/0x3f0 [ 3.634005] kobject_add+0xe4/0x118 [ 3.634011] device_add+0x200/0x870 [ 3.634017] _request_firmware+0x958/0xc38 [ 3.634020] request_firmware_into_buf+0x4c/0x70 .... [ 3.634064] kernel BUG at .../mm/slub.c:294! Here is BUG_ON(object == fp) in set_freepointer(). .... [ 3.634346] Call trace: [ 3.634351] kmem_cache_free+0x504/0x6b8 [ 3.634355] kernfs_put+0x14c/0x1d8 [ 3.634359] kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x88/0xb0 [ 3.634362] sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x54/0xe8 [ 3.634366] kobject_add_internal+0x22c/0x3f0 [ 3.634370] kobject_add+0xe4/0x118 [ 3.634374] device_add+0x200/0x870 [ 3.634378] _request_firmware+0x958/0xc38 [ 3.634381] request_firmware_into_buf+0x4c/0x70 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixes: 726e4109 ("drivers: core: Remove glue dirs from sysfs earlier") Signed-off-by: NMuchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NMukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NPrateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190727032122.24639-1-smuchun@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 30 7月, 2019 6 次提交
-
-
由 Suzuki K Poulose 提交于
Add a generic helper to match any/all devices. Using this introduce new wrappers {bus/driver/class}_find_next_device(). Cc: Elie Morisse <syniurge@gmail.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Cc: Nehal Shah <nehal-bakulchandra.shah@amd.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Shyam Sundar S K <shyam-sundar.s-k@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> # PCI Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190723221838.12024-7-suzuki.poulose@arm.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Suzuki K Poulose 提交于
Add a generic helper to match a device by the ACPI_COMPANION device and provide wrappers for the device lookup APIs. Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> # I2C parts Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190723221838.12024-6-suzuki.poulose@arm.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Suzuki K Poulose 提交于
Add a helper to match a device by its type and provide wrappers for {bus/class/driver}_find_device() APIs. Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190723221838.12024-5-suzuki.poulose@arm.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Suzuki K Poulose 提交于
Add a helper to match the firmware node handle of a device and provide wrappers for {bus/class/driver}_find_device() APIs to avoid proliferation of duplicate custom match functions. Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Acked-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NMathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190723221838.12024-4-suzuki.poulose@arm.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Suzuki K Poulose 提交于
Add a helper to match the device name for device lookup. Also reuse this generic exported helper for the existing bus_find_device_by_name(). and add similar variants for driver/class. Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190723221838.12024-2-suzuki.poulose@arm.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit 515db266 ("driver core: Remove device link creation limitation"), if PM-runtime flags are passed to device_link_add(), it will fail (returning NULL) due to an overly restrictive flags check introduced by that commit. Fix this issue by extending the check in question to cover the PM-runtime flags too. Fixes: 515db266 ("driver core: Remove device link creation limitation") Reported-by: NDmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Tested-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NDmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Tested-by: NMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7674989.cD04D8YV3U@kreacherSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 25 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If device_link_add() is called for a consumer/supplier pair with an existing device link between them and the existing link's type is not in agreement with the flags passed to that function by its caller, NULL will be returned. That is seriously inconvenient, because it forces the callers of device_link_add() to worry about what others may or may not do even if that is not relevant to them for any other reasons. It turns out, however, that this limitation can be made go away relatively easily. The underlying observation is that if DL_FLAG_STATELESS has been passed to device_link_add() in flags for the given consumer/supplier pair at least once, calling either device_link_del() or device_link_remove() to release the link returned by it should work, but there are no other requirements associated with that flag. In turn, if at least one of the callers of device_link_add() for the given consumer/supplier pair has not passed DL_FLAG_STATELESS to it in flags, the driver core should track the status of the link and act on it as appropriate (ie. the link should be treated as "managed"). This means that DL_FLAG_STATELESS needs to be set for managed device links and it should be valid to call device_link_del() or device_link_remove() to drop references to them in certain sutiations. To allow that to happen, introduce a new (internal) device link flag called DL_FLAG_MANAGED and make device_link_add() set it automatically whenever DL_FLAG_STATELESS is not passed to it. Also make it take additional references to existing device links that were previously stateless (that is, with DL_FLAG_STATELESS set and DL_FLAG_MANAGED unset) and will need to be managed going forward and initialize their status (which has been DL_STATE_NONE so far). Accordingly, when a managed device link is dropped automatically by the driver core, make it clear DL_FLAG_MANAGED, reset the link's status back to DL_STATE_NONE and drop the reference to it associated with DL_FLAG_MANAGED instead of just deleting it right away (to allow it to stay around in case it still needs to be released explicitly by someone). With that, since setting DL_FLAG_STATELESS doesn't mean that the device link in question is not managed any more, replace all of the status-tracking checks against DL_FLAG_STATELESS with analogous checks against DL_FLAG_MANAGED and update the documentation to reflect these changes. While at it, make device_link_add() reject flags that it does not recognize, including DL_FLAG_MANAGED. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Tested-by: NMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Review-by: NSaravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2305283.AStDPdUUnE@kreacherSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 19 7月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Williams 提交于
For good reason, the standard device_lock() is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class() because there is simply no sane way to describe the myriad ways the device_lock() ordered with other locks. However, that leaves subsystems that know their own local device_lock() ordering rules to find lock ordering mistakes manually. Instead, introduce an optional / additional lockdep-enabled lock that a subsystem can acquire in all the same paths that the device_lock() is acquired. A conversion of the NFIT driver and NVDIMM subsystem to a lockdep-validate device_lock() scheme is included. The debug_nvdimm_lock() implementation implements the correct lock-class and stacking order for the libnvdimm device topology hierarchy. Yes, this is a hack, but hopefully it is a useful hack for other subsystems device_lock() debug sessions. Quoting Greg: "Yeah, it feels a bit hacky but it's really up to a subsystem to mess up using it as much as anything else, so user beware :) I don't object to it if it makes things easier for you to debug." Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NIra Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/156341210661.292348.7014034644265455704.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
-
由 Dan Williams 提交于
The libnvdimm subsystem arranges for devices to be destroyed as a result of a sysfs operation. Since device_unregister() cannot be called from an actively running sysfs attribute of the same device libnvdimm arranges for device_unregister() to be performed in an out-of-line async context. The driver core maintains a 'dead' state for coordinating its own racing async registration / de-registration requests. Rather than add local 'dead' state tracking infrastructure to libnvdimm device objects, export the existing state tracking via a new kill_device() helper. The kill_device() helper simply marks the device as dead, i.e. that it is on its way to device_del(), or returns that the device was already dead. This can be used in advance of calling device_unregister() for subsystems like libnvdimm that might need to handle multiple user threads racing to delete a device. This refactoring does not change any behavior, but it is a pre-requisite for follow-on fixes and therefore marked for -stable. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Fixes: 4d88a97a ("libnvdimm, nvdimm: dimm driver and base libnvdimm device-driver...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Tested-by: NJane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/156341207332.292348.14959761496009347574.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.comSigned-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
-
- 24 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Suzuki K Poulose 提交于
Add a helper to match device by the of_node. This will be later used to provide wrappers to the device iterators for {bus/class/driver}_find_device(). Convert other users to reuse this new helper. Cc: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com> Cc: linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 03 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
It looks like the child device is often matched with a name. This introduces a helper that does it automatically. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Borislav Petkov 提交于
It is not absolutely clear from the docs how the cleanup path after device_add() should look like so spell it out explicitly. No functional changes, just documentation. Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 20 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 4c06c4e6 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance") introduced a regression that causes suppliers to be suspended prematurely for device links added during consumer driver probe if the initial PM-runtime status of the consumer is "suspended" and the consumer is resumed after adding the link and before pm_runtime_put_suppliers() is called. In that case, pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will drop the rpm_active refcount for the link by one and (since rpm_active is equal to two after the preceding consumer resume) the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter will be decremented, which may cause the supplier to suspend even though the consumer's PM-runtime status is "active". For this reason, partially revert commit 4c06c4e6 as the problem it tried to fix needs to be addressed somewhat differently, and change pm_runtime_get_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() so that the latter only drops rpm_active references acquired by the former. [This requires adding a new field to struct device_link, but I coulnd't find a cleaner way to address the issue that would work in all cases.] This causes pm_runtime_put_suppliers() to effectively ignore device links added during consumer probe, so device_link_add() doesn't need to worry about ensuring that suppliers will remain active after pm_runtime_put_suppliers() for links created with DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE set and it only needs to bump up rpm_active by one for those links, so pm_runtime_active_link() is not necessary any more. Fixes: 4c06c4e6 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance") Reported-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If a stateless device link to a certain supplier with DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME set in the flags is added and then removed by the consumer driver's probe callback, the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter will be nonzero after that which effectively causes the supplier to remain "always on" going forward. Namely, device_link_add() called to add the link invokes device_link_rpm_prepare() which notices that the consumer driver is probing, so it increments the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter with the assumption that the link will stay around until pm_runtime_put_suppliers() is called by driver_probe_device(), but if the link goes away before that point, the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter will remain nonzero. To prevent that from happening, first rework pm_runtime_get_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() to use the rpm_active refounts of device links and make the latter only drop rpm_active and the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter for each link by one, unless rpm_active is one already for it. Next, modify device_link_add() to bump up the new link's rpm_active refcount and the suppliers PM-runtime usage counter by two, to prevent pm_runtime_put_suppliers(), if it is called subsequently, from suspending the supplier prematurely (in case its PM-runtime usage counter goes down to 0 in there). Due to the way rpm_put_suppliers() works, this change does not affect runtime suspend of the consumer ends of new device links (or, generally, device links for which DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME has just been set). Fixes: e2f3cd83 ("driver core: Fix handling of runtime PM flags in device_link_add()") Reported-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Tested-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 01 2月, 2019 8 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add a new device link flag, DL_FLAG_AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER, to request the driver core to probe for a consumer driver automatically after binding a driver to the supplier device on a persistent managed device link. As unbinding the supplier driver on a managed device link causes the consumer driver to be detached from its device automatically, this flag provides a complementary mechanism which is needed to address some "composite device" use cases. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Even though stateful device links are managed by the driver core in principle, their creators are allowed and sometimes even expected to drop references to them via device_link_del() or device_link_remove(), but that doesn't really play well with the "persistent" link concept. If "persistent" managed device links are created from driver probe callbacks, device_link_add() called to do that will take a new reference on the link each time the callback runs and those references will never be dropped, which kind of isn't nice. This issues arises because of the link reference counting carried out by device_link_add() for existing links, but that is only done to avoid deleting device links that may still be necessary, which shouldn't be a concern for managed (stateful) links. These device links are managed by the driver core and whoever creates one of them will need it at least as long as until the consumer driver is detached from its device and deleting it may be left to the driver core just fine. For this reason, rework device_link_add() to apply the reference counting to stateless links only and make device_link_del() and device_link_remove() drop references to stateless links only too. After this change, if called to add a stateful device link for a consumer-supplier pair for which a stateful device link is present already, device_link_add() will return the existing link without incrementing its reference counter. Accordingly, device_link_del() and device_link_remove() will WARN() and do nothing when called to drop a reference to a stateful link. Thus, effectively, all stateful device links will be owned by the driver core. In addition, clean up the handling of the link management flags, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER and DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER, so that (a) they are never set at the same time and (b) if device_link_add() is called for a consumer-supplier pair with an existing stateful link between them, the flags of that link will be combined with the flags passed to device_link_add() to ensure that the life time of the link is sufficient for all of the callers of device_link_add() for the same consumer-supplier pair. Update the device_link_add() kerneldoc comment to reflect the above changes. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Calling rpm_put_suppliers() from pm_runtime_drop_link() is excessive as it affects all suppliers of the consumer device and not just the one pointed to by the device link being dropped. Worst case it may cause the consumer device to stop working unexpectedly. Moreover, in principle it is racy with respect to runtime PM of the consumer device. To avoid these problems drop runtime PM references on the particular supplier pointed to by the link in question only and do that after the link has been dropped from the consumer device's list of links to suppliers, which is in device_link_free(). Fixes: a0504aec ("PM / runtime: Drop usage count for suppliers at device link removal") Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Currently, it is not valid to add a device link from a consumer driver ->probe callback to a supplier that is still probing too, but generally this is a valid use case. For example, if the consumer has just acquired a resource that can only be available if the supplier is functional, adding a device link to that supplier right away should be safe (and even desirable arguably), but device_link_add() doesn't handle that case correctly and the initial state of the link created by it is wrong then. To address this problem, change the initial state of device links added between a probing supplier and a probing consumer to DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE and update device_links_driver_bound() to skip such links on the supplier side. With this change, if the supplier probe completes first, device_links_driver_bound() called for it will skip the link state update and when it is called for the consumer, the link state will be updated to "active". In turn, if the consumer probe completes first, device_links_driver_bound() called for it will change the state of the link to "active" and when it is called for the supplier, the link status update will be skipped. However, in principle the supplier or consumer probe may still fail after the link has been added, so modify device_links_no_driver() to change device links in the "active" or "consumer probe" state to "dormant" on the supplier side and update __device_links_no_driver() to change the link state to "available" only if it is "consumer probe" or "active". Then, if the supplier probe fails first, the leftover link to the probing consumer will become "dormant" and device_links_no_driver() called for the consumer (when its probe fails) will clean it up. In turn, if the consumer probe fails first, it will either drop the link, or change its state to "available" and, in the latter case, when device_links_no_driver() is called for the supplier, it will update the link state to "dormant". [If the supplier probe fails, but the consumer probe succeeds, which should not happen as long as the consumer driver is correct, the link still will be around, but it will be "dormant" until the supplier is probed again.] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit ead18c23 ("driver core: Introduce device links reference counting"), if there is a link between the given supplier and the given consumer already, device_link_add() will refcount it and return it unconditionally without updating its flags. It is possible, however, that the second (or any subsequent) caller of device_link_add() for the same consumer-supplier pair will pass DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME, possibly along with DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE, in flags to it and the existing link may not behave as expected then. First, if DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME is not set in the existing link's flags at all, it needs to be set like during the original initialization of the link. Second, if DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE is passed to device_link_add() in flags (in addition to DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME), the existing link should to be updated to reflect the "active" runtime PM configuration of the consumer-supplier pair and extra care must be taken here to avoid possible destructive races with runtime PM of the consumer. To that end, redefine the rpm_active field in struct device_link as a refcount, initialize it to 1 and make rpm_resume() (for the consumer) and device_link_add() increment it whenever they acquire a runtime PM reference on the supplier device. Accordingly, make rpm_suspend() (for the consumer) and pm_runtime_clean_up_links() decrement it and drop runtime PM references to the supplier device in a loop until rpm_active becones 1 again. Fixes: ead18c23 ("driver core: Introduce device links reference counting") Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
It is incorrect to call pm_runtime_get_sync() under device_links_write_lock(), because it may end up trying to take device_links_read_lock() while resuming the target device and that will deadlock in the non-SRCU case, so avoid that by resuming the supplier device in device_link_add() before calling device_links_write_lock(). Fixes: 21d5c57b ("PM / runtime: Use device links") Fixes: baa8809f ("PM / runtime: Optimize the use of device links") Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit ead18c23 ("driver core: Introduce device links reference counting"), if there is a link between the given supplier and the given consumer already, device_link_add() will refcount it and return it unconditionally. However, if the flags passed to it on the second (or any subsequent) attempt to create a device link between the same consumer-supplier pair are not compatible with the existing link's flags, that is incorrect. First off, if the existing link is stateless and the next caller of device_link_add() for the same consumer-supplier pair wants a stateful one, or the other way around, the existing link cannot be returned, because it will not match the expected behavior, so make device_link_add() dump the stack and return NULL in that case. Moreover, if the DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER flag is passed to device_link_add(), its caller will expect its reference to the link to be dropped automatically on consumer driver removal, which will not happen if that flag is not set in the link's flags (and analogously for DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER). For this reason, make device_link_add() update the existing link's flags accordingly before returning it to the caller. Fixes: ead18c23 ("driver core: Introduce device links reference counting") Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Change the list walk in device_links_driver_cleanup() to a safe one to avoid use-after-free when dropping a link from the list during the walk. Also, while at it, fix device_link_add() to refuse to create stateless device links with DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER set, which is an invalid combination (setting that flag means that the driver core should manage the link, so it cannot be stateless), and extend the kerneldoc comment of device_link_add() to cover the DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER flag properly too. Fixes: 1689cac5 ("driver core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind") Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 31 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Duyck 提交于
Add an additional bit flag to the device_private struct named "dead". This additional flag provides a guarantee that when a device_del is executed on a given interface an async worker will not attempt to attach the driver following the earlier device_del call. Previously this guarantee was not present and could result in the device_del call attempting to remove a driver from an interface only to have the async worker attempt to probe the driver later when it finally completes the asynchronous probe call. One additional change added was that I pulled the check for dev->driver out of the __device_attach_driver call and instead placed it in the __device_attach_async_helper call. This was motivated by the fact that the only other caller of this, __device_attach, had already taken the device_lock() and checked for dev->driver. Instead of testing for this twice in this path it makes more sense to just consolidate the dev->dead and dev->driver checks together into one set of checks. Reviewed-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 22 1月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yong Wu 提交于
DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER/SUPPLIER means "Remove the link automatically on consumer/supplier driver unbind", that means we should remove whole the device_link when there is no this driver no matter what the ref_count of the link is. CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Jerome Brunet 提交于
On platforms making a fair use of regulators, the dev_info() messages coming from the device link function are a bit too verbose. The amount of message will increase further with the clock framework joining the device link party. These messages looks valuable for people debugging device link related issues, so dev_dbg() looks more appropriate than dev_info(). Signed-off-by: NJerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Acked-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 18 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yang 提交于
As the description of struct device_private says, it stores data which is private to driver core. And it already has similar fields like: knode_parent, knode_driver, knode_driver and knode_bus. This look it is more proper to put knode_class together with those fields to make it private to driver core. This patch move device->knode_class to device_private to make it comply with code convention. Signed-off-by: NWei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 06 12月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Rajnoha 提交于
Propagate error code back to userspace if writing the /sys/.../uevent file fails. Before, the write operation always returned with success, even if we failed to recognize the input string or if we failed to generate the uevent itself. With the error codes properly propagated back to userspace, we are able to react in userspace accordingly by not assuming and awaiting a uevent that is not delivered. Signed-off-by: NPeter Rajnoha <prajnoha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ezequiel Garcia 提交于
The current kref and kobject documentation may be insufficient to understand these common pitfalls regarding object lifetime and object releasing. Add a bit more documentation and improve the warnings seen by the user, pointing to the right piece of documentation. Also, it's important to understand that making fun of people publicly is not at all helpful, doesn't provide any value, and it's not a healthy way of encouraging developers to do better. "Mocking mercilessly" will, if anything, make developers feel bad and go away. This kind of behavior should not be encouraged or justified. Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: NEnric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Acked-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 27 11月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Kaitao cheng 提交于
The simple_strto{l,ul} are deprecated, use kstrtou{l,ul} instead. Signed-off-by: NKaitao cheng <pilgrimtao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
Software node is a new struct fwnode_handle type that can be used to describe devices in kernel (software). It is meant to complement fwnodes representing real firmware nodes when they are incomplete (for example missing device properties) and to supply the primary fwnode when the firmware lacks hardware description for a device completely. The software node type is really meant to replace the currently used "property_set" struct fwnode_handle type. The handling of struct property_set is glued to the generic device property handling code, and it is not possible to create a struct property_set independently from the device that it is bind to. struct property_set is only created when device properties are added to already initialized struct device, and control of it is only possible from the generic property handling code. Software nodes are instead designed to be created independently from the device entries (struct device). It makes them much more flexible, as then the device meant to be bind to the node can be created at a later time, and from another location. It is also possible to bind multiple devices to a single software node if needed. The software node implementation also includes support for node hierarchy, which was the main motivation for this commit. The node hierarchy was something that was requested for the struct property_set, but it did not seem reasonable to try to extend the property_set support for that purpose. struct property_set was really meant only for device property handling like the name suggests. Support for struct property_set is not yet removed in this commit, but it will be in the following one. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
Instead of relying on the "platform_notify" callback hook, introducing separate notification function acpi_platform_notify() and calling that directly from drivers core when device entries are added and removed. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
Since it should be possible to support several hardware description models at the same time (at least in theory), for example ACPI and devicetree on a running system, the platform notifications need to be handled differently. For now a single "platform_notify" callback function was used to notify the underlying base system which is in charge of the hardware description when a new device entry was added to the system, but that callback is available to only a single base system at the time. This will add a function device_platform_notify() and replace all direct platform_notify() calls with it. device_platform_notify() will first simply call the platform_notify() callback, so this commit has no functional affect, however, the idea is that individual base systems will put their direct notification calls there instead of using the platform_notify function pointer. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Gaignard 提交于
In some cases the link between between customer and supplier already exist, for example when a device use its parent as a supplier. Do not warn about already existing dependencies because device_link_add() takes care of this case. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180709111753eucas1p1f32e66fb2f7ea3216097cd72a132355d~-rzycA5Rg0378203782eucas1p1C@eucas1p1.samsung.comReported-by: NMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Pingfan Liu 提交于
There is a race window in device_shutdown(), which may cause -1. parent device shut down before child or -2. no shutdown on a new probing device. For 1st, taking the following scenario: device_shutdown new plugin device list_del_init(parent_dev); spin_unlock(list_lock); device_add(child) probe child shutdown parent_dev --> now child is on the tail of devices_kset For 2nd, taking the following scenario: device_shutdown new plugin device device_add(dev) device_lock(dev); ... device_unlock(dev); probe dev --> now, the new occurred dev has no opportunity to shutdown To fix this race issue, just prevent the new probing request. With this logic, device_shutdown() is more similar to dpm_prepare(). Signed-off-by: NPingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-