The "Local READ/WRITE failed" messages are too verbose.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

"canceled" w_read_retry_remote never completed, if they have been
canceled after drbd_disconnect connection teardown cleanup has already
run (or we are currently not connected anyways).

Fixed by not queueing a remote retry if we already know it won't work
(pdsk not uptodate), and cleanup ourselves on "cancel", in case we hit a
race with drbd_disconnect.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

If we detect late (= after grabing mdev->req_lock) that IO got frozen, we
return 1 to generic_make_request(), which simply will retry to make a
request for that bio.

In the subsequent call of generic_make_request() into drbd_make_request_26()
we sleep in inc_ap_bio().
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Now that the peer may handle multi-bio EEs,
we can ignore the peer's limit,
and concentrate on the limits of the local IO stack.

This is safe accross drbd protocol versions,
as our queue_max_sectors() will be adjusted accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

The condition does not fit the commend (I may well be Primary,
even if I lost the disk earlier and now the connection).

And this is catched below anyways, where it also gets logged.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

They should be reimplemented in the current scheme.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

It is force-included on the gcc command line since at least 2.6.15.
Explicit include lines seem to break compilation now in certain configurations.
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NKamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>