- 20 7月, 2021 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Right now, setting up tag_8021q is a 2-step operation for a driver, first the context structure needs to be created, then the VLANs need to be installed on the ports. A similar thing is true for teardown. Merge the 2 steps into the register/unregister methods, to be as transparent as possible for the driver as to what tag_8021q does behind the scenes. This also gets rid of the funny "bool setup == true means setup, == false means teardown" API that tag_8021q used to expose. Note that dsa_tag_8021q_register() must be called at least in the .setup() driver method and never earlier (like in the driver probe function). This is because the DSA switch tree is not initialized at probe time, and the cross-chip notifiers will not work. For symmetry with .setup(), the unregister method should be put in .teardown(). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Make tag_8021q a more central element of DSA and move the 2 driver specific operations outside of struct dsa_8021q_context (which is supposed to hold dynamic data and not really constant function pointers). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee36 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
In preparation of moving tag_8021q to core DSA, move all initialization and teardown related to tag_8021q which is currently done by drivers in 2 functions called "register" and "unregister". These will gather more functionality in future patches, which will better justify the chosen naming scheme. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Simply put, the best-effort VLAN filtering mode relied on VLAN retagging from a bridge VLAN towards a tag_8021q sub-VLAN in order to be able to decode the source port in the tagger, but the VLAN retagging implementation inside the sja1105 chips is not the best and we were relying on marginal operating conditions. The most notable limitation of the best-effort VLAN filtering mode is its incapacity to treat this case properly: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set swp2 master br0 ip link set swp4 master br0 bridge vlan del dev swp4 vid 1 bridge vlan add dev swp4 vid 1 pvid When sending an untagged packet through swp2, the expectation is for it to be forwarded to swp4 as egress-tagged (so it will contain VLAN ID 1 on egress). But the switch will send it as egress-untagged. There was an attempt to fix this here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210407201452.1703261-2-olteanv@gmail.com/ but it failed miserably because it broke PTP RX timestamping, in a way that cannot be corrected due to hardware issues related to VLAN retagging. So with either PTP broken or pushing VLAN headers on egress for untagged packets being broken, the sad reality is that the best-effort VLAN filtering code is broken. Delete it. Note that this means there will be a temporary loss of functionality in this driver until it is replaced with something better (network stack RX/TX capability for "mode 2" as described in Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst, the "port under VLAN-aware bridge" case). We simply cannot keep this code until that driver rework is done, it is super bloated and tangled with tag_8021q. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 7月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
In May 2019 when commit 640f763f ("net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for Spanning Tree Protocol") was introduced, the comment that "STP does not get called for the CPU port" was true. This changed after commit 0394a63a ("net: dsa: enable and disable all ports") in August 2019 and went largely unnoticed, because the sja1105_bridge_stp_state_set() method did nothing different compared to the static setup done by sja1105_init_mac_settings(). With the ability to turn address learning off introduced by the blamed commit, there is a new priv->learn_ena port mask in the driver. When sja1105_bridge_stp_state_set() gets called and we are in BR_STATE_LEARNING or later, address learning is enabled or not depending on priv->learn_ena & BIT(port). So what happens is that priv->learn_ena is not being set from anywhere for the CPU port, and the static configuration done by sja1105_init_mac_settings() is being overwritten. To solve this, acknowledge that the static configuration of STP state is no longer necessary because the STP state is being set by the DSA core now, but what is necessary is to set priv->learn_ena for the CPU port. Fixes: 4d942354 ("net: dsa: sja1105: offload bridge port flags to device") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 6月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
priv->cbs is an array of priv->info->num_cbs_shapers elements of type struct sja1105_cbs_entry which only get allocated if CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBS is enabled. However, sja1105_reload_cbs() is called from sja1105_static_config_reload() which in turn is called for any of the items in sja1105_reset_reasons, therefore during the normal runtime of the driver and not just from a code path which can be triggered by the tc-cbs offload. The sja1105_reload_cbs() function does not contain a check whether the priv->cbs array is NULL or not, it just assumes it isn't and proceeds to iterate through the credit-based shaper elements. This leads to a NULL pointer dereference. The solution is to return success if the priv->cbs array has not been allocated, since sja1105_reload_cbs() has nothing to do. Fixes: 4d752508 ("net: dsa: sja1105: offload the Credit-Based Shaper qdisc") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 6月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
If reloading the static config fails for whatever reason, for example if sja1105_static_config_check_valid() fails, then we "goto out_unlock_ptp" but we print anyway that "Reset switch and programmed static config.", which is confusing because we didn't. We also do a bunch of other stuff like reprogram the XPCS and reload the credit-based shapers, as if a switch reset took place, which didn't. So just unlock the PTP lock and goto out, skipping all of that. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
It turns out that powering down the BASE_TIMER_CLK does not turn off the microcontroller, just its timers, including the one for the watchdog. So the embedded microcontroller is still running, and potentially still doing things. To prevent unwanted interference, we should power down the BASE_MCSS_CLK as well (MCSS = microcontroller subsystem). The trouble is that currently we turn off the BASE_TIMER_CLK for SJA1110 from the .clocking_setup() method, mostly because this is a Clock Generation Unit (CGU) setting which was traditionally configured in that method for SJA1105. But in SJA1105, the CGU was used for bringing up the port clocks at the proper speeds, and in SJA1110 it's not (but rather for initial configuration), so it's best that we rebrand the sja1110_clocking_setup() method into what it really is - an implementation of the .disable_microcontroller() method. Since disabling the microcontroller only needs to be done once, at probe time, we can choose the best place to do that as being in sja1105_setup(), before we upload the static config to the device. This guarantees that the static config being used by the switch afterwards is really ours. Note that the procedure to upload a static config necessarily resets the switch. This already did not reset the microcontroller, only the switch core, so since the .disable_microcontroller() method is guaranteed to be called by that point, if it's disabled, it remains disabled. Add a comment to make that clear. With the code movement for SJA1110 from .clocking_setup() to .disable_microcontroller(), both methods are optional and are guarded by "if" conditions. Tested by enabling in the device tree the rev-mii switch port 0 that goes towards the microcontroller, and flashing a firmware that would have networking. Without this patch, the microcontroller can be pinged, with this patch it cannot. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 6月, 2021 6 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The MAC treats 2500base-x same as SGMII (yay for that) except that it must be set to a different speed. Extend all places that check for SGMII to also check for 2500base-x. Also add the missing 2500base-x compatibility matrix entry for SJA1110D. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
For the xMII Mode Parameters Table to be properly configured for SGMII mode on SJA1110, we need to set the "special" bit, since SGMII is officially bitwise coded as 0b0011 in SJA1105 (decimal 3, equal to XMII_MODE_SGMII), and as 0b1011 in SJA1110 (decimal 11). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
There is a desire to use the generic driver for the Synopsys XPCS located in drivers/net/pcs, and to achieve that, the sja1105 driver must expose an MDIO bus for the SGMII PCS, because the XPCS probes as an mdio_device. In preparation of the SJA1110 which in fact has a different access procedure for the SJA1105, we register this PCS MDIO bus once in the common code, but we implement function pointers for the read and write methods. In this patch there is a single implementation for them. There is exactly one MDIO bus for the PCS, this will contain all PCSes at MDIO addresses equal to the port number. We delete a bunch of hardware support code because the xpcs driver already does what we need. We need to hack up the MDIO reads for the PHY ID, since our XPCS instantiation returns zeroes and there are some specific fixups which need to be applied by the xpcs driver. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The SJA1110 has improved a few things compared to SJA1105: - To send a control packet from the host port with SJA1105, one needed to program a one-shot "management route" over SPI. This is no longer true with SJA1110, you can actually send "in-band control extensions" in the packets sent by DSA, these are in fact DSA tags which contain the destination port and switch ID. - When receiving a control packet from the switch with SJA1105, the source port and switch ID were written in bytes 3 and 4 of the destination MAC address of the frame (which was a very poor shot at a DSA header). If the control packet also had an RX timestamp, that timestamp was sent in an actual follow-up packet, so there were reordering concerns on multi-core/multi-queue DSA masters, where the metadata frame with the RX timestamp might get processed before the actual packet to which that timestamp belonged (there is no way to pair a packet to its timestamp other than the order in which they were received). On SJA1110, this is no longer true, control packets have the source port, switch ID and timestamp all in the DSA tags. - Timestamps from the switch were partial: to get a 64-bit timestamp as required by PTP stacks, one would need to take the partial 24-bit or 32-bit timestamp from the packet, then read the current PTP time very quickly, and then patch in the high bits of the current PTP time into the captured partial timestamp, to reconstruct what the full 64-bit timestamp must have been. That is awful because packet processing is done in NAPI context, but reading the current PTP time is done over SPI and therefore needs sleepable context. But it also aggravated a few things: - Not only is there a DSA header in SJA1110, but there is a DSA trailer in fact, too. So DSA needs to be extended to support taggers which have both a header and a trailer. Very unconventional - my understanding is that the trailer exists because the timestamps couldn't be prepared in time for putting them in the header area. - Like SJA1105, not all packets sent to the CPU have the DSA tag added to them, only control packets do: * the ones which match the destination MAC filters/traps in MAC_FLTRES1 and MAC_FLTRES0 * the ones which match FDB entries which have TRAP or TAKETS bits set So we could in theory hack something up to request the switch to take timestamps for all packets that reach the CPU, and those would be DSA-tagged and contain the source port / switch ID by virtue of the fact that there needs to be a timestamp trailer provided. BUT: - The SJA1110 does not parse its own DSA tags in a way that is useful for routing in cross-chip topologies, a la Marvell. And the sja1105 driver already supports cross-chip bridging from the SJA1105 days. It does that by automatically setting up the DSA links as VLAN trunks which contain all the necessary tag_8021q RX VLANs that must be communicated between the switches that span the same bridge. So when using tag_8021q on sja1105, it is possible to have 2 switches with ports sw0p0, sw0p1, sw1p0, sw1p1, and 2 VLAN-unaware bridges br0 and br1, and br0 can take sw0p0 and sw1p0, and br1 can take sw0p1 and sw1p1, and forwarding will happen according to the expected rules of the Linux bridge. We like that, and we don't want that to go away, so as a matter of fact, the SJA1110 tagger still needs to support tag_8021q. So the sja1110 tagger is a hybrid between tag_8021q for data packets, and the native hardware support for control packets. On RX, packets have a 13-byte trailer if they contain an RX timestamp. That trailer is padded in such a way that its byte 8 (the start of the "residence time" field - not parsed by Linux because we don't care) is aligned on a 16 byte boundary. So the padding has a variable length between 0 and 15 bytes. The DSA header contains the offset of the beginning of the padding relative to the beginning of the frame (and the end of the padding is obviously the end of the packet minus 13 bytes, the length of the trailer). So we discard it. Packets which don't have a trailer contain the source port and switch ID information in the header (they are "trap-to-host" packets). Packets which have a trailer contain the source port and switch ID in the trailer. On TX, the destination port mask and switch ID is always in the trailer, so we always need to say in the header that a trailer is present. The header needs a custom EtherType and this was chosen as 0xdadc, after 0xdada which is for Marvell and 0xdadb which is for VLANs in VLAN-unaware mode on SJA1105 (and SJA1110 in fact too). Because we use tag_8021q in concert with the native tagging protocol, control packets will have 2 DSA tags. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
On SJA1105, there is support for a cascade port which is presumably connected to a downstream SJA1105 switch. The upstream one does not take PTP timestamps for packets received on this port, presumably because the downstream switch already did (and for PTP, it only makes sense for the leaf nodes in a DSA switch tree to do that). I haven't been able to validate that feature in a fully assembled setup, so I am disabling the feature by setting the cascade port to an unused port value (ds->num_ports). In SJA1110, multiple cascade ports are supported, and CASC_PORT became a bit mask from a port number. So when CASC_PORT is set to ds->num_ports (which is 11 on SJA1110), it is actually set to 0b1011, so ports 3, 1 and 0 are configured as cascade ports and we cannot take RX timestamps on them. So we need to introduce a check for SJA1110 and set things differently (to zero there), so that the cascading feature is properly disabled and RX timestamps can be taken on all ports. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
As opposed to SJA1105 where there are parts with TTEthernet and parts without, in SJA1110 all parts support it, but it must be enabled in the static config. So enable it unconditionally. We use it for the tc-taprio and tc-gate offload. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 6月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The SJA1110 contains two types of integrated PHYs: one 100base-TX PHY and multiple 100base-T1 PHYs. The access procedure for the 100base-T1 PHYs is also different than it is for the 100base-TX one. So we register 2 MDIO buses, one for the base-TX and the other for the base-T1. Each bus has an OF node which is a child of the "mdio" subnode of the switch, and they are recognized by compatible string. Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The SJA1110 has an extra configuration in the General Parameters Table through which the user can select the buffer reservation config. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The SJA1110 is basically an SJA1105 with more ports, some integrated PHYs (100base-T1 and 100base-TX) and an embedded microcontroller which can be disabled, and the switch core can be controlled by a host running Linux, over SPI. This patch contains: - the static and dynamic config packing functions, for the tables that are common with SJA1105 - one more static config tables which is "unique" to the SJA1110 (actually it is a rehash of stuff that was placed somewhere else in SJA1105): the PCP Remapping Table - a reset and clock configuration procedure for the SJA1110 switch. This resets just the switch subsystem, and gates off the clock which powers on the embedded microcontroller. - an RGMII delay configuration procedure for SJA1110, which is very similar to SJA1105, but different enough for us to be unable to reuse it (this is a pattern that repeats itself) - some adaptations to dynamic config table entries which are no longer programmed in the same way. For example, to delete a VLAN, you used to write an entry through the dynamic reconfiguration interface with the desired VLAN ID, and with the VALIDENT bit set to false. Now, the VLAN table entries contain a TYPE_ENTRY field, which must be set to zero (in a backwards-incompatible way) in order for the entry to be deleted, or to some other entry for the VLAN to match "inner tagged" or "outer tagged" packets. - a similar thing for the static config: the xMII Mode Parameters Table encoding for SGMII and MII (the latter just when attached to a 100base-TX PHY) just isn't what it used to be in SJA1105. They are identical, except there is an extra "special" bit which needs to be set. Set it. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 6月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Now that both RevMII as well as RevRMII exist, we can deprecate the sja1105,role-mac and sja1105,role-phy properties and simply let the user select that a port operates in MII PHY role by using phy-mode = "rev-mii"; or in RMII PHY role by using phy-mode = "rev-rmii"; There are no fixed-link MII or RMII properties in mainline device trees, and the setup itself is fairly uncommon, so there shouldn't be risks of breaking compatibility. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The sja1105 driver has an intermediate way of determining whether the RGMII delays should be applied by the PHY or by itself: by looking at the port role (PHY or MAC). The port can be put in the PHY role either explicitly (sja1105,role-phy) or implicitly (fixed-link). We want to deprecate the sja1105,role-phy property, so all that remains is the fixed-link property. Introduce a "fixed_link" array of booleans in the driver, and use that to determine whether RGMII delays must be applied or not. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 6月, 2021 7 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
In SJA1105, the xMII Mode Parameters Table field called PHY_MAC denotes the 'role' of the port, be it a PHY or a MAC. This makes a difference in the MII and RMII protocols, but RGMII is symmetric, so either PHY or MAC settings result in the same hardware behavior. The SJA1110 is different, and the RGMII ports only work when configured in MAC mode, so keep the port roles in MAC mode unconditionally. Why we had an RGMII port in the PHY role in the first place was because we wanted to have a way in the driver to denote whether RGMII delays should be applied based on the phy-mode property or not. This is already done in sja1105_parse_rgmii_delays() based on an intermediary struct sja1105_dt_port (which contains the port role). So it is a logical fallacy to use the hardware configuration as a scratchpad for driver data, it isn't necessary. We can also remove the gating condition for applying RGMII delays only for ports in the PHY role. The .setup_rgmii_delay() method looks at the priv->rgmii_rx_delay[port] and priv->rgmii_tx_delay[port] properties which are already populated properly (in the case of a port in the MAC role they are false). Removing this condition generates a few more SPI writes for these ports (clearing the RGMII delays) which are perhaps useless for SJA1105P/Q/R/S, where we know that the delays are disabled by default. But for SJA1110, the firmware on the embedded microcontroller might have done something funny, so it's always a good idea to clear the RGMII delays if that's what Linux expects. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
In order to support the new speed of 2500Mbps, the SJA1110 has achieved the great performance of changing the encoding in the MAC Configuration Table for the port speeds of 10, 100, 1000 compared to SJA1105. Because this is a common driver, we need a layer of indirection in order to program the hardware with the right values irrespective of switch generation. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
On the SJA1105, all ports support the parallel "xMII" protocols (MII, RMII, RGMII) except for port 4 on SJA1105R/S which supports only SGMII. This was relatively easy to model, by special-casing the SGMII port. On the SJA1110, certain ports can be pinmuxed between SGMII and xMII, or between SGMII and an internal 100base-TX PHY. This creates problems, because the driver's assumption so far was that if a port supports SGMII, it uses SGMII. We allow the device tree to tell us how the port pinmuxing is done, and check that against a PHY interface type compatibility matrix for plausibility. The other big change is that instead of doing SGMII configuration based on what the port supports, we do it based on what is the configured phy_mode of the port. The 2500base-x support added in this patch is not complete. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
So far we've succeeded in operating without keeping a copy of the phy-mode in the driver, since we already have the static config and we can look at the xMII Mode Parameters Table which already holds that information. But with the SJA1110, we cannot make the distinction between sgmii and 2500base-x, because to the hardware's static config, it's all SGMII. So add a phy_mode property per port inside struct sja1105_private. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Looking at the SGMII PCS from SJA1110, which is accessed indirectly through a different base address as can be seen in the next patch, it appears odd that the address accessed through indirection still references the base address from the SJA1105S register map (first MDIO register is at 0x1f0000), when it could index the SGMII registers starting from zero. Except that the 0x1f0000 is not a base address at all, it seems. It is 0x1f << 16 | 0x0000, and 0x1f is coding for the vendor-specific MMD2. So, it turns out, the Synopsys PCS implements all its registers inside the vendor-specific MMDs 1 and 2 (0x1e and 0x1f). This explains why the PCS has no overlaps (for the other MMDs) with other register regions of the switch (because no other MMDs are implemented). Change the code to remove the SGMII "base address" and explicitly encode the MMD for reads/writes. This will become necessary for SJA1110 support. Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The SJA1105 R and S switches have 1 SGMII port (port 4). Because there is only one such port, there is no "port" parameter in the configuration code for the SGMII PCS. However, the SJA1110 can have up to 4 SGMII ports, each with its own SGMII register map. So we need to generalize the logic. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Since commit f2f3e09396be ("net: dsa: sja1105: be compatible with "ethernet-ports" OF node name"), DSA supports the "ethernet-ports" name for the container node of the ports, but the sja1105 driver doesn't, because it handles some device tree parsing of its own. Add the second node name as a fallback. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 25 5月, 2021 13 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The shared frame buffer of the SJA1110 is larger than that of SJA1105, which is natural due to the fact that there are more ports. Introduce yet another property in struct sja1105_info which encodes the maximum number of 128 byte blocks that can be used for frame buffers. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The SJA1110 policer array is similar in layout with SJA1105, except it contains one multicast policer per port at the end. Detect the presence of multicast policers based on the maximum number of supported L2 Policing Table entries, and make those policers have a shared index equal to the port's default policer. Letting the user configure these policers is not supported at the moment. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Due to the fact that the port count is different, some static config tables have a different number of elements in SJA1105 compared to SJA1110. Such an example is the L2 Policing table, which has 45 entries in SJA1105 (one per port x traffic class, and one broadcast policer per port) and 110 entries in SJA1110 (one per port x traffic class, one broadcast and one multicast policer per port). Similarly, the MAC Configuration Table, the L2 Forwarding table, all have a different number of elements simply because the port count is different, and although this can be accounted for by looking at ds->ports, the policing table can't because of the presence of the extra multicast policers. The common denominator for the static config initializers for these tables is that they must set up all the entries within that table. So the simplest way to account for these differences in a uniform manner is to look at struct sja1105_table_ops::max_entry_count. For the sake of uniformity, this patch makes that change also for tables whose number of elements did not change in SJA1110, like the xMII Mode Parameters, the L2 Lookup Parameters, General Parameters, AVB Parameters (all of these are singleton tables with a single entry). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
There are two distinct code paths which enter sja1105_clocking.c, one through sja1105_clocking_setup() and the other through sja1105_clocking_setup_port(): sja1105_static_config_reload sja1105_setup | | | +------------------+ | | v v sja1105_clocking_setup sja1105_adjust_port_config | | v | sja1105_clocking_setup_port <------------------+ As opposed to SJA1105, the SJA1110 does not need any configuration of the Clock Generation Unit in order for xMII ports to work. Just RGMII internal delays need to be configured, and that is done inside sja1105_clocking_setup_port for the RGMII ports. So this patch introduces the concept of a "reserved address", which the CGU configuration functions from sja1105_clocking.c must check before proceeding to do anything. The SJA1110 will have reserved addresses for the CGU PLLs for MII/RMII/RGMII. Additionally, make sja1105_clocking_setup() a function pointer so it can be overridden by the SJA1110. Even though nothing port-related needs to be done in the CGU, there are some operations such as disabling the watchdog clock which are unique to the SJA1110. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
If @port is unused, then dsa_upstream_port(ds, port) returns @port, which means we cannot assume the CPU port can be retrieved this way. The sja1105 switches support a single CPU port, so just iterate over the switch ports and stop at the first CPU port we see. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Introduce a SJA1105_MAX_NUM_PORTS macro which at the moment is equal to SJA1105_NUM_PORTS (5). With the introduction of SJA1110, these structures will need to hold information for up to 11 ports. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Do not put unused ports in the forwarding domain, and do not allocate FDB entries for dynamic address learning for them. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The sja1105 driver will gain support for the next-gen SJA1110 switch, which is very similar except for the fact it has more than 5 ports. So we need to replace the hardcoded SJA1105_NUM_PORTS in this driver with ds->num_ports. This patch is as mechanical as possible (save for the fact that ds->num_ports is not an integer constant expression). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
When running this sequence of operations: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set swp4 master br0 bridge vlan add dev swp4 vid 1 We observe the traffic sent on swp4 is still untagged, even though the bridge has overwritten the existing VLAN entry: port vlan ids swp4 1 PVID br0 1 PVID Egress Untagged This happens because we didn't consider that the 'bridge vlan add' command just overwrites VLANs like it's nothing. We treat the 'vid 1 pvid untagged' and the 'vid 1' as two separate VLANs, and the first still has precedence when calling sja1105_build_vlan_table. Obviously there is a disagreement regarding semantics, and we end up doing something unexpected from the PoV of the bridge. Let's actually consider an "existing VLAN" to be one which is on the same port, and has the same VLAN ID, as one we already have, and update it if it has different flags than we do. The first blamed commit is the one introducing the bug, the second one is the latest on top of which the bugfix still applies. Fixes: ec5ae610 ("net: dsa: sja1105: save/restore VLANs using a delta commit method") Fixes: 5899ee36 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
One thing became visible when writing the blamed commit, and that was that STP and PTP frames injected by net/dsa/tag_sja1105.c using the deferred xmit mechanism are always classified to the pvid of the CPU port, regardless of whatever VLAN there might be in these packets. So a decision needed to be taken regarding the mechanism through which we should ensure that delivery of STP and PTP traffic is possible when we are in a VLAN awareness mode that involves tag_8021q. This is because tag_8021q is not concerned with managing the pvid of the CPU port, since as far as tag_8021q is concerned, no traffic should be sent as untagged from the CPU port. So we end up not actually having a pvid on the CPU port if we only listen to tag_8021q, and unless we do something about it. The decision taken at the time was to keep VLAN 1 in the list of priv->dsa_8021q_vlans, and make it a pvid of the CPU port. This ensures that STP and PTP frames can always be sent to the outside world. However there is a problem. If we do the following while we are in the best_effort_vlan_filtering=true mode: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set swp2 master br0 bridge vlan del dev swp2 vid 1 Then untagged and pvid-tagged frames should be dropped. But we observe that they aren't, and this is because of the precaution we took that VID 1 is always installed on all ports. So clearly VLAN 1 is not good for this purpose. What about VLAN 0? Well, VLAN 0 is managed by the 8021q module, and that module wants to ensure that 802.1p tagged frames are always received by a port, and are always transmitted as VLAN-tagged (with VLAN ID 0). Whereas we want our STP and PTP frames to be untagged if the stack sent them as untagged - we don't want the driver to just decide out of the blue that it adds VID 0 to some packets. So what to do? Well, there is one other VLAN that is reserved, and that is 4095: $ ip link add link swp2 name swp2.4095 type vlan id 4095 Error: 8021q: Invalid VLAN id. $ bridge vlan add dev swp2 vid 4095 Error: bridge: Vlan id is invalid. After we made this change, VLAN 1 is indeed forwarded and/or dropped according to the bridge VLAN table, there are no further alterations done by the sja1105 driver. Fixes: ec5ae610 ("net: dsa: sja1105: save/restore VLANs using a delta commit method") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The driver continues probing when a port is configured for an unsupported PHY interface type, instead it should stop. Fixes: 8aa9ebcc ("net: dsa: Introduce driver for NXP SJA1105 5-port L2 switch") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
If any of sja1105_static_config_load(), sja1105_clocking_setup() or sja1105_devlink_setup() fails, we can't just return in the middle of sja1105_setup() or memory will leak. Add a cleanup path. Fixes: 0a7bdbc2 ("net: dsa: sja1105: move devlink param code to sja1105_devlink.c") Fixes: 8aa9ebcc ("net: dsa: Introduce driver for NXP SJA1105 5-port L2 switch") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Unlike other drivers which pretty much end their .probe() execution with dsa_register_switch(), the sja1105 does some extra stuff. When that fails with -ENOMEM, the driver is quick to return that, forgetting to call dsa_unregister_switch(). Not critical, but a bug nonetheless. Fixes: 4d752508 ("net: dsa: sja1105: offload the Credit-Based Shaper qdisc") Fixes: a68578c2 ("net: dsa: Make deferred_xmit private to sja1105") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-