Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 5月, 2021 5 次提交
  3. 15 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 14 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 12 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 27 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 24 4月, 2021 4 次提交
  13. 16 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  15. 09 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  17. 27 3月, 2021 5 次提交
  19. 26 3月, 2021 2 次提交
  21. 19 3月, 2021 2 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Add BPF static linker APIs · faf6ed32
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Introduce BPF static linker APIs to libbpf. BPF static linker allows to
perform static linking of multiple BPF object files into a single combined
resulting object file, preserving all the BPF programs, maps, global
variables, etc.

Data sections (.bss, .data, .rodata, .maps, maps, etc) with the same name are
concatenated together. Similarly, code sections are also concatenated. All the
symbols and ELF relocations are also concatenated in their respective ELF
sections and are adjusted accordingly to the new object file layout.

Static variables and functions are handled correctly as well, adjusting BPF
instructions offsets to reflect new variable/function offset within the
combined ELF section. Such relocations are referencing STT_SECTION symbols and
that stays intact.

Data sections in different files can have different alignment requirements, so
that is taken care of as well, adjusting sizes and offsets as necessary to
satisfy both old and new alignment requirements.

DWARF data sections are stripped out, currently. As well as LLLVM_ADDRSIG
section, which is ignored by libbpf in bpf_object__open() anyways. So, in
a way, BPF static linker is an analogue to `llvm-strip -g`, which is a pretty
nice property, especially if resulting .o file is then used to generate BPF
skeleton.

Original string sections are ignored and instead we construct our own set of
unique strings using libbpf-internal `struct strset` API.

To reduce the size of the patch, all the .BTF and .BTF.ext processing was
moved into a separate patch.

The high-level API consists of just 4 functions:
  - bpf_linker__new() creates an instance of BPF static linker. It accepts
    output filename and (currently empty) options struct;
  - bpf_linker__add_file() takes input filename and appends it to the already
    processed ELF data; it can be called multiple times, one for each BPF
    ELF object file that needs to be linked in;
  - bpf_linker__finalize() needs to be called to dump final ELF contents into
    the output file, specified when bpf_linker was created; after
    bpf_linker__finalize() is called, no more bpf_linker__add_file() and
    bpf_linker__finalize() calls are allowed, they will return error;
  - regardless of whether bpf_linker__finalize() was called or not,
    bpf_linker__free() will free up all the used resources.

Currently, BPF static linker doesn't resolve cross-object file references
(extern variables and/or functions). This will be added in the follow up patch
set.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210318194036.3521577-7-andrii@kernel.org
      faf6ed32
    • A
      libbpf: Rename internal memory-management helpers · 3b029e06
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Rename btf_add_mem() and btf_ensure_mem() helpers that abstract away details
of dynamically resizable memory to use libbpf_ prefix, as they are not
BTF-specific. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210318194036.3521577-4-andrii@kernel.org
      3b029e06
  23. 18 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  25. 05 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  27. 27 2月, 2021 2 次提交
  29. 13 2月, 2021 1 次提交
    • M
      libbpf: Ignore non function pointer member in struct_ops · d2836ddd
      由 Martin KaFai Lau 提交于 
      When libbpf initializes the kernel's struct_ops in
"bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops()", it enforces all
pointer types must be a function pointer and rejects
others.  It turns out to be too strict.  For example,
when directly using "struct tcp_congestion_ops" from vmlinux.h,
it has a "struct module *owner" member and it is set to NULL
in a bpf_tcp_cc.o.

Instead, it only needs to ensure the member is a function
pointer if it has been set (relocated) to a bpf-prog.
This patch moves the "btf_is_func_proto(kern_mtype)" check
after the existing "if (!prog) { continue; }".  The original debug
message in "if (!prog) { continue; }" is also removed since it is
no longer valid.  Beside, there is a later debug message to tell
which function pointer is set.

The "btf_is_func_proto(mtype)" has already been guaranteed
in "bpf_object__collect_st_ops_relos()" which has been run
before "bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops()".  Thus, this check
is removed.

v2:
- Remove outdated debug message (Andrii)
  Remove because there is a later debug message to tell
  which function pointer is set.
- Following mtype->type is no longer needed. Remove:
  "skip_mods_and_typedefs(btf, mtype->type, &mtype_id)"
- Do "if (!prog)" test before skip_mods_and_typedefs.

Fixes: 590a0088 ("bpf: libbpf: Add STRUCT_OPS support")
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212021030.266932-1-kafai@fb.com
      d2836ddd
  31. 13 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  33. 14 12月, 2020 1 次提交
  35. 04 12月, 2020 6 次提交
  37. 10 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  39. 08 10月, 2020 2 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Allow specifying both ELF and raw BTF for CO-RE BTF override · 2b7d88c2
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Use generalized BTF parsing logic, making it possible to parse BTF both from
ELF file, as well as a raw BTF dump. This makes it easier to write custom
tests with manually generated BTFs.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201008001025.292064-4-andrii@kernel.org
      2b7d88c2
    • A
      libbpf: Support safe subset of load/store instruction resizing with CO-RE · a66345bc
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Add support for patching instructions of the following form:
  - rX = *(T *)(rY + <off>);
  - *(T *)(rX + <off>) = rY;
  - *(T *)(rX + <off>) = <imm>, where T is one of {u8, u16, u32, u64}.

For such instructions, if the actual kernel field recorded in CO-RE relocation
has a different size than the one recorded locally (e.g., from vmlinux.h),
then libbpf will adjust T to an appropriate 1-, 2-, 4-, or 8-byte loads.

In general, such transformation is not always correct and could lead to
invalid final value being loaded or stored. But two classes of cases are
always safe:
  - if both local and target (kernel) types are unsigned integers, but of
  different sizes, then it's OK to adjust load/store instruction according to
  the necessary memory size. Zero-extending nature of such instructions and
  unsignedness make sure that the final value is always correct;
  - pointer size mismatch between BPF target architecture (which is always
  64-bit) and 32-bit host kernel architecture can be similarly resolved
  automatically, because pointer is essentially an unsigned integer. Loading
  32-bit pointer into 64-bit BPF register with zero extension will leave
  correct pointer in the register.

Both cases are necessary to support CO-RE on 32-bit kernels, as `unsigned
long` in vmlinux.h generated from 32-bit kernel is 32-bit, but when compiled
with BPF program for BPF target it will be treated by compiler as 64-bit
integer. Similarly, pointers in vmlinux.h are 32-bit for kernel, but treated
as 64-bit values by compiler for BPF target. Both problems are now resolved by
libbpf for direct memory reads.

But similar transformations are useful in general when kernel fields are
"resized" from, e.g., unsigned int to unsigned long (or vice versa).

Now, similar transformations for signed integers are not safe to perform as
they will result in incorrect sign extension of the value. If such situation
is detected, libbpf will emit helpful message and will poison the instruction.
Not failing immediately means that it's possible to guard the instruction
based on kernel version (or other conditions) and make sure it's not
reachable.

If there is a need to read signed integers that change sizes between different
kernels, it's possible to use BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro, which works both
with bitfields and non-bitfield integers of any signedness and handles
sign-extension properly. Also, bpf_core_read() with proper size and/or use of
bpf_core_field_size() relocation could allow to deal with such complicated
situations explicitly, if not so conventiently as direct memory reads.

Selftests added in a separate patch in progs/test_core_autosize.c demonstrate
both direct memory and probed use cases.

BPF_CORE_READ() is not changed and it won't deal with such situations as
automatically as direct memory reads due to the signedness integer
limitations, which are much harder to detect and control with compiler macro
magic. So it's encouraged to utilize direct memory reads as much as possible.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201008001025.292064-3-andrii@kernel.org
      a66345bc