Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 10月, 2021 6 次提交
  3. 14 10月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 12 10月, 2021 8 次提交
  7. 08 10月, 2021 8 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: fix abort logic in btrfs_replace_file_extents · 4afb912f
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Error injection testing uncovered a case where we'd end up with a
corrupt file system with a missing extent in the middle of a file.  This
occurs because the if statement to decide if we should abort is wrong.

The only way we would abort in this case is if we got a ret !=
-EOPNOTSUPP and we called from the file clone code.  However the
prealloc code uses this path too.  Instead we need to abort if there is
an error, and the only error we _don't_ abort on is -EOPNOTSUPP and only
if we came from the clone file code.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      4afb912f
    • F
      btrfs: check for error when looking up inode during dir entry replay · cfd31269
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      At replay_one_name(), we are treating any error from btrfs_lookup_inode()
as if the inode does not exists. Fix this by checking for an error and
returning it to the caller.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      cfd31269
    • F
      btrfs: unify lookup return value when dir entry is missing · 8dcbc261
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() and btrfs_lookup_dir_item() lookup for dir
entries and both are used during log replay or when updating a log tree
during an unlink.

However when the dir item does not exists, btrfs_lookup_dir_item() returns
NULL while btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() returns PTR_ERR(-ENOENT), and if
the dir item exists but there is no matching entry for a given name or
index, both return NULL. This makes the call sites during log replay to
be more verbose than necessary and it makes it easy to miss this slight
difference. Since we don't need to distinguish between those two cases,
make btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() always return NULL when there is no
matching directory entry - either because there isn't any dir entry or
because there is one but it does not match the given name and index.

Also rename the argument 'objectid' of btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() to
'index' since it is supposed to match an index number, and the name
'objectid' is not very good because it can easily be confused with an
inode number (like the inode number a dir entry points to).

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      8dcbc261
    • F
      btrfs: deal with errors when adding inode reference during log replay · 52db7779
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      At __inode_add_ref(), we treating any error returned from
btrfs_lookup_dir_item() or from btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() as meaning
that there is no existing directory entry in the fs/subvolume tree.
This is not correct since we can get errors such as, for example, -EIO
when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's btree.

So fix that and return the error to the caller when it is not -ENOENT.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      52db7779
    • F
      btrfs: deal with errors when replaying dir entry during log replay · e15ac641
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      At replay_one_one(), we are treating any error returned from
btrfs_lookup_dir_item() or from btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() as meaning
that there is no existing directory entry in the fs/subvolume tree.
This is not correct since we can get errors such as, for example, -EIO
when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's btree.

So fix that and return the error to the caller when it is not -ENOENT.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e15ac641
    • F
      btrfs: deal with errors when checking if a dir entry exists during log replay · 77a5b9e3
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Currently inode_in_dir() ignores errors returned from
btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() and from btrfs_lookup_dir_item(), treating
any errors as if the directory entry does not exists in the fs/subvolume
tree, which is obviously not correct, as we can get errors such as -EIO
when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's tree.

Fix that by making inode_in_dir() return the errors and making its only
caller, add_inode_ref(), deal with returned errors as well.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      77a5b9e3
    • J
      btrfs: update refs for any root except tree log roots · d175209b
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      I hit a stuck relocation on btrfs/061 during my overnight testing.  This
turned out to be because we had left over extent entries in our extent
root for a data reloc inode that no longer existed.  This happened
because in btrfs_drop_extents() we only update refs if we have SHAREABLE
set or we are the tree_root.  This regression was introduced by
aeb935a4 ("btrfs: don't set SHAREABLE flag for data reloc tree")
where we stopped setting SHAREABLE for the data reloc tree.

The problem here is we actually do want to update extent references for
data extents in the data reloc tree, in fact we only don't want to
update extent references if the file extents are in the log tree.
Update this check to only skip updating references in the case of the
log tree.

This is relatively rare, because you have to be running scrub at the
same time, which is what btrfs/061 does.  The data reloc inode has its
extents pre-allocated, and then we copy the extent into the
pre-allocated chunks.  We theoretically should never be calling
btrfs_drop_extents() on a data reloc inode.  The exception of course is
with scrub, if our pre-allocated extent falls inside of the block group
we are scrubbing, then the block group will be marked read only and we
will be forced to cow that extent.  This means we will call
btrfs_drop_extents() on that range when we COW that file extent.

This isn't really problematic if we do this, the data reloc inode
requires that our extent lengths match exactly with the extent we are
copying, thankfully we validate the extent is correct with
get_new_location(), so if we happen to COW only part of the extent we
won't link it in when we do the relocation, so we are safe from any
other shenanigans that arise because of this interaction with scrub.

Fixes: aeb935a4 ("btrfs: don't set SHAREABLE flag for data reloc tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d175209b
    • Q
      btrfs: unlock newly allocated extent buffer after error · 19ea40dd
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
There is a bug report that injected ENOMEM error could leave a tree
block locked while we return to user-space:

  BTRFS info (device loop0): enabling ssd optimizations
  FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
  name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0
  CPU: 0 PID: 7579 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1 #16
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
  rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x8d/0xcf lib/dump_stack.c:106
   fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:52 [inline]
   should_fail+0x13c/0x160 lib/fault-inject.c:146
   should_failslab+0x5/0x10 mm/slab_common.c:1328
   slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.99+0x4e/0xc0 mm/slab.h:494
   slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3120 [inline]
   slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3214 [inline]
   kmem_cache_alloc+0x44/0x280 mm/slub.c:3219
   btrfs_alloc_delayed_extent_op fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h:299 [inline]
   btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x38c/0x670 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4833
   __btrfs_cow_block+0x16f/0x7d0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
   btrfs_cow_block+0x12a/0x300 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
   btrfs_search_slot+0x6b0/0xee0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
   btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x80/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3905
   btrfs_new_inode+0x311/0xa60 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6530
   btrfs_create+0x12b/0x270 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6783
   lookup_open+0x660/0x780 fs/namei.c:3282
   open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3352 [inline]
   path_openat+0x465/0xe20 fs/namei.c:3557
   do_filp_open+0xe3/0x170 fs/namei.c:3588
   do_sys_openat2+0x357/0x4a0 fs/open.c:1200
   do_sys_open+0x87/0xd0 fs/open.c:1216
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x34/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
  RIP: 0033:0x46ae99
  Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48
  89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d
  01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
  RSP: 002b:00007f46711b9c48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000078c0a0 RCX: 000000000046ae99
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000000a1 RDI: 0000000020005800
  RBP: 00007f46711b9c80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000017
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000078c0a0 R15: 00007ffc129da6e0

  ================================================
  WARNING: lock held when returning to user space!
  5.15.0-rc1 #16 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor/7579 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
  1 lock held by syz-executor/7579:
   #0: ffff888104b73da8 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
  __btrfs_tree_lock+0x2e/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:112

[CAUSE]
In btrfs_alloc_tree_block(), after btrfs_init_new_buffer(), the new
extent buffer @buf is locked, but if later operations like adding
delayed tree ref fail, we just free @buf without unlocking it,
resulting above warning.

[FIX]
Unlock @buf in out_free_buf: label.
Reported-by: NHao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsZ9O6Zr0KK1yGn=1rQi6Crh1yeCRdTSBxx9R99L4xdn-Q@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      19ea40dd
  9. 07 10月, 2021 6 次提交
  11. 06 10月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 05 10月, 2021 10 次提交