Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 25 2月, 2009 1 次提交
    • S
      x86: fix performance regression in write() syscall · 30d697fa
      由 Salman Qazi 提交于 
      While the introduction of __copy_from_user_nocache (see commit:
0812a579) may have been an improvement
for sufficiently large writes, there is evidence to show that it is
deterimental for small writes.  Unixbench's fstime test gives the
following results for 256 byte writes with MAX_BLOCK of 2000:

    2.6.29-rc6 ( 5 samples, each in KB/sec ):
    283750, 295200, 294500, 293000, 293300

    2.6.29-rc6 + this patch (5 samples, each in KB/sec):
    313050, 3106750, 293350, 306300, 307900

    2.6.18
    395700, 342000, 399100, 366050, 359850

    See w_test() in src/fstime.c in unixbench version 4.1.0.  Basically, the above test
    consists of counting how much we can write in this manner:

    alarm(10);
    while (!sigalarm) {
            for (f_blocks = 0; f_blocks < 2000; ++f_blocks) {
                   write(f, buf, 256);
            }
            lseek(f, 0L, 0);
    }

Note, there are other components to the write syscall regression
that are not addressed here.
Signed-off-by: NSalman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      30d697fa
  3. 20 2月, 2009 6 次提交
  5. 17 2月, 2009 3 次提交
  7. 16 2月, 2009 7 次提交
  9. 15 2月, 2009 5 次提交
  11. 14 2月, 2009 6 次提交
  13. 13 2月, 2009 12 次提交