1. 04 5月, 2017 6 次提交
  2. 14 4月, 2017 2 次提交
  3. 09 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 09 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 25 2月, 2017 2 次提交
  6. 23 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 03 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  8. 11 1月, 2017 2 次提交
  9. 08 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 02 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 01 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      zram: fix unbalanced idr management at hot removal · 529e71e1
      Takashi Iwai 提交于
      The zram hot removal code calls idr_remove() even when zram_remove()
      returns an error (typically -EBUSY).  This results in a leftover at the
      device release, eventually leading to a crash when the module is
      reloaded.
      
      As described in the bug report below, the following procedure would
      cause an Oops with zram:
      
       - provision three zram devices via modprobe zram num_devices=3
       - configure a size for each device
         + echo "1G" > /sys/block/$zram_name/disksize
       - mkfs and mount zram0 only
       - attempt to hot remove all three devices
         + echo 2 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
         + echo 1 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
         + echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
           - zram0 removal fails with EBUSY, as expected
       - unmount zram0
       - try zram0 hot remove again
         + echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
           - fails with ENODEV (unexpected)
       - unload zram kernel module
         + completes successfully
       - zram0 device node still exists
       - attempt to mount /dev/zram0
         + mount command is killed
         + following BUG is encountered
      
       BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffa0002ba0
       IP: get_disk+0x16/0x50
       Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
       CPU: 0 PID: 252 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.9.0-rc6 #176
       Call Trace:
         exact_lock+0xc/0x20
         kobj_lookup+0xdc/0x160
         get_gendisk+0x2f/0x110
         __blkdev_get+0x10c/0x3c0
         blkdev_get+0x19d/0x2e0
         blkdev_open+0x56/0x70
         do_dentry_open.isra.19+0x1ff/0x310
         vfs_open+0x43/0x60
         path_openat+0x2c9/0xf30
         do_filp_open+0x79/0xd0
         do_sys_open+0x114/0x1e0
         SyS_open+0x19/0x20
         entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94
      
      This patch adds the proper error check in hot_remove_store() not to call
      idr_remove() unconditionally.
      
      Fixes: 17ec4cd9 ("zram: don't call idr_remove() from zram_remove()")
      Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1010970
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161121132140.12683-1-tiwai@suse.deSigned-off-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
      Reported-by: NDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
      Tested-by: NDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>    [4.4+]
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      529e71e1
  12. 08 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 05 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 27 7月, 2016 4 次提交
    • M
      zram: use __GFP_MOVABLE for memory allocation · 9bc482d3
      Minchan Kim 提交于
      Zsmalloc is ready for page migration so zram can use __GFP_MOVABLE from
      now on.
      
      I did test to see how it helps to make higher order pages.  Test
      scenario is as follows.
      
      KVM guest, 1G memory, ext4 formated zram block device,
      
        for i in `seq 1 8`;
        do
                dd if=/dev/vda1 of=mnt/test$i.txt bs=128M count=1 &
        done
      
        wait `pidof dd`
      
        for i in `seq 1 2 8`;
        do
                rm -rf mnt/test$i.txt
        done
        fstrim -v mnt
      
        echo "init"
        cat /proc/buddyinfo
      
        echo "compaction"
        echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
        cat /proc/buddyinfo
      
      old:
      
        init
        Node 0, zone      DMA    208    120     51     41     11      0      0      0      0      0      0
        Node 0, zone    DMA32  16380  13777   9184   3805    789     54      3      0      0      0      0
        compaction
        Node 0, zone      DMA    132     82     40     39     16      2      1      0      0      0      0
        Node 0, zone    DMA32   5219   5526   4969   3455   1831    677    139     15      0      0      0
      
      new:
      
        init
        Node 0, zone      DMA    379    115     97     19      2      0      0      0      0      0      0
        Node 0, zone    DMA32  18891  16774  10862   3947    637     21      0      0      0      0      0
        compaction
        Node 0, zone      DMA    214     66     87     29     10      3      0      0      0      0      0
        Node 0, zone    DMA32   1612   3139   3154   2469   1745    990    384     94      7      0      0
      
      As you can see, compaction made so many high-order pages. Yay!
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-13-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Reviewed-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9bc482d3
    • S
      zram: use crypto api to check alg availability · 415403be
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      There is no way to get a string with all the crypto comp algorithms
      supported by the crypto comp engine, so we need to maintain our own
      backends list.  At the same time we additionally need to use
      crypto_has_comp() to make sure that the user has requested a compression
      algorithm that is recognized by the crypto comp engine.  Relying on
      /proc/crypto is not an options here, because it does not show
      not-yet-inserted compression modules.
      
      Example:
      
       modprobe zram
       cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4
       modprobe lz4
       cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4
      name         : lz4
      driver       : lz4-generic
      module       : lz4
      
      So the user can't tell exactly if the lz4 is really supported from
      /proc/crypto output, unless someone or something has loaded it.
      
      This patch also adds crypto_has_comp() to zcomp_available_show().  We
      store all the compression algorithms names in zcomp's `backends' array,
      regardless the CONFIG_CRYPTO_FOO configuration, but show only those that
      are also supported by crypto engine.  This helps user to know the exact
      list of compression algorithms that can be used.
      
      Example:
        module lz4 is not loaded yet, but is supported by the crypto
        engine. /proc/crypto has no information on this module, while
        zram's `comp_algorithm' lists it:
      
       cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4
      
       cat /sys/block/zram0/comp_algorithm
      [lzo] lz4 deflate lz4hc 842
      
      We still use the `backends' array to determine if the requested
      compression backend is known to crypto api.  This array, however, may not
      contain some entries, therefore as the last step we call crypto_has_comp()
      function which attempts to insmod the requested compression algorithm to
      determine if crypto api supports it.  The advantage of this method is that
      now we permit the usage of out-of-tree crypto compression modules
      (implementing S/W or H/W compression).
      
      [sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com: zram-use-crypto-api-to-check-alg-availability-v3]
        Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160604024902.11778-4-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531122017.2878-5-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      415403be
    • S
      zram: switch to crypto compress API · ebaf9ab5
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      We don't have an idle zstreams list anymore and our write path now works
      absolutely differently, preventing preemption during compression.  This
      removes possibilities of read paths preempting writes at wrong places
      (which could badly affect the performance of both paths) and at the same
      time opens the door for a move from custom LZO/LZ4 compression backends
      implementation to a more generic one, using crypto compress API.
      
      Joonsoo Kim [1] attempted to do this a while ago, but faced with the
      need of introducing a new crypto API interface.  The root cause was the
      fact that crypto API compression algorithms require a compression stream
      structure (in zram terminology) for both compression and decompression
      ops, while in reality only several of compression algorithms really need
      it.  This resulted in a concept of context-less crypto API compression
      backends [2].  Both write and read paths, though, would have been
      executed with the preemption enabled, which in the worst case could have
      resulted in a decreased worst-case performance, e.g.  consider the
      following case:
      
      	CPU0
      
      	zram_write()
      	  spin_lock()
      	    take the last idle stream
      	  spin_unlock()
      
      	<< preempted >>
      
      		zram_read()
      		  spin_lock()
      		   no idle streams
      			  spin_unlock()
      			  schedule()
      
      	resuming zram_write compression()
      
      but it took me some time to realize that, and it took even longer to
      evolve zram and to make it ready for crypto API.  The key turned out to be
      -- drop the idle streams list entirely.  Without the idle streams list we
      are free to use compression algorithms that require compression stream for
      decompression (read), because streams are now placed in per-cpu data and
      each write path has to disable preemption for compression op, almost
      completely eliminating the aforementioned case (technically, we still have
      a small chance, because write path has a fast and a slow paths and the
      slow path is executed with the preemption enabled; but the frequency of
      failed fast path is too low).
      
      TEST
      ====
      
      - 4 CPUs, x86_64 system
      - 3G zram, lzo
      - fio tests: read, randread, write, randwrite, rw, randrw
      
      test script [3] command:
       ZRAM_SIZE=3G LOG_SUFFIX=XXXX FIO_LOOPS=5 ./zram-fio-test.sh
      
                         BASE           PATCHED
      jobs1
      READ:           2527.2MB/s	 2482.7MB/s
      READ:           2102.7MB/s	 2045.0MB/s
      WRITE:          1284.3MB/s	 1324.3MB/s
      WRITE:          1080.7MB/s	 1101.9MB/s
      READ:           430125KB/s	 437498KB/s
      WRITE:          430538KB/s	 437919KB/s
      READ:           399593KB/s	 403987KB/s
      WRITE:          399910KB/s	 404308KB/s
      jobs2
      READ:           8133.5MB/s	 7854.8MB/s
      READ:           7086.6MB/s	 6912.8MB/s
      WRITE:          3177.2MB/s	 3298.3MB/s
      WRITE:          2810.2MB/s	 2871.4MB/s
      READ:           1017.6MB/s	 1023.4MB/s
      WRITE:          1018.2MB/s	 1023.1MB/s
      READ:           977836KB/s	 984205KB/s
      WRITE:          979435KB/s	 985814KB/s
      jobs3
      READ:           13557MB/s	 13391MB/s
      READ:           11876MB/s	 11752MB/s
      WRITE:          4641.5MB/s	 4682.1MB/s
      WRITE:          4164.9MB/s	 4179.3MB/s
      READ:           1453.8MB/s	 1455.1MB/s
      WRITE:          1455.1MB/s	 1458.2MB/s
      READ:           1387.7MB/s	 1395.7MB/s
      WRITE:          1386.1MB/s	 1394.9MB/s
      jobs4
      READ:           20271MB/s	 20078MB/s
      READ:           18033MB/s	 17928MB/s
      WRITE:          6176.8MB/s	 6180.5MB/s
      WRITE:          5686.3MB/s	 5705.3MB/s
      READ:           2009.4MB/s	 2006.7MB/s
      WRITE:          2007.5MB/s	 2004.9MB/s
      READ:           1929.7MB/s	 1935.6MB/s
      WRITE:          1926.8MB/s	 1932.6MB/s
      jobs5
      READ:           18823MB/s	 19024MB/s
      READ:           18968MB/s	 19071MB/s
      WRITE:          6191.6MB/s	 6372.1MB/s
      WRITE:          5818.7MB/s	 5787.1MB/s
      READ:           2011.7MB/s	 1981.3MB/s
      WRITE:          2011.4MB/s	 1980.1MB/s
      READ:           1949.3MB/s	 1935.7MB/s
      WRITE:          1940.4MB/s	 1926.1MB/s
      jobs6
      READ:           21870MB/s	 21715MB/s
      READ:           19957MB/s	 19879MB/s
      WRITE:          6528.4MB/s	 6537.6MB/s
      WRITE:          6098.9MB/s	 6073.6MB/s
      READ:           2048.6MB/s	 2049.9MB/s
      WRITE:          2041.7MB/s	 2042.9MB/s
      READ:           2013.4MB/s	 1990.4MB/s
      WRITE:          2009.4MB/s	 1986.5MB/s
      jobs7
      READ:           21359MB/s	 21124MB/s
      READ:           19746MB/s	 19293MB/s
      WRITE:          6660.4MB/s	 6518.8MB/s
      WRITE:          6211.6MB/s	 6193.1MB/s
      READ:           2089.7MB/s	 2080.6MB/s
      WRITE:          2085.8MB/s	 2076.5MB/s
      READ:           2041.2MB/s	 2052.5MB/s
      WRITE:          2037.5MB/s	 2048.8MB/s
      jobs8
      READ:           20477MB/s	 19974MB/s
      READ:           18922MB/s	 18576MB/s
      WRITE:          6851.9MB/s	 6788.3MB/s
      WRITE:          6407.7MB/s	 6347.5MB/s
      READ:           2134.8MB/s	 2136.1MB/s
      WRITE:          2132.8MB/s	 2134.4MB/s
      READ:           2074.2MB/s	 2069.6MB/s
      WRITE:          2087.3MB/s	 2082.4MB/s
      jobs9
      READ:           19797MB/s	 19994MB/s
      READ:           18806MB/s	 18581MB/s
      WRITE:          6878.7MB/s	 6822.7MB/s
      WRITE:          6456.8MB/s	 6447.2MB/s
      READ:           2141.1MB/s	 2154.7MB/s
      WRITE:          2144.4MB/s	 2157.3MB/s
      READ:           2084.1MB/s	 2085.1MB/s
      WRITE:          2091.5MB/s	 2092.5MB/s
      jobs10
      READ:           19794MB/s	 19784MB/s
      READ:           18794MB/s	 18745MB/s
      WRITE:          6984.4MB/s	 6676.3MB/s
      WRITE:          6532.3MB/s	 6342.7MB/s
      READ:           2150.6MB/s	 2155.4MB/s
      WRITE:          2156.8MB/s	 2161.5MB/s
      READ:           2106.4MB/s	 2095.6MB/s
      WRITE:          2109.7MB/s	 2098.4MB/s
      
                                          BASE                       PATCHED
      jobs1                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     102,480,595,419 (  41.53%)	  114,508,864,804 (  46.92%)
      stalled-cycles-backend       51,941,417,832 (  21.05%)	   46,836,112,388 (  19.19%)
      instructions                283,612,054,215 (    1.15)	  283,918,134,959 (    1.16)
      branches                     56,372,560,385 ( 724.923)	   56,449,814,753 ( 733.766)
      branch-misses                   374,826,000 (   0.66%)	      326,935,859 (   0.58%)
      jobs2                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     155,142,745,777 (  40.99%)	  164,170,979,198 (  43.82%)
      stalled-cycles-backend       70,813,866,387 (  18.71%)	   66,456,858,165 (  17.74%)
      instructions                463,436,648,173 (    1.22)	  464,221,890,191 (    1.24)
      branches                     91,088,733,902 ( 760.088)	   91,278,144,546 ( 769.133)
      branch-misses                   504,460,363 (   0.55%)	      394,033,842 (   0.43%)
      jobs3                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     201,300,397,212 (  39.84%)	  223,969,902,257 (  44.44%)
      stalled-cycles-backend       87,712,593,974 (  17.36%)	   81,618,888,712 (  16.19%)
      instructions                642,869,545,023 (    1.27)	  644,677,354,132 (    1.28)
      branches                    125,724,560,594 ( 690.682)	  126,133,159,521 ( 694.542)
      branch-misses                   527,941,798 (   0.42%)	      444,782,220 (   0.35%)
      jobs4                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     246,701,197,429 (  38.12%)	  280,076,030,886 (  43.29%)
      stalled-cycles-backend      119,050,341,112 (  18.40%)	  110,955,641,671 (  17.15%)
      instructions                822,716,962,127 (    1.27)	  825,536,969,320 (    1.28)
      branches                    160,590,028,545 ( 688.614)	  161,152,996,915 ( 691.068)
      branch-misses                   650,295,287 (   0.40%)	      550,229,113 (   0.34%)
      jobs5                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     298,958,462,516 (  38.30%)	  344,852,200,358 (  44.16%)
      stalled-cycles-backend      137,558,742,122 (  17.62%)	  129,465,067,102 (  16.58%)
      instructions              1,005,714,688,752 (    1.29)	1,007,657,999,432 (    1.29)
      branches                    195,988,773,962 ( 697.730)	  196,446,873,984 ( 700.319)
      branch-misses                   695,818,940 (   0.36%)	      624,823,263 (   0.32%)
      jobs6                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     334,497,602,856 (  36.71%)	  387,590,419,779 (  42.38%)
      stalled-cycles-backend      163,539,365,335 (  17.95%)	  152,640,193,639 (  16.69%)
      instructions              1,184,738,177,851 (    1.30)	1,187,396,281,677 (    1.30)
      branches                    230,592,915,640 ( 702.902)	  231,253,802,882 ( 702.356)
      branch-misses                   747,934,786 (   0.32%)	      643,902,424 (   0.28%)
      jobs7                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     396,724,684,187 (  37.71%)	  460,705,858,952 (  43.84%)
      stalled-cycles-backend      188,096,616,496 (  17.88%)	  175,785,787,036 (  16.73%)
      instructions              1,364,041,136,608 (    1.30)	1,366,689,075,112 (    1.30)
      branches                    265,253,096,936 ( 700.078)	  265,890,524,883 ( 702.839)
      branch-misses                   784,991,589 (   0.30%)	      729,196,689 (   0.27%)
      jobs8                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     440,248,299,870 (  36.92%)	  509,554,793,816 (  42.46%)
      stalled-cycles-backend      222,575,930,616 (  18.67%)	  213,401,248,432 (  17.78%)
      instructions              1,542,262,045,114 (    1.29)	1,545,233,932,257 (    1.29)
      branches                    299,775,178,439 ( 697.666)	  300,528,458,505 ( 694.769)
      branch-misses                   847,496,084 (   0.28%)	      748,794,308 (   0.25%)
      jobs9                              perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     506,269,882,480 (  37.86%)	  592,798,032,820 (  44.43%)
      stalled-cycles-backend      253,192,498,861 (  18.93%)	  233,727,666,185 (  17.52%)
      instructions              1,721,985,080,913 (    1.29)	1,724,666,236,005 (    1.29)
      branches                    334,517,360,255 ( 694.134)	  335,199,758,164 ( 697.131)
      branch-misses                   873,496,730 (   0.26%)	      815,379,236 (   0.24%)
      jobs10                             perfstat
      stalled-cycles-frontend     549,063,363,749 (  37.18%)	  651,302,376,662 (  43.61%)
      stalled-cycles-backend      281,680,986,810 (  19.07%)	  277,005,235,582 (  18.55%)
      instructions              1,901,859,271,180 (    1.29)	1,906,311,064,230 (    1.28)
      branches                    369,398,536,153 ( 694.004)	  370,527,696,358 ( 688.409)
      branch-misses                   967,929,335 (   0.26%)	      890,125,056 (   0.24%)
      
                                  BASE           PATCHED
      seconds elapsed        79.421641008	78.735285546
      seconds elapsed        61.471246133	60.869085949
      seconds elapsed        62.317058173	62.224188495
      seconds elapsed        60.030739363	60.081102518
      seconds elapsed        74.070398362	74.317582865
      seconds elapsed        84.985953007	85.414364176
      seconds elapsed        97.724553255	98.173311344
      seconds elapsed        109.488066758	110.268399318
      seconds elapsed        122.768189405	122.967164498
      seconds elapsed        135.130035105	136.934770801
      
      On my other system (8 x86_64 CPUs, short version of test results):
      
                                  BASE           PATCHED
      seconds elapsed        19.518065994	19.806320662
      seconds elapsed        15.172772749	15.594718291
      seconds elapsed        13.820925970	13.821708564
      seconds elapsed        13.293097816	14.585206405
      seconds elapsed        16.207284118	16.064431606
      seconds elapsed        17.958376158	17.771825767
      seconds elapsed        19.478009164	19.602961508
      seconds elapsed        21.347152811	21.352318709
      seconds elapsed        24.478121126	24.171088735
      seconds elapsed        26.865057442	26.767327618
      
      So performance-wise the numbers are quite similar.
      
      Also update zcomp interface to be more aligned with the crypto API.
      
      [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144480832108927&w=2
      [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145379613507518&w=2
      [3] https://github.com/sergey-senozhatsky/zram-perf-test
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531122017.2878-3-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Suggested-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Suggested-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
      Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ebaf9ab5
    • S
      zram: rename zstrm find-release functions · 2aea8493
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      This has started as a 'add zlib support' work, but after some thinking I
      saw no blockers for a bigger change -- a switch to crypto API.
      
      We don't have an idle zstreams list anymore and our write path now works
      absolutely differently, preventing preemption during compression.  This
      removes possibilities of read paths preempting writes at wrong places
      and opens the door for a move from custom LZO/LZ4 compression backends
      implementation to a more generic one, using crypto compress API.
      
      This patch set also eliminates the need of a new context-less crypto API
      interface, which was quite hard to sell, so we can move along faster.
      
      benchmarks:
      
      (x86_64, 4GB, zram-perf script)
      
      perf reported run-time fio (max jobs=3).  I performed fio test with the
      increasing number of parallel jobs (max to 3) on a 3G zram device, using
      `static' data and the following crypto comp algorithms:
      
      	842, deflate, lz4, lz4hc, lzo
      
      the output was:
      
       - test running time (which can tell us what algorithms performs faster)
      
      and
      
       - zram mm_stat (which tells the compressed memory size, max used memory, etc).
      
      It's just for information.  for example, LZ4HC has twice the running
      time of LZO, but the compressed memory size is: 23592960 vs 34603008
      bytes.
      
        test-fio-zram-842
           197.907655282 seconds time elapsed
           201.623142884 seconds time elapsed
           226.854291345 seconds time elapsed
        test-fio-zram-DEFLATE
           253.259516155 seconds time elapsed
           258.148563401 seconds time elapsed
           290.251909365 seconds time elapsed
        test-fio-zram-LZ4
            27.022598717 seconds time elapsed
            29.580522717 seconds time elapsed
            33.293463430 seconds time elapsed
        test-fio-zram-LZ4HC
            56.393954615 seconds time elapsed
            74.904659747 seconds time elapsed
           101.940998564 seconds time elapsed
        test-fio-zram-LZO
            28.155948075 seconds time elapsed
            30.390036330 seconds time elapsed
            34.455773159 seconds time elapsed
      
      zram mm_stat-s (max fio jobs=3)
      
        test-fio-zram-842
        mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472 673185792 690266112        0 690266112        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472 673185792 690266112        0 690266112        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472 673185792 690266112        0 690266112        0        0
        test-fio-zram-DEFLATE
        mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472  24379392  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472  24379392  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472  24379392  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        test-fio-zram-LZ4
        mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        test-fio-zram-LZ4HC
        mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
        test-fio-zram-LZO
        mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472  34603008  50335744        0  50335744        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472  34603008  50335744        0  50335744        0        0
        mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472  34603008  50335744        0  50339840        0        0
      
      This patch (of 8):
      
      We don't perform any zstream idle list lookup anymore, so
      zcomp_strm_find()/zcomp_strm_release() names are not representative.
      
      Rename to zcomp_stream_get()/zcomp_stream_put().
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531122017.2878-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2aea8493
  15. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  16. 21 5月, 2016 4 次提交
    • S
      zram: introduce per-device debug_stat sysfs node · 623e47fc
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      debug_stat sysfs is read-only and represents various debugging data that
      zram developers may need.  This file is not meant to be used by anyone
      else: its content is not documented and will change any time w/o any
      notice.  Therefore, the output of debug_stat file contains a version
      string.  To avoid any confusion, we will increase the version number
      every time we modify the output.
      
      At the moment this file exports only one value -- the number of
      re-compressions, IOW, the number of times compression fast path has
      failed.  This stat is temporary any will be useful in case if any
      per-cpu compression streams regressions will be reported.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160513230834.GB26763@bbox
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160511134553.12655-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      623e47fc
    • S
      zram: remove max_comp_streams internals · 43209ea2
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      Remove the internal part of max_comp_streams interface, since we
      switched to per-cpu streams.  We will keep RW max_comp_streams attr
      around, because:
      
      a) we may (silently) switch back to idle compression streams list and
         don't want to disturb user space
      
      b) max_comp_streams attr must wait for the next 'lay off cycle'; we
         give user space 2 years to adjust before we remove/downgrade the attr,
         and there are already several attrs scheduled for removal in 4.11, so
         it's too late for max_comp_streams.
      
      This slightly change a user visible behaviour:
      
      - First, reading from max_comp_stream file now will always return the
        number of online CPUs.
      
      - Second, writing to max_comp_stream will not take any effect.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160503165546.25201-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      43209ea2
    • S
      zram: user per-cpu compression streams · da9556a2
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      Remove idle streams list and keep compression streams in per-cpu data.
      This removes two contented spin_lock()/spin_unlock() calls from write
      path and also prevent write OP from being preempted while holding the
      compression stream, which can cause slow downs.
      
      For instance, let's assume that we have N cpus and N-2
      max_comp_streams.TASK1 owns the last idle stream, TASK2-TASK3 come in
      with the write requests:
      
        TASK1            TASK2              TASK3
       zram_bvec_write()
        spin_lock
        find stream
        spin_unlock
      
        compress
      
        <<preempted>>   zram_bvec_write()
                         spin_lock
                         find stream
                         spin_unlock
                           no_stream
                             schedule
                                           zram_bvec_write()
                                            spin_lock
                                            find_stream
                                            spin_unlock
                                              no_stream
                                                schedule
         spin_lock
         release stream
         spin_unlock
           wake up TASK2
      
      not only TASK2 and TASK3 will not get the stream, TASK1 will be
      preempted in the middle of its operation; while we would prefer it to
      finish compression and release the stream.
      
      Test environment: x86_64, 4 CPU box, 3G zram, lzo
      
      The following fio tests were executed:
            read, randread, write, randwrite, rw, randrw
      with the increasing number of jobs from 1 to 10.
      
                        4 streams        8 streams       per-cpu
        ===========================================================
        jobs1
        READ:           2520.1MB/s       2566.5MB/s      2491.5MB/s
        READ:           2102.7MB/s       2104.2MB/s      2091.3MB/s
        WRITE:          1355.1MB/s       1320.2MB/s      1378.9MB/s
        WRITE:          1103.5MB/s       1097.2MB/s      1122.5MB/s
        READ:           434013KB/s       435153KB/s      439961KB/s
        WRITE:          433969KB/s       435109KB/s      439917KB/s
        READ:           403166KB/s       405139KB/s      403373KB/s
        WRITE:          403223KB/s       405197KB/s      403430KB/s
        jobs2
        READ:           7958.6MB/s       8105.6MB/s      8073.7MB/s
        READ:           6864.9MB/s       6989.8MB/s      7021.8MB/s
        WRITE:          2438.1MB/s       2346.9MB/s      3400.2MB/s
        WRITE:          1994.2MB/s       1990.3MB/s      2941.2MB/s
        READ:           981504KB/s       973906KB/s      1018.8MB/s
        WRITE:          981659KB/s       974060KB/s      1018.1MB/s
        READ:           937021KB/s       938976KB/s      987250KB/s
        WRITE:          934878KB/s       936830KB/s      984993KB/s
        jobs3
        READ:           13280MB/s        13553MB/s       13553MB/s
        READ:           11534MB/s        11785MB/s       11755MB/s
        WRITE:          3456.9MB/s       3469.9MB/s      4810.3MB/s
        WRITE:          3029.6MB/s       3031.6MB/s      4264.8MB/s
        READ:           1363.8MB/s       1362.6MB/s      1448.9MB/s
        WRITE:          1361.9MB/s       1360.7MB/s      1446.9MB/s
        READ:           1309.4MB/s       1310.6MB/s      1397.5MB/s
        WRITE:          1307.4MB/s       1308.5MB/s      1395.3MB/s
        jobs4
        READ:           20244MB/s        20177MB/s       20344MB/s
        READ:           17886MB/s        17913MB/s       17835MB/s
        WRITE:          4071.6MB/s       4046.1MB/s      6370.2MB/s
        WRITE:          3608.9MB/s       3576.3MB/s      5785.4MB/s
        READ:           1824.3MB/s       1821.6MB/s      1997.5MB/s
        WRITE:          1819.8MB/s       1817.4MB/s      1992.5MB/s
        READ:           1765.7MB/s       1768.3MB/s      1937.3MB/s
        WRITE:          1767.5MB/s       1769.1MB/s      1939.2MB/s
        jobs5
        READ:           18663MB/s        18986MB/s       18823MB/s
        READ:           16659MB/s        16605MB/s       16954MB/s
        WRITE:          3912.4MB/s       3888.7MB/s      6126.9MB/s
        WRITE:          3506.4MB/s       3442.5MB/s      5519.3MB/s
        READ:           1798.2MB/s       1746.5MB/s      1935.8MB/s
        WRITE:          1792.7MB/s       1740.7MB/s      1929.1MB/s
        READ:           1727.6MB/s       1658.2MB/s      1917.3MB/s
        WRITE:          1726.5MB/s       1657.2MB/s      1916.6MB/s
        jobs6
        READ:           21017MB/s        20922MB/s       21162MB/s
        READ:           19022MB/s        19140MB/s       18770MB/s
        WRITE:          3968.2MB/s       4037.7MB/s      6620.8MB/s
        WRITE:          3643.5MB/s       3590.2MB/s      6027.5MB/s
        READ:           1871.8MB/s       1880.5MB/s      2049.9MB/s
        WRITE:          1867.8MB/s       1877.2MB/s      2046.2MB/s
        READ:           1755.8MB/s       1710.3MB/s      1964.7MB/s
        WRITE:          1750.5MB/s       1705.9MB/s      1958.8MB/s
        jobs7
        READ:           21103MB/s        20677MB/s       21482MB/s
        READ:           18522MB/s        18379MB/s       19443MB/s
        WRITE:          4022.5MB/s       4067.4MB/s      6755.9MB/s
        WRITE:          3691.7MB/s       3695.5MB/s      5925.6MB/s
        READ:           1841.5MB/s       1933.9MB/s      2090.5MB/s
        WRITE:          1842.7MB/s       1935.3MB/s      2091.9MB/s
        READ:           1832.4MB/s       1856.4MB/s      1971.5MB/s
        WRITE:          1822.3MB/s       1846.2MB/s      1960.6MB/s
        jobs8
        READ:           20463MB/s        20194MB/s       20862MB/s
        READ:           18178MB/s        17978MB/s       18299MB/s
        WRITE:          4085.9MB/s       4060.2MB/s      7023.8MB/s
        WRITE:          3776.3MB/s       3737.9MB/s      6278.2MB/s
        READ:           1957.6MB/s       1944.4MB/s      2109.5MB/s
        WRITE:          1959.2MB/s       1946.2MB/s      2111.4MB/s
        READ:           1900.6MB/s       1885.7MB/s      2082.1MB/s
        WRITE:          1896.2MB/s       1881.4MB/s      2078.3MB/s
        jobs9
        READ:           19692MB/s        19734MB/s       19334MB/s
        READ:           17678MB/s        18249MB/s       17666MB/s
        WRITE:          4004.7MB/s       4064.8MB/s      6990.7MB/s
        WRITE:          3724.7MB/s       3772.1MB/s      6193.6MB/s
        READ:           1953.7MB/s       1967.3MB/s      2105.6MB/s
        WRITE:          1953.4MB/s       1966.7MB/s      2104.1MB/s
        READ:           1860.4MB/s       1897.4MB/s      2068.5MB/s
        WRITE:          1858.9MB/s       1895.9MB/s      2066.8MB/s
        jobs10
        READ:           19730MB/s        19579MB/s       19492MB/s
        READ:           18028MB/s        18018MB/s       18221MB/s
        WRITE:          4027.3MB/s       4090.6MB/s      7020.1MB/s
        WRITE:          3810.5MB/s       3846.8MB/s      6426.8MB/s
        READ:           1956.1MB/s       1994.6MB/s      2145.2MB/s
        WRITE:          1955.9MB/s       1993.5MB/s      2144.8MB/s
        READ:           1852.8MB/s       1911.6MB/s      2075.8MB/s
        WRITE:          1855.7MB/s       1914.6MB/s      2078.1MB/s
      
      perf stat
      
                                        4 streams                       8 streams                       per-cpu
        ====================================================================================================================
        jobs1
        stalled-cycles-frontend      23,174,811,209 (  38.21%)     23,220,254,188 (  38.25%)       23,061,406,918 (  38.34%)
        stalled-cycles-backend       11,514,174,638 (  18.98%)     11,696,722,657 (  19.27%)       11,370,852,810 (  18.90%)
        instructions                 73,925,005,782 (    1.22)     73,903,177,632 (    1.22)       73,507,201,037 (    1.22)
        branches                     14,455,124,835 ( 756.063)     14,455,184,779 ( 755.281)       14,378,599,509 ( 758.546)
        branch-misses                    69,801,336 (   0.48%)         80,225,529 (   0.55%)           72,044,726 (   0.50%)
        jobs2
        stalled-cycles-frontend      49,912,741,782 (  46.11%)     50,101,189,290 (  45.95%)       32,874,195,633 (  35.11%)
        stalled-cycles-backend       27,080,366,230 (  25.02%)     27,949,970,232 (  25.63%)       16,461,222,706 (  17.58%)
        instructions                122,831,629,690 (    1.13)    122,919,846,419 (    1.13)      121,924,786,775 (    1.30)
        branches                     23,725,889,239 ( 692.663)     23,733,547,140 ( 688.062)       23,553,950,311 ( 794.794)
        branch-misses                    90,733,041 (   0.38%)         96,320,895 (   0.41%)           84,561,092 (   0.36%)
        jobs3
        stalled-cycles-frontend      66,437,834,608 (  45.58%)     63,534,923,344 (  43.69%)       42,101,478,505 (  33.19%)
        stalled-cycles-backend       34,940,799,661 (  23.97%)     34,774,043,148 (  23.91%)       21,163,324,388 (  16.68%)
        instructions                171,692,121,862 (    1.18)    171,775,373,044 (    1.18)      170,353,542,261 (    1.34)
        branches                     32,968,962,622 ( 628.723)     32,987,739,894 ( 630.512)       32,729,463,918 ( 717.027)
        branch-misses                   111,522,732 (   0.34%)        110,472,894 (   0.33%)           99,791,291 (   0.30%)
        jobs4
        stalled-cycles-frontend      98,741,701,675 (  49.72%)     94,797,349,965 (  47.59%)       54,535,655,381 (  33.53%)
        stalled-cycles-backend       54,642,609,615 (  27.51%)     55,233,554,408 (  27.73%)       27,882,323,541 (  17.14%)
        instructions                220,884,807,851 (    1.11)    220,930,887,273 (    1.11)      218,926,845,851 (    1.35)
        branches                     42,354,518,180 ( 592.105)     42,362,770,587 ( 590.452)       41,955,552,870 ( 716.154)
        branch-misses                   138,093,449 (   0.33%)        131,295,286 (   0.31%)          121,794,771 (   0.29%)
        jobs5
        stalled-cycles-frontend     116,219,747,212 (  48.14%)    110,310,397,012 (  46.29%)       66,373,082,723 (  33.70%)
        stalled-cycles-backend       66,325,434,776 (  27.48%)     64,157,087,914 (  26.92%)       32,999,097,299 (  16.76%)
        instructions                270,615,008,466 (    1.12)    270,546,409,525 (    1.14)      268,439,910,948 (    1.36)
        branches                     51,834,046,557 ( 599.108)     51,811,867,722 ( 608.883)       51,412,576,077 ( 729.213)
        branch-misses                   158,197,086 (   0.31%)        142,639,805 (   0.28%)          133,425,455 (   0.26%)
        jobs6
        stalled-cycles-frontend     138,009,414,492 (  48.23%)    139,063,571,254 (  48.80%)       75,278,568,278 (  32.80%)
        stalled-cycles-backend       79,211,949,650 (  27.68%)     79,077,241,028 (  27.75%)       37,735,797,899 (  16.44%)
        instructions                319,763,993,731 (    1.12)    319,937,782,834 (    1.12)      316,663,600,784 (    1.38)
        branches                     61,219,433,294 ( 595.056)     61,250,355,540 ( 598.215)       60,523,446,617 ( 733.706)
        branch-misses                   169,257,123 (   0.28%)        154,898,028 (   0.25%)          141,180,587 (   0.23%)
        jobs7
        stalled-cycles-frontend     162,974,812,119 (  49.20%)    159,290,061,987 (  48.43%)       88,046,641,169 (  33.21%)
        stalled-cycles-backend       92,223,151,661 (  27.84%)     91,667,904,406 (  27.87%)       44,068,454,971 (  16.62%)
        instructions                369,516,432,430 (    1.12)    369,361,799,063 (    1.12)      365,290,380,661 (    1.38)
        branches                     70,795,673,950 ( 594.220)     70,743,136,124 ( 597.876)       69,803,996,038 ( 732.822)
        branch-misses                   181,708,327 (   0.26%)        165,767,821 (   0.23%)          150,109,797 (   0.22%)
        jobs8
        stalled-cycles-frontend     185,000,017,027 (  49.30%)    182,334,345,473 (  48.37%)       99,980,147,041 (  33.26%)
        stalled-cycles-backend      105,753,516,186 (  28.18%)    107,937,830,322 (  28.63%)       51,404,177,181 (  17.10%)
        instructions                418,153,161,055 (    1.11)    418,308,565,828 (    1.11)      413,653,475,581 (    1.38)
        branches                     80,035,882,398 ( 592.296)     80,063,204,510 ( 589.843)       79,024,105,589 ( 730.530)
        branch-misses                   199,764,528 (   0.25%)        177,936,926 (   0.22%)          160,525,449 (   0.20%)
        jobs9
        stalled-cycles-frontend     210,941,799,094 (  49.63%)    204,714,679,254 (  48.55%)      114,251,113,756 (  33.96%)
        stalled-cycles-backend      122,640,849,067 (  28.85%)    122,188,553,256 (  28.98%)       58,360,041,127 (  17.35%)
        instructions                468,151,025,415 (    1.10)    467,354,869,323 (    1.11)      462,665,165,216 (    1.38)
        branches                     89,657,067,510 ( 585.628)     89,411,550,407 ( 588.990)       88,360,523,943 ( 730.151)
        branch-misses                   218,292,301 (   0.24%)        191,701,247 (   0.21%)          178,535,678 (   0.20%)
        jobs10
        stalled-cycles-frontend     233,595,958,008 (  49.81%)    227,540,615,689 (  49.11%)      160,341,979,938 (  43.07%)
        stalled-cycles-backend      136,153,676,021 (  29.03%)    133,635,240,742 (  28.84%)       65,909,135,465 (  17.70%)
        instructions                517,001,168,497 (    1.10)    516,210,976,158 (    1.11)      511,374,038,613 (    1.37)
        branches                     98,911,641,329 ( 585.796)     98,700,069,712 ( 591.583)       97,646,761,028 ( 728.712)
        branch-misses                   232,341,823 (   0.23%)        199,256,308 (   0.20%)          183,135,268 (   0.19%)
      
      per-cpu streams tend to cause significantly less stalled cycles; execute
      less branches and hit less branch-misses.
      
      perf stat reported execution time
      
                                4 streams        8 streams       per-cpu
        ====================================================================
        jobs1
        seconds elapsed        20.909073870     20.875670495    20.817838540
        jobs2
        seconds elapsed        18.529488399     18.720566469    16.356103108
        jobs3
        seconds elapsed        18.991159531     18.991340812    16.766216066
        jobs4
        seconds elapsed        19.560643828     19.551323547    16.246621715
        jobs5
        seconds elapsed        24.746498464     25.221646740    20.696112444
        jobs6
        seconds elapsed        28.258181828     28.289765505    22.885688857
        jobs7
        seconds elapsed        32.632490241     31.909125381    26.272753738
        jobs8
        seconds elapsed        35.651403851     36.027596308    29.108024711
        jobs9
        seconds elapsed        40.569362365     40.024227989    32.898204012
        jobs10
        seconds elapsed        44.673112304     43.874898137    35.632952191
      
      Please see
        Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146166970727530
        Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146174716719650
      for more test results (under low memory conditions).
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Suggested-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      da9556a2
    • S
      zsmalloc: require GFP in zs_malloc() · d0d8da2d
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      Pass GFP flags to zs_malloc() instead of using a fixed mask supplied to
      zs_create_pool(), so we can be more flexible, but, more importantly, we
      need this to switch zram to per-cpu compression streams -- zram will try
      to allocate handle with preemption disabled in a fast path and switch to
      a slow path (using different gfp mask) if the fast one has failed.
      
      Apart from that, this also align zs_malloc() interface with zspool/zbud.
      
      [sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com: pass GFP flags to zs_malloc() instead of using a fixed mask]
        Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160429150942.GA637@swordfish
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160429150942.GA637@swordfishSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d0d8da2d
  17. 16 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  18. 08 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 07 11月, 2015 3 次提交
  20. 09 9月, 2015 3 次提交
    • S
      zram: unify error reporting · 70864969
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      Make zram syslog error reporting more consistent. We have random
      error levels in some places. For example, critical errors like
        "Error allocating memory for compressed page"
      and
        "Unable to allocate temp memory"
      are reported as KERN_INFO messages.
      
      a) Reassign error levels
      
      Error messages that directly affect zram
      functionality -- pr_err():
      
       Error allocating zram address table
       Error creating memory pool
       Decompression failed! err=%d, page=%u
       Unable to allocate temp memory
       Compression failed! err=%d
       Error allocating memory for compressed page: %u, size=%zu
       Cannot initialise %s compressing backend
       Error allocating disk queue for device %d
       Error allocating disk structure for device %d
       Error creating sysfs group for device %d
       Unable to register zram-control class
       Unable to get major number
      
      Messages that do not affect functionality, but user
      must be warned (because sysfs attrs will be removed in
      this particular case) -- pr_warn():
      
       %d (%s) Attribute %s (and others) will be removed. %s
      
      Messages that do not affect functionality and mostly are
      informative -- pr_info():
      
       Cannot change max compression streams
       Can't change algorithm for initialized device
       Cannot change disksize for initialized device
       Added device: %s
       Removed device: %s
      
      b) Update sysfs_create_group() error message
      
      First, it lacks a trailing new line; add it.  Second, every error message
      in zram_add() has a "for device %d" part, which makes errors more
      informative.  Add missing part to "Error creating sysfs group" message.
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      70864969
    • S
      zsmalloc: account the number of compacted pages · 860c707d
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      Compaction returns back to zram the number of migrated objects, which is
      quite uninformative -- we have objects of different sizes so user space
      cannot obtain any valuable data from that number.  Change compaction to
      operate in terms of pages and return back to compaction issuer the
      number of pages that were freed during compaction.  So from now on we
      will export more meaningful value in zram<id>/mm_stat -- the number of
      freed (compacted) pages.
      
      This requires:
       (a) a rename of `num_migrated' to 'pages_compacted'
       (b) a internal API change -- return first_page's fullness_group from
           putback_zspage(), so we know when putback_zspage() did
           free_zspage().  It helps us to account compaction stats correctly.
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      860c707d
    • S
      zsmalloc/zram: introduce zs_pool_stats api · 7d3f3938
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      `zs_compact_control' accounts the number of migrated objects but it has
      a limited lifespan -- we lose it as soon as zs_compaction() returns back
      to zram.  It worked fine, because (a) zram had it's own counter of
      migrated objects and (b) only zram could trigger compaction.  However,
      this does not work for automatic pool compaction (not issued by zram).
      To account objects migrated during auto-compaction (issued by the
      shrinker) we need to store this number in zs_pool.
      
      Define a new `struct zs_pool_stats' structure to keep zs_pool's stats
      there.  It provides only `num_migrated', as of this writing, but it
      surely can be extended.
      
      A new zsmalloc zs_pool_stats() symbol exports zs_pool's stats back to
      caller.
      
      Use zs_pool_stats() in zram and remove `num_migrated' from zram_stats.
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Suggested-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7d3f3938
  21. 15 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      zram: fix pool name truncation · 4ce321f5
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      zram_meta_alloc() constructs a pool name for zs_create_pool() call as
      
          snprintf(pool_name, sizeof(pool_name), "zram%d", device_id);
      
      However, it defines pool name buffer to be only 8 bytes long (minus
      trailing zero), which means that we can have only 1000 pool names: zram0
      -- zram999.
      
      With CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT enabled an attempt to create a device zram1000
      can fail if device zram100 already exists, because snprintf() will
      truncate new pool name to zram100 and pass it debugfs_create_dir(),
      causing:
      
        debugfs dir <zram100> creation failed
        zram: Error creating memory pool
      
      ... and so on.
      
      Fix it by passing zram->disk->disk_name to zram_meta_alloc() instead of
      divice_id.  We construct zram%d name earlier and keep it as a ->disk_name,
      no need to snprintf() it again.
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4ce321f5
  22. 14 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • K
      block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios · 54efd50b
      Kent Overstreet 提交于
      The way the block layer is currently written, it goes to great lengths
      to avoid having to split bios; upper layer code (such as bio_add_page())
      checks what the underlying device can handle and tries to always create
      bios that don't need to be split.
      
      But this approach becomes unwieldy and eventually breaks down with
      stacked devices and devices with dynamic limits, and it adds a lot of
      complexity. If the block layer could split bios as needed, we could
      eliminate a lot of complexity elsewhere - particularly in stacked
      drivers. Code that creates bios can then create whatever size bios are
      convenient, and more importantly stacked drivers don't have to deal with
      both their own bio size limitations and the limitations of the
      (potentially multiple) devices underneath them.  In the future this will
      let us delete merge_bvec_fn and a bunch of other code.
      
      We do this by adding calls to blk_queue_split() to the various
      make_request functions that need it - a few can already handle arbitrary
      size bios. Note that we add the call _after_ any call to
      blk_queue_bounce(); this means that blk_queue_split() and
      blk_recalc_rq_segments() don't need to be concerned with bouncing
      affecting segment merging.
      
      Some make_request_fn() callbacks were simple enough to audit and verify
      they don't need blk_queue_split() calls. The skipped ones are:
      
       * nfhd_make_request (arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c)
       * axon_ram_make_request (arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c)
       * simdisk_make_request (arch/xtensa/platforms/iss/simdisk.c)
       * brd_make_request (ramdisk - drivers/block/brd.c)
       * mtip_submit_request (drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c)
       * loop_make_request
       * null_queue_bio
       * bcache's make_request fns
      
      Some others are almost certainly safe to remove now, but will be left
      for future patches.
      
      Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
      Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
      Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
      Cc: Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
      Cc: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
      Cc: Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>
      Cc: Philip Kelleher <pjk1939@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
      Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
      Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> (for the 'md/md.c' bits)
      Acked-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
      [dpark: skip more mq-based drivers, resolve merge conflicts, etc.]
      Signed-off-by: NDongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net>
      Signed-off-by: NMing Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      54efd50b