- 11 7月, 2014 8 次提交
-
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
For some reason we have assumed NOIDLE was implied by one of the other flags we set. It is not (anymore?). Explicitly set REQ_NOIDLE for synchronous meta data updates, or we can seriously starve random writes when using CFQ. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
This probably does not have any real life impact, but we should first persist any potentially new UUID and other meta data flags, as well as our new role, before we allow/disallow write access. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
This should reduce latency for such in-DRBD-protocol "pings", and may help reduce spurious disconnect/reconnect cycles due to "PingAck did not arrive in time." Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
The conf_update mutex used to be held while clearing the net_conf->discard_my_data flag inside drbd_set_role. It was moved into drbd_adm_set_role with drbd: allow parallel promote/demote actions but then replaced at that location by the newly introduced adm_mutex with drbd: Fix a potential deadlock in drbdsetup, introduce resource->adm_mutex And I simply forgot to put it back in at the original location. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
If we re-write all meta data due to resize, we have open-coded write-out of our meta data super block. Stop the md_sync_timer, it would just trigger scary but in this case spurious "timer expired" messages. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
This fixes one recent regresion, and one long existing bug. The bug: drbd_try_clear_on_disk_bm() assumed that all "count" bits have to be accounted in the resync extent corresponding to the start sector. Since we allow application requests to cross our "extent" boundaries, this assumption is no longer true, resulting in possible misaccounting, scary messages ("BAD! sector=12345s enr=6 rs_left=-7 rs_failed=0 count=58 cstate=..."), and potentially, if the last bit to be cleared during resync would reside in previously misaccounted resync extent, the resync would never be recognized as finished, but would be "stalled" forever, even though all blocks are in sync again and all bits have been cleared... The regression was introduced by drbd: get rid of atomic update on disk bitmap works For an "empty" resync (rs_total == 0), we must not "finish" the resync on the SyncSource before the SyncTarget knows all relevant information (sync uuid). We need to wait for the full round-trip, the SyncTarget will then explicitly notify us. Also for normal, non-empty resyncs (rs_total > 0), the resync-finished condition needs to be tested before the schedule() in wait_for_work, or it is likely to be missed. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
We may implicitly call drbd_send() from inside wait_for_work(), via maybe_send_barrier(). If the "stop" signal was send just before that, drbd_send() would call flush_signals(), and we would run an unbounded schedule() afterwards. Fix: check for thread_state == RUNNING before we schedule() Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Just trigger the occasional lazy bitmap write-out during resync from the central wait_for_work() helper. Previously, during resync, bitmap pages would be written out separately, synchronously, one at a time, at least 8 times each (every 512 bytes worth of bitmap cleared). Now we trigger "merge friendly" bulk write out of all cleared pages every two seconds during resync, and once the resync is finished. Most pages will be written out only once. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Previously, once you disabled flushes as a means of enforcing write-ordering, you'd need to detach/re-attach to enable them again. Allow drbdsetup disk-options to re-enable previously disabled write-ordering policy options at runtime. While at it fix RCU in drbd_bump_write_ordering() max_allowed_wo() uses rcu_dereference, therefore it must be called within rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Reduce the number of calls to first_peer_device(). Instead, call first_peer_device() just once to assign a local variable peer_device. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Instead of dropping and re-aquiring the spinlock around the submit, just remember that we want to submit, and do that only once we have dropped the spinlock for good. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
Since the member of drbd_device is called ldev Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
Some parts of the code assumed that get_ldev_if_state(device, D_ATTACHING) is sufficient to access the ldev member of the device object. That was wrong. ldev may not be there or might be freed at any time if the device has a disk state of D_ATTACHING. bm_rw() Documented that drbd_bm_read() is only called from drbd_adm_attach. drbd_bm_write() is only called when a reference is held, and it is documented that a caller has to hold a reference before calling drbd_bm_write() drbd_bm_write_page() Use get_ldev() instead of get_ldev_if_state(device, D_ATTACHING) drbd_bmio_set_n_write() No longer use get_ldev_if_state(device, D_ATTACHING). All callers hold a reference to ldev now. drbd_bmio_clear_n_write() All callers where holding a reference of ldev anyways. Remove the misleading get_ldev_if_state(device, D_ATTACHING) drbd_reconsider_max_bio_size() Removed the get_ldev_if_state(device, D_ATTACHING). All callers now pass a struct drbd_backing_dev* when they have a proper reference, or a NULL pointer. Before this fix, the receiver could trigger a NULL pointer deref when in drbd_reconsider_max_bio_size() drbd_bump_write_ordering() Used get_ldev_if_state(device, D_ATTACHING) with the wrong assumption. Remove it, and allow the caller to pass in a struct drbd_backing_dev* when the caller knows that accessing this bdev is safe. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Discards don't have any payload. But the scsi layer still expects a bio_vec it can use internally, see sd_setup_discard_cmnd() and blk_add_request_payload(). Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 01 5月, 2014 24 次提交
-
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
If there are no peer_devices or connections, I'd rather have NULL than some "arbitrary" address pretending to point to a struct. Helps to avoid hard to debug symptoms, in case we ever try to use and dereference a drbd_connection or drbd_peer_device where we in fact don't have any connection at all. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
A newly created device was never exposed before, i.e. has a exposed_data_uuid of 0. Then it is valid to attach to any current_uuid of a backing device (of course also to a newly created one (4)) Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
In case a connection transitions into C_TIMEOUT within the timer function (request_timer_fn()) we need to make sure that the receiver thread (potentially running on a different CPU) sees the updated cstate later on. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
...instead directly assigning to q->limits.discard_zeroes_data Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Just because it is the oldest not yet completed request does not make it the oldest request waiting for disk. Or waiting for the peer. And we completely missed already completed requests that would still hold references to activity log extents, waiting only for the barrier ack. Find two oldest not yet completely processed requests, one that is still waiting for local completion, and one that is still waiting for some response from the peer. These may or may not be the same request object. Then separately apply the network and disk timeouts, respectively. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
In the implementation as it was, the two peers sent each other a challenge, and expects the challenge hashed with the shared secret back. A attacker could simply wait for the challenge of the peer, and send the same challenge back. Then it waits for the response, and sends the same response back. Prevent this by not accepting a challenge from the peer that is the same as the challenge sent to the peer. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Once our sender thread needs to wait_for_work(), and actually needs to schedule(), just before we do that, we already check if it is useful to implicitly close the last epoch. The condition was too strict: only implicitly close the epoch, if there have been no new (write) requests at all. The assumption was that if there were new requests, they would always be communicated one way or another, and would send necessary epoch separating barriers explicitly. This is not always true, e.g. when becoming diskless, or while explicitly starting a full resync. The last communicated epoch could stay open for a long time, locking down corresponding activity log extents. It is safe to always implicitly send that last barrier, as soon as we determin that there cannot be more requests in the last communicated epoch, even if there have been (uncommunicated) new requests in new epochs meanwhile. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
When batching more updates to the activity log into single transactions, we lost the ability for new requests to force themselves into the active set: all preparation steps became non-blocking, and if all currently hot extents keep busy, they could starve out new incoming requests to cold extents for quite a while. This can only happen if your IO backend accepts more IO operations per average DRBD replication round trip time than you have al-extents configured. If we have incoming requests to cold extents, at least do one blocking update per transaction. In an artificial worst-case workload on SSD with an asynchronous 600 ms replication link, with al-extents = 7 (the minimum we allow), and concurrent full resynch, without this patch, some write requests have been observed to be starved for 40 seconds. With this patch, application observed a worst case latency of twice the replication round trip time. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
We want to store in persistent meta data what the peer DRBD can handle, which, due to spreading requests to multiple bios, may be more than its backing device can handle. Otherwise, if a disconnected Primary temporarily loses access to its local data as well, we may accidentally shrink the max-bio setting, portentially causing already assembled, but not yet processed, application bios to be spuriously failed due to device limits. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
In the drbd make request function, specifically in drbd_send_and_submit(), we decide whether we want to send the actual write request, or only a "set this block out of sync" information. We do so based on the current connection state, while holding the req_lock. The connection state is not supposed to change while holding the req_lock. But in drbd_start_resync, we did change that state anyways, while only holding the global_state_lock, which is enough to change sync-after dependencies (paused vs active resync), but not good enough to change the connection state. Fix: in drbd_start_resync, first grab the req_lock to serialize with drbd_send_and_submit(), before grabbing the global_state_lock to be able to evaluate the sync-after dependencies. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Allow the user of REQ_DISCARD. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Note that I do NOT call __drbd_chk_io_error for failed REQ_DISCARD. That may be wrong, though, or needs to differ between EOPNOTSUPP and other errors... Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
If the receiver needs to serve a discard request on a queue that does not announce to be discard cabable, it falls back to do synchronous blkdev_issue_zeroout(). We expect only "reasonably" large (up to one activity log extent?) discard requests. We do this to not to not block the receiver for too long in this fallback code path, and to not set/clear too many bits inside one spinlock_irq_save() in drbd_set_in_sync/drbd_set_out_of_sync, Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
We plan to use genl_family->parallel_ops = true in the future, but need to review all possible interactions first. For now, only selectively drop genl_lock() in drbd_set_role(), instead serializing on our own internal resource->conf_update mutex. We now can be promoted/demoted on many resources in parallel, which may significantly improve cluster failover times when fencing is required. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Because all administrative requests via genetlink have been globally serialized via genl_lock(), we used to have one static struct drbd_config_context "admin context". Move this on-stack to the respective callback functions. This will allow us to selectively drop the genl_lock() (or use genl_family->parallel_ops) in the future. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
When a 'cluster wide' disconnect executes, the result comes back from the peer, and immediately after that the connection breaks then _conn_rq_cond() reported back SS_CW_SUCCESS. Therefore _conn_request_state() calls conn_set_state(), which has a BUG() in it. The BUG() is hit because conn_is_valid_transition() does not like the transaction. Which goes back to is_valid_soft_transition() returning SS_OUTDATE_WO_CONN. This fix is to consider an error reported by is_valid_soft_transition() even when the peer agreed to the transaction. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
Before, application IO could pre-empt resync activity for up to hardcoded 20 seconds per resync request. A very busy server could throttle the effective resync bandwidth down to one request per 20 seconds. Now, we only let application IO pre-empt resync traffic while the current resync rate estimate is above c-min-rate. If you disable the c-min-rate throttle feature (set c-min-rate = 0), application IO will no longer pre-empt resync traffic at all. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
If max-buffers and socket buffer sizes are "too small" for the chosen resync rate, this could lead potentially lead to a distributed deadlock, which may or may not resolve itself via the "ko-count" and request timeout mechanism, or could be resolved by forced disconnect. One option to deal with this is proper configuration: use larger max-buffer and socket buffers settings, or reduce the resync rate. But even with bad configuration we should not deadlock, but "gracefully" recover. The issue is avoided by using only up to max-buffers/2 for resync requests, and by using max-buffers not as a hard limit for data buffer allocations, but as a throttle threshold only. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
While merging adjacent dirty blocks into resync requests, the resync rate throttle was disregarded. For very low resync rates, the effective rate may have exceeded the intended rate by a larger margin. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Lars Ellenberg 提交于
If we don't make resync or verify progress for "too long", we want to flag it as "stalled". Since 2010, "use rolling marks for resync speed calculation" this "too long" was wrong by a factor of HZ. With HZ 250, it would have been flagged as stalled after 100 minutes. Hardcode 3 minutes instead. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
If a user forces the operation he takes the blame in case the peer does not have enough space. No reason to dey this... Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
Actually we are clearing the susp_fen flag if we are not going to call a fencing handler. For setting the susp_fen flag needs to be edge-triggerd, and not level triggered. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
由 Philipp Reisner 提交于
When we need to outdate the peer while being promoted to primary, and the connection gets established at the same time, we deadlock in drbd_try_outdate_peer() when trying to clear the susp_fen bit. Fix this by setting the STATE_SENT bit while holding the mutex. Using drbd_change_state(.. , CS_HARD, ..) which does not block until STATE_SENT is cleared, is only for clearness. It does not contribute anything to the fix. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 02 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-