1. 28 6月, 2019 1 次提交
    • D
      keys: Replace uid/gid/perm permissions checking with an ACL · 2e12256b
      David Howells 提交于
      Replace the uid/gid/perm permissions checking on a key with an ACL to allow
      the SETATTR and SEARCH permissions to be split.  This will also allow a
      greater range of subjects to represented.
      
      ============
      WHY DO THIS?
      ============
      
      The problem is that SETATTR and SEARCH cover a slew of actions, not all of
      which should be grouped together.
      
      For SETATTR, this includes actions that are about controlling access to a
      key:
      
       (1) Changing a key's ownership.
      
       (2) Changing a key's security information.
      
       (3) Setting a keyring's restriction.
      
      And actions that are about managing a key's lifetime:
      
       (4) Setting an expiry time.
      
       (5) Revoking a key.
      
      and (proposed) managing a key as part of a cache:
      
       (6) Invalidating a key.
      
      Managing a key's lifetime doesn't really have anything to do with
      controlling access to that key.
      
      Expiry time is awkward since it's more about the lifetime of the content
      and so, in some ways goes better with WRITE permission.  It can, however,
      be set unconditionally by a process with an appropriate authorisation token
      for instantiating a key, and can also be set by the key type driver when a
      key is instantiated, so lumping it with the access-controlling actions is
      probably okay.
      
      As for SEARCH permission, that currently covers:
      
       (1) Finding keys in a keyring tree during a search.
      
       (2) Permitting keyrings to be joined.
      
       (3) Invalidation.
      
      But these don't really belong together either, since these actions really
      need to be controlled separately.
      
      Finally, there are number of special cases to do with granting the
      administrator special rights to invalidate or clear keys that I would like
      to handle with the ACL rather than key flags and special checks.
      
      
      ===============
      WHAT IS CHANGED
      ===============
      
      The SETATTR permission is split to create two new permissions:
      
       (1) SET_SECURITY - which allows the key's owner, group and ACL to be
           changed and a restriction to be placed on a keyring.
      
       (2) REVOKE - which allows a key to be revoked.
      
      The SEARCH permission is split to create:
      
       (1) SEARCH - which allows a keyring to be search and a key to be found.
      
       (2) JOIN - which allows a keyring to be joined as a session keyring.
      
       (3) INVAL - which allows a key to be invalidated.
      
      The WRITE permission is also split to create:
      
       (1) WRITE - which allows a key's content to be altered and links to be
           added, removed and replaced in a keyring.
      
       (2) CLEAR - which allows a keyring to be cleared completely.  This is
           split out to make it possible to give just this to an administrator.
      
       (3) REVOKE - see above.
      
      
      Keys acquire ACLs which consist of a series of ACEs, and all that apply are
      unioned together.  An ACE specifies a subject, such as:
      
       (*) Possessor - permitted to anyone who 'possesses' a key
       (*) Owner - permitted to the key owner
       (*) Group - permitted to the key group
       (*) Everyone - permitted to everyone
      
      Note that 'Other' has been replaced with 'Everyone' on the assumption that
      you wouldn't grant a permit to 'Other' that you wouldn't also grant to
      everyone else.
      
      Further subjects may be made available by later patches.
      
      The ACE also specifies a permissions mask.  The set of permissions is now:
      
      	VIEW		Can view the key metadata
      	READ		Can read the key content
      	WRITE		Can update/modify the key content
      	SEARCH		Can find the key by searching/requesting
      	LINK		Can make a link to the key
      	SET_SECURITY	Can change owner, ACL, expiry
      	INVAL		Can invalidate
      	REVOKE		Can revoke
      	JOIN		Can join this keyring
      	CLEAR		Can clear this keyring
      
      
      The KEYCTL_SETPERM function is then deprecated.
      
      The KEYCTL_SET_TIMEOUT function then is permitted if SET_SECURITY is set,
      or if the caller has a valid instantiation auth token.
      
      The KEYCTL_INVALIDATE function then requires INVAL.
      
      The KEYCTL_REVOKE function then requires REVOKE.
      
      The KEYCTL_JOIN_SESSION_KEYRING function then requires JOIN to join an
      existing keyring.
      
      The JOIN permission is enabled by default for session keyrings and manually
      created keyrings only.
      
      
      ======================
      BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY
      ======================
      
      To maintain backward compatibility, KEYCTL_SETPERM will translate the
      permissions mask it is given into a new ACL for a key - unless
      KEYCTL_SET_ACL has been called on that key, in which case an error will be
      returned.
      
      It will convert possessor, owner, group and other permissions into separate
      ACEs, if each portion of the mask is non-zero.
      
      SETATTR permission turns on all of INVAL, REVOKE and SET_SECURITY.  WRITE
      permission turns on WRITE, REVOKE and, if a keyring, CLEAR.  JOIN is turned
      on if a keyring is being altered.
      
      The KEYCTL_DESCRIBE function translates the ACL back into a permissions
      mask to return depending on possessor, owner, group and everyone ACEs.
      
      It will make the following mappings:
      
       (1) INVAL, JOIN -> SEARCH
      
       (2) SET_SECURITY -> SETATTR
      
       (3) REVOKE -> WRITE if SETATTR isn't already set
      
       (4) CLEAR -> WRITE
      
      Note that the value subsequently returned by KEYCTL_DESCRIBE may not match
      the value set with KEYCTL_SETATTR.
      
      
      =======
      TESTING
      =======
      
      This passes the keyutils testsuite for all but a couple of tests:
      
       (1) tests/keyctl/dh_compute/badargs: The first wrong-key-type test now
           returns EOPNOTSUPP rather than ENOKEY as READ permission isn't removed
           if the type doesn't have ->read().  You still can't actually read the
           key.
      
       (2) tests/keyctl/permitting/valid: The view-other-permissions test doesn't
           work as Other has been replaced with Everyone in the ACL.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      2e12256b
  2. 01 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 30 4月, 2019 1 次提交
    • T
      smack: Check address length before reading address family · b9ef5513
      Tetsuo Handa 提交于
      KMSAN will complain if valid address length passed to bind()/connect()/
      sendmsg() is shorter than sizeof("struct sockaddr"->sa_family) bytes.
      
      Also, since smk_ipv6_port_label()/smack_netlabel_send()/
      smack_ipv6host_label()/smk_ipv6_check()/smk_ipv6_port_check() are not
      checking valid address length and/or address family, make sure we check
      both. The minimal valid length in smack_socket_connect() is changed from
      sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6) bytes to SIN6_LEN_RFC2133 bytes, for it seems
      that Smack is not using "struct sockaddr_in6"->sin6_scope_id field.
      Signed-off-by: NTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      b9ef5513
  4. 04 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 03 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  6. 28 2月, 2019 2 次提交
  7. 23 2月, 2019 1 次提交
    • G
      security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break · 09186e50
      Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
      In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
      cases where we are expecting to fall through.
      
      This patch fixes the following warnings:
      
      security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c:85:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:940:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:943:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:972:21: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:974:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      security/smack/smack_lsm.c:3391:9: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      security/apparmor/domain.c:569:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      
      Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
      
      Also, add a missing break statement to fix the following warning:
      
      security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:116:26: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      Acked-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
      Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      Acked-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
      09186e50
  8. 01 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 19 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  10. 09 1月, 2019 11 次提交
  11. 22 12月, 2018 10 次提交
  12. 04 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • Z
      smack: fix access permissions for keyring · 5b841bfa
      Zoran Markovic 提交于
      Function smack_key_permission() only issues smack requests for the
      following operations:
       - KEY_NEED_READ (issues MAY_READ)
       - KEY_NEED_WRITE (issues MAY_WRITE)
       - KEY_NEED_LINK (issues MAY_WRITE)
       - KEY_NEED_SETATTR (issues MAY_WRITE)
      A blank smack request is issued in all other cases, resulting in
      smack access being granted if there is any rule defined between
      subject and object, or denied with -EACCES otherwise.
      
      Request MAY_READ access for KEY_NEED_SEARCH and KEY_NEED_VIEW.
      Fix the logic in the unlikely case when both MAY_READ and
      MAY_WRITE are needed. Validate access permission field for valid
      contents.
      Signed-off-by: NZoran Markovic <zmarkovic@sierrawireless.com>
      Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
      5b841bfa
  13. 11 10月, 2018 2 次提交
  14. 03 10月, 2018 1 次提交
    • E
      signal: Distinguish between kernel_siginfo and siginfo · ae7795bc
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      Linus recently observed that if we did not worry about the padding
      member in struct siginfo it is only about 48 bytes, and 48 bytes is
      much nicer than 128 bytes for allocating on the stack and copying
      around in the kernel.
      
      The obvious thing of only adding the padding when userspace is
      including siginfo.h won't work as there are sigframe definitions in
      the kernel that embed struct siginfo.
      
      So split siginfo in two; kernel_siginfo and siginfo.  Keeping the
      traditional name for the userspace definition.  While the version that
      is used internally to the kernel and ultimately will not be padded to
      128 bytes is called kernel_siginfo.
      
      The definition of struct kernel_siginfo I have put in include/signal_types.h
      
      A set of buildtime checks has been added to verify the two structures have
      the same field offsets.
      
      To make it easy to verify the change kernel_siginfo retains the same
      size as siginfo.  The reduction in size comes in a following change.
      Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      ae7795bc
  15. 19 9月, 2018 2 次提交
  16. 24 7月, 2018 3 次提交