- 12 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The macro btrfs_std_error got renamed to btrfs_handle_fs_error in an independent branch for the same merge target (4.7). To make the code compilable for bisectability reasons, add a temporary stub. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Current btrfs qgroup design implies a requirement that after calling btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() there must be a commit root switch. Normally this is OK, as btrfs_qgroup_accounting_extents() is only called inside btrfs_commit_transaction() just be commit_cowonly_roots(). However there is a exception at create_pending_snapshot(), which will call btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() but no any commit root switch. In case of creating a snapshot whose parent root is itself (create a snapshot of fs tree), it will corrupt qgroup by the following trace: (skipped unrelated data) ====== btrfs_qgroup_account_extent: bytenr = 29786112, num_bytes = 16384, nr_old_roots = 0, nr_new_roots = 1 qgroup_update_counters: qgid = 5, cur_old_count = 0, cur_new_count = 1, rfer = 0, excl = 0 qgroup_update_counters: qgid = 5, cur_old_count = 0, cur_new_count = 1, rfer = 16384, excl = 16384 btrfs_qgroup_account_extent: bytenr = 29786112, num_bytes = 16384, nr_old_roots = 0, nr_new_roots = 0 ====== The problem here is in first qgroup_account_extent(), the nr_new_roots of the extent is 1, which means its reference got increased, and qgroup increased its rfer and excl. But at second qgroup_account_extent(), its reference got decreased, but between these two qgroup_account_extent(), there is no switch roots. This leads to the same nr_old_roots, and this extent just got ignored by qgroup, which means this extent is wrongly accounted. Fix it by call commit_cowonly_roots() after qgroup_account_extent() in create_pending_snapshot(), with needed preparation. Mark: I added a check at the top of qgroup_account_snapshot() to skip this code if qgroups are turned off. xfstest btrfs/122 exposes this problem. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 10 5月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Stehlé 提交于
Make sure to deallocate fspath with vfree() in case of error in init_ipath(). fspath is allocated with vmalloc() in init_data_container() since commit 425d17a2 ("Btrfs: use larger limit for translation of logical to inode"). Signed-off-by: NVincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Be verbose if there are no workspaces at all, ie. the module init time preallocation failed. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
With just one preallocated workspace we can guarantee forward progress even if there's no memory available for new workspaces. The cost is more waiting but we also get rid of several error paths. On average, there will be several idle workspaces, so the waiting penalty won't be so bad. In the worst case, all cpus will compete for one workspace until there's some memory. Attempts to allocate a new one are done each time the waiters are woken up. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Preallocate one workspace for each compression type so we can guarantee forward progress in the worst case. A failure cannot be a hard error as we might not use compression at all on the filesystem. If we can't allocate the workspaces later when need them, it might actually deadlock, but in such situation the system has effectively not enough memory to operate properly. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The names are confusing, pick more fitting names and add comments. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 09 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Borowski 提交于
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4623:21 signed integer overflow: 10808 * 262144 cannot be represented in type 'int [8]' If 8192<=items<16384, we request a writeback of an insane number of pages which is benign (everything will be written). But if items>=16384, the space reservation won't be enough. Signed-off-by: NAdam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2016 23 次提交
-
-
由 Zygo Blaxell 提交于
During a mount, we start the cleaner kthread first because the transaction kthread wants to wake up the cleaner kthread. We start the transaction kthread next because everything in btrfs wants transactions. We do reloc recovery in the thread that was doing the original mount call once the transaction kthread is running. This means that the cleaner kthread could already be running when reloc recovery happens (e.g. if a snapshot delete was started before a crash). Relocation does not play well with the cleaner kthread, so a mutex was added in commit 5f316481 "Btrfs: fix race between balance recovery and root deletion" to prevent both from being active at the same time. If the cleaner kthread is already holding the mutex by the time we get to btrfs_recover_relocation, the mount will be blocked until at least one deleted subvolume is cleaned (possibly more if the mount process doesn't get the lock right away). During this time (which could be an arbitrarily long time on a large/slow filesystem), the mount process is stuck and the filesystem is unnecessarily inaccessible. Fix this by locking cleaner_mutex before we start cleaner_kthread, and unlocking the mutex after mount no longer requires it. This ensures that the mounting process will not be blocked by the cleaner kthread. The cleaner kthread is already prepared for mutex contention and will just go to sleep until the mutex is available. Signed-off-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Move the op exclusivity check before the other code (same as in ADD_DEV). Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Perform the want_write check if we get far enough to do any writes. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Move scratch super outside of the chunk lock to avoid below lockdep warning. The better place to scratch super is in the function btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev() just before free_device, which is outside of the chunk lock as well. To reproduce: (fresh boot) mkfs.btrfs -f -draid5 -mraid5 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde mount /dev/sdc /btrfs dd if=/dev/zero of=/btrfs/tf1 bs=4096 count=100 (get devmgt from https://github.com/asj/devmgt.git) devmgt detach /dev/sde dd if=/dev/zero of=/btrfs/tf1 bs=4096 count=100 sync btrfs replace start -Brf 3 /dev/sdf /btrfs <-- devmgt attach host7 ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 4.6.0-rc2asj+ #1 Not tainted --------------------------------------------------- btrfs/2174 is trying to acquire lock: (sb_writers){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff812449b4>] __sb_start_write+0xb4/0xf0 but task is already holding lock: (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa05c5f55>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x145/0x980 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. Chain exists of: sb_writers --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(sb_writers); *** DEADLOCK *** -> #0 (sb_writers){.+.+.+}: [<ffffffff810e6415>] __lock_acquire+0x1bc5/0x1ee0 [<ffffffff810e707e>] lock_acquire+0xbe/0x210 [<ffffffff810df49a>] percpu_down_read+0x4a/0xa0 [<ffffffff812449b4>] __sb_start_write+0xb4/0xf0 [<ffffffff81265534>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x50 [<ffffffff812508a2>] path_openat+0x952/0x1190 [<ffffffff81252451>] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 [<ffffffff8123f5cc>] file_open_name+0xfc/0x140 [<ffffffff8123f643>] filp_open+0x33/0x60 [<ffffffffa0572bb6>] update_dev_time+0x16/0x40 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa057f60d>] btrfs_scratch_superblocks+0x5d/0xb0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa057f70e>] btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev+0xae/0xd0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa05c62c5>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x4b5/0x980 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa05c6ae8>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x358/0x530 [btrfs] Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Ashish Samant 提交于
pagev array in scrub_block{} is of size SCRUB_MAX_PAGES_PER_BLOCK. page_index should be checked with the same to trigger BUG_ON(). Signed-off-by: NAshish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
btrfs_map_block can go horribly wrong in the face of fs corruption, lets agree to not be assholes and panic at any possible chance things are all fucked up. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> [ removed type casts ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The struct 'map_lookup' uses type int for @stripe_len, while btrfs_chunk_stripe_len() can return a u64 value, and it may end up with @stripe_len being undefined value and it can lead to 'divide error' in __btrfs_map_block(). This changes 'map_lookup' to use type u64 for stripe_len, also right now we only use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN for stripe_len, so this adds a valid checker for BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN. Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Reported-by: NQuentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ folded division fix to scrub_raid56_parity ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
If the label setting ioctl races with sysfs label handler, we could get mixed result in the output, part old part new. We should either get the old or new label. The chances to hit this race are low. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Add a sanity check for the fs_info as we will dereference it, similar to what the 'store features' handler does. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We don't want to trigger the change on a read-only filesystem, similar to what the label handler does. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The key variable occupies 17 bytes, the key_start is used once, we can simply reuse existing 'key' for that purpose. As the key is not a simple type, compiler doest not do it on itself. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The size of root item is more than 400 bytes, which is quite a lot of stack space. As we do IO from inside the subvolume ioctls, we should keep the stack usage low in case the filesystem is on top of other layers (NFS, device mapper, iscsi, etc). Reviewed-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We're going to use the argument multiple times later. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
When the replace target fails, the target device will be taken out of fs device list, scratch + update_dev_time and freed. However we could do the scratch + update_dev_time and free part after the device has been taken out of device list, so that we don't have to hold the device_list_mutex and uuid_mutex locks. Reported issue: [ 5375.718845] ====================================================== [ 5375.718846] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 5375.718849] 4.4.5-scst31x-debug-11+ #40 Not tainted [ 5375.718849] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 5375.718851] btrfs-health/4662 is trying to acquire lock: [ 5375.718861] (sb_writers){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff812214f7>] __sb_start_write+0xb7/0xf0 [ 5375.718862] [ 5375.718862] but task is already holding lock: [ 5375.718907] (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa028263c>] btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev+0x3c/0x150 [btrfs] [ 5375.718907] [ 5375.718907] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 5375.718907] [ 5375.718908] [ 5375.718908] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 5375.718911] [ 5375.718911] -> #3 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.+.}: [ 5375.718917] [<ffffffff810da4be>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1e0 [ 5375.718921] [<ffffffff81633949>] mutex_lock_nested+0x69/0x3c0 [ 5375.718940] [<ffffffffa0219bf6>] btrfs_show_devname+0x36/0x210 [btrfs] [ 5375.718945] [<ffffffff81267079>] show_vfsmnt+0x49/0x150 [ 5375.718948] [<ffffffff81240b07>] m_show+0x17/0x20 [ 5375.718951] [<ffffffff81246868>] seq_read+0x2d8/0x3b0 [ 5375.718955] [<ffffffff8121df28>] __vfs_read+0x28/0xd0 [ 5375.718959] [<ffffffff8121e806>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 [ 5375.718962] [<ffffffff8121f4c9>] SyS_read+0x49/0xa0 [ 5375.718966] [<ffffffff81637976>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a [ 5375.718968] [ 5375.718968] -> #2 (namespace_sem){+++++.}: [ 5375.718971] [<ffffffff810da4be>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1e0 [ 5375.718974] [<ffffffff81635199>] down_write+0x49/0x80 [ 5375.718977] [<ffffffff81243593>] lock_mount+0x43/0x1c0 [ 5375.718979] [<ffffffff81243c13>] do_add_mount+0x23/0xd0 [ 5375.718982] [<ffffffff81244afb>] do_mount+0x27b/0xe30 [ 5375.718985] [<ffffffff812459dc>] SyS_mount+0x8c/0xd0 [ 5375.718988] [<ffffffff81637976>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a [ 5375.718991] [ 5375.718991] -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){+.+.+.}: [ 5375.718994] [<ffffffff810da4be>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1e0 [ 5375.718996] [<ffffffff81633949>] mutex_lock_nested+0x69/0x3c0 [ 5375.719001] [<ffffffff8122d608>] path_openat+0x468/0x1360 [ 5375.719004] [<ffffffff8122f86e>] do_filp_open+0x7e/0xe0 [ 5375.719007] [<ffffffff8121da7b>] do_sys_open+0x12b/0x210 [ 5375.719010] [<ffffffff8121db7e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20 [ 5375.719013] [<ffffffff81637976>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a [ 5375.719015] [ 5375.719015] -> #0 (sb_writers){.+.+.+}: [ 5375.719018] [<ffffffff810d97ca>] __lock_acquire+0x17ba/0x1ae0 [ 5375.719021] [<ffffffff810da4be>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1e0 [ 5375.719026] [<ffffffff810d3bef>] percpu_down_read+0x4f/0xa0 [ 5375.719028] [<ffffffff812214f7>] __sb_start_write+0xb7/0xf0 [ 5375.719031] [<ffffffff81242eb4>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x50 [ 5375.719035] [<ffffffff8122ded2>] path_openat+0xd32/0x1360 [ 5375.719037] [<ffffffff8122f86e>] do_filp_open+0x7e/0xe0 [ 5375.719040] [<ffffffff8121d8a4>] file_open_name+0xe4/0x130 [ 5375.719043] [<ffffffff8121d923>] filp_open+0x33/0x60 [ 5375.719073] [<ffffffffa02776a6>] update_dev_time+0x16/0x40 [btrfs] [ 5375.719099] [<ffffffffa02825be>] btrfs_scratch_superblocks+0x4e/0x90 [btrfs] [ 5375.719123] [<ffffffffa0282665>] btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev+0x65/0x150 [btrfs] [ 5375.719150] [<ffffffffa02c6c80>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6b0/0x990 [btrfs] [ 5375.719175] [<ffffffffa02c729e>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x33e/0x540 [btrfs] [ 5375.719199] [<ffffffffa02c7f58>] btrfs_auto_replace_start+0xf8/0x140 [btrfs] [ 5375.719222] [<ffffffffa02464e6>] health_kthread+0x246/0x490 [btrfs] [ 5375.719225] [<ffffffff810a70df>] kthread+0xef/0x110 [ 5375.719229] [<ffffffff81637d2f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 [ 5375.719230] [ 5375.719230] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5375.719230] [ 5375.719233] Chain exists of: [ 5375.719233] sb_writers --> namespace_sem --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex [ 5375.719233] [ 5375.719234] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 5375.719234] [ 5375.719234] CPU0 CPU1 [ 5375.719235] ---- ---- [ 5375.719236] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 5375.719238] lock(namespace_sem); [ 5375.719239] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 5375.719241] lock(sb_writers); [ 5375.719241] [ 5375.719241] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 5375.719241] [ 5375.719243] 4 locks held by btrfs-health/4662: [ 5375.719266] #0: (&fs_info->health_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0246303>] health_kthread+0x63/0x490 [btrfs] [ 5375.719293] #1: (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa02c6611>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x41/0x990 [btrfs] [ 5375.719319] #2: (uuid_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0282620>] btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev+0x20/0x150 [btrfs] [ 5375.719343] #3: (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa028263c>] btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev+0x3c/0x150 [btrfs] [ 5375.719343] [ 5375.719343] stack backtrace: [ 5375.719347] CPU: 2 PID: 4662 Comm: btrfs-health Not tainted 4.4.5-scst31x-debug-11+ #40 [ 5375.719348] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-6018R-WTRT/X10DRW-iT, BIOS 1.0c 01/07/2015 [ 5375.719352] 0000000000000000 ffff880856f73880 ffffffff813529e3 ffffffff826182a0 [ 5375.719354] ffffffff8260c090 ffff880856f738c0 ffffffff810d667c ffff880856f73930 [ 5375.719357] ffff880861f32b40 ffff880861f32b68 0000000000000003 0000000000000004 [ 5375.719357] Call Trace: [ 5375.719363] [<ffffffff813529e3>] dump_stack+0x85/0xc2 [ 5375.719366] [<ffffffff810d667c>] print_circular_bug+0x1ec/0x260 [ 5375.719369] [<ffffffff810d97ca>] __lock_acquire+0x17ba/0x1ae0 [ 5375.719373] [<ffffffff810f606d>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20 [ 5375.719376] [<ffffffff810da4be>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x1e0 [ 5375.719378] [<ffffffff812214f7>] ? __sb_start_write+0xb7/0xf0 [ 5375.719383] [<ffffffff810d3bef>] percpu_down_read+0x4f/0xa0 [ 5375.719385] [<ffffffff812214f7>] ? __sb_start_write+0xb7/0xf0 [ 5375.719387] [<ffffffff812214f7>] __sb_start_write+0xb7/0xf0 [ 5375.719389] [<ffffffff81242eb4>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x50 [ 5375.719393] [<ffffffff8122ded2>] path_openat+0xd32/0x1360 [ 5375.719415] [<ffffffffa02462a0>] ? btrfs_congested_fn+0x180/0x180 [btrfs] [ 5375.719418] [<ffffffff810f606d>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20 [ 5375.719420] [<ffffffff8122f86e>] do_filp_open+0x7e/0xe0 [ 5375.719423] [<ffffffff810f615d>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6d/0x80 [ 5375.719426] [<ffffffff81201a9b>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x26b/0x5d0 [ 5375.719430] [<ffffffff8122e7d4>] ? getname_kernel+0x34/0x120 [ 5375.719433] [<ffffffff8121d8a4>] file_open_name+0xe4/0x130 [ 5375.719436] [<ffffffff8121d923>] filp_open+0x33/0x60 [ 5375.719462] [<ffffffffa02776a6>] update_dev_time+0x16/0x40 [btrfs] [ 5375.719485] [<ffffffffa02825be>] btrfs_scratch_superblocks+0x4e/0x90 [btrfs] [ 5375.719506] [<ffffffffa0282665>] btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev+0x65/0x150 [btrfs] [ 5375.719530] [<ffffffffa02c6c80>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6b0/0x990 [btrfs] [ 5375.719554] [<ffffffffa02c6b23>] ? btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x553/0x990 [btrfs] [ 5375.719576] [<ffffffffa02c729e>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x33e/0x540 [btrfs] [ 5375.719598] [<ffffffffa02c7f58>] btrfs_auto_replace_start+0xf8/0x140 [btrfs] [ 5375.719621] [<ffffffffa02464e6>] health_kthread+0x246/0x490 [btrfs] [ 5375.719641] [<ffffffffa02463d8>] ? health_kthread+0x138/0x490 [btrfs] [ 5375.719661] [<ffffffffa02462a0>] ? btrfs_congested_fn+0x180/0x180 [btrfs] [ 5375.719663] [<ffffffff810a70df>] kthread+0xef/0x110 [ 5375.719666] [<ffffffff810a6ff0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x200/0x200 [ 5375.719669] [<ffffffff81637d2f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 [ 5375.719672] [<ffffffff810a6ff0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x200/0x200 [ 5375.719697] ------------[ cut here ]------------ Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reported-by: NYauhen Kharuzhy <yauhen.kharuzhy@zavadatar.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
The "sizeof(*arg->clone_sources) * arg->clone_sources_count" expression can overflow. It causes several static checker warnings. It's all under CAP_SYS_ADMIN so it's not that serious but lets silence the warnings. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Luis de Bethencourt 提交于
Since mixed block groups accounting isn't byte-accurate and f_bree is an unsigned integer, it could overflow. Avoid this. Signed-off-by: NLuis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com> Suggested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Luis de Bethencourt 提交于
Metadata for mixed block is already accounted in total data and should not be counted as part of the free metadata space. Signed-off-by: NLuis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114281Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Austin S. Hemmelgarn 提交于
Currently, we don't allow the user to try and rebalance to a dup profile on a multi-device filesystem. In most cases, this is a perfectly sensible restriction as raid1 uses the same amount of space and provides better protection. However, when reshaping a multi-device filesystem down to a single device filesystem, this requires the user to convert metadata and system chunks to single profile before deleting devices, and then convert again to dup, which leaves a period of time where metadata integrity is reduced. This patch removes the single-device-only restriction from converting to dup profile to remove this potential data integrity reduction. Signed-off-by: NAustin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 28 4月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Now we force to create empty block group to keep data profile alive, however, in the below example, we eventually get an empty block group while we're trying to get more space for other types (metadata/system), - Before, block group "A": size=2G, used=1.2G block group "B": size=2G, used=512M - After "btrfs balance start -dusage=50 mount_point", block group "A": size=2G, used=(1.2+0.5)G block group "C": size=2G, used=0 Since there is no data in block group C, it won't be deleted automatically and we have to get the unused 2G until the next mount. Balance itself just moves data and doesn't remove data, so it's safe to not create such a empty block group if we already have data allocated in other block groups. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Chandan Rajendra 提交于
The delalloc reserved space is calculated in terms of number of bytes used by an integral number of blocks. This is done by rounding down the value of 'pos' to the nearest multiple of sectorsize. The file offset value held by 'pos' variable may not be aligned to sectorsize and hence when passing it as an argument to btrfs_delalloc_release_space(), we may end up releasing larger delalloc space than we originally had reserved. Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Now that we bail out immediately if ->writepage() returns an error, we don't need an extra error to retain the error code. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
If sequential writer is writing in the middle of the page and it just redirties the last written page by continuing from it. In the above case this can end up with seeking back to that firstly redirtied page after writing all the pages at the end of file because btrfs updates mapping->writeback_index to 1 past the current one. For non-cow filesystems, the cost is only about extra seek, while for cow filesystems such as btrfs, it means unnecessary fragments. To avoid it, we just need to continue writeback from the last written page. This also updates btrfs to behave like what write_cache_pages() does, ie, bail out immediately if there is an error in writepage(). <Ref: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg52628.html> Reported-by: NHolger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Luke Dashjr 提交于
32-bit ioctl uses these rather than the regular FS_IOC_* versions. They can be handled in btrfs using the same code. Without this, 32-bit {ch,ls}attr fail. Signed-off-by: NLuke Dashjr <luke-jr+git@utopios.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 07 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we rename an inode A (be it a file or a directory), create a new inode B with the old name of inode A and under the same parent directory, fsync inode B and then power fail, at log tree replay time we end up removing inode A completely. If inode A is a directory then all its files are gone too. Example scenarios where this happens: This is reproducible with the following steps, taken from a couple of test cases written for fstests which are going to be submitted upstream soon: # Scenario 1 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc mount /dev/sdc /mnt mkdir -p /mnt/a/x echo "hello" > /mnt/a/x/foo echo "world" > /mnt/a/x/bar sync mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y mkdir /mnt/a/x xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/a/x <power failure happens> The next time the fs is mounted, log tree replay happens and the directory "y" does not exist nor do the files "foo" and "bar" exist anywhere (neither in "y" nor in "x", nor the root nor anywhere). # Scenario 2 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc mount /dev/sdc /mnt mkdir /mnt/a echo "hello" > /mnt/a/foo sync mv /mnt/a/foo /mnt/a/bar echo "world" > /mnt/a/foo xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/a/foo <power failure happens> The next time the fs is mounted, log tree replay happens and the file "bar" does not exists anymore. A file with the name "foo" exists and it matches the second file we created. Another related problem that does not involve file/data loss is when a new inode is created with the name of a deleted snapshot and we fsync it: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc mount /dev/sdc /mnt mkdir /mnt/testdir btrfs subvolume snapshot /mnt /mnt/testdir/snap btrfs subvolume delete /mnt/testdir/snap rmdir /mnt/testdir mkdir /mnt/testdir xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/testdir # or fsync some file inside /mnt/testdir <power failure> The next time the fs is mounted the log replay procedure fails because it attempts to delete the snapshot entry (which has dir item key type of BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY) as if it were a regular (non-root) entry, resulting in the following error that causes mount to fail: [52174.510532] BTRFS info (device dm-0): failed to delete reference to snap, inode 257 parent 257 [52174.512570] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [52174.513278] WARNING: CPU: 12 PID: 28024 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3986 __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x178/0x351 [btrfs]() [52174.514681] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) [52174.515630] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod overlay crc32c_generic ppdev xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq parport_pc tpm_tis sg parport tpm evdev i2c_piix4 proc [52174.521568] CPU: 12 PID: 28024 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 4.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-27+ #1 [52174.522805] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [52174.524053] 0000000000000000 ffff8801df2a7710 ffffffff81264e93 ffff8801df2a7758 [52174.524053] 0000000000000009 ffff8801df2a7748 ffffffff81051618 ffffffffa03591cd [52174.524053] 00000000fffffffe ffff88015e6e5000 ffff88016dbc3c88 ffff88016dbc3c88 [52174.524053] Call Trace: [52174.524053] [<ffffffff81264e93>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [52174.524053] [<ffffffff81051618>] warn_slowpath_common+0x99/0xb2 [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa03591cd>] ? __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x178/0x351 [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffff81051679>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0x50 [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa03591cd>] __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x178/0x351 [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffff8118f5e9>] ? iput+0xb0/0x284 [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa0359fe8>] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x1c/0x3d [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa038631e>] check_item_in_log+0x1fe/0x29b [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa0386522>] replay_dir_deletes+0x167/0x1cf [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa038739e>] fixup_inode_link_count+0x289/0x2aa [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa038748a>] fixup_inode_link_counts+0xcb/0x105 [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa038a5ec>] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x258/0x32c [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa03885b2>] ? replay_one_extent+0x511/0x511 [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa034f288>] open_ctree+0x1dd4/0x21b9 [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa032b753>] btrfs_mount+0x97e/0xaed [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffff8108e1b7>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [52174.524053] [<ffffffff8117bafa>] mount_fs+0x67/0x131 [52174.524053] [<ffffffff81193003>] vfs_kern_mount+0x6c/0xde [52174.524053] [<ffffffffa032af81>] btrfs_mount+0x1ac/0xaed [btrfs] [52174.524053] [<ffffffff8108e1b7>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [52174.524053] [<ffffffff8108c262>] ? lockdep_init_map+0xb9/0x1b3 [52174.524053] [<ffffffff8117bafa>] mount_fs+0x67/0x131 [52174.524053] [<ffffffff81193003>] vfs_kern_mount+0x6c/0xde [52174.524053] [<ffffffff8119590f>] do_mount+0x8a6/0x9e8 [52174.524053] [<ffffffff811358dd>] ? strndup_user+0x3f/0x59 [52174.524053] [<ffffffff81195c65>] SyS_mount+0x77/0x9f [52174.524053] [<ffffffff814935d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6b [52174.561288] ---[ end trace 6b53049efb1a3ea6 ]--- Fix this by forcing a transaction commit when such cases happen. This means we check in the commit root of the subvolume tree if there was any other inode with the same reference when the inode we are fsync'ing is a new inode (created in the current transaction). Test cases for fstests, covering all the scenarios given above, were submitted upstream for fstests: * fstests: generic test for fsync after renaming directory https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8694281/ * fstests: generic test for fsync after renaming file https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8694301/ * fstests: add btrfs test for fsync after snapshot deletion https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8670671/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
Mostly direct substitution with occasional adjustment or removing outdated comments. Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yauhen Kharuzhy 提交于
If device replace entry was found on disk at mounting and its num_write_errors stats counter has non-NULL value, then replace operation will never be finished and -EIO error will be reported by btrfs_scrub_dev() because this counter is never reset. # mount -o degraded /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/ # btrfs replace status /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/ Started on 25.Mar 07:28:00, canceled on 25.Mar 07:28:01 at 0.0%, 40 write errs, 0 uncorr. read errs # btrfs replace start -B 4 /dev/sdg /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/ ERROR: ioctl(DEV_REPLACE_START) failed on "/media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/": Input/output error, no error Reset num_write_errors and num_uncorrectable_read_errors counters in the dev_replace structure before start of replacing. Signed-off-by: NYauhen Kharuzhy <yauhen.kharuzhy@zavadatar.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-