Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  3. 07 11月, 2020 1 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: fix up sparse warnings in checkpoint code · 05d5233d
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Add missing __acquires() and __releases() annotations.  Also, in an
"this should never happen" WARN_ON check, if it *does* actually
happen, we need to release j_state_lock since this function is always
supposed to release that lock.  Otherwise, things will quickly grind
to a halt after the WARN_ON trips.

Fixes: 96f1e097 ("jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock...")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      05d5233d
  5. 08 8月, 2020 2 次提交
  7. 06 8月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 04 6月, 2020 1 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: avoid leaking transaction credits when unreserving handle · 14ff6286
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      When reserved transaction handle is unused, we subtract its reserved
credits in __jbd2_journal_unreserve_handle() called from
jbd2_journal_stop(). However this function forgets to remove reserved
credits from transaction->t_outstanding_credits and thus the transaction
space that was reserved remains effectively leaked. The leaked
transaction space can be quite significant in some cases and leads to
unnecessarily small transactions and thus reducing throughput of the
journalling machinery. E.g. fsmark workload creating lots of 4k files
was observed to have about 20% lower throughput due to this when ext4 is
mounted with dioread_nolock mount option.

Subtract reserved credits from t_outstanding_credits as well.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8f7d89f3 ("jbd2: transaction reservation support")
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200520133119.1383-3-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      14ff6286
  11. 01 3月, 2020 1 次提交
    • Q
      jbd2: fix data races at struct journal_head · 6c5d9112
      由 Qian Cai 提交于 
      journal_head::b_transaction and journal_head::b_next_transaction could
be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,

 LTP: starting fsync04
 /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev
 EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem
 EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
 ==================================================================
 BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer [jbd2] / jbd2_write_access_granted [jbd2]

 write to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25721 on cpu 70:
  __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0xdd/0x210 [jbd2]
  __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2569
  jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x2d15/0x3f20 [jbd2]
  (inlined by) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction at fs/jbd2/commit.c:1034
  kjournald2+0x13b/0x450 [jbd2]
  kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0
  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 read to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25724 on cpu 68:
  jbd2_write_access_granted+0x1b2/0x250 [jbd2]
  jbd2_write_access_granted at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1155
  jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x60 [jbd2]
  __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x50/0x90 [ext4]
  ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x158/0x620 [ext4]
  ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x54f/0xca0 [ext4]
  ext4_ind_map_blocks+0xc79/0x1b40 [ext4]
  ext4_map_blocks+0x3b4/0x950 [ext4]
  _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4]
  ext4_get_block+0x3b/0x50 [ext4]
  __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0
  __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50
  ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4]
  generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290
  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
  ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
  new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
  __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
  vfs_write+0x103/0x260
  ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
  __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
  do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

 5 locks held by fsync04/25724:
  #0: ffff99f9911093f8 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x21c/0x260
  #1: ffff99f9db4c0348 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}, at: ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x65/0x210 [ext4]
  #2: ffff99f5e7dfcf58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2]
  #3: ffff99f9db4c0168 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++}, at: ext4_map_blocks+0x176/0x950 [ext4]
  #4: ffffffff99086b40 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x4e/0x250 [jbd2]
 irq event stamp: 1407125
 hardirqs last  enabled at (1407125): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790
 hardirqs last disabled at (1407124): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790
 softirqs last  enabled at (1405528): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c
 softirqs last disabled at (1405521): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0

 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
 CPU: 68 PID: 25724 Comm: fsync04 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7
 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019

The plain reads are outside of jh->b_state_lock critical section which result
in data races. Fix them by adding pairs of READ|WRITE_ONCE().
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NQian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043111.2227-1-cai@lca.pwSigned-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      6c5d9112
  13. 22 2月, 2020 1 次提交
    • W
      jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when clearing block group bits · 8eedabfd
      由 wangyan 提交于 
      I found a NULL pointer dereference in ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits().
The running environment:
	kernel version: 4.19
	A cluster with two nodes, 5 luns mounted on two nodes, and do some
	file operations like dd/fallocate/truncate/rm on every lun with storage
	network disconnection.

The fallocate operation on dm-23-45 caused an null pointer dereference.

The information of NULL pointer dereference as follows:
	[577992.878282] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-23-45.
	[577992.878290] Aborting journal on device dm-23-45.
	...
	[577992.890778] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-24-46.
	[577992.890908] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890916] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_extend_trans:474 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890918] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890920] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_rotate_tree_right:2500 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890922] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890924] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_do_insert_extent:4382 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890928] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_insert_extent:4842 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890928] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890930] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree:4947 ERROR: status = -30
	[577992.890933] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890939] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
	[577992.890949] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000020
	[577992.890950] Mem abort info:
	[577992.890951]   ESR = 0x96000004
	[577992.890952]   Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
	[577992.890952]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
	[577992.890953]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
	[577992.890954] Data abort info:
	[577992.890955]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
	[577992.890956]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
	[577992.890958] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000f8da07a9
	[577992.890960] [0000000000000020] pgd=0000000000000000
	[577992.890964] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
	[577992.890965] Process fallocate (pid: 88392, stack limit = 0x00000000013db2fd)
	[577992.890968] CPU: 52 PID: 88392 Comm: fallocate Kdump: loaded Tainted: G        W  OE     4.19.36 #1
	[577992.890969] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDD, BIOS 0.98 08/25/2019
	[577992.890971] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
	[577992.891054] pc : _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x63c/0x968 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891082] lr : _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x618/0x968 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891084] sp : ffff0000c8e2b810
	[577992.891085] x29: ffff0000c8e2b820 x28: 0000000000000000
	[577992.891087] x27: 00000000000006f3 x26: ffffa07957b02e70
	[577992.891089] x25: ffff807c59d50000 x24: 00000000000006f2
	[577992.891091] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffff807bd39abc30
	[577992.891093] x21: ffff0000811d9000 x20: ffffa07535d6a000
	[577992.891097] x19: ffff000001681638 x18: ffffffffffffffff
	[577992.891098] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff000080a03df0
	[577992.891100] x15: ffff0000811d9708 x14: 203d207375746174
	[577992.891101] x13: 73203a524f525245 x12: 20373439343a6565
	[577992.891103] x11: 0000000000000038 x10: 0101010101010101
	[577992.891106] x9 : ffffa07c68a85d70 x8 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f
	[577992.891109] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000080
	[577992.891110] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000002
	[577992.891112] x3 : ffff000001713390 x2 : 2ff90f88b1c22f00
	[577992.891114] x1 : ffff807bd39abc30 x0 : 0000000000000000
	[577992.891116] Call trace:
	[577992.891139]  _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x63c/0x968 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891162]  _ocfs2_free_clusters+0x100/0x290 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891185]  ocfs2_free_clusters+0x50/0x68 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891206]  ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree+0x198/0x5e0 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891227]  ocfs2_add_inode_data+0x94/0xc8 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891248]  ocfs2_extend_allocation+0x1bc/0x7a8 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891269]  ocfs2_allocate_extents+0x14c/0x338 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891290]  __ocfs2_change_file_space+0x3f8/0x610 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891309]  ocfs2_fallocate+0xe4/0x128 [ocfs2]
	[577992.891316]  vfs_fallocate+0x11c/0x250
	[577992.891317]  ksys_fallocate+0x54/0x88
	[577992.891319]  __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x28/0x38
	[577992.891323]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
	[577992.891325]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
	[577992.891327]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

My analysis process as follows:
ocfs2_fallocate
  __ocfs2_change_file_space
    ocfs2_allocate_extents
      ocfs2_extend_allocation
        ocfs2_add_inode_data
          ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree
            ocfs2_insert_extent
              ocfs2_do_insert_extent
                ocfs2_rotate_tree_right
                  ocfs2_extend_rotate_transaction
                    ocfs2_extend_trans
                      jbd2_journal_restart
                        jbd2__journal_restart
                          /* handle->h_transaction is NULL,
                           * is_handle_aborted(handle) is true
                           */
                          handle->h_transaction = NULL;
                          start_this_handle
                            return -EROFS;
            ocfs2_free_clusters
              _ocfs2_free_clusters
                _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits
                  ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits
                    ocfs2_journal_access_gd
                      __ocfs2_journal_access
                        jbd2_journal_get_undo_access
                          /* I think jbd2_write_access_granted() will
                           * return true, because do_get_write_access()
                           * will return -EROFS.
                           */
                          if (jbd2_write_access_granted(...)) return 0;
                          do_get_write_access
                            /* handle->h_transaction is NULL, it will
                             * return -EROFS here, so do_get_write_access()
                             * was not called.
                             */
                            if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) return -EROFS;
                    /* bh2jh(group_bh) is NULL, caused NULL
                       pointer dereference */
                    undo_bg = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *)
                                bh2jh(group_bh)->b_committed_data;

If handle->h_transaction == NULL, then jbd2_write_access_granted()
does not really guarantee that journal_head will stay around,
not even speaking of its b_committed_data. The bh2jh(group_bh)
can be removed after ocfs2_journal_access_gd() and before call
"bh2jh(group_bh)->b_committed_data". So, we should move
is_handle_aborted() check from do_get_write_access() into
jbd2_journal_get_undo_access() and jbd2_journal_get_write_access()
before the call to jbd2_write_access_granted().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f72a623f-b3f1-381a-d91d-d22a1c83a336@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NYan Wang <wangyan122@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
      8eedabfd
  15. 14 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 25 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  19. 06 11月, 2019 11 次提交
  21. 21 10月, 2019 5 次提交
  23. 09 10月, 2019 1 次提交
    • Q
      locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release() · 5facae4f
      由 Qian Cai 提交于 
      Since the following commit:

  b4adfe8e ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_release")

@nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so remove it from all
lock_release() calls and friends.
Signed-off-by: NQian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: duyuyang@gmail.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jack@suse.com
Cc: jlbec@evilplan.or
Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: jslaby@suse.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Cc: mark@fasheh.com
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: mripard@kernel.org
Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Cc: sean@poorly.run
Cc: st@kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568909380-32199-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pwSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      5facae4f
  25. 25 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  27. 25 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  29. 21 6月, 2019 1 次提交
    • R
      jbd2: introduce jbd2_inode dirty range scoping · 6ba0e7dc
      由 Ross Zwisler 提交于 
      Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space
of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry.  The
consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly
appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of
time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the
pages under writeback to be written out.

The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from
/dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem.  This can
cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of
the entire dd operation.

We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges
associated with a given transaction.  We do this via the jbd2_inode
structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it
follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure.

This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in
journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for
a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode
in question is still being appended to.
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      6ba0e7dc
  31. 11 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 01 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  35. 22 2月, 2019 1 次提交
    • Z
      jbd2: fix compile warning when using JBUFFER_TRACE · 01215d3e
      由 zhangyi (F) 提交于 
      The jh pointer may be used uninitialized in the two cases below and the
compiler complain about it when enabling JBUFFER_TRACE macro, fix them.

In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_get_undo_access’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
                                      ^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1219:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
  struct journal_head *jh;
                       ^
In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
                                      ^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1332:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
  struct journal_head *jh;
                       ^
Signed-off-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      01215d3e
  37. 11 2月, 2019 2 次提交
    • Z
      jbd2: discard dirty data when forgetting an un-journalled buffer · 59759926
      由 zhangyi (F) 提交于 
      We do not unmap and clear dirty flag when forgetting a buffer without
journal or does not belongs to any transaction, so the invalid dirty
data may still be written to the disk later. It's fine if the
corresponding block is never used before the next mount, and it's also
fine that we invoke clean_bdev_aliases() related functions to unmap
the block device mapping when re-allocating such freed block as data
block. But this logic is somewhat fragile and risky that may lead to
data corruption if we forget to clean bdev aliases. So, It's better to
discard dirty data during forget time.

We have been already handled all the cases of forgetting journalled
buffer, this patch deal with the remaining two cases.

- buffer is not journalled yet,
- buffer is journalled but doesn't belongs to any transaction.

We invoke __bforget() instead of __brelese() when forgetting an
un-journalled buffer in jbd2_journal_forget(). After this patch we can
remove all clean_bdev_aliases() related calls in ext4.
Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      59759926
    • Z
      jbd2: clear dirty flag when revoking a buffer from an older transaction · 904cdbd4
      由 zhangyi (F) 提交于 
      Now, we capture a data corruption problem on ext4 while we're truncating
an extent index block. Imaging that if we are revoking a buffer which
has been journaled by the committing transaction, the buffer's jbddirty
flag will not be cleared in jbd2_journal_forget(), so the commit code
will set the buffer dirty flag again after refile the buffer.

fsx                               kjournald2
                                  jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
jbd2_journal_revoke                commit phase 1~5...
 jbd2_journal_forget
   belongs to older transaction    commit phase 6
   jbddirty not clear               __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer
                                     __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer
                                      test_clear_buffer_jbddirty
                                       mark_buffer_dirty

Finally, if the freed extent index block was allocated again as data
block by some other files, it may corrupt the file data after writing
cached pages later, such as during unmount time. (In general,
clean_bdev_aliases() related helpers should be invoked after
re-allocation to prevent the above corruption, but unfortunately we
missed it when zeroout the head of extra extent blocks in
ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents()).

This patch mark buffer as freed and set j_next_transaction to the new
transaction when it already belongs to the committing transaction in
jbd2_journal_forget(), so that commit code knows it should clear dirty
bits when it is done with the buffer.

This problem can be reproduced by xfstests generic/455 easily with
seeds (3246 3247 3248 3249).
Signed-off-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      904cdbd4
  39. 04 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  41. 17 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  43. 21 5月, 2018 1 次提交