This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

I've always found it very confusing that the "Media ancillary drivers (tuners,
sensors, i2c, frontends)" comment came after the "Autoselect" option. This patch
moves it up and changes the "Autoselect" text to correspond more closely to
the "Media ancillary drivers" comment.
It also fixes two typos.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

When the bttv driver is running without i2c_debug being set, the kernel
log is being flooded with the string ">". This string is really a part of
a debug message that is logged using several substrings protected by a
conditional check.
This patch adds the same conditional check to the leaked substring.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Törnblom <john.tornblom@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispqueue.c:399:18: warning: 'pa' may be
used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
This is a false positive but the compiler has no way to know about it,
so initialize the variable to 0.
drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispqueue.c:445:6: warning:
'vm_page_prot' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
This is a false positive and the compiler should know better. Use
uninitialized_var().
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Previously, demodulator and tuner attach was done in the
demod_attach callback. Migrate the tuner part in the
tuner_attach callback in ngene_info to do thing in right place.
Signed-off-by: NPatrice Chotard <patricechotard@free.fr>
Reviewed-by: NAntti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Previously, gate control didn't work until drxd_init()
execution. Migrate necessary set of commands in drxd_attach
to allow gate control to be used by tuner which are
accessible through i2c gate.

Reported-by: frederic.mantegazza@gbiloba.org
Signed-off-by: NPatrice Chotard <patricechotard@free.fr>
Reviewed-by: NAntti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This patch replaces the global frame stats variables by using
internal variables in mcam_camera structure.
Signed-off-by: NAlbert Wang <twang13@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NLibin Yang <lbyang@marvell.com>
Acked-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

During modiles initialization rc-core schedules work which calls
request_module() several times to load ir-*-decoder modules, but
it does not wait or cancel this work on module unloading.
rc-core should use request_module_nowait() instead, because it
anyway cannot load modules synchronously or cancel/wait pending
work on unloading, because this leads to deadlock on modules_mutex
between several "modprobe" processes.
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.c: In function
‘csiphy_routing_cfg’:
drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.c:71:57: warning: ‘shift’
may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispcsiphy.c:40:6: note: ‘shift’ was
declared here
The warning is a false positive but the compiler is right in
complaining. Fix it by using the correct enum data type for the iface
argument and adding a default case in the switch statement.
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Use uninterruptible mutex_lock in the release() file op to make sure all
resources are properly freed when a process is being terminated. Returning
-ERESTARTSYS has no effect for a terminating process and this may cause driver
resources not to be released.
This was found using the following semantic patch (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/):
<spml>
@r@
identifier fops;
identifier release_func;
@@
static const struct v4l2_file_operations fops = {
.release = release_func
};
@depends on r@
identifier r.release_func;
expression E;
@@
static int release_func(...)
{
...
- if (mutex_lock_interruptible(E)) return -ERESTARTSYS;
+ mutex_lock(E);
...
}
</spml>
Signed-off-by: NCyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Add an entry for the mt9m032, mt9p031, mt9t001 and mt9v032 Aptina sensor
drivers.
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This device was originally made by Twinhan/Azurewave[1] and sometimes
named DTV-DVB UDTT7049, it could be also found in Italy under the name
of Digicom Digitune-S[2], or Think Xtra Hollywood DVB-T USB2.0[3].
Components:
  Usb bridge: ULi M9206
  Frontend: MT352CG
  Tuner: MT2060F
The firmware can be downloaded with:
$ ./Documentation/dvb/get_dvb_firmware vp7049
[1] http://www.azurewave.com/Support_Utility_Driver.asp
[2] http://www.digicom.it/digisit/driver_link.nsf/driverprodotto?openform&prodotto=DigiTuneS
[3] http://www.txitalia.it/prodotto.asp?prodotto=txhollywooddvttvSigned-off-by: NAntonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Add an entry to download the dvb-usb-vp7049-0.95.fw firmware for the
Twinhan vp7049 and similar devices.
Known devices of this kind are:
  Twinhan/Azurewave DTV-DVB UDTT7049
  Digicom Digitune-S
  Think Xtra Hollywood DVB-T USB2.0
Signed-off-by: NAntonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NAntonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Fix CodingStyle issues introduced by the last patch
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Add an m920x_rc_core_query() function for drivers which want to use the
linux RC core infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: NAntonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Parsing the RC press state is invariant wrt. the keycode, take it out of
the keycode scanning loop.
Signed-off-by: NAntonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This is in preparation to using RC core infrastructure for some devices,
the RC button state parsing logic can be shared berween rc.legacy and
rc.core callbacks as it is independent from the mechanism used for RC
handling.
Signed-off-by: NAntonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This is in preparation for the vp7049 frontend attach function which is
going to set a sequence of registers as well.
Signed-off-by: NAntonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>